Monday, March 19, 2012

Tyler Clementi and the Dharun Ravi Trial: Why the Verdict Is Just

Tyler Clementi and the Dharun Ravi Trial: Why the Verdict Is Just

-by Michelangelo Signorile

I'm with those who lament the sad reality of young lives ruined in the
aftermath of Tyler Clementi's suicide and the conviction of his
roommate, Dharun Ravi, who spied on Clementi with a webcam. And I
don't want to see Ravi deported, nor getting a ten-year prison term,
the maximum sentence for his crimes.

But the bottom line is that Ravi was offered a plea deal in which he
would have avoided jail time as well as deportation. Instead, he and
his legal team put faith in what they thought was a homophobic
judicial system, one that would slough off hate crimes against gays --
as it had so many times in the past -- and once again validate the
"gay panic" defense, which in this case was dressed up as the "teen
prank" defense.

But it didn't work. The jury did exactly as it was instructed to do,
looking at the law and the 15 counts and returning with a guilty
verdict on all of them. Ravi did spy on Clementi, thereby violating
the invasion of privacy law. He did tamper with the evidence later,
deleting text messages and tweets, knowing what he'd done. And all of
the evidence shows that he did attempt to intimidate Clementi on the
basis of his sexual orientation -- and he succeeded -- which was the
basis of the hate crimes counts.

No jury that thought long and hard about the case could have returned
with any other verdict. It is not the jury's job to think about
sentencing or punishment. It is its job to follow the law.

We've seen too many cases in the past where juries didn't do that,
where they accepted the "gay panic" defense, as well as its cousin,
the "trans panic" defense -- in which defendants get sympathy for
harboring feelings that many in society, presumably including jurors,
also harbor, even if all believe those feelings are wrong.

In the days since the verdict, we've seen claims that it went to0 far
and articles focusing on the debate on hate crimes laws. But I'd like
to ask those who say it was just a "prank" to replace Ravi's
statements and implications about gays with those of other groups.
What if Ravi had told others that he suspected his roommate was a Jew,
and made it clear that he didn't like the idea of having a Jewish
roommate? What if he then spied on his Jewish roommate in an attempt
to embarrass him based on some characteristic or activity connected to
his being Jewish, and then invited others to mock the Jew online?

Ravi was attempting to play into the "ick" factor, sending tweets of
his roommate "making out with a dude." His attorney tried to make this
into an understandable reaction on the part of an 18-year-old today,
claiming "he didn't know how to deal with it because he was a kid."

In other words, kids are expected to be homophobic and freaked out by
affection between two men. The jury, in this day of gay-straight
alliances in high school and over a couple of decades of gay and
lesbian characters all over television, including MTV, didn't buy it.

That's not to say that Ravi should have the book thrown at him. On my
radio program on Friday we were inundated with calls from people
unhappy with me for not believing Ravi should be deported nor get the
maximum ten years. But this is not about vengeance. Though Ravi broke
several laws, he did not cause Clementi's death. Many others who would
be spied on and intimidated would not commit suicide as a result.
Ravi's crimes should be treated independently of Clementi's death.

Ravi came to the U.S. from India as a child, not of his own choosing.
It would be cruel to deport him as a punishment. Nor should he serve
ten years in prison. Those issues are up to the judge in this case as
well as immigration officials and, ultimately, an immigration judge,
and hopefully they will be fair.

But the jury did its job. The system worked. Hate crimes laws are
meant to send a message about bias-motivated crimes -- which are
directed at an entire group, not just at an individual -- to would-be
criminals. But this case perhaps means that these laws should also
send a message to those already charged -- those who know they are
guilty and and are facing a trial: Take the plea and don't put your
faith in the system being homophobic, because that can't be counted on
any longer. Sad as all the facts are in this case, that is progress.

More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelangelo-signorile/tyler-clementi-dharun-ravi_b_1362562.html

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment