----
as you can see from the comments here, it is you and your fellow
neocons who are naive when it comes to foreign policy.
to continue to support a failed interventionist policy is naive.
Ron Paul is spot on ... the US must stop trying to play world police
and take care of Americans first and foremost
On Nov 10, 9:27 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Geoffrey!
>
> Dr. Paul is a much more polished, and classy individual than Ross.
> Congressman Paul is just naive as Hell when it comes to foreign policy! It
> baffles the mind, that someone that intelligent, especially with regard to
> economics, could be so disillusioned.
>
> Dr. Paul would make a great Secretary of Treasury! Let's hope the new
> conservative Administration chooses him for the position!
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:34 PM, geoffrey theist <gtheist...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > remember ROSS PEROT???!!!
>
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:59 PM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
> >> *Ron Paul: Third-party power or GOP kingmaker?
> >> *By Brent Budowsky - 11/08/11 10:30 AM ET
>
> >> Wouldn't you rather I write about Ron Paul than about Herman Cain, who
> >> will soon flame out, or Rick Perry, who has already flamed out? The new NBC/
> >> *Wall Street Journal* poll suggests Ron Paul would win 18 percent as a
> >> third-party candidate running against Obama and Romney!
>
> >> The other underestimated factor in the Republican race is that
> >> proportional representation will give Ron Paul potentially major influence
> >> in choosing the nominee at the convention, and major leverage because he
> >> certainly would be a powerful third-party candidate if he does run.
>
> >> The GOP nominating process has turned into a debacle for the conservative
> >> wing of the party. Donald Trump was a joke. Rick Perry self- destructed, as
> >> I predicted he would. Now conservatives are reduced to making excuses for
> >> Herman Cain as woman after woman emerges with charges of abuse. Frankly it
> >> is pretty sad that certain conservatives, including some highly visible
> >> conservative Republican women, were reduced to invoking Clarence Thomas,
> >> high-tech lynching and the bogus race issue as woman after woman emerges
> >> with charges against Cain.
>
> >> The next question for Republicans will be whether Mike Huckabee, who
> >> would be a formidable candidate, sees a boomlet for him to jump in. And
> >> whether Jon Huntsman makes a serious bid to be a viable alternative to the
> >> "well-lubricated weather vane," Mitt Romney.
>
> >> If the final choice is Obama versus Romney, the campaign would be
> >> purgatory for true liberals and true conservatives, with the final choice
> >> of Romney and Obama being a battle of two Rorschach tests. Can anyone
> >> imagine Ron Paul, Rick Perry and Herman Cain raising Mitt Romney's hand in
> >> triumph at a convention where a Romney nomination would leave many
> >> conservatives appalled and disgusted?
>
> >> Ron Paul has been the constant of the 2012 campaign. If he entered a
> >> general election as a third-party candidate against Romney and Obama with
> >> 18 percent, that number might well rise after presidential debates between
> >> the three of them.
>
> >> There is another scenario. Mitt Romney is obviously having big trouble
> >> rising above 25 to 30 percent of Republican support. If Perry and Cain both
> >> drop out early in 2012, as I predict, Ron Paul's numbers would rise for the
> >> Republican battle.
>
> >> Could Ron Paul win a direct two-candidate contest of Paul v. Romney? I
> >> would like to see a poll about that race. Alternatively:
>
> >> With proportional representation, Ron Paul could have potentially
> >> decisive influence at the convention, if Romney does not have enough
> >> supporters to win the nomination. What would Ron Paul do? This is a very
> >> interesting question.
>
> >> My wild guess today is that Ron Paul could either help lead a dramatic
> >> move to entice a new true conservative to challenge and defeat Romney (such
> >> as Huckabee), or Dr. Paul could emerge as a third-party candidate equal to
> >> or stronger than Ross Perot was.
>
> >>http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/192299-ro...
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment