Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
(actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
clear and present danger??
On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> ever lived, including Hitler.
>
> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> time, Mark. You need it! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Einstein,
>
> > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>
> > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> > > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > > feel.
>
> > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > > But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > > country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> > > along by talking-up my document on the NET. — John A. Armistead —
> > > Patriot
>
> > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hey John!
>
> > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > > > or otherwise stupid. — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! — John
> > > > > > A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm thrilled that
> > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> > > > > > turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> > > > > > doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> > > > > > > millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > > > citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — J. A. A.
> > > > > > > —
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> > > > > differs
> > > > > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > > > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > > > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > > > > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> > > > > great
> > > > > > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
> > > > > > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > > > > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > > > > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > > > > > > > street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> > > > > game
> > > > > > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > > > > > > > polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> > > > > > > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> > > > > candidate
> > > > > > > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the
> > > > > > > > > people! — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> > > > > > > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> > > > > > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> > > > > > > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean
> > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> > > > > > > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more
> > > > > influence
> > > > > > > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course,
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> > > > > democracy."
>
> > > > > > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means
> > > > > and why
> > > > > > > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your
> > > > > world.
>
> > > > > > > > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > about up.
>
> > > > > > > > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Jonathan: Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities
> > > > > > > > > vote. The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles
> > > > > > > > > than the man-on-the-street. Of course, that shift of power runs
> > > > > > > > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy. The 1st
> > > > > Amendment
> > > > > > > > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other
> > > > > > > > > medium". Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > correctly peg him as
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment