Re: Paul Krugman: It is all Ron Paul’s fault that people are questioning the Fed

Let's see. Oil sold on international markets is traded in U.S.
dollars, and the Fed is deliberately trying to weaken the dollar
through monetary expansion, and there is no relationship between the
two policies and what is happening to oil prices?

Who knows ??? The wellhead price has not changed in almost a
year....

On Apr 29, 7:45 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Paul Krugman: It is all Ron Paul s fault that people are questioning the FedApril 29, 2011 byWilliam Anderson
> Well, at least Paul Krugman understands that Ron Paul is using his subcommittee chairmanship as a bully pulpit, but Krugman is claiming that it is Ron Paul who will bear responsibility for mass unemployment. In his Friday column, Krugman says that Paul is intimidating the Fed, which means that all of this worry about nonexistent inflation is going to result in higher rates of unemployment.
> I cover Krugman s latest rant in myKrugman-in-Wonderland blog post today. To be honest, I think this is only the beginning. Krugman is going to start blaming the Austrians for everything, and he is going to be claiming that we are motivated by racial hatred. Yep, pointing out inflation is racist. Only in the elite world of the NYTimesand academe.
> xxxFriday, April 29, 2011All is well -- on the inflation front! (If you like inflation)William Anderson
> At the end of "Animal House," there is a scene in which the character played by Kevin Bacon is "assuring" the panicked crowd that "ALL IS WELL!"
> I make that point because every time I read something from Paul Krugman or someone claiming the Federal Reserve System is being too tight with money and that there really hardly any inflation at all, I think of Kevin Bacon's "Animal House" character. With the price of food, fuel, and consumer goods skyrocketing, the notion that the massive Ben Bernanke "experiment" of showering the world with dollars has had almost no effect on oil and food prices really is a joke.
> But, the joke is on us, if Krugman is to be believed. Fuel prices? Food prices? Oh, they'revolatile, so we pay no attention to them. In reading Krugman's column today on "The Intimidated Fed," I must admit that his explanation of higher oil and gasoline prices smacks of Jake Blue's excuses when faced with his jilted fiance (played by Carrie Fisher) who is pointing a machine gun at him:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFvujknrBuE&feature=player_embeddedActually, according to Krugman, it isRon Paul'sfault:What s going on here? My interpretation is that Mr. Bernanke is allowing himself to be bullied by the inflationistas: the people who keep seeing runaway inflation just around the corner and are undeterred by the fact that they keep on being wrong.Lately the inflationistas have seized on rising oil prices as evidence in their favor, even though -- as Mr. Bernanke himself pointed out -- these prices have nothing to do with Fed policy. The way oil prices are coloring the discussion led the economist Tim Duy to suggest, sarcastically, that basic Fed policy is now to do nothing about unemployment because some people in the Middle East are seeking democracy. (emphasis added)But I d put it differently. I d say that the Fed s policy is to do nothing about unemployment because Ron Paul is now the chairman of the House subcommittee on monetary policy. (emphasis added)So much for the Fed s independence. And so much for the future of America s increasingly desperate jobless.Let's see. Oil sold on international markets is traded in U.S. dollars, and the Fed is deliberately trying to weaken the dollar through monetary expansion, and there is no relationship between the two policies and what is happening to oil prices?
> Belushi! Thou shouldst be living at this hour! Krugman hath need of thee!
> Actually, claiming that Ron Paul is really responsible for people wondering out loud of there just might be a connection between the rise of commodity prices and the Fed's massive monetary expansion honors Rep. Paul too much. (Not that Krugman is honoring him; Krugman has come to condemn Paul, not to praise him.)
> The idea that Ron Paul is "intimidating" anyone really is a pathetic joke. During sessions of the House Subcommittee on Monetary Policy, the Democrats act as if they are playing their own version of "Animal House," complete with staged walkouts. (And, no, Rep. Paul does not play the Dean Wormer role and yell at the departing Democrats, "You're finished here at Faber!")
> Now, if Krugman has any guts at all, he could be calling for the ultimate marriage of "monetary and fiscal" policies: Have the Fed purchase short-term T-bills directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury. (The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 outlaws such actions, but all it takes to change the law or get around its provisions is a stroke of the pen, right? Obama already has been making "signing statements" in which he says he doesn't have to follow Congressional directives, so why not end this prohibition with a simple executive order?)
> You see, should Krugman believe that they way to eliminate high rates of unemployment is through massive new government spending, why not go whole hog? Let the Fed just finance ALL government borrowing this way. I'm sure that "America's increasingly desperate jobless" would appreciate being hired as street sweepers to sweep up all of the dollar bills lying in the gutter!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.