If I had wanted to have the opinions of others influence anything, I would have sought public office and had my insightful solutions neutered in committees and on the floor of the House and the Senate.
You are confused.
MOST of the comments toward your efforts seek either clarification OR to denote how your approach fails to deliver as promised. Few to zero comments have been to suggest a 'red' color be used rather than a 'blue'.
It was only after the Civil War that media coverage started showing photographs of political candidates and of rallies and conventions. From that day forward, ego-maniacal career politicians became the norm. And those were treated like (unconstitutional) royalty by the media—which is largely responsible for the long, slow decline of the US economy.
Lincoln begins what is now readily viewed as Big Government. It is only since television that 'weather people' tend to dominate the political spectrum. It is the Nanny State and subsequent pull-peddling that has fueled the machines.
My New Constitution will pin-back-the-ears of the corrupt US media, and remove all undue influences by those purporting to assess the events of the day.
So you continue to repeat, but like other claims ... once viewed, your Constitution does not deliver.
Regard$,
--MJ
Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell
No comments:
Post a Comment