voters to decide for themselves whether to have a New Constitution.
It is YOU who are the bad guy, here. Why are you attacking my efforts
to save this country from the corruption that is so evident? — J. A.
A. —
>
On Feb 26, 2:06 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> my comment is the reverse... trying to re-write and institute the
> basic the basic laws of any country without the active input of the
> whole of society makes you a Fascist and supporter of dictators.
>
> On Feb 26, 5:57 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Mark, since you have not said one thing positive about my efforts; and
> > since you try to berate me by comparing me to "bad people", that
> > identifies you as a socialist-communist. Bug-off, loser! — J. A. A.
> > —
>
> > On Feb 25, 11:27 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > <<<<Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be
> > > the latter.>>>
>
> > > Funny, hitler and Qadaffi said the same thing. Fine company there.
>
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > Dear MJ: You sir, are a total BUM! What I have written describing my
> > > > New Constitution and how such would be apt to events in the news would
> > > > fill several "War and Peace"-size novels. Not a single WORD of what I
> > > > have written supports socialism nor communism! I am in favor of
> > > > having a super-efficient, minimum-size government that has close to
> > > > zero interaction with individual citizens. 'My' government will no
> > > > longer keep records on the law-abiding citizens, because taxes will be
> > > > value-added, only. And I have nixed having the government maintain
> > > > records of criminal investigations of anyone found to be innocent.
> > > > Those on-file records tend to prejudice law enforcement to "convict"
> > > > the person they failed to convict the last time. My corrections of
> > > > corrupt law enforcement practices, alone, should be justification
> > > > enough to ratify my New Constitution! Presently, the USA is a police
> > > > state—with the strings being pulled by corrupt public figures. And
> > > > the courts have done whatever the political leaders dictate. I've put
> > > > them in their place, big time!
>
> > > > You, MJ, are little more than a party-crasher. I do not appreciate in
> > > > the least having you post your elementary version of "A" constitution
> > > > of some kind. Post your God-damned junk constitution under your name,
> > > > not mine. I am not playing games, here. If you would like to get
> > > > back into anyone's good graces, explain your political philosophy in
> > > > two paragraphs or less. Unless I see the words: "I pro-capitalist
> > > > and anti-socialist"… included, then I will know for sure that you are
> > > > just some HACKER who is back-dooring your socialist-communist ideals.
> > > > Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be
> > > > the latter. — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Feb 23, 9:40 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > In case anyone missed it ... anyone who ASKS to
> > > > > see this 'Constitution' ... is labelled as a socialist-communist.
> > > > > My guess is that this Constitution upholds,
> > > > > endorses and hails ... socialism. THAT is the
> > > > > true reason Armistead does not want to post it OR let anyone 'see it'.
> > > > > Pity.
>
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJ
>
> > > > > "We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the
> > > > > consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
>
> > > > > At 09:33 PM 2/23/2011, you wrote:
>
> > > > > >Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on
> > > > > >MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist-
> > > > > >communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! —
> > > > > >John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > >On Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > How does John expect to implement his New Constitution if no one is
> > > > ever
> > > > > > > allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the making.
>
> > > > > > > On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
> > > > > > > > scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor
> > > > anyone
> > > > > > > > else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
> > > > > > > > entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins
> > > > with
> > > > > > > > our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
> > > > > > > > speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick
> > > > > > > > out of office any public official or employee, including the
> > > > > > > > President
> > > > > > > > himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To
> > > > wit:
>
> > > > > > > > Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the DEMS slammed down your
> > > > > > > > throats.
>
> > > > > > > > On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New
> > > > > > > >> Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of
> > > > it
> > > > > > > >> not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document.
> > > > > > > >> This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies,
> > > > but to
> > > > > > > >> be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would,
> > > > maliciously,
> > > > > > > >> make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to
> > > > side-track
> > > > > > > >> my efforts.
>
> > > > > > > >> I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for
> > > > fourteen
> > > > > > > >> years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises
> > > > highlighted
> > > > > > > >> in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts.
> > > > What
> > > > > > > >> is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the
> > > > original
> > > > > > > >> constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the
> > > > > > > >> Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with
> > > > our
> > > > > > > >> Constitution.
>
> > > > > > > >> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
> > > > > > > >> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor
> > > > anyone
> > > > > > > >> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about
> > > > this
> > > > > > > >> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins
> > > > with
> > > > > > > >> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
> > > > > > > >> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
> > > > have
> > > > > > > >> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or
> > > > kick
> > > > > > > >> out of office any public official or employee, including the
> > > > President
> > > > > > > >> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request
> > > > of a
> > > > > > > >> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To
> > > > wit:
>
> > > > > > > >> "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment
> > > > of
> > > > > > > >> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > > >> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements
> > > > shall
> > > > > > > >> be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
> > > > > > > >> freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press
> > > > or
> > > > > > > >> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >> right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its
> > > > > > > >> branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so
> > > > > > > >> petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant,
> > > > timely,
> > > > > > > >> comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities
> > > > who
> > > > > > > >> have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient
> > > > aspect of
> > > > > > > >> the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications.
> > > > Failure
> > > > > > > >> to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance
> > > > shall,
> > > > > > > >> on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s
> > > > employment,
> > > > > > > >> especially those in management or public office�including judges
> > > > and
> > > > > > > >> justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any
> > > > competent
> > > > > > > >> Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly
> > > > > > > >> addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No
> > > > > > > >> judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above
> > > > required
> > > > > > > >> duties, that they in any way might be compromising their
> > > > objectivity
> > > > > > > >> or fairness in court; justice be not �blind�, but well
> > > > informed.
> > > > > > > >> Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be
> > > > reasonable
> > > > > > > >> truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or
> > > > > > > >> deliberate omission of the truth�except in cases of obvious
> > > > fiction or
> > > > > > > >> satire�is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular
> > > > news
> > > > > > > >> medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is
> > > > > > > >> prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly
> > > > > > > >> occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by,
> > > > or
> > > > > > > >> ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named
> > > > as
> > > > > > > >> being authored by management;
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment