Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Dear J. A.: Thanks! My New Constitution has the best interests of
everyone at heart. MJ, as much as he wishes, won't be a co-author of
even a word of it. — NE —
>
On Feb 15, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> It appears to me that "NoEinstein" has squat.
>
> On 2/14/2011 9:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Dear MJ:  Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par
> > with
> > your library of worthy quotes from others.  Albert Einstein covered
> > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> > when apt.  Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure.  So, I
> > must decline to reply to you in the future.  You individual approval
> > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> > ratification process.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> > On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net>  wrote:
> >> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy?
> >> Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed and we might get somewhere?
> >> Regard$,
> >> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can
> >> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to
> >> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of
> >> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything
> >> about anything, without having to bother to deal
> >> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<micha...@america.net>  wrote:
> >> Dear MJ:  Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with
> >> your library of worthy quotes from others.  Albert Einstein covered
> >> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >> when apt.  Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure.  So, I
> >> must decline to reply to you in the future.  You individual approval
> >> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >> ratification process.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown.
> >>> I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or attempt to) your efforts or claims.
> >>> Regard$,
> >>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive
> >>> minds.  But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the
> >>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret
> >>> the loss of their pleasing vision.
> >>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ:  Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with
> >>> your library of worthy quotes from others.  Albert Einstein covered
> >>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >>> when apt.  Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure.  So, I
> >>> must decline to reply to you in the future.  You individual approval
> >>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >>> ratification process.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net>  wrote:
> >>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm
> >>>> doing.  I invite your more specific comments, because time does not
> >>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies.  Your "$" salutation amuses
> >>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to
> >>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US
> >>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something
> >>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had.
> >>>> Post the text already.
> >>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable.
> >>>> Regard$,
> >>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world is no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong probability that yours is a fake. --  H.L. Mencken
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges
> and lawyers <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.