been copied and pasted numbers of times. The many readers of my posts
surely know that it is very real. I don't care in the least what you
nor MJ think about my Patriotic Efforts for the good of the country.
For all I know, you two are communist operatives organizing opposition
to the constitution that will put an end to your ilk. Save the
readers and Google time and money: Simply go away from my posts. You
are no longer welcome, here. — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Feb 17, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> The more I watch this thread between John (NoEinstein) and Michael (MJ)
> the more convinced I am that John has no New Constitution. If he does,
> it will never be implemented because no one will ever see it.
>
> On 2/17/2011 7:53 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > On Feb 16, 8:46 am, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >> <sigh>
> >> I made no claim nor expressed any desire to be a 'co-author'. Yet MORE fallacy.
> >> This is getting rather sad, really.
>
> > Then, take you "quotations" elsewhere. Ha, ha, HA! � J. A. A. �
> >> Regard$,
> >> --MJ
> > At 10:54 PM 2/15/2011, you wrote:Dear J. A.: Thanks! My New
> > Constitution has the best interests of
> >> everyone at heart. MJ, as much as he wishes, won't be a co-author of
> >> even a word of it. � NE �
> >> On Feb 15, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> It appears to me that "NoEinstein" has squat.
>
> >>> On 2/14/2011 9:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par
> >>>> with
> >>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered
> >>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I
> >>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval
> >>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>> On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy?
> >>>>> Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed and we might get somewhere?
> >>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can
> >>>>> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to
> >>>>> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of
> >>>>> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything
> >>>>> about anything, without having to bother to deal
> >>>>> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with
> >>>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered
> >>>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >>>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I
> >>>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval
> >>>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >>>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown.
> >>>>>> I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or attempt to) your efforts or claims.
> >>>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive
> >>>>>> minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the
> >>>>>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret
> >>>>>> the loss of their pleasing vision.
> >>>>>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with
> >>>>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered
> >>>>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >>>>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I
> >>>>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval
> >>>>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >>>>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm
> >>>>>>> doing. I invite your more specific comments, because time does not
> >>>>>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies. Your "$" salutation amuses
> >>>>>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to
> >>>>>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US
> >>>>>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something
> >>>>>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had.
> >>>>>>> Post the text already.
> >>>>>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable.
> >>>>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world is no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong probability that yours is a fake. -- H.L. Mencken
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >>>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> >>> --
> >>> Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges
> >>> and lawyers<http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges
> and lawyers <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment