life' with slavery notwithstanding ...
What this Abelson person is saying is (within
your assertion) the 'santity of life' for those
who will have their health care provided by
others ... and that those who will be FORCED to pay do not matter.
EVERYONE has a right to life; their OWN life;
self-ownership. Legitimate Government serves to SECURE this right.
Regard$,
--MJ
"If a man has the right to self-ownership, to the
control of his life, then in the real world he
must also have the right to sustain his life by
grappling with and transforming resources; he
must be able to own the ground and the resources
on which he stands and which he must use; in
short, to sustain his human right" -- Murray Rothbard.
At 04:08 PM 2/1/2011, you wrote:
>But conservatives say they believe in the sanctity of life. Oh
>right, the sanctity of rich people's lives. The rest of us don't
>matter.
>
>
>On 2/1/11, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
> > REED ABELSON
> > Federal Judge Rules That Health Law Violates Constitution (February 1,
> > 2011) The legislation put an end to lifetime limits on coverage for
> > the first time, erasing the financial burdens, including personal
> > bankruptcy, that had affected many ailing Americans.
> > MJ
> > So OTHER PEOPLE should be FORCED and ENSLAVED
> to provide payment for 'care'.
> >
> > REED ABELSON
> > For example, Hillary St. Pierre, a 28-year-old former registered nurse
> > who has Hodgkin's lymphoma, had expected to reach her insurance plan's
> > $2 million limit this year. Under the new law, the cap was eliminated
> > when the policy she gets through her husband's employer was renewed
> > this year.
> > Bastiat
> > "But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the
> > law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other
> > persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at
> > the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without
> > committing a crime.
> >
> > "Then abolish this law without delay, for it
> is not only an evil itself, but
> > also it is a fertile source for further evils because it invites reprisals.
> > If such a law which may be an isolated case is not abolished
> > immediately, it will spread, multiply, and develop into a system.
> >
> > "The person who profits from this law will complain bitterly, defending his
> > acquired rights. He will claim that the state is obligated to protect and
> > encourage his particular industry; that this procedure enriches the state
> > because the protected industry is thus able to spend more and to pay higher
> > wages to the poor workingmen.
> >
> > "Do not listen to this sophistry by vested interests. The acceptance of
> > these arguments will build legal plunder into a whole system. In fact, this
> > has already occurred. The present-day delusion is an attempt to enrich
> > everyone at the expense of everyone else; to make plunder universal under
> > the pretense of organizing it."
> >
> >
> > REED ABELSON
> > Ms. St. Pierre, who has already come close once before to losing her
> > coverage because she had reached the plan's maximum, says she does not
> > know what she will do if the cap is reinstated. "I will be forced to
> > stop treatment or to alter my treatment," Ms. St. Pierre, who lives in
> > Charlestown, N.H., with her husband and son, said in an e-mail. "I
> > will find a way to continue and survive, but who is going to pay?"
> > MJ
> > Yeah ... "Not I said St. Pierre."
> >
> > REED ABELSON
> > "We've got to protect people from catastrophic health problems," said
> > Ron Pollack, the executive director of Families USA, a consumer
> > advocacy group that favored the law's passage. "We don't want people
> > bankrupted."
> > MJ
> > Yeah, FUCK those who will be FORCED to pay for others so long as
> > anyone with an ailment has access to other people's wallets.
> >
> > REED ABELSON
> > Protecting people from facing these extremes is one of the main goals
> > of the law, according to its proponents.
> > MJ
> > Economic ignorance abounds.
> >
> > REED ABELSON
> > Before the law was passed, an estimated 20,000 insured Americans
> > reached the lifetime limits of their coverage each year. Decades old,
> > these restrictions were put in place when both medical care and health
> > insurance were much less expensive than they are today, said Tom
> > Wildsmith, an official with the American Academy of Actuaries.
> > MJ
> > And we do not give a shit WHY medical care and insurance are so
> > expensive NOW either. Just give us access to other people's wallets.
> >
> > Regard$,
> > --MJ
> >
> > When the next health-care crisis hits -- and it will because socialism
> > cannot work -- I predict statists will blame it on greed and deregulation.
> > -- Jacob Hornberger
> >
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>--
>Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>Have a great day,
>Tommy
>
>--
>Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
>* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment