G. Roberts, Jr. about the disqualifying aspects of having Barack Obama
become President, are included in numbers of essays that I wrote
leading up to the 2008 Election. In looking back at those, most
continue to be quite apt as we consider how best to save the USA.
Here is one those, I think, interesting essays:
9/04/08
MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA!
If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited
last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this
country over to them! Wearing lipstick doesn't signify that there is
less POWER in "the weaker sex", it just differentiates the Hockey Moms
from the Pit Bulls!
At last week's Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked
the throng, "Are you ready to take back this country?" That question
seemed to imply that Obama's motive for 'change' is to wrest the
control of our country from the powers-that-be in Washington, and
return control to the People. On that one goal Obama and I agree—The
PEOPLE SHOULD BE IN CONTROL! That said, having Barack Obama be
elected President would be THE most catastrophic thing to happen to
this country, 9/11 included…
As was highlighted by Republicans last night, Barack Obama has ZERO
executive experience. He's running to be President because his
lifelong inferiority complex—caused by to his being biracial; 'poor';
and brought up without a father—demands to be compensated. When more
and more Blacks began identifying with Obama's angry tone of speech,
even while he was still in his teens, Obama began being hyped by
Blacks as their future leader. With each public speech that he
delivered, his ego swelled. Eventually, he deluded himself into
believing that he's entitled to be President. The country owes him
such, simply because of his sad childhood.
Obama's undeserved rise to power was bolstered by the deeply corrupt
Democratic Party. Such was needing a Manchurian Candidate—without the
independence of the Clintons—who would be the puppet of Howard Dean
and his band of thieves. Those like Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle and
Bob Casey endorsed Obama, not because he's exceptional, but because
he's unexceptional enough to be needing them to help him "run things"
in Washington. Take away the implied rewards for those endorsing
Obama, and the endorsements would have been few, indeed.
For the record, my New Constitution requires that any civil employee
or office holder be fired for publicly endorsing a candidate for
government office. That stipulation will stop the you-owe-me-one
obligations, once in office, which have so compromised candidates'
ability to do their jobs of representing the People.
Screaming Howard Dean, the DNC Chairman, knows that he himself will
never be President. But that hasn't stopped Dean from lusting to have
as much behind-the-scenes power in the White House as he can muster.
Up until Dean "lost it" in 2004, he had been incredibly successful at
generating ideological and financial support over the Internet.
Barack Obama has followed Dean's example—perhaps under Dean's tutorage—
to gain "grass roots" support via the Internet. Very early, 90 plus
percent of Blacks—who feel that THEY are entitled to be "compensated",
too—began backing Obama. They did so with their dollars and with
their relentless neighborhood recruitments of voters, and new
registrants to vote… for Obama. The latter is a tacit violation of
principles of democracy.
A Black man who was interviewed in Time Square right after Obama's
acceptance of his party's nomination, sounded proud as he said, "This
year I contributed $50.00 to Obama. Obama won't accept contributions
from special interests." Well, I've got news for you: Blacks ARE a
special interest! And they are a hugely threatening one to the future
of the USA!
If Blacks manage to win "the game" of getting Obama elected, there
will be in-your-face celebrating. Right off the bat, Blacks will be
expecting to see the last vestiges of racial discrimination end. They
will be expecting to have their lot in life be improved, yesterday—
because they are Black—and that is the worst form of racism. There
will be violence from Blacks when they aren't as empowered by Obama's
election as they had hoped. And there will be violence from whites if
Blacks are empowered, inequitably. The Democrats and Obama have
gotten this country into a lose/lose situation if Obama gets elected.
The Watts Riots will look like soccer celebrations by comparison.
Sarah Palin is a Breath of Fresh Air (!) in the midst of the dire
situation that the USA finds itself in. If John McCain, the current
standard bearer of the Republican Party, becomes President, our broken
and corrupt "two party" government will be sitting there, unscathed.
Yes, McCain is a maverick who sticks to his principles. And even
though Palin is a "barracuda", the US Constitution doesn't grant the
Executive Office the POWER necessary to implement the changes that
need to be made in our government.
Sarah Palin is a genuine gold nugget charmer! But it pains my heart
to have such a HOPEFUL PRESENCE as she be sacrificed against the
Calcified Wall of Corruption that is our Congress.
However, Sarah Palin need not be sacrificed! To save both McCain and
her from failure in 'correcting' our government, all that McCain and
she need to do is to: Publicly acknowledge that it is PRUDENT to let
the American People vote on my democracy-based New Constitution, in
November of 2010! By making just that one simple acknowledgment,
Congress, and the World, will be put on notice that the American
People are determined to take back control of government. For much
too long political parties; lobbyists; PACS; the media; and the "great
traditions" of Congress have locked us into continuing to do the same
old ineffectual things.
Historically, Republicans have been pro business; anti big government;
and anti taxes. But as long as we're in debt—and we are, big time,
because of Bush's wars—taxes can't be lowered much. On a positive
note: My New Constitution removes the authority of governments—local,
state and federal—to raise taxes, ANY taxes, without a direct vote of
the People! And the vote for passage becomes 60%, not 50.0001%.
Every law, regulation or procedure that is on the books will be
reviewed and revoted, WITH full citizen input. Never again will this
country be strapped by laws not supported by a big majority. And
never again will the bad laws that got passed be allowed to hold the
People captive, simply because the People are too law abiding.
This week on CNN's 'Larry King Live', Jesse Ventura tells us that he
wants to be a player in this country's… Revolution. Ventura says that
he has no intention of voting for a Democrat nor a Republican.
Charles Barkley, a potential candidate for governor in Alabama, thinks
that Democrats and Republicans are corrupt. So, he'll run as an
Independent. And both Obama and McCain are talking about re taking
control of our (party-dominated) governments.
Because of the above, and individual observations, too, thinking
Americans, everywhere, should realize: The major changes needed in our
government will require tearing down and rebuilding from the ground
up. But the Plans and Specifications to do so are poised and
polished. People, start DEMANDING to learn more about my New
Constitution! The media is giving hints that it can't keep its
collective heads buried-in-the-sand much longer regarding the prospect
of there being a New Constitution.
One day, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will make a great first woman
President of the United States of America. To help assure that such a
goal isn't an impossible one for her, simply realize: "A New
Constitution is the only 'change' that we need!" Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
On Jan 26, 5:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> The recent 'State of the Union Address' highlights why "saving our
> government" in its present form is counterproductive. Hundreds of
> dolled-out men and women in Congress—by their attendance at the address
> —paid homage to that squatting dictator, Indonesian, socialist-
> communist Barack Obama. Though the group was supposedly mixed-up
> (They are "that", too.), people stood on command to have the Anti-
> Christ, Obama, be greeted like a rock star. He found willing hands to
> shake along the 'aisle', that was somehow populated by his most doting
> supporters. From appearances, alone, Obama seemed like an entering
> hero, rather than THE most corrupt and hurtful-to-America person in
> the entire history of this country!
>
> Our should-be-cherished American Flag, in that House Chamber, was
> desecrated by having Barack Obama stand in front of it—like he does at
> every public appearance that he makes. The wrong public perception is
> that elected officials, fraudulent Presidents, and our corrupt
> government are synonymous with the USA. But nothing could be further
> from the truth! The USA is "We, the People", NOT they, the
> controlling government!
>
> "The federal government shall not be considered to be synonymous with
> the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor are they
> dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall be
> answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens thereof."
>
> "The American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue.
> Only when the President or Secretary of State are addressing the
> nation or appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries shall the
> American Flag, bunting, or flag-color drapes be used as a backdrop.
> No other public official nor candidate shall use such. Flags shall
> not be displayed in or outside of government buildings other than:
> public schools, post offices, military bases, memorials, the White
> House, the Pentagon, and outside of the Capital or other government
> seats."
>
> NOTE: The 'State of the Union Address' is an address of Congress that
> just happens to be televised to the People. A televised address to
> the nation, from the Oval Office, of Barack Obama giving-himself-up to
> authorities for TREASON, would be an acceptable use of the Flag.
>
> It is a cardinal, and I think, capital offense to allow justices of
> the Supreme Court to attend any government events that have them
> socializing with anyone from the opposing branches of government.
>
> "Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect, high moral
> character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable nature, and for
> their proficiency and expediency in office. Such shall not be aloft
> nor considered infallible in all their judgments, yet shall be
> respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall make decisions
> based on apt laws and this New Constitution—never on their personal
> ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise
> the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges
> and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the
> latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren't royalty, nor do
> they have an implied moral judgment inherently superior to public
> macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered lavishly, sit in throne-
> like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress in a style that
> differentiates them from the People. They shall not socialize with,
> nor privately be in conference with, members of the Executive or
> Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend State of the
> Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not stand for
> entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be addressed only as:
> judge or justice. Judges and justices not respecting such provisions,
> or who exhibit excessive arrogance or pomposity on the job shall be
> removed."
>
> As most should know, those elected to the office of President shall be
> required to take the following oath: "I solemnly affirm that I will
> faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and
> will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the
> (New) Constitution of the United States." Prior to his questionable
> "election" as President, Barack Obama had made strong anti-
> constitution statements, decrying the fact that the Constitution
> LIMITED the powers of Congress, rather than giving more power to
> Congress. Here is what I wrote about how Obama got… "elected". Chief
> Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., failed to protect the USA from a
> Manchurian Candidate when he—tantamount to treason, himself—accepted
> the BOTCHED Oath of Office, thus confirming Barack Obama, the Anti-
> Christ, as "President".
>
> 01/22/09
>
> Tradition Reigns Supreme: Democracy Denied.
>
> Our elite media must surely be thrilled by the turnout to witness the
> inauguration of this country's 44th President, Barack Hussein Obama.
> The happy and sometimes tearful throng was amazing. That sea of warm
> bodies which assembled on the Washington Mall 1/20/2009 has a long
> traditional—much like the pressing crowds which go to New York's Times
> Square to be a part of the New Year's Eve celebration. On such cold
> days, both events tend to defy logic. But for the media, the
> inaugural turnout was like a vote-of-confidence for their job well
> done in getting Obama elected.
>
> Strictly by chance, I watched the CBS News coverage of the
> inauguration. I was determined NOT to watch CNN, which is largely
> responsible for Obama's 'win'. Cutesy, cutesy Katie Couric, and Bob
> Schieffer, were in awe of the elite Washington insiders who filed
> through the West Portal of the Capital toward the best seats. Those
> 'important' people are the ones responsible for our country's woes. I
> don't think they should be praised as celebrities.
>
> During the campaign both news moderators were clearly biased for
> Obama. Couric's interview of Governor Sarah Palin, last year, in
> which Couric tried to pin down Palin regarding her sources of
> information on foreign affairs, was motivated as much by partisan bias
> as by informational necessity. Such questioning, also, showed a lack
> of good conversational etiquette, which one would expect from a media
> celebrity—like Couric hopes she can be, but keeps coming up short of
> ever actually being. Couric sees herself as the next Barbara Walters
> in waiting. Barbara has been an excellent interviewer of the rich,
> famous and notorious. She was as gushy in her awe of Obama in her
> endorsements on the 'View' as she was for that other married Black
> politician with whom she admits having had an affair. Black men
> definitely have a long history with the ladies.
>
> Bob Schieffer was a prominent celebrity at the 2008 Democratic
> Convention. He got to sit close to the podium. His being a news
> moderator, who was clearly biased for a particular candidate, should
> have gotten him fired. But his choice for President, Barack Obama,
> happened to match the dollars-and-cents choice of media bosses. One
> frequent guest on 'Larry King Live', Minnesota's former Governor Jesse
> Ventura is outspoken, politically. A year or so ago Ventura got a job
> to moderate a TV show. But when he mentioned that he would be running
> for public office himself, his job disappeared. Strange... very
> strange. If moderators are biased toward Democrats that's fine. But
> if a moderator wishes to be biased toward his own commitment to try to
> correct our nation's problems, such individuality is suppressed by the
> media. I can empathize with Ventura on that, because the media has
> similarly suppressed my New Constitution, which solves the fatal
> problems in our government, AND in the news media. From the media's
> point of view, if our problems ever get solved, the media won't have
> very much to talk about.
>
> The majority of those who traveled to Washington to be a part of...
> history were Blacks. If the inauguration had been a celebration of
> Blacks' final triumph over discrimination and bigotry, such would have
> been a wonderful event. But those Black Block voters for Obama—who
> formed his core constituency during the campaign—were blinded to
> realize, or even to care, that Obama was a man without principles who
> would 'win' by hook-or-by-crook. Most people know that Blacks are
> more willing to look-the-other-way to crime than are whites. Obama's
> election to become President was akin to having corrupt officials make
> bad calls in the Super Bowl in order to win. Such a 'win' should be
> cause for shame, NOT celebration!
>
> Economic disparity between Blacks and whites should be important
> discrimination talking points. But isn't it strange that Blacks can
> find the money necessary to travel to the inauguration, and to
> purchase the smiling pictures of Barack Obama on plates, coins and
> every other manner of rip-off, but Blacks can't find the money needed
> to carry-their-own-weight without looking to Washington for handouts?
>
> Obama actually increased Blacks' economic hardship when he milked
> them, and others in need, of the money necessary to let him BUY his
> way into the White House. The millions of people who contributed to
> Obama's campaign are going to feel entitled to payback. But when
> Obama can't deliver on his promises of economic betterment, there will
> be a lot of unhappy campers on the Washington Mall. The best thing
> Obama could have done as the President Elect would have been to call-
> off the wasteful inaugural celebration, entirely, so he can get right
> to work. But Obama knows from experience that the pockets of the
> disadvantaged are deep for extravagance, when the false political
> promises are as high as his have been.
>
> I listened for, but couldn't isolate, any words in Obama's inaugural
> address worthy of being chiseled in stone. But I did hear Obama say:
> "Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them
> may be new. But the values upon which our success depends—hard work
> and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty
> and patriotism—those things are old." Obama ACCENTED the word
> "...old" and looked perturbed saying it.
>
> My New Constitution stresses FAIR PLAY and democracy. I've also
> stressed individual patriotism (over the mass-minded deferral of
> authority to others). With hard honest work most American's won't
> need to look to government at all. So, understandably, Obama looks
> down on those type things. His rise to power is grounded in having a
> majority of people be unwilling to carry their own weight without
> assistance. Socialism is Obama's watchword.
>
> If fair play, which is in the SPIRIT of our Constitution, and
> especially so in our Bill of Rights, had been more prominent in our
> nation's history, there wouldn't have been a need for Martin Luther
> King, Jr. to "...have a dream." That dream would already be a
> reality. And if fair play was rightly important, there wouldn't be a
> US Senate; political parties; lobbyists; the electoral college system;
> nor would there be discrimination of any kind, because such isn't
> fair. Fair Play requires that people "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
> Those two things could almost be made a one-sentence constitution:
> ***Love thy neighbor as thyself and be fair in all of your dealings
> with others.*** Or… "Do unto others as you would have them do unto
> you."
>
> Recently, I asked Rush Limbaugh and others to consider whether or not
> Fair Play, democracy and self-rule are at the heart and soul of our
> nation's founding, and if such constitute the SPIRIT of our
> Constitution. If the answer was... "no", then I have wasted 13 years
> of my life writing my New Constitution of the United States of
> America. But if the answer is "yes", then Barack Obama is unqualified
> to become President.
>
> Regarding the latter: Obama was condescending to Hillary Clinton by
> repeatedly saying that she was doing well... for a woman. Obama
> talked about his inevitable victory, while the race for the Democratic
> nomination for President was still going on. He never demanded that
> the media give Clinton equal time and fair treatment. He embraced the
> decisions of the unconstitutional Democratic Party Rules and Bylaws
> Committee over the rules of democracy itself. He benefited unfairly
> from the disparity of voter information and influence between the
> earlier and latter primary voters. [The earlier voters have more
> power, because he used his leads in those primaries to stampede voters
> to his side. But his later-revealed character flaws, like being a
> member of Jeremiah Wright's congregation; looking down on Bible
> readers with their... guns; and being two-faced about NAFTA never were
> issues known to the early primary voters.]
>
> Obama favored undemocratic "delegate counts" (and the electoral
> college system) over the democratic, easy-to-determine, popular vote.
> He sees no problem with having his supporters being involved in the
> registration of new voters pledged to him. He has no problem doing
> business with bombers and crooks. He thinks it is perfectly OK to
> give and get bribes in exchange for political favors. And Obama wants
> to preserve the status quo of party rule and corruption in Washington
> for at least four more years.
>
> The USA could well be mortally wounded because Chief Justice John G.
> Roberts, Jr.—the new-kid-on-the-block—favors 'tradition' and
> corruption in Washington over democracy, fair play, and the rule of
> the People. Roberts administered a largely BOTCHED Oath of Office to
> Barack Hussein Obama, knowing full well that he was betraying the
> SPIRIT of the Constitution. When Roberts came through that West
> Portal of the Capital, he was smiling. He twisted and turned to speak
> to the "important" people already assembled. Apparently, Washington's
> Pomp and Circumstances, amid so many lovely limestone buildings and
> monuments—with their ubiquitous flags, and with all of the ubiquitous
> politicians eager to be photographed or interviewed in front of such—
> was just too seductive an environment for Roberts to resist being
> corrupted by.
>
> I've already revealed the major precepts of my New Constitution. My
> long efforts are a direct affront to the status quo, corrupt
> institutions of government, the media, and education. Those three
> share blame for this country's decline. But hopefully, my having hit
> metal-to-flint has sparked new fires of patriotism. Like I've said,
> it will only take one honest man, or woman, with the public's ear, to
> turn America around. And People, "Uncle Sam needs... YOU!"
>
> On several occasions during the 2008 presidential campaign, Governor
> Sarah Palin repeated my words when she said: "Government isn't the
> SOLUTION; government is the PROBLEM!" When enough Americans come to
> realize that simple fact, then, there will be New Hope for this
> nation!
>
> There was LOVE in my heart for the American People while I wrote the
> New Constitution. That means: People of all races, colors and
> creeds! If and when right things can start being done, MOST Americans
> will benefit! And a new harmony will prevail throughout this Great
> Land!
>
> My New Constitution—which is poised and polished—can FIX our broken
> government! To start to learn how that will be accomplished, skim my
> many posts for more premises of, and excerpts from, my 'New
> Constitution of the United States of America'!
>
> Respectfully Submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead, Patriot
> AKA — NoEinstein — on Google's sci.physics
>
> Note: Those who are interested are invited to read my recently
> published book, "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity"
> available at Amazon and B. & N.
>
> __________
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment