All of this is nonsense !!! People are judged or not judged for what they do ON THIS BOARD.
Just why should anyone take it "easier" on any one else ??
It is NOT censorship to deny Merc the right to continue to threaten the children of others (or to use hers as an excuse or as a crutch)
This string will be closed at 12:30 GMT - 6.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:21 AM, nominal9 <nominal9@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello Perp....
THIRD ERSON ADDRESS:For those who may not Know... Perp(lexed) is the
"nemesis" that Merc is so upset with....
For my own sake.... I think Perp(lexed) will also agree that I have
never asked for Perplexed to be censored, banned or even silenced in
any other group or forum... I think I may have asked Perplexed to try
to take it a bit easier on Merc... but that whole attempt was sort of
futile.
DIRECT ADDRESS: Anyway, Perplexed, as to what you have uncovered as to
Merc being (or not) a "registered nurse"....I can't say, myself,
because I do not have the actual facts, either way.... but Merc does
seem to be knowledgeable in the medical area, above the usual level of
a layman, and she has been represented to be a "working" nurse by her
friend, les.... so, maybe your research was not definitive....As to
the assertion you made:"And NOBODY has ever attacked her kid.
EVER."..... I don't think that is totally true, I would have to try
to go back through old posts on other boards regarding people I may
not even know to prove my doubts.... which is something that I don't
like to do to anyone.....and will not do now.... but I think you are
wrong about that, even when it regards you, yourself, Preplexed.
"You're no better than she is if you continue posting this crap."....
as to this orther statement... this whole... "better" issue as a
general "theme" always bothers me.... "better" implies some sort of
superior vs. inferior relation... Generally, I never claim to be
"better" than any others, especially in a social, economic, racial/
ethnic , class standing or even intelligence sense. Frankly, from
other posts of yours that I have seen, Perplexed, you seem to think of
yourself as "better" in all of those "social" senses... But I'll give
you the benefit of semantics and assume that you are accusing me of
being "worse" in an ethical sense by spreading falsehoods regarding
the situation between you and Merc.....Like I said... I tend to
believe that Merc is basically telling the truth, as to herself and
especially as to her child......
But, here's my question to you.... Perplexed... are you here at this
time in support or in opposition to the Censorship of Merc or of her
Banning?.....Because.... that is my issue.... Censorship, Freedom of
Speech.... etc....
nominal9
On Nov 21, 3:43 pm, Perplexed <openlyincogn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As I understand it, Merc
> is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
> registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge or
> even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> others here abouts....
> ---------------
>
> You are a fool to believe anything that loonbat types. She claimed
> she was a nurse, so I looked her up in her state's database and posted
> the link to that database showing that she is not only NOT a
> registered nurse, she's not even a registered nurses' aide hired to
> change bedpans.
>
> She's a deranged lunatic who has wished gang rape, death, and
> mutilation on other people's children numerous times (including
> mine). She's come on this very forum and attacked me and my kids more
> than once. And NOBODY has ever attacked her kid. EVER. Stop
> supporting her brand of deranged hate and blaming others for what merc
> does. You're no better than she is if you continue posting this crap.
>
> On Nov 19, 12:22 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > bring
> > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > will
> > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
> > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the victim,
> > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very ignorant
> > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed the
> > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it, Merc
> > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
> > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge or
> > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > others here abouts....
> > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is living
> > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among "half-
> > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
> > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the crap
> > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the crap
> > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > "banning".....
> > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Nominal9,
>
> > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To bring
> > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I will
> > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa...
> > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the low, in
> > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass stupid, as
> > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of answer....
> > > > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > > > brains... for eternity....
> > > > nominal9
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e...
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237...
> > > > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the Pusillanimous
> > > > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along with the
> > > > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > > > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at least
> > > > two
> > > > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > > > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still .....whatever
> > > > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > > > comparison
> > > > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and of the
> > > > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that les and
> > > > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > > > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to run
> > > > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say... censorship
> > > > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > > > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous Pellet, more than ample
> > > > warning of his impending dishonor , shame and eternal damnation of
> > > > being relegated to my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame....Consigned
> > > > to an eternity of literal punishment to correspond to the
> > > > metaphorical condition in which he lives his life as the censor and
> > > > sysop of 72... which is to say, Damnerd to an Eternity in Hell with
> > > > his Head Stuck Up His Ass and with Shit for Brains. But Rabbit, the
> > > > Pusilllanomous Pellet, seems to scoff at this most foul and dire
> > > > opprobrium... seemingly glad to join the ranks of his fellow Head Up
> > > > The Ass and Shit For Brains sysops and Censors in their eternal
> > > > misery...
>
> > > > So be it....Abandon All Hope...forever...
>
> > > > nominal9
>
> > > > Rogue View profile
> > > > More options Aug 27, 12:46 pm
>
> > > > From: Rogue <rogueplan...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:29 -0400
> > > > Local: Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:46 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > Rabbit? Ban posters?
>
> > > > Say it ain't so! / rogue
>
> > > > - Hide quoted text -
> > > > -Reporting spam
> > > > Message reported
> > > > Rate this post:
>
> > > > nominal9 View profile
> > > > More options Aug 30, 2:33 pm
>
> > > > From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > > > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > Local: Mon, Aug 30 2010 2:33 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove |
> > > > Report
> > > > this message | Find messages by this author
>
> > > >http://www.bio.miami.edu/hare/poop.html
>
> > > > Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet... with the shit-eating grin..... /
> > > > n9
>
> > > > Then I tried to add another post in reply to a snide aside by Rabbit
> > > > under his pseudonym...RighteousObserver...
> > > > here's Rabbit's "concealed" whiny-ass post
>
> > > > From: RighteousObserver <tinywhiterab...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > Local: Tues, Aug 31 2010 7:24 am
> > > > Subject: I Sucked The Fun Out Of 71 And Now I'm Here For You On 72!
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > I *am* RighteousOberserver.
>
> > > > Sworn Defender of Board Justice and um..er..other stoopid shit like
> > > > that.
>
> > > > <doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin' the crab><doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin'
> > > > the crab> / rabbit
>
> > > > To which I replied with my own counter that flashed on the board for
> > > > a
> > > > minute or so... before rabbit proceeded to remove it from 72...
> > > > as I recall it....
>
> > > > "The cecotrophic Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet with the shit-
> > > > eating grin... turns two big floppy deaf ears...."
>
> > > > That was it.... looks like I'm "Banned" from 72... too.....another
> > > > badge of honor.....
> > > > Always good to be Banned by the Damned ... see?... Rabbit does
> > > > deserve
> > > > to be in Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame...
>
> > > > n9- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment