dick armey?
or our dick?
On Oct 14, 10:54 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Nom,
>
> With regard to Ann, I must have missed the time that you reference,
> when Ann didn't nail the issue right square on the head, and call a spade a
> spade.
>
> With regard to the Senator from Tel-Aviv, Joe Lieberman......He has put
> Israel's interests before our own way, way way too many times for my
> tastes. We know where his loyalty is.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:21 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Ann... Ann.. Ann....
>
> > You do have your head up your ass....
> > but like the proverbial clockon the wall, you do happen to tell the
> > right time every so often....
> > I agee about Dick 'the blooming AssHole' Blumenthal.... although
> > perhaps not on all of the same grounds as you.....
>
> > so.... I wonder what Ann thinks about Lyin' Joe Lieberman...
> > aka the Bi-sexual Bi- partisan who screws both Democrats and
> > Republicans... both up the Ass.... (HAR)....
> > nominal9
>
> > On Oct 13, 8:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > *There's a Reason They Call Him 'Dick'*
> > > by Ann Coulter
> > > Posted 10/13/2010 ET
> > > Updated 10/13/2010 ET
>
> > >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39409
>
> > > If the Bush administration ever treated terrorism suspects the way
> > > Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal treats law-abiding
> > citizens
> > > and small businesses, even conservatives would have blanched.
>
> > > This activist, interventionist Democrat -- like his identical, slightly
> > less
> > > oily twin, Eliot Spitzer -- decided at age 5 he was going to be a U.S.
> > > senator and then the first Jewish president. And he doesn't care how many
> > > lives he has to destroy to get there.
>
> > > Currently, Blumenthal is running for the U.S. Senate against Linda
> > McMahon
> > > in Connecticut. He must be stopped.
>
> > > Even his ideological ally, The New York *Times*, thinks he must be
> > stopped.
> > > That paper ran a front-page expose on Blumenthal's lies about having
> > served
> > > in Vietnam, violating a century-old Times tradition of never printing
> > > information unflattering to a Democrat.
>
> > > Blumenthal apologized for lying about being in Vietnam, saying, "I take
> > full
> > > responsibility." Who else was he considering blaming? The voices in his
> > > head?
>
> > > Among Blumenthal's taxpayer-funded citizen-persecution projects was the
> > one
> > > he waged against Gina Kolb, owner of Computer Plus Center in East
> > Hartford.
>
> > > After selling $17.2 million worth of computers and servers to the state
> > in
> > > 2001, Kolb found herself being sued by Blumenthal for $1.75 million for
> > > allegedly overcharging the state $500,000.
>
> > > Publicity-whore Blumenthal sent out an accusatory press release about
> > Kolb,
> > > saying: "No supplier should be permitted to shortchange or overcharge the
> > > state without severe consequences."
>
> > > Soon thereafter, Kolb was arrested at her home on seven first-degree
> > larceny
> > > charges, courtesy of Connecticut's crazily hyperactive attorney general.
>
> > > Wonder why you have a $4 billion deficit, Nutmeggers? Blumenthal's
> > endless
> > > investigations into responsible, law-abiding citizens like Kolb have now
> > > cost more than the entire Iraq War. (And that's just the cost of the
> > paper
> > > for Blumenthal's 12 billion press releases!)
>
> > > A court dismissed all charges against Kolb and her company in 2008. But
> > not
> > > before this female businesswoman had her company completely shattered by
> > the
> > > pathologically ambitious attorney general.
>
> > > I'm sorry, I know you need to be on television every single day, Dick,
> > but
> > > that's not enough of a reason to destroy innocent citizens' lives, much
> > less
> > > use taxpayer money to do so.
>
> > > Kolb was far from the only innocent citizen persecuted by Blumenthal. The
> > > reason we know her story is that, instead of moving as far away from
> > > Connecticut as she could, Kolb turned around and sued the state for
> > > violating her constitutional rights.
>
> > > The jury agreed, awarding her $18 million for Blumenthal's "pattern of
> > > conduct" that destroyed Kolb's business and impugned her integrity.
>
> > > Noticeably, the attorney general who spends most of his waking hours
> > phoning
> > > reporters, holding press conferences and issuing press releases did not
> > make
> > > a peep about Kolb's total vindication in court, despite his having
> > earlier
> > > blackened her name. Perhaps he was busy attending a fake Vietnam
> > veterans'
> > > reunion that day.
>
> > > To the contrary, Blumenthal continued using the power of his office to
> > > persecute Kolb. This is the problem with government officials using
> > taxpayer
> > > money to further their own political ambitions: No one could tell him to
> > cut
> > > his losses and stop harassing Kolb.
>
> > > Blumenthal filed a blizzard of motions -- at taxpayer expense --
> > appealing
> > > the jury's verdict in favor of Kolb. One of them finally succeeded in
> > > getting a judge to reduce the damages to Kolb, who presumably is now
> > living
> > > in Hawaii under an assumed name so Blumenthal doesn't start making crank
> > > calls to her.
>
> > > (She should go to Vietnam! Blumenthal will never find her there!)
>
> > > Connecticut taxpayers spent millions of dollars harassing this innocent
> > > businesswoman, successfully destroying a profitable, job-creating
> > computer
> > > company in the state and one law-abiding taxpayer in the process. Thanks,
> > > Dick!
>
> > > Blumenthal's 24-hour publicity office managed to produce a gleaming press
> > > release on the reduction of Kolb's damages award, in which he vowed to
> > > "continue fighting to overturn this verdict."
>
> > > Asked by Charles Kochakian of the New Haven *Register *about the case and
> > > whether Blumenthal ever released a statement when a victim of his legal
> > > harassment was vindicated, Blumenthal essentially said: No one is ever
> > > vindicated. Just because no wrongdoing was found, he said, doesn't mean
> > > wrongdoing didn't occur.
>
> > > Welcome to Connecticut, where you're guilty until proved innocent (and
> > you
> > > can never be proved innocent).
>
> > > Most shockingly, Blumenthal said he would never issue a press release
> > about
> > > one of his publicly accused targets being vindicated because "new
> > evidence
> > > may well emerge."
>
> > > "New evidence may well emerge" that Dick Blumenthal is a child molesting
> > ax
> > > murderer. But until it does, no one has a right to say so. Hello? ACLU?
> > > Heard of Dick Blumenthal?
>
> > > Everyone in Connecticut knows Blumenthal's name, largely on account of
> > his
> > > daily press conferences for nearly two decades as attorney general,
> > > announcing lawsuits to combat every minor inconvenience. Arby's served
> > > jalapeno poppers at 114 degrees? Blumenthal is holding a press conference
> > at
> > > noon!
>
> > > This hyperactive, publicity-mad lunatic is constantly announcing new
> > > lawsuits far beyond the purview of his office, like some New England
> > version
> > > of Hugo Chavez. This won him the title: "Worst Attorney General in the
> > > Country" from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
>
> > > He's sued power companies for contributing to "global warming," asking
> > the
> > > courts to impose cap and trade -- a bill so absurd neither Obama nor the
> > > Democratic Senate will touch it.
>
> > > He's sued gun companies, trying to hold them responsible for criminal
> > acts
> > > by third parties involving guns.
>
> > > He's sued tobacco companies so he could extort millions of dollars for
> > his
> > > old law firm and other legal cronies overseeing the shakedown -- I mean
> > > "settlement."
>
> > > Blumenthal is now in a tight race with Linda McMahon for the U.S. Senate.
> > I
> > > understand why Connecticut would like to get rid of him, but that's no
> > > reason to foist this menace on the rest of the country. How about sending
> > > him to Vietnam?
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment