Judge Andrew Napolitano is substituting for Glenn Beck this week, who
is getting a well-deserved vacation. Most of the shows are reruns of
some of Beck's more fiery presentations on the corruption in
Washington. The looming killer of what we had known as… "America" is
the deliberate destruction of the capitalist system that made this
country great. The prevailing view point of leftist Democrats and
progressives is that Capitalism must fall so that a new socialist /
Marxist / communist government can replace our already made useless
Republic form of government.
It is absolutely amazing to me that people like Beck and Napolitano
can talk about the unconstitutional and down-right criminal things
going on in the White House and in Congress without saying these
words: "Folks, our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. Every
public official in the federal government and in our state governments
must swear to uphold and defend the Constitution. There is no more
basic precept of the Constitution than that the PEOPLE shall control
government rather than the converse. But government has evolved to
blatantly and deliberately disregard the Will of the People. We have
elected DICTATORS, not elected representatives. And every one of
those who have voted for any semblance of a socialist agenda are
clearly guilty of TREASON! Treason, people, is a Capital Offense.
And the enslaving of generations of Americans to pay off debts never
approved by the People is the Capital crime that is so very much in
evidence. To begin to fix our broken government, we must first
arrest, try and hang those guilty of deliberately trying to destroy
our Republic and our crucial Capitalist System."
Several weeks ago on the Mike Huckabee Show, actor Jon Voight read a
short message he had written on the plight of America. Voight cited
the deliberate lies and falsehoods of the Obama administration for
repeatedly saying that capitalism is at the root of our problems.
Within seconds, Huckabee put on his trademark phony smile and said, "I
didn't think Obama is deliberately trying to hurt America. … his
policies, perhaps." I was as floored as Voight that Huckabee could be
so rude as to try to negate the soulful message Jon Voight had just
delivered. I was also amazed that Huckabee could be so naïve as to
believe that Obama would lie and villainize capitalist interests
without those acts being deliberate.
This weekend, there was a rerun of a Mike Huckabee Show from Las
Vegas. Mr. Las Vegas, Wayne Newton, talked about how damaging Obama's
remarks had been about not having (expensive) conventions and
conferences in Las Vegas. Thousands of people lost their jobs due to
the reduction in the numbers of people going to Vegas. No sooner than
Newton had uttered his heartfelt feelings, Mike Huckabee rushed a
reply of his own… and at the very MOMENT when the audience would be
applauding Newton's soulful remarks. Mike Huckabee deliberately
reduced the intensity of applause AGAINST our treasonous dictator,
Barack Obama! Huckabee is an anti free speech, Treasonous bastard no
better than Barack Obama!
Later on that same show the audience was allowed to ask several
questions. A Houston lady named Chris said, "Governor, I guess you
heard that Woody Allen said that President Obama should be dictator
for a while. What do you think about that?" To which Mike Huckabee
replied, " Woody Allen has said a lot of things I don't agree with,
and I would add that to the list. The wonderful thing about this
country is we don't have dictators, we have elected representatives
and we have people who lead us; they don't own us. Liberty is still
what makes us unique as Americans. With all respect to Mr. Allen,
he's a great comedian, a very talented writer, and a funny person.
But I'm going to let his politics be for someone else."
Wow! The lies that come from Mike Huckabee! Anyone with half a brain
surely realizes that Barack Obama isn't responding to the Will of the
People. While he has majorities in both houses of Congress, Obama is
orchestrating his economy-destroying legislation like the DICTATOR
that he is!
The only truthful reply to that lady's questions would have been for
Huckabee to say, "President Obama already IS our dictator. Isn't he?
At least that's how it looks to me!" A total of at least three times
in two weeks, Mike Huckabee has deliberately put the best… "spin" on
President Obama's crimes. Huckabee is aiding and abetting crimes that
threaten the survival of the USA. So, Mike Huckabee should be
arrested, tried and hanged for treason, too! Additionally, his fraud
as a "bass player" continues with each show… Not a note or chord from
him can be heard!
Following Glenn Beck's opting-out on having a leadership position in
our 2nd American Revolution, he has continued to talk about the
virtues of the Founding Fathers. On one particular show, earlier, he
had explained how a mixed church congregation had heard a call-to-arms
and rushed to fire "the shot heard round the world." Apparently,
there was no pacifism in religious congregations in those days. If
there had been, we would now be a British possession.
I was pleased to learn from Beck and his guest that a well-educated
"slave" named James Armistead had worked for General Lafayette and
later became a double agent spy working for America. James Armistead
could well be credited with winning the revolution, because he
revealed the strength and the location of Cornwallis's troops at
Yorktown. Because my fraternal family line descends from William
Armistead who settled in Virginia, there is a reasonable chance that
James Armistead had worked for William. It would be completely
consistent with what I know of the character of my ancestors, for
James to have been treated like family; allowed to become well-
educated; and freed. If that be true, then Armisteads have helped to
save this country twice: In the revolution, and again at Fort McHenry
in the War of 1812. Major George Armistead is credited with saving
Baltimore from the British invasion.
I fully intend to help save the USA in this our 2nd Revolution against
the corruption in Washington. I can feel my ancestors urging me on!
"United we stand; divided we fall." May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google's news group sci.physics.
>
On Sep 2, 7:14 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Being FAIR to America and to Glenn Beck.
>
> Most of us have attended football games in stadia holding, say, 80
> thousand people. We've seen Goodyear blimp images of what that
> quantity of people looks like compared to the widely-understood size
> of a football field. So, I take personal offense when a "supposedly"
> objective reporter like Fox News's Chris Wallace interviews Glenn Beck
> and says: "… tens of thousands, perhaps a hundred thousand" attended
> Beck's 8/28 rally. Does LIBERAL BIAS require blatant unfairness to
> anyone?
>
> Some of you know that I am a registered architect. We structural
> designers must regularly account for the weight of crowds of people
> standing in ballrooms, conference rooms or halls. Most building codes
> require calculating one person for every six square feet of floor
> space. The latter is also a standard for calculating the conglomerate
> width of door openings for fire safety.
>
> I accessed Google Earth and saw the layout of the reflection pool area
> between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument. Taking two
> simple measurements, I had the crowd extending 5,280 feet from where
> Beck spoke, out to past the Washington Monument. And I measured 1,000
> feet as the average width of the crowd through the trees and to the
> edge of the two clearings beyond the first buffer of trees. The
> reflection pool took up about 200 feet of the 1,000, leaving 800 feet
> as the effective width of the HUGE crowd. I calculate the area of
> ground occupied by those attending Beck's rally as follows: 5,280 feet
> x 800 feet = 4,224,000 square feet. *** The very accurate number of
> people attending Beck's rally was: 4,224,000 divided by 6 sq. ft. /
> person = 704,000 people. *** That's not… "tens of thousands", now, is
> it!
>
> It's amazing to me that Fox News is considered to be… conservative.
> Yes, they allow coverage of the conservative side of issues. But they
> simultaneously allow the lying liberals to put the best "spin" on
> anything the CRIMINAL Obama regime does. I include "Fox News
> Contributors" Alan Colmes, Bill Beckel, and Juan Williams in the group
> of spin doctors. And I especially include Barack Obama, himself, who
> is given full coverage by Fox News for every lie that he makes. My
> New Constitution includes the following MANDATE for the media:
>
> "Each medium shall respond to breaking news without considering the
> response of any other medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage
> or non coverage shall not be excused by the media response. A medium
> reporting on government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with
> detachment—being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not
> repressing thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. *** Every medium
> shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity nor bias."
>
> And… "Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be
> reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth,
> or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction
> or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news
> medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is
> prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly
> occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or
> ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as
> being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in
> any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments
> occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would
> come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> innocuous. *** No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology
> of its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses
> such job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss
> of license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> promote the ideology of management is a felony. *** No medium shall
> analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> pending election or referendum. *** Nor shall they invite others
> outside of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the
> candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
> provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
> the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
> of the referenda issues."
>
> Folks, Fox News will be required to cease running ALL of its news
> commentary shows. And if they "pick and choose" the developing news
> stories so as to be favorable to the political ideology of their
> management, Fox News Network will be closed down, permanently.
> Similarly, if Jay Leno (or Letterman) has a guest on his program and
> asks the guess "who" he or she favors in the next election, Leno must
> be fired by NBC, or such network will be closed down. Oprah Winfrey,
> as charming as she is, can no longer tout her choice(s) for public
> office. Nor can those on 'The View'. The simple reasonable principle
> behind all of this is: *** The opinions of those having high paying
> media jobs shall have no more influence on the outcomes of elections
> than the opinions of any man-on-the-street. Being the editor of this
> or that magazine isn't justification for allowing that person,
> including the George Will types or the converse, to have extra
> influence on what happens in this country, simply, because he or she
> has a syndicated column in newspapers, or etc.
>
> The Free Speech aspect concerning elections which CAN continue is the
> publishing of magazines or books that DON'T represent themselves as
> "news sources". A daily paper having any ideology, whatsoever, is
> acceptable if such never purports to be a news source, and clearly
> says that on the cover. Even reporting the 'sports scores' or
> predicting the 'weather' would be disallowed, because some people
> might subscribe just for the latter, then be badly influenced by the
> biased political commentary. It is important to note that the latter
> right to commentary regarding elections shall not allow any TV shows
> to discuss elections, because those audiences are largely captive.
> Books and magazines are purchased voluntarily. Pay-for-view shows
> that have clearly stated positions of bias would probably be
> allowable.
>
> Glenn Beck got belittled by the Rev. Al Sharpton for not making the
> 8/28 rally exactly like Beck had hinted. Sharpton continues his
> divisiveness in America by constantly insisting that Blacks are OWED
> this or that treatment. Sharpton is angry that Beck chanced to
> reserve the Lincoln Memorial on the same date that MLK made his
> incredible "I have a dream…" speech. That effectively denied Sharpton
> the venue where his own divisive statements would have had the maximum
> effect.
>
> If there is anything positive happening in this country, it is the
> diminishment of the size of the likely Black block vote for
> Democrats. Thinking Blacks (there are some of those) are smart enough
> to realize that the beef of the Tea Party Movement over our bad
> government has to do with unwise economics, not racial hatred. Blacks
> are at least 90% assimilated into our colorless American society.
> Still, many of them (unwisely) vote as a block, and complain as a
> block to "n" words, or etc,. because they know those actions have
> aided their cause. As with most group lobbies, getting fair treatment
> isn't sufficient. The new goal, in the Al Sharpton era, is to get more
> power than fairness dictates.
>
> Recently, I made the assessment that a lot of Americans are two-
> faced. The upside of that is that the majority of Americans can, in a
> very short time, decide to show their best nature. The wonderful
> movie 'Pay It Forward' highlighted how people can show their good
> sides and start to correct most things that are bad about society.
> Group biases aimed at gaining unfair advantages can cease in a single
> day IF the members of those groups will realize that their objectives
> have already been met. The 'National Rifle Association' is a powerful
> lobby that certainly has its objectives met in my New Constitution.
> To wit: "2nd Amendment: Law-abiding, peaceable Citizens shall have
> the right to keep and bear arms for sport or protection. Such may use
> appropriate action—by degrees—to counter unlawful, forced or
> threatening intrusion onto or into their private property, including:
> verbal warning; the threat of; and then the use of, deadly force, if
> necessary." Ratify my New Constitution and there won't be any need
> for Supreme Court interpretations regarding gun ownership.
>
> I've watched the Glenn Beck show long enough that I'm pretty sure why
> Beck turned pacifist. A couple of months ago, our dictator
> "President" instructed that terrorists and those threatening the
> country with violence can be shot and killed with impunity (no
> trials). Almost daily, Beck was being mentioned by Obama and other
> radical progressives as being someone promoting fear and hatred in
> this country. You could almost see Beck shaking in his tennis shoes
> at the thought he might be instigating 'violence' against government
> that could justify his being shot. He mentioned having gotten death
> threats on his shows. So, it's understandable why Beck 'got religion'
> and became non-violent. He has, effectively, opted-out of leading the
> 2nd American Revolution—bloodless or not—because of his fear of being
> killed.
>
> At the 8/28 rally, Glenn Beck supposed that there could be an "eight
> year old George Washington in the audience". That one statement told
> me that Beck is too naïve to realize that the problems with our
> "broke", broke government can be fixed in months, not years, simply by
> ratifying my TOUGH New Constitution of the United States of America!
> He supposes that ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment