How do you explain that? Paranoia?
On Jul 18, 12:45 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> The question was YOUR definition of racism. That is what is needed.
> All too often what the dictionary has as a definition and what you in
> your most un-infinite wisdom decide a word means are poles apart. What
> is YOUR definition of racism. Then there is a starting place.
>
> euwe wrote:
> > Own a dictionary, dick?
>
> > On Jul 18, 12:29 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> You are the one with the word games. I asked a simple question.
> >> Define your terms. That is supposedly the first and most important of
> >> a discussion. You are doing everything you can to evade that by
> >> throwing up any and all other comments you can. What I might think of
> >> the guy in the article has nothing to do with this until you define
> >> what YOU mean by racism. Anything else is just dust to cover up.
>
> >> euwe wrote:
>
> >>> As I said, racists like to play word games like the guy in the article
> >>> - the neo nazi, a group that dick doesn't think has anything to do
> >>> with racism.
>
> >>> On Jul 17, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> I would join you if I knew what you consider racism. You apparently
> >>>> are not interested in telling us what you consider racism to be, so I
> >>>> cannot join you in having that story speak to me as it does to you.
> >>>> Sorry. Maybe if you define your terms I can join you in your seeing
> >>>> racism. Until then, nada. In the meantime, showing stories and
> >>>> calling them racism tells me nothing at all. Define your terms or
> >>>> forget about it.
>
> >>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>> Look, you didn't see any racism in that story - that speaks loud
> >>>>> enough for me.
>
> >>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Stick to the subject. How do you define racism. Define it and I
> >>>>>> will tell you whether I support racism or not. All else is garbage.
>
> >>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>>>> And that means what with this discussion?
> >>>>>>> --------
> >>>>>>> was there anything in that article related to racism? Did you see
> >>>>>>> anything there to comment on, either positive or negative? Would you
> >>>>>>> think that was a Republican, or a liberal?
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 17, 11:22 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> And that means what with this discussion? This discussion was to do
> >>>>>>>> with whether I condemned racism and my expectation of your defining what
> >>>>>>>> you consider racism so I could respond. You are doing everything you
> >>>>>>>> can to keep from defining racism so I will not respond to your
> >>>>>>>> question. Throwing up a bunch of other stories does not change the
> >>>>>>>> basic issue of your not defining what you want me to respond to. Do
> >>>>>>>> that and we have something to discuss. Until then, you are saying
> >>>>>>>> nothing that is of the slightest interest for me to respond to.
>
> >>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 10:14 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> And you know this how. I think if they do so and you are friends, then
> >>>>>>>>>> that would reflect on you as well as on them. so I guess that would
> >>>>>>>>>> make you a racist by definition.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> but when they're alone with friends, they talk frankly about their
> >>>>>>>>>>> hate for minorities.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 8:24 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> people who are racist play word games rather than admit their racism
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anointed One,
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are absolutely right. I know from prior dealings that euwe will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> just pick and pick until he has some little point that he thinks he can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> make a big deal out of and then will talk exclusively about that while
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ignoring all the major points that you make. I am saying that if you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do not define what YOU mean by racism, then the possibilities of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> complete misunderstanding and misquoting are legion and homey just got
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tired of playing that game with euwe. It has been his MO and I think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it sucks major.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about."
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I find that just the opposite is true. When someone asks you to define
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the terms it is meant to clarify point by point to avoid being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstood. Just think what would happen to Washington if Congress
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to "define their terms", No unread obamacare, no, "we'll find out
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it happens again" wallstreet reform, Hell no Obama.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weasels and liars don't like "define the terms"..... honest men love
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 4:10 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about. I think you know what I mean. Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racism, defined in any way at all, bother you? Enough to do something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about it?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 7:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Define racism. After all we have been told that speaking of black
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> holes in the sky is racist, black holes in an office is racist,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niggardly is racist, etc. Define your terms.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does racism bother you?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:34 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are. Makes no difference to me. Seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a big point with the leftists though. They are the ones always
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a point about it. The rest of us have long ago agreed with MLK
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his rainbow ideal of life. I don't know what the leftists want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except to divide the nation up into little groups based on race, sex,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> color, age, national origin, etc and then try to make up special
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitlements for all of them so they can claim they care!! And then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the election forget all the above until the next election. At
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least that sure seems to be their MO. And then claim anyone who does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not support them is racist/sexist/ageist/whatever-ist. You are just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following your latest talking points from the 8:30 AM call.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you anti-racist, dick?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you could even write this garbage tells us just how racist
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are. You think that blaming the other guy as if he would do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what you would do in any circumstance is a good tactic. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is is a real cry for help from your guts to put you out of your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misery. Let's just hope that the public is smart enough to do just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this November.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarcastic American! wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, July 15, 2010
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How 2 b a racist without being one
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was more confused than a libertarian who didn t know the definition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Laissez Faire economics due to his Franco phobia.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all know racism is wrong. Even the Conservatives know this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So how do you get around this? Conservatives know that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International Jewish Bankers created all their problems. But hey! Say
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in public and you are then branded as an anti-Semitic monster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those damn skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis make you blush because they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> express what in is in the
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment