Dear Tico: Know this: Your socialist opinion about my New
Constitution isn't apt in the "NEW" USA where the promotion of
socialism in any medium, including this news group, is either a felony
or treason, depending on the severity. — J. A. A. —
On May 28, 5:20 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then as any reasonable citizen that has asked for and never received a
> full copy of your "new constitution" (so I can "easily understand" it)
> and as a citizen of reasonable temperament speaking to the creator of
> a "government document" I would like to ask why you are so "
> adversarial" every time someone asks for a copy....
>
> You sir are in violation of your own document.... get a rope!!!!
>
Oh? How so? — J. A. A. —
>
> On May 28, 1:56 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Dear plainolamerican: Well said! "What do you call a heavy chain on
> > the bottom of the ocean with a thousand lawyers attached? Answer: A
> > GOOD START!" My new constitution will castrate the entire profession
> > known as lawyers! That screwed-up profession dominates the House,
> > Senate, the Executive Office and the Justice Department. But no
> > more! My New Constitution will limit the number of lawyers (or any
> > other profession for that matter) working in government to be no more
> > than 20%. And my New Constitution will mandate that no lawyer, ever
> > again, can be employed by any business (such as banks and big
> > corporations) where they try to force relationships to be
> > adversarial. And my N. Const. will strike down any supposed contract
> > that isn't easily understood by people of average background. And it
> > will mandate that those harmed by any business get quick and
> > reasonable amends without requiring that anyone get a lawyer and sue
> > anyone. In short. I eliminate 75% of the reasons lawyers find work!
> > Lastly, if even one lawyer seeks to go into public office when there
> > are already 20% of those in that same branch who are lawyers, never
> > again will any public-connected funding be available for sending any
> > person to any God Damned law school! Are you listening, Tico? Ha,
> > ha, HA! — NoEinstein —
>
> > On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > petition
> > > ---
> > > oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> > > no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> > > freedom
>
> > > On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > > > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > > > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > > > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment