Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Re: New Baseline for discussion

*      The root of the evil... lay not in corruption but in the system which bred it, the alliance between industrialists and politicians which produced benefits in the form of tariffs, public lands, and federal subsidies: Samuel P Hays

An excellent post by JD , Strategic parameters on global economy is a baseline for discussion for establishing global peace and stability. My Global Peace Mega Projects is based on similar line using accountability and rule of Law for protection of global investors and global trading routes. Wholesallers in mafia /corruption houses are getting too much of commission.

http://www.naymz.com/profile/repscoreLeaderboard.action ,

Telecom Engineer

·         Telecommunication Engineer ,  Your Rank: 4 out of 19

·         System engineering Your Rank: 26 out of 179,

·         MIS  Your Rank: 19 out of 178

·         Teaching Your Rank: 71 out of 467

·       Project management Your Rank: 871 out of 7004

·       Security Your Rank: 380 out of 3322,

Zonal Manager 

·         Zonal managerYour Rank: 1 out of 10

·         International marketing Your Rank: 150 out of 816

·         human resources Your Rank: 182 out of 2301

·         Journalist Your Rank: 59 out of 598

·         Planning, Your Rank: 841 out of 6026

·         Audit & Accounts ,: Your Rank: 3 out of 16

·         PakistanYour Rank: 50 out of 1041

President TPI Inc

·         Code Breaker  : 1 of 1

·         Delphi Technique 1of 1

·         Cryptanalyst Your Rank: 2 out of 2

·         Cryptology Your Rank: 1 out of 4

·         Predicted solutions Your Rank: 1 out of 1

·         Forecasting &predictions Your Rank: 77 out of 627

·         Hypothesis Your Rank: 4 out of 5

·         Archaeology Your Rank: 3 out of 9

·         Solutions Your Rank: 507 out of 6674

Manager Asia WGJG : Peace & Security

·        Law & Consitution

·         Legal researcher Your Rank: 2 out of 5

·         Accountability : Your Rank: 20 out of 82,

·         International law Your Rank: 35 out of 153

·         Judge : Your Rank: 9 out of 129

·         Political science Your Rank: 8 out of 46

·         Religious Your Rank: 4 out of 36,

·         Interogation Your Rank: 1 out of 1

·         Global peace Your Rank: 3 out of 3

·         Dispute resolution Your Rank: 17 out of 65

·         Human rights Your Rank: 10 out of 39

·         Revenue corruption Your Rank: 1 out of1

·         Historian 6 of 35,

·         Resolution of disputes Your Rank: 1 out of 1

·        Chairman Social Welfare  

·         Social work Your Rank: 13 out of 47

·         Medical treatment Your Rank: 2 out of 8

·         Medicines Your Rank: 1 out of 13,

·         Psychiatrist Your Rank: 2 out of 39

·         P psychologist Your Rank: 46 out of 289,

·         Nuclear engineering Your Rank: 9 out of 28

·         Culture Your Rank: 70 out of 271\

Strategist Your Rank: 140 out of 781

Mathematical modelling Your Rank: 3 out of 6

Hypothesis Your Rank: 4 out of 5,

Operational analysis Your Rank: 14 out of 76 ,

Ethnoarchaeology Your Rank: 1 out of 1

Detective Your Rank: 10 out of 48,

President IT Genitics 

E lectronics engineering Your Rank: 7 out of 72,

Electrical engineering Your Rank: 17 out of 145

IT Your Rank: 827 out of 10700 ,

Research Your Rank: 448 out of 5061

Writer Your Rank: 227 out of 2157,

http://www.linkedin.com/in/nazeerbhatti52  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nazeerbhatti52/es  

http://www.facebook.com/people/Nazeer-Chaudhry/100001466267372 http://nazeerchaudhry.blogspot.com/ http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Nazeer_Ahmad_Chaudhry http://www.naymz.com/nazeerchaudhry-6e1c6?networkMessage.uid=yvor http://twitter.com/nazeeraahmadch http://nazeerchaudhry.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?orderby=updated

Contribution : http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Special:Contributions&target=User:Nazeer%20Ahmad%20Chaudhry&offset=450

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/User:Nazeer_Ahmad_Chaudhry

Ending Terrorism: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ending-terrorism/

Human Rights: http://soleilmavis.ning.com/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kMD9ONVk38

http://peacepink.ning.com/profile/NazeerAhmadChaudhry101

Manager Asia : WGJG http://www.globalunityharmony.com/apps/auth/login?why=pw&next=apps%2Ffriends%2Findex 

http://www.xing.com/profile/Nazeer_Chaudhry

 

Global Solution of Problems : http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/global-solution-of-problems/

http://www.xing.com/profile/Nazeer_Chaudhry

  

On 21 February 2012 00:08, JDR <jdrwarhawk@gmail.com> wrote:
Rather than all this left vs right, Dem vs Repub, Conserv vs Liberal
bantering, where one of two choices must be made - and thus limiting
the discussion and possibilities, and dividing us, I would like to
suggest ways we can talk outside this arena.

I am interested in what discussion may come from the following
economic scenarios:
First, a good or service is offered, which is purchased by a
consumer.  What is an acceptable amount of "profit" that should be
made?  Should there be any limit to what the "seller" can make?  If
someone can produce a good or service for say $1 and sell it for
$1,000 - is that okay?  If it is not, then what would be an acceptable
amount of "profit"?  Let's use percent, rather than any specific
dollar amount - so they we can talk about any scenario, not just the
example I listed.  For example, a 50% profit would mean having sold
the item for $1.50

The next question then is what should happen to the profit?  I am
talking profit, after all expenses are paid for, beyond funds needed
to keep the business running.  How should the profit be split up - or
- redistributed/ or not?  Again, let's talk numbers (percentages)
here, not political rantings.  For example, should 100% stay with the
owner?  Should it be split amongst all who work for the "company or
ownership"?  If so, who should get what?

Remember, if we stick to using percentages, what we answer to question
1 shouldn't impact our thoughts/answers on question 2.  Some might
feel differently about $1mil in profits vs. $10 in profits - but by
using percentage, it's the same difference.  Percentage should level
the playing field.

Lastly, we shouldn't need to note our political leanings here, just
numbers.  I feel that by using numbers (something we should all be
able to agree on -not necessarily the final number, but just what a
number is - a value) maybe we can come closer to finding agreement or
compromise....vs using words to keep us divided.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment