To date, IN ANY STATE, there is no discrimination against homosexuals living as a couple, that a few legal documents, such as a living will, a last will, and documents allowing for the sharing of of financial portfolios and accounts would remedy. This fact in and of itself, establishes my point, that there is a secular movement in an attempt to force mainstream America to accept "gay marriage" as being the only recourse to allow homosexuals to be "equal". In fact, this is nothing but a ploy to try and force the gay lifestyle upon Americans as being "normal"; and anyone who opposes such a radical change in the definition of "Marriage" are homophobic.
What you have are ADVANTAGES bestowed on SOME covenants while others are not provided them.
If history is a guide, this will be a LOSER to those wanting to 'protect' marriage (whatever that means).
The problem with DOMA is that it circumvents AIVS1C1 (among other problems of lacking constitutional authority/power).
Those wanting to 'protect' marriage (whatever that means) would be more prudent in their efforts were they seeking to REMOVE Government from the equation rather than seeking to use it as the club.
Regard$,
--MJ
No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him. -- Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816.
No comments:
Post a Comment