Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
debates.
---
Iran's nukes are not America's business and no more of a threat than
Israel, Russia or China nukes.
Don't be so afraid.
On Jan 16, 8:32 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than Crazy Uncle Ron's recent claims, (because Crazy Uncle Ron at
> first beleived that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, but didn't seem
> alarmed about it, and when this was pointed out to PlainOl, who also didn't
> care, he said, "Cite examples" which I did. Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
> Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
> debates.
>
> Where are you getting that there is no evidence that Iran is not attempting
> to make a nuclear weapon? From Panetta's recent statement?
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/damning-report-on-iran-shin...
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8866022/Ira...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is not a single credible report that says that they are. All the
> > reports that are referred to claim a certainty that Iran is in the business
> > of processing radioactive material solely for use in their Nuclear reactors
> > and medical uses. There is no proof (not a shred) that there is anything
> > else going on. Paul is on THAT committee. As opposed to all others he is
> > the only candidate that would have access to all the evidence.
>
> > Iran has a whole lot of oil... they have no refineries... They export
> > crude and import gas, oil, and other oil products... that is why Paul says
> > they don't even have enough gas for their cars...They don't.
>
> > The USA has even more oil than Iran.... why in the hell are they using and
> > refining the nuclear process??
>
> > Do I want someone that looks at and assesses all the facts before
> > screaming for war on unfounded bases. Why, yes, I do; if speaking of Paul.
>
> > If the question is about Monkey man from Iran... then, No, I do not;
> > fortunately there is not a shred of credible evidence that this will or can
> > take place.
>
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other
> >> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking
> >> nuclear power?
>
> >> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon?
>
> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> Please read the word COULD>>>>>>>
>
> >>> Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
> >>> preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
> >>> security."
> >>> "If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
> >>> is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
> >>> a nuclear weapon.
> >>> A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
> >>> over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
> >>> And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
> >>> a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
>
> >>> There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
> >>> positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
> >>> it.
>
> >>> On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> >>> > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> >>> > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> >>> > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a
> >>> fair,
> >>> > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul
> >>> > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> >>> > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which
> >>> turns
> >>> > out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> >>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <
> >>> keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and
> >>> re-read
> >>> > > it.
>
> >>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> >>> > >> misinformed
> >>> > >> ---
> >>> > >> again, what I've written are facts:
> >>> > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an
> >>> 'important'
> >>> > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> >>> > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> >>> > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> >>> > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash
> >>> allegedly
> >>> > >> showed
> >>> > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to
> >>> Jeremy
> >>> > >> > Bash?
>
> >>> > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to
> >>> stay
> >>> > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> >>> > >> nevertheless
> >>> > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating
> >>> their
> >>> > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> >>> > >> misinformation
> >>> > >> > as the truth.
>
> >>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> >>> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> >>> > >> > > ---
> >>> > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP.
> >>> > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron
> >>> Paul
> >>> > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt
> >>> whomever
> >>> > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed
> >>> bias
> >>> > >> > > against Paul.
>
> >>> > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her
> >>> husband
> >>> > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the
> >>> Secretary
> >>> > >> > > of Defense.
>
> >>> > >> > > some don't forget
>
> >>> > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> >>> > >> > > > **
> >>> > >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> >>> > >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> >>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-...
>
> >>> > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire
> >>> primary, Ron
> >>> > >> Paul
> >>> > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> >>> > >> presidential
> >>> > >> > > > campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in
> >>> second
> >>> > >> place,
> >>> > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> >>> > >> supporters at a
> >>> > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last
> >>> night
> >>> > >> was a
> >>> > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the
> >>> real
> >>> > >> > > > conversation."
>
> >>> > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> >>> > >> 76-year-old
> >>> > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul
> >>> said
> >>> > >> after
> >>> > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted
> >>> to
> >>> > >> thank
> >>> > >> > > the
> >>> > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> >>> > >> > > > He continued:
>
> >>> > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> >>> > >> what--what is
> >>> > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be
> >>> > >> ignoring
> >>> > >> > > so
> >>> > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> >>> > >> fascinating
> >>> > >> > > when
> >>> > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it
> >>> could be
> >>> > >> in the
> >>> > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of
> >>> have to
> >>> > >> chuckle
> >>> > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one
> >>> > >> thing they
> >>> > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status
> >>> quo
> >>> > >> of this
> >>> > >> > > > country.
>
> >>> > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul
> >>> was
> >>> > >> forced
> >>> > >> > > to cut
> >>> > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob
> >>> of more
> >>> > >> than
> >>> > >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day
> >>> and a
> >>> > >> half,
> >>> > >> > > to
> >>> > >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters,
> >>> who are
> >>> > >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible
> >>> > >> > > atmosphere,"
> >>> > >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement.
>
> >>> > >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting
> >>> out
> >>> > >> early
> >>> > >> > > from
> >>> > >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off,
> >>> cutting
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're
> >>> > >> stopping."
>
> >>> > >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg
> >>> > >> > > > 36KViewDownload
>
> >>> > >> > > --
> >>> > >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> > >> > > For options & help seehttp://
> >>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> > >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> > >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> > >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>> > >> --
> >>> > >> Thanks for
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment