This is a common conceptual error among statist
It was funny to watch both Chris Matthews and Chris Wallace interview Ron Paul and worry that if pot was legal we would have people driving while high or using drugs while baby sitting
And you old ladies worry that tobacco must be regulated else people will get minors to smoke
It shows your retarded state controlled intellects and atrophied imaginations
If tobacco or pot or salt or fat or heroin or anything else was legal to sell or buy with no regulation it would still be illegal to neglect or abuse children. It would still be illegal to trespass on a road or sidewalk and use it while violating the owners safety rules
On Monday, September 26, 2011, Jreed62254@aol.com <jreed62254@aol.com> wrote:
> I don't think anyone disagrees with regulating the tobacco and smoking as much as they think it's over regulated. I think they should be able to ban smoking to minors, just as they do alcohol. I think they go to far when they inter into a private business and decide that your patrons can't smoke in your establishment or home or backyard. Yes, before you get your horses all riled up, there were attempts at stopping people from smoking their own back yard and home if you have children at home or in the car.
>
>
>
> Never pet a dog that's on fire and never fry bacon naked.
> America First
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GeriOhMy <GeriOhMy@aol.com>
> To: P00FUGO <P00FUGO@aol.com>; cbhensler <cbhensler@aol.com>; microdhses <microdhses@gmail.com>
> Cc: conner2or <conner2or@aol.com>; HogPod22 <HogPod22@aol.com>; Scorpi0Lady1 <Scorpi0Lady1@aol.com>; vbboyd123456 <vbboyd123456@yahoo.com>; sergeantfreedom <sergeantfreedom@gmail.com>; Salemst <Salemst@aol.com>; AudioLaw <AudioLaw@aol.com>; lenaprimeaux <lenaprimeaux@bellsouth.net>; onepocketplayer <onepocketplayer@gmail.com>; beau <beau@gcbussu.com>; paul.dunk <paul.dunk@hotmail.com>; konola <konola@bresnan.net>; echos70 <echos70@aol.com>; kol.altai <kol.altai@aol.com>; amancin <amancin@aol.com>; gods1stwitness <gods1stwitness@gmail.com>; generalcongress <generalcongress@constitutionalgov.us>; mccloediii <mccloediii@dslextreme.com>; mckinneyhunter <mckinneyhunter@aol.com>; postherguy <postherguy@aol.com>; fkerogen <fkerogen@aol.com>; lascoti <lascoti@aol.com>; carpbear <carpbear@sbcglobal.net>; apassaro <apassaro@crosslink.net>; clayton.purdy <clayton.purdy@gmail.com>; kmcgee3 <kmcgee3@aol.com>; dijon50 <dijon50@aol.com>; gjorgejimenez <gjorgejimenez@aol.com>; drecpa <drecpa@aol.com>; rblaine_1941 <rblaine_1941@yahoo.com>; sergeantalvarez <sergeantalvarez@gmail.com>; chirho33 <chirho33@aol.com>; srking <srking@compuserve.com>; colony14 <colony14@gmail.com>; maximus475 <maximus475@cox.net>; sherrydawn06 <sherrydawn06@aol.com>; jpassgo <jpassgo@aol.com>; elliajt <elliajt@aol.com>; whatnowgop <whatnowgop@yahoo.com>; harleymanfl <harleymanfl@cox.net>; jreed62254 <jreed62254@aol.com>; sjmark <sjmark@fuse.net>; baywife <baywife@aol.com>; ladywindsor1 <ladywindsor1@aol.com>; jmach499 <jmach499@hotmail.com>; evedemian <evedemian@verizon.net>; stevenshamrak.e <stevenshamrak.e@gmail.com>; churi1001 <churi1001@gmail.com>; rgellar000 <rgellar000@yahoo.com>; murray1833 <murray1833@aol.com>; marckie13 <marckie13@aol.com>; mike_stathas <mike_stathas@yahoo.com>; bern30_06 <bern30_06@hotmail.com>; brewwwww <brewwwww@runbox.com>; cougarden <cougarden@msn.com>; edpals2 <edpals2@yahoo.com>; freelancer514 <freelancer514@aol.com>; gaylesafe <gaylesafe@aol.com>; hemilight <hemilight@hotmail.com>; hillbillytrailer <hillbillytrailer@aol.com>; ilester <ilester@shawbleckner.com>; jmills9786 <jmills9786@aol.com>; joelrachmiel <joelrachmiel@aol.com>; oldpolitico <oldpolitico@cs.com>; predatorbc <predatorbc@aol.com>; rockysma1 <rockysma1@msn.com>; sandysbeau <sandysbeau@aol.com>; sirguy2003 <sirguy2003@ameritech.net>; lfeverest <lfeverest@yahoo.com>; d3869 <d3869@sbcglobal.net>; jimibee22 <jimibee22@aol.com>; twelve43 <twelve43@comcast.net>; trggerhppy13 <trggerhppy13@aol.com>; dagoodguys <dagoodguys@yahoo.com>; jmach499 <jmach499@verizon.net>; patriot451 <patriot451@gmail.com>; sfrenegademanboy <sfrenegademanboy@aol.com>; vbrown1072 <vbrown1072@aol.com>; wakeupwayup <wakeupwayup@aol.com>; majors.bruce <majors.bruce@gmail.com>; vandoran.heather <vandoran.heather@yahoo.com>; jeri006 <jeri006@aol.com>; john_rice <john_rice@zoom-dsl.com>; justinsgma <justinsgma@aol.com>; pasharabit <pasharabit@verizon.net>; info <info@sarahpac.com>; algae5636 <algae5636@aol.com>; majorhart <majorhart@sbcglobal.net>; judyfuller007 <judyfuller007@aol.com>; ea.richards <ea.richards@att.net>
> Sent: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 6:01 am
> Subject: Re: DS role model for youth, I 'just said no'. and it worked..2
>
> those who smoke are using the most addictive powerful -but legal narcotic out there-and sadly it is that way because of the ingredients added by tobacco companies to help make them addictive. those same ingredients - from gun powder to keeping the lit to poisons like arsenic.
> if people were to smoke pure tobacco they would not smoke -it is to putrid and it would also not be addictive.
> then the FACT that second hand smoke is nearly as lethal as the smoker's inhaling in the first place,
> the bottom line- when smokers are done fulfilling their right to use the drug- they throw the remnants on the streets at intersections, set forest fires and set their own beds on fire- perhaps the only justice.
>
> to think the tobacco companies would curtail sales to minors on their own- or put warnings on the product without government regulations making them do so is to think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president of the PTA.
>
> denying they are targeting children in third world countries to keep their profit margin up is pro corporation ignorance .
>
> In a message dated 9/26/2011 10:38:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time, P00FUGO@aol.com writes:
>
> YES
>
> In a message dated 9/26/2011 10:37:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, cbhensler@aol.com writes:
>
> you are hopeless, why are you fighting so hard top protect these entities at the expense of actual human beings? why? Yes or no question....do you think the tobacco companies/lobby targeted our youth? Yes or no. Do you think they mislead the population on the whole about how dangerous cigarettes are and the effects of secondhand smoke and what the actual ingredients were in their product? yes or no.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: D S <microdhses@gmail.com>
> To: cbhensler <cbhensler@aol.com>
> Cc: conner2or <conner2or@aol.com>; HogPod22 <HogPod22@aol.com>; GeriOhMy <GeriOhMy@aol.com>; Scorpi0Lady1 <Scorpi0Lady1@aol.com>; vbboyd123456 <vbboyd123456@yahoo.com>; sergeantfreedom <sergeantfreedom@gmail.com>; Salemst <Salemst@aol.com>; AudioLaw <AudioLaw@aol.com>; lenaprimeaux <lenaprimeaux@bellsouth.net>; onepocketplayer <onepocketplayer@gmail.com>; beau <beau@gcbussu.com>; paul.dunk <paul.dunk@hotmail.com>; konola <konola@bresnan.net>; echos70 <echos70@aol.com>; kol.altai <kol.altai@aol.com>; amancin < --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment