> LARGER IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES BUDGET CRISIS:
>
> It is amazing how backward United States politics can sometimes
> become.
FINALLY, someone willing to move the debt BACKWARDS!
>When Congress has to pay debt & fund adequate programs &
> services, it bogs down in revenue arguments.
It isn't congress who pays, we the people pay
>Actually its lawful duty
> is to adequacy of provision, not simply provision, of whatever is
> determined to be necessary to the "general welfare" of the United
> States.
Now THERE is a broad term, and I bet you define it way different than
I do.
> The founding fathers of
> the Constitutional republic, educated as they were in what could be
> known, and was considered relevant, at that time, wisely thought it
> best to understand "general welfare" as being what is both necessary &
> sufficient to assure the basic ideals of the Declaration of
> Independence.
Emphasis on the word "basic"
>The United States is understood clearly as "we the
> people", meaning all of the people, leaving no legal room to leave
> anyone out in any discriminatory or prejudicial manner. That
> pertaining to the enabling of the preservation of life, liberty, and
> the pursuit of happiness of every person, by whatever means necessary
> to that effect.
You added "by whatever means necessary", don't lie
> If something were imperiling lives, reasonable
> liberties, or the chance to pursuit of happiness of any Americans,
> then it was necessary to find sufficient government remedy to that
> cause, by means of government expenditures on what would preserve the
> lofty ideals enshrined in the founding documents of the Republic.
The government debt is imperiling lives
>Much of that seems far too forgotten,
I would say "twisted beyond recognition" by people like you
> Cutting programs and services, as a means to "balancing the budget"
> and "reducing the debt" is essentially backward thinking.
Only to IDIOTS who can't grasp basic math and basic economics
> In that intent was a socialism, meant to provide for all Americans
> equally,
Bullshit
> America's socialism has claimed that Marxism is flawed, in contrast to
> its own system, based on its own Constitution, but the results of that
> claim now remain to be proven
They all failed, what proof do you need?
>& some in the world are predicting
> America's failure with Marxism, and Marxist influenced ideology
> winning out in the larger theater of international, globalized
> politics.
Not a chance in hell
> Robert Ezergailis
> Hamilton, Canada
Stay in Canada, mind your own business
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment