you from this point on. I don't have time to argue over your
worthless points of view on anything. I will of course continue to
reply to those who have a considerate tone, and a genuine interest in
understanding what I have done for the good of the American People.
Long may an America, that is consistent with the ideals of the
Founding Fathers, survive. — John A. Armistead — Patriot —
>
On May 7, 10:58 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:53 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > Dear Moderator Mark: Some of the arguments on other groups have been
> > going on for years.
>
> How nice for them, just how does that apply here??
>
> > Not a week goes by that the same explanations are
> > made over and over.
>
> Explanations are just fine, how does that apply to your trolling and
> spamming??
>
> > Precisely worded material, like my New
> > Constitution, cannot be paraphrased.
>
> *Your tripe has precise words but is definitely NOT precisely worded. *
>
> > Anyone reading the same thing
> > ten times can find something new and important with each reading.
>
> Not according to you... there is but ONE definition... yours and ANY
> disagreement with the worlds premier "Patriot" is received with cries of
> "Communist/Socialist" the very things your supposed super document
> promotes.....right down to Stalinesque systems of denouncements on the
> street.
>
> > Only a socialist-communist like you, would be offended reading a
> > document that will outlaw your kind in the USA.
>
> See, it proves point above. Absolute Stalinism.
>
> > So, stay a Tico.
>
> You say that as though there is a choice. There is not. (Look it up before
> thinking or saying something really stupid....AGAIN)
>
> > The
> > cost of living down there is low enough you should be able to survive
> > on a moderator's stipend.
>
> Thanks to the US policy of simply printing more cash (and idiots like you
> DOING nothing about it) to pay its bills the Dollar has lost about 20% of it
> value outside the US (read in the real world). The US is now just as
> affordable for someone from outside.
>
> And to end this...... Keep *Spamming* the board with something that is
> simply an invention (and a poor one at that) of you mind while simply *
> trolling* to get your blog search numbers up and I will simply delete the
> thread.
>
> Keep advertising your book(s) in your posts and the thread will disappear.
>
> *LAST Warning.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > — J. A. A. —
>
> > On May 6, 8:40 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > noeinstein,
>
> > > Of course I am safe from prosecution...I have not come close to breaking
> > any
> > > law. It has NOTHING to do with my location. I can also NOT be fired.
> > > Periodically copying identical material from identical sources with near
> > or
> > > identical comments is the very definition of *SPAM. *
> > > ***
> > > *Your supposed "reason" for spamming is not relevant and is obviously
> > more
> > > important to you than anyone else.
>
> > > I could care less if its your "new constitution" or a treatise on
> > scratching
> > > your ass... spam is spam is spam.
>
> > > As to people taking umbrage with what YOU and you ALONE alone call an
> > > attack... they have pills and psychiatrists for that... this is not the
> > > place..maybe a little inpatient care for a while....seek help.
>
> > > As to the rules governing this Forum.... repeated use of it and TROLLING
> > > just to keep the thread alive so it drives search engines to your
> > personal
> > > blog through keywords is SPAMMING....
>
> > > Keep it up and the thread you have been so careful to groom will
> > disappear.
>
> > > As to your unabashed advertising of your "Book".... that too, has been
> > > stopped. there is an area supplied on our "pages" section for such tripe.
>
> > > Play by the rules.... no lobbyists allowed.... no unsolicited ads for
> > > personal gain...
>
> > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > Dear Mark: You may be "safe" from prosecution, but not safe from
> > > > being fired. Most of the readers I'm attracting are conservatives in
> > > > the USA. Few of those take kindly to your attacking me for
> > > > periodically copying parts of my precisely-worded New Constitution.
> > > > That document isn't something that can be paraphrased, repeatedly.
> > > > I'm sure you would enjoy discussing each little point. But like I've
> > > > told J. Ashley, not one word of my document is in flux. — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On May 4, 5:11 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Dear Einstein,
>
> > > > > I fully comply with "Google, Costa Rica" and WTO rules and in no way
> > am I
> > > > > subject to ANY part of your governments rules, regulations, or
> > > > Constitution.
> > > > > Just how ignorant are you that you would think so >??
>
> > > > > I could care less that Google is a US Corporation... It is also a
> > Costa
> > > > > Rican S.A. and those are the rules that cover me and those ONLY.
> > Please
> > > > read
> > > > > OUR constitution.
>
> > > > > All political points of view are accepted here.... we just do not
> > accept
> > > > > SPAM regardless of how it is cloaked.
>
> > > > > Your civil rights are exactly what MY constitution says they are at
> > MY
> > > > ISP
> > > > > address. Welcome to the world!!!!!!
>
> > > > > If "wringing the neck" continues to be a source of ad nausea SPAM the
> > > > thread
> > > > > will be shut down and removed.
>
> > > > > In short, you are on a WORLD forum.... NOT a USA forum..... get used
> > to
> > > > it.
>
> > > > > The posters here are not stupid nor are they ignorant.
> > > > > Constant repetition is a standard tool of the communist/socialist
> > left
> > > > and
> > > > > you, more than anyone else seem to be perfectly comfortable using
> > it....
> > > > I
> > > > > wonder why.
>
> > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:45 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Mark: It's one thing to enjoy reading different points of
> > view.
> > > > > > It's another one, entirely, to use your unlimited response time to
> > > > > > attack, often by TONE, the ideas of others. Though you are in
> > Costa
> > > > > > Rica, you aren't above having to conform to the Free Speech
> > > > > > requirements of the US Constitution. Google is, first and
> > foremost, a
> > > > > > US corporation. When you violate MY civil rights, Google becomes
> > > > > > responsible. Political Forum bragged that all political points of
> > > > > > view are accepted. When you cited me for rightfully demanding that
> > > > > > Barack Obama be made to account (hang by the neck until dead) for
> > his
> > > > > > anti-America actions, you sided with the LEFT,
> > socialist-communists.
> > > > > > You show yourself to have been using your... "moderator" job to
> > > > > > promote your personal political objectives. I don't think...
> > "that"
> > > > > > was part of your job description. I highly recommend that you just
> > > > > > fade into the woodwork, like Keith has tended to do. The
> > readership
> > > > > > of "Wringing-the-neck... " isn't going up because you keep popping
> > > > > > in. — J. A. Armistead —
>
> > > > > > On May 3, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > Einstein... here is your latest post.... it did not post when
> > > > > > > moderated. I have checked and there are indeed large portions of
> > your
> > > > > > > former posts missing... our local moderators did NOT do that. If
> > you
> > > > > > > check though you will find that each section of your constitution
> > > > that
> > > > > > > was posted is still there at least ONCE. Gee, I warned you
> > against
> > > > > > > spam... Talk to your buddies at Google...ONLY they can do that,
> > and
> > > > it
> > > > > > > is an auto response accomplished within the servers to save
> > space.
>
> > > > > > > As to my "lowly" "job" here... I enjoy reading different points
> > of
> > > > > > > view and am not so stupid that I need things CONSTANTLY repeated
> > to
> > > > > > > me; neither are the other posters.
>
> > > > > > > Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The
> > > > > > > Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful.
> > > > > > > (Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has
> > monkeys
> > > > > > > in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international
> > peace
> > > > > > > negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of
> > trying
> > > > > > > to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you
> > that
> > > > > > > none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from
> > my
> > > > > > > New Constitution—so that more and more people can understand what
> > I
> > > > > > > have done on their behalf—to be "spam". If the only thing that
> > > > > > > 'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what
> > everyone
> > > > > > > on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would
> > tire
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are
> > > > > > > first-
> > > > > > > time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New
> > > > > > > Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the
> > adjunct
> > > > > > > block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There
> > are
> > > > > > > many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the
> > lives
> > > > > > > of average Americans better.
>
> > > > > > > It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a
> > fall-
> > > > > > > from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group
> > isn't
> > > > > > > part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am
> > sympathetic to
> > > > > > > the computer storage problems associated with active posts.
> > Several
> > > > > > > months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith
> > popped-in
> > > > > > > sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to
> > defend...
> > > > > > > socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up,
> > because
> > > > > > > those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding
> > what I
> > > > > > > was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would
> > be
> > > > > > > for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang
> > > > > > > around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied
> > > > > > > below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off"
> > tone
> > > > > > > and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a
> > > > > > > Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA,
> > if
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment