"Political Forum" probably has more drop-in readers than any personal
blog. Also, Political Forum sends out a list of the most active
posts. After people see... "Wringing-the-neck... " enough times, they
get curious and start reading. I know that it's not as important the
number of readers I reach as the 'quality' of readers. Over the past
year I've given Glenn Beck dozens of opportunities to say: "Those we
suppose are representing us in Washington, willfully, violate their
sworn oats to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. Every
time the Democrats vote for this or that social program, which steals
from the workers to give to the non workers, they violate the most
basic premise of the Constitution, which is: That our Government is a
Representative REPUBLIC. Socialism or communism, in any form, are the
antithesis of the Constitution, and any one in Congress who votes
along those lines is a CRIMINAL. Barack Obama, the Manchurian
Candidate, swore to the same oath, but he has only pushed to turn this
country socialist or communist from day one. By not taking his oath
seriously, Barack Obama is guilty of capital TREASON, as is Chief
Justice John G. Robert's, Jr. who was so shallow as to believe that
sworn oaths are just part of the Washington RITUAL, commonly
disregarded. The majority of what happens in Washington is
unconstitutional and is thus criminal. I, for one, can't stand idly
by while the USA fails because of socialism. The criminals in
Washington as well as those at Fox News should all be arrested!" —
John A. Armistead —
On May 3, 10:56 pm, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Einstein,
>
> Why don't you have your own blog entitled "Wringing-
> the neck ofemptyritual" ?
>
> *************************************************************************** *****************************************
> On May 1, 8:28 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: I've posted my various essays, separately, under the apt Title
> > Lines. In order to make all of those be easily locatable by you
> > readers, I have subsequently added each one, like 'replies to myself'
> > under this "folder post", Wringing-the-Neck ofEmptyRitual. When I
> > attempted to do that... again, I am angered to learn that someone at
> > Google has deleted all of my "collective" essays which include 85% of
> > my New Constitution. If the deletion of "duplicate" files is Google's
> > Objective, they should have removed the separately-named, and lesser
> > read, New Posts, but RETAINED the collective posts that most of my
> > readers would like to be able to see in ONE LOCATION. Below, is my
> > most recent, and crucially important, post directed to the US Secret
> > Service.
>
> > Building Obama's Gallowshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ca...
>
> > The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62...
> > +in+the+'Corn'+of+po
>
> > On Apr 1, 2:29 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Talk, alone, can't save the US economy and social order.
>
> > > This week Glenn Beck compared Judaism and Islam. He's right that Jews
> > > are less harsh in dealing with 'prohibited' activities than Muslims.
> > > But, apparently, Beck hasn't considered the "hidden dangers" posed by
> > > the Jews in Israel that hurt the chances the world can avoid humanity-
> > > threatening conflicts. To wit: Following WWII, and the admittedly
> > > terrible Holocaust, Jews were a race without a nation. Over the ages
> > > Jews had had legitimate claim to much of the Holy Land. But that land
> > > had since ceded to those of the Muslim faith. By force of armed
> > > conflict, Jews confiscated the land of Muslims without fair
> > > compensation. Though they had the 'nation' they so desired, it was a
> > > nation obtained by immoral acts, including murder, covetousness and
> > > grand theft. In "celebration" of the new nation of Israel, the USA
> > > formed an alliance to protect Israel from armed aggression. Isn't it
> > > ironic that our country had not considered it… "worthy" to come to the
> > > aid of those Muslims driven from the Holy Land?
>
> > > Because the US regularly sides with Jewish crooks and uses our
> > > military might to neutralize those who are only seeking justice, the
> > > USA has become a despised nation. Our capitalist successes have made
> > > us look like crooks in those realms, too. Thousands of Americans have
> > > died and are dying in the wars being fought. And perhaps millions of
> > > Americans, and that many more of our allies, are now living in fear of
> > > terrorism… Such would NOT be the case if Jews hadn't felt "entitled"
> > > to be crooks because of the Holocaust. True to form, Jews take every
> > > opportunity for selfish gain, without considering the morality of
> > > their actions.
>
> > > Muslims deserve to be treated fairly. Understandably, the nation of
> > > Israel is an affront to the moral sensibilities of Muslims. My book,
> > > "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity", touts how FAIR
> > > capitalist successes—evenly spread throughout all the peoples of the
> > > world—can foster world peace, harmony and prosperity. Such successes
> > > can be more profound than ever experienced by the vast majority of
> > > Muslims. *** As I see it, Israel has a moral obligation to help
> > > foster capitalist successes within Muslim nations. Unless they
> > > willingly do so, the world will remain just hours away from a world
> > > war more terrible than anyone can imagine, and more terrible than any
> > > of the 'punishments' Muslims use on those breaking their rules—beyond
> > > which Glenn Beck, apparently, has not seen.
>
> > > Instead of the trillions of dollars being spent to defend Israel and
> > > to fight their wars for them, that money should be spent to equitably
> > > turn Israel into a model two-race nation. That's just a concept, mind
> > > you. I can envision an Architectural Master Plan that layers and
> > > weaves quality working and living spaces on the limited land
> > > available. Holy places common to both religions should become neutral
> > > territory, with wise controlled-access being allowed for all who
> > > respect the sanctity of the spaces. Where there are now rock piles,
> > > there should become gardens! The goal should be to once again make
> > > Israel a safe destination for those interested in religious history.
> > > The Jewish Temple, at least partially, should be reconstructed, NOT as
> > > an affront to those of other faiths, but as a tribute to the
> > > technological achievements of those from other ages. Muslim places of
> > > high importance should be developed for high purposes, too.
>
> > > Progress toward peace and prosperity can happen rapidly, IF Muslims
> > > will start correcting their very bad public relations—like yesterday.
> > > When the Koran was written, the world was composed largely of warring
> > > barbarians. Religiousritualwas a way to separate friend from foe.
> > > The more loyal a follower, the more committed that person was to the
> > > rituals of his faith. Intended or not, that "emptyritual", which I
> > > abhor, has brainwashed Muslims till they are… the most mass-minded
> > > people on Earth. Muslims have little or no individual moral
> > > sensibility to question the harsh punishments of 'sinners'. Their
> > > only standard is a largely barbaric religious code that has never been
> > > brought into the civilized age.
>
> > > Glenn Beck talks about the billions of 'bad' Muslims. Where are
> > > others, such as me, to propose that there be concerted efforts to make
> > > this world economically and socially FAIR within every nation? I'm
> > > betting that terrorism and wars won't even be considered, once Muslims
> > > start sharing in the simple capitalist successes that countries like
> > > the USA and Israel have for too long kept the knack-for-obtaining
> > > secret from others. We live on one, common, planet Earth, people!
> > > Teaching capitalism for the benefit of the uninitiated, will
> > > eventually benefit every one of us in the long run. That is my hope
> > > and dream!
>
> > > Respectfully submitted,
>
> > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > AKA NoEinstein on sci.physics news group.
>
> > > On Mar 13, 11:51 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Folks: As closely as possible, following the outline of our original
> > > > Constitution, is the attached Article from my New Constitution.:
>
> > > > "Article V:
>
> > > > Section 1, 2 & 3: Whenever 50% of the House deems necessary, the
> > > > House may propose amendments to the New Constitution, or call a
> > > > convention for proposing amendments; such may be ratified in a one
> > > > day, direct referendum of the People of all the states and
> > > > territories, provided 60% of the registered voters who vote concur.
> > > > The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the
> > > > authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land,
> > > > and judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state
> > > > constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or
> > > > job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and
> > > > judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and
> > > > local governments—and all employees of those who regularly deal with
> > > > the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the
> > > > entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such.
> > > > No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification
> > > > for any office, public trust or job.
> > > > To form more perfect government, the House may authorize tests of
> > > > variations of government or laws that are, in the main, consistent
> > > > with the intents of this New Constitution. With the assent of 55% of
> > > > the legislature or legislatures of the state(s) involved, such tests
> > > > may encompass one or several states for a period of time sufficient to
> > > > evaluate performance. Subsequently, the House may vote to pass laws
> > > > of national scope on the issues tested. Conflicts arising from the
> > > > test(s) shall be resolved in the courts using this New Constitution
> > > > and apt federal laws, but with no intent at any time to punish those
> > > > persons, groups or states for their involvement in the test, done for
> > > > the common good."
>
> > > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > Those who are interested are invited to read my just-published book,
> > > > "The Shortest Distance, Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. &
> > > > N.). Thanks!
>
> > > > On Mar 11, 10:22 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Folks: Some shallow, at Google or otherwise, changed the title of
> > > > > this post to "…EmptyRhetoric" rather than "…EmptyRitual". I was
> > > > > unable to reply and to have the latter, correct name of my original
> > > > > post be included. That's important so all excerpts from my New
> > > > > Constitution can be found under one heading.
>
> > > > > Note: The reason I used "…EmptyRitual" relates as much to religions
> > > > > and social habits as it does to our government—which is more
> > > > > interested in form and process than in getting results that will be
> > > > > beneficial to the
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment