Lines. In order to make all of those be easily locatable by you
readers, I have subsequently added each one, like 'replies to myself'
under this "folder post", Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual. When I
attempted to do that... again, I am angered to learn that someone at
Google has deleted all of my "collective" essays which include 85% of
my New Constitution. If the deletion of "duplicate" files is Google's
Objective, they should have removed the separately-named, and lesser
read, New Posts, but RETAINED the collective posts that most of my
readers would like to be able to see in ONE LOCATION. Below, is my
most recent, and crucially important, post directed to the US Secret
Service.
Building Obama's Gallows
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/caef7db016310d60/5300df2a461e1aeb?hl=en#5300df2a461e1aeb
The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62032166072f9168
/c1b14fcc9ddfd1adhl=en+%5C+5300df2a461e1aeb&lnk=gst&q=The+USA+is+lost
+in+the+'Corn'+of+po
On Apr 1, 2:29 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Talk, alone, can't save the US economy and social order.
>
> This week Glenn Beck compared Judaism and Islam. He's right that Jews
> are less harsh in dealing with 'prohibited' activities than Muslims.
> But, apparently, Beck hasn't considered the "hidden dangers" posed by
> the Jews in Israel that hurt the chances the world can avoid humanity-
> threatening conflicts. To wit: Following WWII, and the admittedly
> terrible Holocaust, Jews were a race without a nation. Over the ages
> Jews had had legitimate claim to much of the Holy Land. But that land
> had since ceded to those of the Muslim faith. By force of armed
> conflict, Jews confiscated the land of Muslims without fair
> compensation. Though they had the 'nation' they so desired, it was a
> nation obtained by immoral acts, including murder, covetousness and
> grand theft. In "celebration" of the new nation of Israel, the USA
> formed an alliance to protect Israel from armed aggression. Isn't it
> ironic that our country had not considered it… "worthy" to come to the
> aid of those Muslims driven from the Holy Land?
>
> Because the US regularly sides with Jewish crooks and uses our
> military might to neutralize those who are only seeking justice, the
> USA has become a despised nation. Our capitalist successes have made
> us look like crooks in those realms, too. Thousands of Americans have
> died and are dying in the wars being fought. And perhaps millions of
> Americans, and that many more of our allies, are now living in fear of
> terrorism… Such would NOT be the case if Jews hadn't felt "entitled"
> to be crooks because of the Holocaust. True to form, Jews take every
> opportunity for selfish gain, without considering the morality of
> their actions.
>
> Muslims deserve to be treated fairly. Understandably, the nation of
> Israel is an affront to the moral sensibilities of Muslims. My book,
> "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity", touts how FAIR
> capitalist successes—evenly spread throughout all the peoples of the
> world—can foster world peace, harmony and prosperity. Such successes
> can be more profound than ever experienced by the vast majority of
> Muslims. *** As I see it, Israel has a moral obligation to help
> foster capitalist successes within Muslim nations. Unless they
> willingly do so, the world will remain just hours away from a world
> war more terrible than anyone can imagine, and more terrible than any
> of the 'punishments' Muslims use on those breaking their rules—beyond
> which Glenn Beck, apparently, has not seen.
>
> Instead of the trillions of dollars being spent to defend Israel and
> to fight their wars for them, that money should be spent to equitably
> turn Israel into a model two-race nation. That's just a concept, mind
> you. I can envision an Architectural Master Plan that layers and
> weaves quality working and living spaces on the limited land
> available. Holy places common to both religions should become neutral
> territory, with wise controlled-access being allowed for all who
> respect the sanctity of the spaces. Where there are now rock piles,
> there should become gardens! The goal should be to once again make
> Israel a safe destination for those interested in religious history.
> The Jewish Temple, at least partially, should be reconstructed, NOT as
> an affront to those of other faiths, but as a tribute to the
> technological achievements of those from other ages. Muslim places of
> high importance should be developed for high purposes, too.
>
> Progress toward peace and prosperity can happen rapidly, IF Muslims
> will start correcting their very bad public relations—like yesterday.
> When the Koran was written, the world was composed largely of warring
> barbarians. Religiousritualwas a way to separate friend from foe.
> The more loyal a follower, the more committed that person was to the
> rituals of his faith. Intended or not, that "emptyritual", which I
> abhor, has brainwashed Muslims till they are… the most mass-minded
> people on Earth. Muslims have little or no individual moral
> sensibility to question the harsh punishments of 'sinners'. Their
> only standard is a largely barbaric religious code that has never been
> brought into the civilized age.
>
> Glenn Beck talks about the billions of 'bad' Muslims. Where are
> others, such as me, to propose that there be concerted efforts to make
> this world economically and socially FAIR within every nation? I'm
> betting that terrorism and wars won't even be considered, once Muslims
> start sharing in the simple capitalist successes that countries like
> the USA and Israel have for too long kept the knack-for-obtaining
> secret from others. We live on one, common, planet Earth, people!
> Teaching capitalism for the benefit of the uninitiated, will
> eventually benefit every one of us in the long run. That is my hope
> and dream!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> AKA NoEinstein on sci.physics news group.
>
> On Mar 13, 11:51 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: As closely as possible, following the outline of our original
> > Constitution, is the attached Article from my New Constitution.:
>
> > "Article V:
>
> > Section 1, 2 & 3: Whenever 50% of the House deems necessary, the
> > House may propose amendments to the New Constitution, or call a
> > convention for proposing amendments; such may be ratified in a one
> > day, direct referendum of the People of all the states and
> > territories, provided 60% of the registered voters who vote concur.
> > The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the
> > authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land,
> > and judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state
> > constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or
> > job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and
> > judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and
> > local governments—and all employees of those who regularly deal with
> > the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the
> > entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such.
> > No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification
> > for any office, public trust or job.
> > To form more perfect government, the House may authorize tests of
> > variations of government or laws that are, in the main, consistent
> > with the intents of this New Constitution. With the assent of 55% of
> > the legislature or legislatures of the state(s) involved, such tests
> > may encompass one or several states for a period of time sufficient to
> > evaluate performance. Subsequently, the House may vote to pass laws
> > of national scope on the issues tested. Conflicts arising from the
> > test(s) shall be resolved in the courts using this New Constitution
> > and apt federal laws, but with no intent at any time to punish those
> > persons, groups or states for their involvement in the test, done for
> > the common good."
>
> > — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > Those who are interested are invited to read my just-published book,
> > "The Shortest Distance, Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. &
> > N.). Thanks!
>
> > On Mar 11, 10:22 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Folks: Some shallow, at Google or otherwise, changed the title of
> > > this post to "…EmptyRhetoric" rather than "…EmptyRitual". I was
> > > unable to reply and to have the latter, correct name of my original
> > > post be included. That's important so all excerpts from my New
> > > Constitution can be found under one heading.
>
> > > Note: The reason I used "…EmptyRitual" relates as much to religions
> > > and social habits as it does to our government—which is more
> > > interested in form and process than in getting results that will be
> > > beneficial to the vast majority (60% plus) of Americans.
>
> > > I am cutting, pasting and re posting the last two replies I made to
> > > Keith in Koln.
>
> > > Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My
> > > father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most
> > > frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The
> > > "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct
> > > the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to
> > > experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the
> > > police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or
> > > not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony
> > > for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is
> > > latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the
> > > presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury
> > > has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be
> > > the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... ***
> > > Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not
> > > guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended!
>
> > > I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said
> > > anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others.
> > > Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System:
>
> > > "Article III:
>
> > > Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
> > > such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
> > > interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
> > > rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
> > > laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
> > > Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
> > > as part of any
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment