I'm wanting to correct the deficiencies in our government and our
society. I definitely am not a defender of the status quo in our
government, nor in how our society gets along! If you have monkeys,
where do you live? — J. A. Armistead —
>
On Apr 20, 1:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Einstein,
>
> I do not masquerade under that name. It was sarcastically given to me
> a few years ago on this very forum. I liked it. Most of this grand
> world are not citizens of the USA... why the surprise ?? As to Keith
> being a lawyer... so am I. Keith is allowed to do as he pleases... He
> and I are ALWAYS in agreement in everything except politics, religion
> and life in general. It is not the interpretation of your present
> constitution that is causing problems.... it is the misinterpretation.
> The same would happen with yours only much faster. The most crippling
> thing in the US is your absolute lack of multi-party recognition. A
> coalition type government would serve you much better. You installed
> these as being superior post world war II in many countries.
>
> As to monkeys... I have two types in my garden (yard to you) they seem
> to function together much better than the US government.
>
> As to your misplaced national pride... there are many countries that
> enjoy more actual personal freedoms than yours.
>
> I do not have to sell my home (if I were to decide to) to someone I or
> my neighbors do not like. I do not have to hire a secretary unless she
> has physical characteristics that I enjoy (and I am free to advertise
> this). I do not have to ask anyone for permission to buy a gun. I do
> not have to allow law enforcement on my property unless I want to. It
> is perfectly acceptable here, when addressing a group of people that
> are strangers, to ask for a response from the "Negro" or the "fat man"
> or the "woman with big tits" .... and the list goes on. Get a grip and
> learn something before spouting from ignorance. Your society is
> repressive.
>
> On Apr 20, 2:40 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark: The fact that you masquerade under the name the Annointed (sic)
> > One, shows you've got mental problems. Aren't you even a citizen of
> > the USA? Don't you like anything about anything? Keith implied that
> > you were anxious to read my next "missive". Why is Keith, a lawyer,
> > having to speak for you monkeys? My guess is you could get-off most
> > criminal charges by pleading insanity. So far, most that you've said
> > supports the latter conclusion. — J. A. A. —
>
> > On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Einstein,
>
> > > Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> > > give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> > > there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
>
> > > Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> > > considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
>
> > > Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> > > about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> > > (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> > > clear and present danger??
>
> > > On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> > > > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> > > > World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> > > > naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> > > > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > > > TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> > > > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> > > > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> > > > their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > > > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> > > > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> > > > ever lived, including Hitler.
>
> > > > Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> > > > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> > > > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> > > > giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> > > > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> > > > you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> > > > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > > > better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> > > > time, Mark. You need it! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Einstein,
>
> > > > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > > > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > > > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > > > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>
> > > > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > > > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > > > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > > > > > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> > > > > > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > > > > > feel.
>
> > > > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > > > > > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > > > > > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > > > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> > > > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > > > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > > > > > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> > > > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > > > > > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > > > > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > > > > > But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> > > > > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > > > > > country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> > > > > > along by talking-up my document on the NET. — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > Patriot
>
> > > > > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Hey John!
>
> > > > > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> > > > > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > > > > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > > > > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > > > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > > > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > > > > > > or otherwise stupid. — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> > > > > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> > > > > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! — John
> > > > > > > > > A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm thrilled that
> > > > > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> > > > > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> > > > > > > > > turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> > > > > > > > > doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> > > > > > > > > > millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > > > > > > citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — J. A. A.
> > > > > > > > > > —
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment