saving the USA. So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly
undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 24, 12:17 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> And yet you continue to reply -- spewing fallacy -- while pretending NOT to reply.
> In reality, I am interested in returning America to liberty and freedom. What is obvious, however, are your Orwellian efforts.
> Regard$,
> --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 12:07 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:MJ, the party crasher, is bent on destroying, not saving the USA. So,
> that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. —
> J. A. A. —
> >
> On Mar 22, 6:43 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > And yet you AGAIN provide a response.
> > You will be hard-pressed to PROVE your silly assertion that I am somehow a "deranged, socialist-communist" ... but I suggest you do so.
> > There is a pattern here ... you provide absurd claims/assertions ... others 'call' you on it -- usually requesting substantiation ... you pitch a fit and spew fallacy while calling names.
> > Regard$,
> > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 06:38 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:MJ, the deranged, socialist-communist, party crasher is undeserving of
> > being replied to. — J. A. A. —
> > >
> > On Mar 22, 12:57 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > >Folks: Apparently, MJ is incapable of reasoning. He supposes that
> > > >since my "ideal" (not mandated in my New Constitution) government
> > > >would have ZERO outlays to individual citizens, i.e., no SS, Medicare,
> > > >Medicaid, nor Unemployment, that that shows me to be a socialist. Can
> > > >you believe it?!
> > >
> > > <sigh>
> > > How a Government programs the STEALS from person
> > > A in order to give to person B will be
> > > 'privatized' not being provided notwithstanding,
> > > the portion that continues to embrace socialism,
> > > of course, was "while continuing to "cover" only
> > > those older or sicker people who have no other
> > > means of surviving or of getting first rate
> > > care". Like the woman who finally agrees on her
> > > price being a 'prostitute', so too is yours an embrace of socialism.
> > >
> > > Sad isn't it, that Armistead is reduced to
> > > projecting his shortcomings onto others.
> > >
> > > It is also noted that you AVOIDED the second
> > > example (like the misdirection you attempt on the
> > > first) of your socialist tendencies.
> > >
> > > >Socialism and communism (the ideal of Barack Obama)
> > > >have government providing everything and controlling everything.
> > >
> > > Government 'providing' everything is not required
> > > for socialism's myriad of children.
> > >
> > > > I want government to provide next to nothing and to control next to
> > > >nothing.
> > >
> > > Except what excerpts of your Constitution you
> > > have provided does not bolster such a claim.
> > >
> > > > A properly functioning free enterprise system can do those
> > > >thing, AND allow the maximum FAIR prosperity for the maximum number of
> > > >Americans!
> > >
> > > And yet your own brand of utopian socialism raises its head again.
> > >
> > > >MJ is revealing himself to be a socialist-communist bent on retarding
> > > >my efforts to promote my New Constitution. He and Jonathan Ashley
> > > >aren't wanting to save the USA, but to have the USA fail. A person
> > > >can be either FOR me or AGAINST me. 100% of those who are against me
> > > >are criminal, socialist-communists like OUTLAW Barack Obama. — John
> > >
> > > Your fantasies and fallacies may aid you in
> > > retaining that pleasing vision, but they do little to those who grasp reality.
> > >
> > > I certainly understand your need to pretend your
> > > embraces of socialism are really not. I can also
> > > understand your desire for baseless
> > > 'name-calling'. I am quite certain that OTHERS do as well.
> > >
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJ
> > >
> > > Nothing in the world is more dangerous than
> > > sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >A. Armistead — Patriot
> > >
> > > >On Mar 21, 10:26 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and
> > > > communism are the anti-thesis of a
> > > > representative republic or a democracy. My New
> > > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the
> > > > People and will fire, jail or hang those in
> > > > government who support socialism and
> > > > communism. When you attack my New Constitution
> > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
> > > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties
> > > > person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J.
> > > > A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same
> > > > person:I am personally recommending that Social
> > > > Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment
> > > > Insurance ALL be privatized—while continuing to
> > > > "cover" only those older or sicker people who
> > > > have no other means of surviving or of getting
> > > > first rate care. The implications are rather
> > > > OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism.
> > > > > There is ALSO this from the same
> > > > person:Businesses or professions meeting
> > > > licensing standards germane to the type and
> > > > scope of work such perform, and being regularly
> > > > apprised of substantive new developments, may
> > > > control their own work without governmental
> > > > sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to
> > > > be other than self-trained to maintain
> > > > continuing competency for doing safe work
> > > > within their chosen type. Professionals
> > > > qualified by training, testing and experience
> > > > who perform safe and acceptable work within an
> > > > area of their competency shall not be
> > > > sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job
> > > > class or licensing jurisdiction—beyond fair
> > > > registration cost. No more than 25% of
> > > > regulatory board members shall have been
> > > > employed in the profession or industry
> > > > regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
> > > > > It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this
> > > > 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR
> > > > that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.
> > > > > <sigh> Sad.
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJThere is simply no other choice than
> > > > this: either abstain from interference in the
> > > > free play of the market, or to delegate the
> > > > entire management of production and
> > > > distribution to the government. Either
> > > > capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way. -- Ludwig von Mises
> > >
> > > >--
> > > >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > >For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > >
> > > >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see <a...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment