defending myself, I must use the same bullets to dispatch those bent
on doing me, or others in this country harm, no one can declare
otherwise. I know that Mark is a God-damned liberal. And you could
well be a wolf in sheep's clothing. I sincerely doubt that a person
with a Doctor of Law Degree would be content to co-moderate anything
with the likes of Mark. Also, your use of the English language falls
below that of most lawyers. Google is largely controlled by
liberals. When my New Constitution starts being so viciously attacked
by liberals, that is proof that my document is accomplishing its
intended purpose: "Returning control of government to the People; and
removing all controlling influences by biased groups." If my
accomplishing those ends upsets you, that is your problem, not mine.
I wasn't put on this Earth for recreational bantering with mental
lightweights on any subject. Learn or leave, that is the readers'
option on MY original posts! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Mar 28, 12:02 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guten Abend from Köln, John,
>
> You are incorrect in your assessment. Yes, PoliticalForum is moderated. As
> a matter of fact, you have been warned by Mark "The Annointed One"
> Kahle, who co-moderates PoliticalForum with me, that your continuous
> "Spam", (and if you don't know the definition of "Spam"; I suggest that
> you look at PoliticalForum's Rules & Guidelines, which can be found here:http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/web/political-forum-dec...
> ) should cease. By that, I mean that today, you have submitted three
> messages within seven minutes, and countless other messages for the past
> month that are identical....Something to the effect of: "MJ, The Party
> Crasher", YadaYadaYada..."
>
> We get it. We got it three weeks ago. You don't want to post your "New
> Constitution"; you don't want to address those individuals who have posed
> legitimate questions regarding the content of your New Constitution, and
> you consider any criticism to your proposed "New Constitution" spurious.
>
> There is a gamut of issues, events, scenarios, assholes, theologies,
> considerations, and baseball that could be discussed, and that we would
> love to hear your opinion on. Shit can the canned responses.
>
> By the same token, all of ya'll who have these lovely, quippy signatures,
> that are usually longer than whatever it is that you are posting, are also
> getting a bit stale. Just as important, wiping the previous embedded text
> in the message that you are writing, saves a lot of time when scrolling and
> trying to find the newest post in the thread.
>
> Thanks for all of your consideration!
>
> KeithInKöln
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment