The only person that has the prerogative to say who is or is not wanted here is Keith or ME and I am a Costa Rican citizen...gee talk about GLOBALIZATION.... sheesh. Grow a pair, "Patriot".........
Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist- communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! — John A. Armistead — Patriot
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashleyii@lavabit.com> wrote:
John,--
I was under the impression when I joined this political "discussion" group that folks subscribed to the group to discuss political issues.
Your failure to post YOUR New Constitution when at least four people (including myself) have expressed a sincere interest in reading it shows you are not interested in having it enacted. Either that or you are afraid of the feedback you will receive.
I seem to recall your concern with publishing it was it isn't copyrighted. Would a true "patriot" (as you continually label yourself) be more concerned with the direction in which his country is headed or HIS copyright protection? As it stands now, YOUR New Constitution will likely die when you do because no one else will ever have a chance to read it.
Your claim that I am "likely socialist-communist" shows you have never read anything I have posted to this group. If you had you would know that I come real close to believing that the government that governs best is no government at all. A completely voluntary society could not possibly be any worse than the socialist police state we now live in.
Your comment, "You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA!" only confirms my suspicion that you are a wanna-be dictator. If you were a moderator for this group, I would likely have been banned long ago because I dared to comment on YOUR posts.
On 2/23/2011 6:33 PM, NoEinstein wrote:Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist- communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! — John A. Armistead — PatriotOn Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:How does John expect to implement his New Constitution if no one is ever allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the making. On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to speak from personal experience that few if any other person could have had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick out of office any public official or employee, including the President himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of a single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To wit:Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the DEMS slammed down your throats.On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of it not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document. This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, but to be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, maliciously, make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to side-track my efforts.I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for fourteen years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises highlighted in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts. What is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the original constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with our Constitution.That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to speak from personal experience that few if any other person could have had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick out of office any public official or employee, including the President himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of a single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To wit:"1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and the right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s employment, especially those in management or public office�including judges and justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in court; justice be not �blind�, but well informed. Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission of the truth�except in cases of obvious fiction or satire�is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political preferences�at risk of loss of license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues�on an as occurs basis�is allowed, provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by the medium�s content, they shall be allowed to reply�without editing�in that medium. Each medium shall respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment� being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the free consent of the apt parties."Keith, the above should highlight the extreme attention to detail I've put into my document. No person, by a casual comment, shall have the "right" to denigrate my efforts. The following proviso is at the closing of my New Constitution:"Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and specifically approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New Constitution shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or business which polls the People on their support or non support of this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum, shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein� including the full punishments relating thereto�for non compliance with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro- will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!"� John A. Armistead � PatriotOn Feb 20, 12:54 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:Good Afternoon John, Like Jonathan, Michael, and Mark, I too would like to see your New Constitution that you ave talked about for at least several years. Yes, I realize that you have posted various parts and pieces of this document, but why not post the damn thing, for us to read and try to understand? Why the hesitation? Are you concerned about some sort of copyright infringement? If that is the case, then I can understand.....To a degree, and you need only state that this is the cause of your hesitation. Although I disagree with Michael (MJ) on a number of occasions, I will say that he is a well thought, well meaning and logical gentleman and not one who is apt to hurl insult or personal attacks on the board. Just a thought, but obviously we'd love to see your work! KeithInTampa (Today) On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:30 PM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:Folks: The following was prompted by a direct email to me. (See below.) I'd like to share it with you. � John A. Armistead � Patriot 02/19/11 Dear Robert (Prezioso): My first essay 'title-set" on.. read more »
--
Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges and lawyers yourself!
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
The cost of living hasn't affected its popularity.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment