Re: WikiLeaks, "Progressivism," and "National Security"

I agree. I didn't say life in the dungeon was a bad thing.

Pretty fucking stupid though

On Dec 1, 8:54 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That 22 year old kid turned over documents that did in fact, threaten and
> harm our national security.
>
> What William Anderson, (who's column I agree with for the most part, with
> one major exception) fails to acknowledge or touch upon, is that our Nation
> depends upon "secretive" information gathering in order to protect and
> defend against those individuals and entities that wish to see our Nation as
> we know it, and Western civilization as we know it, destroyed and done away
> with.  Those that provide this "secretive" information, will be far more
> reluctant to provide such information in the future, if the perception
> continues that we cannot keep a secret.
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:40 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > That "flimsy security line", is about to put a 22 year old kid in a
> > dungeon for the rest of his life
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.