that vote that way or have said they were indeed Marxists.
Please get the facts straight.
On Sep 21, 10:34 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *I am out of time and I will waste no more of it on this today. *
> *Democrats are not Marxists, Communists, or Socialists.*
> **
> *You are mistaken. *
>
> **
>
> *
>
> *
>
> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hey Tom, since you seem to have a little time on your hands this
> > afternoon:
>
> > Here is a post by Travis from yesterday, which is captioned, "Communist
> > Goals - 1963 Congressional Record. In the Congressional Record, an
> > excerpt from, "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen is read and quoted.
>
> > Why don't you take the time to see how your Senators compare to this track
> > record? How many of the current Democrats have supported the tenets and
> > platform from this excerpt in 1963? I bet it would shock you to learn the
> > truth.
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bb...
> > #
>
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> *Wrong again.*
> >> *Democrats are not Marxists.*
> >> **
> >> *Calling them such is not the truth, it is false slander.*
>
> >> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>> *Democrats are not Marxists. *
> >>> **
> >>> *That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand Oppressive Party
> >>> Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". *
> >>> **
> >>> *======================*
> >>> **
> >>> Which you do, at every opportunity that you get. There is a distinction
> >>> however, Those who I identify as "Marxists" have a track record of their
> >>> votes and policies.
>
> >>> Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote in a Marxist
> >>> fashion, what else would one call them?
> >>> **
> >>> **
>
> >>>> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some
> >>>>> secondary issue.
>
> >>>>> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and determine how
> >>>>> repeal of DADT will effect the military. Second, and more importantly, the
> >>>>> goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out of amending the proposed
> >>>>> Defense Appropriations bill now before the Congress. I don't trust the
> >>>>> likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a host of other Marxists
> >>>>> controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations. You shouldn't either.
>
> >>>>> From CNN:
>
> >>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html
>
> >>>>> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins
> >>>>> (Confused, Maine) said she would side with the rest of the GOP because the
> >>>>> Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to shut Republicans out of the
> >>>>> debate."
>
> >>>>> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
> >>>>> Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But she said Senate
> >>>>> Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and Democrats
> >>>>> "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense bill.
>
> >>>>> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the majority
> >>>>> leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an agreement so that the
> >>>>> Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said.
>
> >>>>> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a
> >>>>> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full debate on
> >>>>> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal
> >>>>> before the military has completed its review.
>
> >>>>> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is to
> >>>>> be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the
> >>>>> implementation of any new changes," Snowe's statement said.
>
> >>>>> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy bill,
> >>>>> would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the Pentagon completes
> >>>>> a review of the repeal's impact on the military. The review is due in
> >>>>> December and would serve as the basis for necessary certification by the
> >>>>> president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that
> >>>>> the military could handle repealing the policy.
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >>>> Have a great day,
> >>>> Tommy
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment