Saturday, July 31, 2010

Re: Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!

Masochists can't win our Revolution!

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer expresses resolve to take her state's
immigration law issues all the way to the Supreme Court to get…
justice. This week, such justice was denied by a lower court on the
grounds that the Federal Government preempts the states on laws
regarding our national borders. Commentators believe that such ruling
was a victory for the White House—a victory to continue to do nothing
to secure our border with Mexico.

The White House sees illegal Hispanics as potential voters, who, if
given amnesty, will tip-the-scales to allow leftist, socialist/
communist Democrats to win the war to control the future of the USA.
I'm pleased that dozens of states, besides Arizona, are taking up the
cause of demanding that our borders be secured. Nebraska was one of
the first to publicly support Arizona. Because Nebraska is a farming
state, thousands of illegals work in the fields, there, doing jobs
that out-of-work citizens need in these depressed economic times.

While there may be perceived strength in the growing support for
Arizona regarding illegal immigration, there is little actual value in
having unity on that or any issue. That's because we no longer have a
Representative Republic in this country, as our Founding Fathers
mandated in the Constitution. The White House—with its czars and
executive orders—is effectively controlling everything, without the
voters having any say-so. Polls show that from 52% to 65% of
Americans believe our government is a failure. Only 20% still have
confidence in the US Congress. Folks, those numbers show that we have
passed the threshold necessary for this country to kick-the-rascals-
out. But we should do so, not by winning any more impotent elections,
but because the offenses of every single elected official who has
voted to destroy the USA are criminal and TREASON!

Gov. Jan Brewer mentions a WEB site where contributions can be made to
a fund to aid Arizona in preparing their legal arguments. That money
will go to god-damned lawyers to "fight" for justice. In the USA our
tolerance for anything done by lawyers always borders on masochism.
Obviously, we must love the P A I N. Governor Brewer sure loves pain
of any kind. *** The legal authority of the Federal Government over
the people, as well as the authority of the entire federal court
system, is VOIDED due to criminality and TREASON! *** Even so, most
pain-loving Americans would rather continue playing the losing game of
politics—within our failed system of government—rather than doing the
simple things needed to win the Revolution.

Will going to rallies in the broiling sun be a simple thing to allow
winning? How about listening to the Glenn Beck Show on Fox, and
getting down on your knees and praying? Or… hoping that Sarah Palin
has a plan to save the USA? No, none of those things are necessary!
All that is required is to have strong enough local or state jails or
prisons, wherein the criminals guilty of treason can be held until
tried and hanged. Of course it will also require having at least one
governor or state attorney general with the gonads to demand the
arrest of the leftist, socialist/communist Democrats, in Congress, who
set foot in a particular state.

A high-profile catalyst for government change would be to have
Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman order the arrest of Senator Ben Nelson.
Some of you may recall that Senator Harry Reid had offered Nelson a
huge bribe—known as the "cornhusker purchase"—to support Obama Care.
After the bribe was made public, Nelson weaseled out by using spin and
lies. Still, he cast a deciding 60th vote to allow Obama Care to move
forward in the Senate. Ben Nelson must hang!

If a million tea party goers show up in Washington 8/28, there will be
at least a "show" of support for change in government. But there will
also be cameras on the crowd for the purpose of recording behavior, or
"divisive signs" being waved, to justify calling the "mod" racists.
The latter objective is the corrupt last hope of Democrats to maintain
their control of Congress. If that sinister objective is to be
realized, it will require that the historic Black block vote hold
together 100%. And it will require that Blacks continue to remain
BLIND to the economic, rather than the largely non-existent racial
basis for our hatred of socialism and communism.

Those in the macro crowds at the rallies represent true America. If,
like Glenn Beck, many show up on 8/28 wearing combat boots, in their
hearts they already know that taking back our government justifies our
being as violent as is necessary—in Washington or not.

Revolutionaries are PATRIOTS, not law breakers! The law breakers are
the elected officials who are squatting in public offices. They swore
to uphold and protect the US Constitution, then, from day one have
disregarded that fundamental document while working tirelessly to turn
America into a socialist/communist system. The law breakers could
easily include… any Capital Police officers, or even Secret Service
members, if such in any way defend corrupt members of Congress, or
defend our most corrupt President Barack Obama, and all of his
dastardly staff and advisors.

In Greece, there were violent scenes of lines of police with plastic
shields and billy clubs hitting the angry citizens. If on 8/28 the
determined crowd of a million patriots marches toward the White House,
will the on-the-public-payroll police officers side with the PATRIOTS…
or will they side with the TRAITORS of America who should all be
hanged? My New Constitution has the following important provisions,
which I think are, also, well within the spirit of our present
Constitution:

"Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any
branch or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at
no time be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. Legal authority of law enforcement or the
courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption.
Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies shall not be
organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not
be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of
such auspices.
All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
"I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath." No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for
making complaints against another office holder, employee or
superior. No government employee nor office holder shall be coerced
into wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real
or implied threat of the loss of one's job, promotion or benefits, nor
by any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a
threat, bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year
prison sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes
or promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath."

Governor Jan Brewer—if she will put down her hair spray long enough to
read the above anti-corruption clauses in my New Constitution—should
realize that NO Federal Court, bureau nor agency has any authority
over her state when the MAJORITY in the Federal Government are
corrupt! The authority of the Federal Government is automatically
VOIDED because of corruption! And that principle is well within the
SPIRIT of our original Constitution, which allows impeaching those
guilty of… "high crimes and misdemeanors". TREASON is about as high a
crime as there is; correct?

"United we stand; divided we fall." May we all unite to SAVE the USA!

Respectfully submitted,


— John A. Armistead — Patriot

AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics news group

>
On Jul 26, 6:50 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Fixing our 'broke' governments from OUTSIDE of those.
>
> Glenn Beck rightfully acknowledges that our "Republic" has been
> destroyed.  The White House is now controlling every aspect of our
> lives…  But most people won't realize such fact until 2012.  These are
> ECONOMIC issues, not racial issues.  The traitor leftist, socialist/
> communist Democrats and cross-over Republicans in Washington have all
> violated their sworn oaths to uphold and defend our Constitution.  In
> short, they have changed our government to mimic those clearly shown
> to have failed in other parts of the world.  Folks, working to destroy
> the USA is TREASON!  And people guilty of treason shall be put to
> death!
>
> The crimes of those in Washington have already been committed, and are
> continuing to be committed every day.  Elected officials not honoring
> our Constitution are illegitimate squatters in Washington.  When the
> 8/28 Rally is held in the broiling August sun, illegitimate
> congressmen and White House traitors will be sitting in air-
> conditioned comfort inside of OUR buildings.  And they will be being
> protected by a Capital Police Force, and by the US Secret Service,
> from bodily harm.  Traitors should be ARRESTED by the on-the-public-
> payroll police; don't you think?  Any police officer not doing so
> would be aiding and abetting traitors.  And that is, also, a capital
> "Capital" crime!
>
> If, say, Nancy Pelosi—with gavel or not—walks through the throngs
> toward the US Capital, spit on her!  Make sure video cameras are
> rolling from every direction, so the identity of any police officer or
> other "public" official taking issue with your exercising of Free
> Speech rights, can be ascertained.  (Note: Free Speech is what the
> macro consensus of the People says it is, NOT what Congress or the
> illegitimate Supreme Court has said, or might say!)
>
> The 8/28 Rally will be a total failure if the objective is only…
> Beck's "miracle…" of having Republicans win both houses of Congress.
> As I explained two days ago, the "getters" from government are now
> controlling who can be elected to public office.  The "getters" pay
> little or no taxes, but expect to be able to control the entire
> economic structure of our (once) greatest nation in the world.
>
> I love democracy, and I love Americans of all races.  (I'm 1/16
> American Indian.)  But I HATE and detest how groups, such as Blacks
> and Hispanics, are using their BLOCK voting… 'power' to have more
> influence than any fair democracy can allow them to have.  Those
> groups surely deserve to be treated fairly.  I wrote my New
> Constitution while constantly asking myself: "Will what I have just
> written be fair to minorities?"  The corrections I've made to our
> justice/court system, alone, should remove most biases that often send
> Blacks to jail either for crimes not committed, or have Blacks
> receiving harsher sentences for a crime than whites.  In short, I have
> corrected the "need" to have any group… represent any person in order
> for such person to be treated fairly.
>
> The two most racist groups in America are: Jews and Blacks.  At the
> slightest provocation, Jews will cry… 'anti-Semitic.'  Jews are so
> 'soft-skinned' that one wonders how they are able to muster the will
> to fight the likes of Iran.  The preferred 'weapon' for Jews is:
> Subversive control of governments.  Most politicians know that they
> can't get elected without publicly expressing "support for Israel".
> Jews are effectively blackmailing the USA into supporting an
> illegitimate nation of Jews in Israel!  And because of our… coerced
> support, the USA is largely despised by Muslims—who also like to fault
> our capitalist successes, compared to their more… eked-out desert
> existence.
>
> ** The survival of the Human Race could well hinge of dramatically
> improving the lives of typical Muslims all over the world.  Of course,
> our willingness to help do so would increase if Muslims would begin to
> consider… WOMEN to be part of the Human Race.  I say, "Amen", to
> everything that the Rev. Franklin Graham is doing to improve the lives
> of Muslim women.  Few Muslims will ever be loved until they can stop
> being… barbarians, and treat women with equality and respect.  In that
> regard, Muslims can control their own destiny.  The fate of the world
> could well depend on having Muslims clean-up their un-civil public
> images, symbolized by veiled women in burkas.
>
> An innocent pronunciation of the 'Negro' race, has turned into a big
> problem.  NOTE: I had always heard that word pronounced 'Negra', long
> before I ever saw the word in print.  I once had a pair of binoculars
> stolen from under my driver's seat, when new tires were put on my
> car.  I called the dealer and explained that the same 'Negra' man who
> changed the tires, had seemed nervous, and wouldn't look me in the eye
> when I spoke to him.  The person I had called said: "I have never
> heard anyone call a black 'that name' before."  Well… "Sticks and
> stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me!"  Apparently,
> Blacks let it be known at every opportunity that being called
> "Niggers" doesn't meet with their approval.  Neither does what many
> Blacks call whites meet with whites' approval.  But few whites care
> that much about name-calling.  Blacks, on the other hand, like to
> rally as much hatred as they can against whites, because hatred is the
> glue that holds their block voting together.  "Damn the USA!" isn't
> just Rev. Jeremiah Wright's notion.  By degrees, that is the 'feel
> good' sentiment being expressed, at least tacitly, in most Black
> churches.  Being "sensitive" to the playing of 'Dixie' (actually a
> Yankee song), or to the displaying of the Confederate Flag, rallies
> the hatred within the Black race to keep them voting as a block.
>
> The… 'power' of  block voting is undeserved power.  The latter is the
> anti-thesis of democracy and fair play—which my New Constitution will
> STOP from day one!  Blacks can block-vote for anyone they choose.  But
> such person will be put to DEATH for voting counter to: "Fair play and
> democracy shall have supremacy in America!"  So, never again, will
> there be any… "advantage" in block voting.  Democracy and fair play
> shall rule!
>
> The Democrats are already fomenting block voting by tagging anyone
> who's pro-economy, a racist.  I heard Juan Williams and Jesse Jackson
> say that, repeatedly, this week.  Here's what my New Constitution
> requires:
>
> 1st Amendment:  No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> be secular.  No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
> freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or
> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right
> of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches
> or departments for redress of grievances.  Citizens so petitioning
> government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive,
> helpful and just responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly
> read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances
> or requests for directions or clarifications.  Failure to so respond
> to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> having his or her civil rights fully upheld.  No judge or justice
> shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> court; justice be not "blind", but well informed.  Freedom of the
> press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> in reporting.  Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> prohibited.  Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> innocuous.  *** No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology
> of its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses
> such job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss
> of license or closure of the business.  Flagrantly editing news to
> promote the ideology of management is a felony.  No medium shall
> analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> pending election or referendum.  Nor shall they invite others outside
> of the media to do so.  But factual, thorough coverage of the
> candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
> provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
> the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
> of the referenda issues.  It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action.  No
> medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
> others, but if a person is harmed by the medium's content, they shall
> be allowed to reply—without editing—in that ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment