But the people on Journ-0-Lisps all discussed how they believed in telling lies to support Obama
"The List" of Journolist Participants is Fake
Media
by Cenk Uygur | July 26, 2010 - 9:24am
----------------------------------------------------------
There is now a list going around in conservative websites purporting to be "The List" of media participants in Journolist. It's fake. How do I know? I'm on The List. And I was never on Journolist.
Don't get me wrong, I would have loved to have been on Journolist. It sounds fun. I'd like being on The List even more. That sounds bad ass. Someone I know was on Nixon's Enemies List - I've always thought that was the single coolest distinction anyone could have. This is as close as I got. As much as I would have loved it, I shouldn't be on The List.
Why do I make this painful admission? Is it because I don't want to be associated with those no good libs secretly controlling the media? Hell no. Would have loved that, too. It's because you should know that people that are on that so-called "confirmed" list were not necessarily on Journolist. As usual, the conservative media seems to have completely made this up. Seen this movie before?
I guess I should consider it a compliment that I was on the made up list. In other words, someone thought if there is going to be a liberal media conspiracy I was probably involved. That's pretty cool. But I have a more important question about this purported scandal.
The conservative critics claim this proves the media is all a liberal conspiracy. And as part of the proof, they show e-mails from Journolist trying to sway the media to cover things with a liberal slant. But if the media is already liberal why do the liberals have to convince them?
Some of the e-mails seem to show people strategizing over how to swing the narrative in the press. Well, if it's a conspiracy, why don't they just call up the New York Times, Washington Post, ABC News, etc. and just get them to run their liberal buddies' ideas as facts? Why do they have to try so hard to figure out a way to influence them through their own articles?
Wouldn't this prove the opposite - that the mainstream media is not liberal? They hardly ever listen to these self-avowed liberal journalists. The people on this mailer seem to be on the outside looking in, trying to figure out how the influence the conversation (presumably the same exact thing conservative journalists and advocates are doing).
In fact, in one of the first stories that The Daily Caller ran, they share e-mails from the list about anger toward George Stephanopoulos for asking about Rev. Wright during the 2008 debates. Well, if they run the media, why didn't the liberals just get George not to ask that question? Why did the so-called liberal media ask such a conservative question in the first place? If it's a conspiracy why won't Stephanopoulos listen to them?
In other words, why won't the liberal media listen to the liberal media?
Now, for the extra irony - one of the other questions Stephanopoulos asked in that same debate was planted by ... Sean Hannity. Stephanopoulos was on Hannity's show when pressed about Obama's connection to Bill Ayers and decided that he would ask it in the debate. So, is there then a conservative media conspiracy?
Of course, the reality is that the media has many forms. There are straight news reporters and there are advocate journalists, like some people on Journolist and almost everyone at Fox News (I had to say "almost" because of Shep Smith, damn him for making things complicated) .
Of course, many of the people on Journolist freely admit that they write for liberal publications like The Nation, whereas Fox News claims to do fair and balanced reporting. So, they're both advocates, just one side is lying about it (I'm always amused by this lie; how can anyone say with a straight face that Fox News doesn't have a conservative perspective? ).
Finally, let me ask you one more question. If the liberal media is so strong how come all of the liberals in the country don't have as much influence as just Glenn Beck? That's really painful to write, but clearly true.
Here's my proof. Every progressive organization, leader, advocate, journalist, congressmen, etc. have said that Elizabeth Warren should be nominated as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Yet, they still can't get the job done. It is at best a 50-50 proposition right now. Yet, just the thought that Shirley Sherrod might be on Glenn Beck's show on one night is enough to get her fired.
The mere threat of Beck swings the Obama administration immediately. That's power. That's influence. All of the progressives and liberals in the country put together can barely move the president on Warren. And this is supposed to be a liberal president with a liberal media? What an unbelievable joke.
The Tea Party Movement: Outraged over deficits since Jan 21, 2009.
--- In NewJersey_for_Kerry@yahoogroups.com, Kenneth Sloan <wilddudenj@...> wrote:
>
> Oh, my Gawd! Shelia Jackson did a Ronald Reagan!
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 7/25/10, Rich Martin <richsrants@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Rich Martin <richsrants@...>
> Subject: [NewJersey_for_Kerry] You won’t see these in the ABC/CBS/NBC/PBS/NYT jauggernaut
> To: AntiTerrorismCoalition@yahoogroups.com, Illusion_of_Freedom@yahoogroups.com, worldintelligencenetwork@yahoogroups.com, Reality_101@yahoogroups.com, NewJersey_for_Kerry@yahoogroups.com, jennabushfanclub@yahoogroups.com, ImpeachJeb@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, July 25, 2010, 6:37 PM
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Â
> Â
> Â
> Â
> Sheila Jackson north and south Vietnam Foreign affairs committee
> http://www.cbsnews. com/8301- 503544_162- 20010824- 503544.html
> Â
> Â
> Sheila Jackson: TP R KKK
> http://www.examiner .com/x-31244- Louisville- Public-Policy- Examiner~ y2010m7d17- Is-Sheila- Jackson-Lee- really-that- stupid
> Â
> Â
> Â
> Enquirer reports: 2 more women accuse algore
>
>
> http://www.nydailyn ews.com/news/ national/ 2010/07/21/ 2010-07-21_ al_gore_former_ vice_president_ probed_by_ police_for_ sexual_misconduc t_with_two_ ma.html
>
> Â
> Â
> Â
>
> Â
>
>
> Â
>
>
> "Reject Elena Kagan's Nomination to Supreme Court"
> http://www.ipetitio ns.com/petition/ rejectelenakagan /
> Â
>
> "We're all Arizonans now." Sarah Palin
> Â
> Â
>
> I am a sovereign
> http://www.freedoms phoenix.com/ Find-Freedom. htm?At=0095721
>
>
> Â> Join a TEA Party. Google tea party [name of your town]> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email is archived at http://groups. google.com/ group/richsrants ?hl=en>>  >  Rich Martin
> I'M MAD, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE
> Â
> .
> Â
>
>
>
> Â
> Â
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ ___
> Penny Stock Jumping 2000%
> Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
> AwesomePennyStocks. com
>
__._,_.___![Yahoo! Groups]()
.![]()
__,_._,___
This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current administration from transforming this country into something not intended by the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be deleted.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en
For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit http://www.teapartypatriots.org.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment