problems.
This past week, newswoman Helen Thomas vented her frustrations over
the Palestinian crises by suggesting that Jews in Israel should go
'home' to Poland and to Germany. At various times in the past, Jews
and Muslims, alike, have had valid claims to the same land areas in
what is now… called Israel. After WW II, Jews took, by force, land
that wasn't rightfully theirs—at least not in accordance with the last
valid owners having the dominant right to be there.
Following the Holocaust, Jews had this air of entitlement to have a
'home'. Poland and Germany hadn't been very hospitable places. Part
of the reason for the dislike of Jews had been the dominance of Jews
in the media, and in banking. When things aren't going well in a
country—politically and financially—it was convenient to blame the
Jews. Because they were a 'race' that banded together,
preferentially, Jews were never really 'part' of a country. They were
their own country within a country. Like an underground society, they
seek advantages to compensate for what they believe to be
discrimination. The name-of-the-game for Jews is: Getting more power
and control than they deserve, because they have been treated badly in
the past.
In the USA, our 1st Amendment free speech rights, absolutely, protect
Helen Thomas when she vents her frustrations over Israel. She had no
reason to apologize, and certainly no reason to retire from the
media. The subliminal mechanism, in play, that caused Helen to retire
was—plain and simply—the wrongful and excessive POWER of Jews in this
country and around the world. If there is another… 9/11 in this
country, it will be largely due to the hatred for the USA, because of
our tacit, or otherwise, support of Israel's right to exist.
Unfortunately, politicians need the support of Jews to get elected.
So, they must all seem to be incensed by any statement that Jews
aren't very well loved throughout the world. If you, the readers, had
to decide which is more important, our 1st Amendment Free Speech
Rights… or allowing Jews, all over the world, to have more power than
they deserve, how would you vote?
My New Constitution changes the 'selfish' structure of society by
severely punishing any person, such as a lobbyist, who tries to get
more power for any group than that group is entitled to have. As I've
explained before, most minority groups were well-intended, initially,
when they sought fairness and justice. Unfortunately, once groups
realized that they have political power, too often, they begin
demanding undeserved power. Those over-using their power include the
obvious: labor unions; big business; racial minority groups; gun
rights groups; religious groups; (unconstitutional) government
workers' unions; political parties; right-to-life groups, and the
elitist and probably un savable… media.
Today, I heard Cal Thomas bragging about how Fox News is the only
viable news medium. It's frightening to realize that Fox toots-their-
own horn, daily. Bill O'Reilly, in particular, brags about the
flagging ratings of all the news networks but… Fox. Why the
bragging? Because such will increase advertising revenues, and allow
paying those Fox News egotists higher salaries. Understanding that
Fox has headquarters in NYC, it's not hard to conclude that Jews are
screwing things up at Fox for their own selfish advantage. I
challenge anyone to answer this question: "What public-service purpose
does Fox News have that's not more self-serving and controlling, than
civil-minded?" Can Brit Hume, or any other stone-head, justify Fox's
existence?
Much of the group-against-group animosity in this country is due to
the realization that some, like Jews, are getting undeserved
successes. That's been a primary motivation for the rise in the power
(and the corruption) of groups. But what if, in a single day, no
group would ever again get an unfair advantage over any of the
others? My New Constitution requires that all those who are employed
by government take the following LOYALTY oath:
"I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath." No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for
making complaints against another office holder, employee or
superior. No government employee nor office holder shall be coerced
into wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real
or implied threat of the loss of one's job, promotion or benefits, nor
by any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a
threat, bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year
prison sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes
or promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.
and … "The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens' votes shall have parity without compromise. Principles of
fair play and democracy shall reign supreme in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
play shall be guilty of a felony."
I repeatedly copy the above for you, the readers, because that loyalty
oath to the People—and the associated CAPITAL punishment for not
abiding by that oath—will have the effect of ELIMINATING the attaining
of unjust power in the USA! No politician will risk being put to
death for advocating unfair, and anti-democracy SOCIALISM or
Communism! The gaining of unfair advantages is the entire reason that
groups—the anti-thesis of democracy—exist.
I'm disheartened that Barack Obama's approval ratings in the polls
stay above 40%… It's a near certainty that those who are 'excusing'
that treasonous rascal who has bankrupted this country, and who is
enslaving generations of Americans in order to pay for his spending
programs, are the same shallow-minded minorities, and lazy, career
students, who put Obama into office. Obama's promises to the 'middle
classes' that they will get something for nothing, continues to push
the USA to the brink of destruction.
*** There's virtually no chance that electing more Tea Party-
Republicans, this November, will cause the structural changes needed
to correct our broken government. The 'sports mentality' in this
country assures that there aren't enough voters staying apprised of
our crises, to push-through the needed changes. It won't happen… A
hundred Sarah Palins won't make it happen. However, ARRESTING the
treasonous bastards who vote for Obama's spending programs WILL bring
the needed structural changes! The advantage of the latter, quite-
constitutional criminal arrest processes, is that this country can go
on loving the sports pages more than politics, while the state courts
deal most effectively with those not respecting the Will of the
Voters. It will only take, say, 'a' Governor Bobby Jindal, to arrest
Barack Obama the next time he sets foot in LA, to quickly begin to
purge the leftist, socialist-communist Democrats from government. I'm
reasonably certain that the Secret Service won't obstruct having Obama
be arrested. Those guys are smart enough to know that it's the People
that pay their salaries. So, they owe their loyalty to the PEOPLE,
not to that rascal Barack Obama!
Fox's Megyn Kelly may be OK as a 'screen saver', but I can't for the
life of me understand why that bitch gets to tout her ideas about
anything on national TV. Apparently, she got a law degree—which
supposedly entitles her to bias justice by her errant comments A
recent example is: Kelly sided with a morbidly obese lady who
registered at a gym in order to… loose weight. That woman was so
heavy that she would break the exercise equipment if she stepped on.
She would also break most chairs in restaurants unless she used two or
three under her bottom; and would cause jetliners to crash if two more
people, like her, were allowed on a full plane. People do have
rights. But destroying property isn't one of them. My New
Constitution contains the following: "Personal fitness can be a
condition of employment."
It remains to be seen if any of the elite news commentators, regularly
seen on those news round-tables, are patriots enough to start talking
STRUCTURAL changes to our government. George Will's comment that
"Things will be better following November's election." leaves all of
the anti-democracy, party-based government hierarchies in place; and
it leaves all of the bad, socialist laws in place. It's quite
possible that the USA would be better off having George Will devote
himself to baseball, full time. His implying that our bad system of
government will be getting better, soon, isn't inspiring the needed
changes. As with Sarah Palin, George Will is allaying appropriate
actions with his calming rhetoric. Folks, revolutions are won by
deeds, not by words!
"United we stand; divided we fall." May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Jun 8, 9:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Elections Can't Correct Our Broken Government.
>
> Fox News' Bill O'Reilly paraphrased George Will, who had talked about
> this country's prospects in the present crises. Then, O'Reilly said:
> "George is smart." before adding—with his usual shallow-minded grin—
> that he (O'Reilly) is smart, too. Unfortunately, Bill's I.Q. meter
> has more to do with the ratings of his show, than with the depth of
> either his understanding of the problems, or of his motivation to do a
> damn thing to help correct those pressing problems. Apparently, the
> World, and its crises, exist for Bill O'Reilly's selfish pleasure.
>
> George Will is indeed smart (or more correctly, insightful). But he's
> never shown himself to have more than a commentator's goal of
> maintaining or increasing his readership. Most of his… talk, is just
> to have a perceived one-up-manship on other commentators—like those at
> the New York Times—who see the World through different color glasses.
> The hodge-podge of commentators who do battle on the Sunday Morning TV
> political round-tables, get to express their notions about politics
> and government whether right or wrong. Naïve listeners, apparently,
> get confused regarding the facts. That's why my New Constitution
> states:
>
> … "Each medium shall respond to breaking news without considering the
> response of any other medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage
> or non coverage shall not be excused by the media response. A medium
> reporting on government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with
> detachment—being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not
> repressing thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. *** Every medium
> shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity nor bias.
> False or deceptive commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate
> use by any candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or
> deceptive campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or
> innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any
> special interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of
> candidates for public office; flagrant violation is a felony."
>
> and… "No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of its
> management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such job
> to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside
> of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the
> candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
> provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
> the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
> of the referenda issues."
>
> and… "Any government employee, media figure or private person(s) who
> uses the authority or influence of their job, or their celebrity, to
> argue against democracy and fair play shall be guilty of a felony."
> Note: Some of those who repeatedly argue against fair play and
> democracy include: Bob Beckel; Arianna Huffington; Geraldo Rivera;
> Alan Colmes; Donna Brazile; all leftist Democrats anywhere in the USA;
> and President Obama and his band of traitors in the White House. More
> than regularly committing felonies, the leftist Democrats, President
> Obama and his band of White House traitors are guilty of capital
> treason for working to subvert our Constitution so as to turn our
> nation into a socialist - communist one, and doing so after having
> SWORN to uphold, protect and defend the Constitution—which is the
> primary Law of the Land. The survival of the USA hinges on having
> numbers of dedicated, patriotic, and freedom loving public servants,
> who have the public's eye, to stand WITH the Constitution, and
> rightfully arrest; have tried; and hanged the several hundred who are
> responsible for the socio-political and economic destruction of our
> nation. Not respecting the Will of the People is a most serious crime
> for elected or appointed public officials.
>
> Many of you have heard: "When I became a man, I put away 'childish
> things'."— like balls, bats and gloves. This past week the nation was
> expected to feel… good that an umpire was made to cry after having,
> horrendously, missed correctly calling an 'out' that was thrown to
> first base. If not for that bad call, the pitcher would have been
> credited with… a "perfect game". George Will—once considered to
> become the Commissioner of Baseball—defended there being no instant
> replays in that game. He argued that second-guessing (bad) calls
> would keep terminally long games going, when all that would be
> required to stop the game would be for the umpire to call a… "strike"
> when there was actually a "ball". It's clear that on issues of
> morality, George Will favors having the powerful and fallible
> (umpires) be in the game, rather than have baseball be played…
> fairly. His main standard of morality is to have 'stuff' that he can
> talk about in his columns. Instant replays would surely remove a lot
> of the animosity that keeps the fans coming back for more. At times,
> booing an umpire is an end in itself. Clearly, George Will wants the
> bad things to continue. So, he's not as 'smart' (and moral) as he's
> sometimes perceived.
>
> About two months ago, Glenn Beck ran out of any new corruption in the
> White House and in Congress to expose. Beck claims that he was
> Divinely Inspired to make "Faith, Hope, and Charity" his mantra. Now,
> he's passing up wearing jeans and sport coats in favor of suits and
> ties, making Beck seem more like a preacher than an in-the-trenches
> fighter to correct our broken government. Beck supposes, in his
> various states of madness, that understanding history; having good
> character; and praying are all that's needed to turn our nation
> around. Is yours truly, John A. Armistead, the only person in this
> country to know that adapting my New Constitution is THE quickest,
> easiest, and most effective way to FIX our broken government? Though
> I watch Fox News, daily, I see less and less supporting that such
> network has a moral backbone. On Fox, arguing has become an end in
> itself. In the 2008 election, CNN actively pushed to get socialists
> into office. But supposedly conservative Fox News won't do the
> converse in 2010. Instead, they apparently wish to lure viewers, even
> those wanting socialism, by having traitors like Bob Beckel appear on
> various shows. Time was when the FTC required stations (and networks)
> to prove that their programming is in keeping with the public good.
> I'll bet that no person on Earth can prove that Fox News cares where
> this country is headed. They only care about their share of the
> viewers. Sheppard Smith has the right Idea: Cover the news and let
> others do the (corrupt) commentating.
>
> Greta Van Susteren has an hour long show on Fox every weekday. Her
> 'moral sensibility', apparently, limits her to being just a reporter…
> who "covers" the news. Rarely has Greta sided very strongly with the
> correct, conservative political machine. She did that (barely) when
> she pressured Sen. Harry Reid to tell why he supported Obama Care when
> the American people, in poll after poll, revealed that they don't want
> government being involved in running health care at all. As an out,
> Reid—who is difficult to imagine ever having been a… boxer—turned
> effeminate and asked: "What should I have done, not pushed for health
> care at all?" Immediately, Greta should have shouted: "Yes, Senator,
> that's exactly what you should have done!" Ask yourselves, people,
> why didn't Van Susteren show some morality and side with the PEOPLE
> rather than with the criminals who are now squatting in public
> offices?
>
> Van Susteren did an admirable job getting Joran Van der Sloot to open-
> up about his selling of that poor Natalee Hollowell, from the USA, to
> a man headed to South America. That's a high-profile criminal
> investigation. But doesn't it pale, as a story, to there being a
> penned-and-polished New Constitution of the United States of America
> that can reverse the destructive tendencies in our government? I
> certainly think so!
>
> The leaking oil problem in the Gulf highlights a potential human-race-
> destroying problem: Suppose an asteroid is discovered that will crash
> into and destroy the world in two months. For too long, people have
> deferred to our mindless government for answers. Government had no
> answers with Katrina, nor with the oil spill. Apparently, as long as
> "thinking Americans" have their basketball, baseball, and football to
> distract them from other daily cares, the government, or the whole
> world… can be damned. Twenty four hours before that asteroid hits,
> newspapers will be printing those… sports pages, as if nothing is
> different.
>
> Unless Americans can utilize the solutions that are in the offing, the
> time could come when there will be no more sports to distract us, nor
> an "us" to be distracted by sports. Many are, strongly, foretelling
> our doom. Only I have the solution already in hand! Please tell your
> friends, neighbors, relatives and associates that a SC man, John A.
> Armistead, has penned and polished a New Constitution to put the
> People at the top of the pecking order. "United we stand; divided we
> fall." May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics
>
>
>
> On Jun 5, 7:08 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Winning the "sticky" Revolution.
>
> > Long before the present oil spill crisis in the Gulf of
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment