Re: Congressman Ron Paul Introduces H.R. 2768: Immediately Strip $1.6 Trillion From Rothschild's Federal Reserve.

true

but same problem

On Aug 4, 12:08 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (There was no federal reserve bank during Jackson's and Lincoln's era.....I
> think you are referencing a "National Bank")
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > the USA must free itself from the bonds of the FR
>
> > some don't forget:
> > Five US Presidents who sought to abolish the Jewish-owned Federal
> > Reserve Bank were assassinated:
>
> > 1) Andrew Jackson (Survived); 2) Abraham Lincoln; 3) James Garfield;
> > 4) William McKinley; 5) John Kennedy.
>
> > In a speech before Congress in 2002, entitled Abolish the Fed, Ron
> > Paul said:
>
> > — "Abolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congress to reassert its
> > Constitutional authority over monetary policy. The Constitution does
> > not give Congress the authority to delegate control over monetary
> > policy to a Central Bank. I urge my colleagues to put an end to the
> > manipulation of the money supply which erodes Americans' standard of
> > living and enriches well-connected elites." —
>
> > — "The greatest threat facing America today is not terrorism or
> > illegal immigration. The greatest threat is the shameless deficit
> > spending of our government and Federal Reserve currency devaluation.
> > The Press sometimes criticizes Federal Reserve policy but the validity
> > of the fiat system itself is never challenged. History shows that when
> > the destruction of monetary value becomes rampant, the political
> > structure becomes unstable. We then have good reason to be concerned
> > about the future of our nation."
>
> > On Aug 3, 9:19 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > **
> > >     <http://politicalvelcraft.org/author/volubrjotr/> Congressman Ron
> > Paul
> > > Introduces H.R. 2768: Immediately Strip $1.6 Trillion From Rothschild's
> > > Federal Reserve.<
> >http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/08/03/congressman-ron-paul-introduc...>
> > > *Volubrjotr <http://politicalvelcraft.org/author/volubrjotr/>* | August
> > 3,
> > > 2011 at 22:10 | Tags: debt <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=debt>,
> > Federal
> > > government of the United
> > > States<
> >http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=federal-government-of-the-united-st...>,
> > > federal reserve <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=federal-reserve>,
> > Federal
> > > Reserve System <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=federal-reserve-system
> > >,
> > > Money
> > > supply <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=money-supply>, Orders of
> > magnitude
> > > (numbers) <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=orders-of-magnitude-numbers>,
> > Ron
> > > Paul <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=ron-paul>, United States
> > Treasury
> > > security <
> >http://politicalvelcraft.org/?tag=united-states-treasury-security>|
> > > Categories:
> > > bailout <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?cat=1763588>,
> > > economy<http://politicalvelcraft.org/?cat=8590>,
> > > federal reserve <http://politicalvelcraft.org/?cat=6631>,
> > > rothschild<http://politicalvelcraft.org/?cat=676901>| URL:
> >http://wp.me/psXSG-bf1
>
> > > Rep. Ron Paul on Monday introduced legislation that would lower the
> > federal
> > > government's debt by canceling the roughly $1.6 trillion in debt held by
> > the
> > > Federal Reserve. Paul has argued for the last few weeks that the idea
> > > represents a quick way to make the growing fiscal crisis more manageable.
> > > Under his bill, H.R. 2768, [...]
>
> > > Read more of this
> > > post<
> >http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/08/03/congressman-ron-paul-introduc...>
>
> > > Add a comment to this
> > > post<
> >http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/08/03/congressman-ron-paul-introduc...>
>
> > >   [image: WordPress]
>
> > > WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> | Thanks for flying with
> > WordPress!
> > > Manage Subscriptions<
> >http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&...>|
> > > Unsubscribe<
> >http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&...>|
> > > Express
> > > yourself. Start a blog. <http://wordpress.com/signup/>
>
> > > *Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:*
> >http://subscribe.wordpress.com
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: I fail to see why this would even be controversial at all - if the cops know the race, it should be reported

it should be reported
---
of course it should
to do otherwise would be protection

On Aug 4, 2:43 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/141747/arkansas-democrat...

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 'Police Beat' column identifies suspects by race]

the liberal media doesn't want to offend their constituancy by
exposing the race of criminals

that's why the press doesn't report that 100 white women per day are
sexually attacked by black men or why white men don't rape black
women?

On Aug 4, 5:29 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> This totally mystifies me.  The basic premise is that the Arkansas
> Democrat was now printing the race of the criminals who are raping or
> mugging or attacking people in the area and the question is whether they
> should do this or not.  Nobody, least of all me, said anything about
> only printing this when the criminal is non-white and yet the responder
> immediately jumped on the idea that the racial description is all too
> often used only when the alleged criminal is not white.  I bet the
> victims are feeling all warm and fuzzy because they were attacked by
> someone and the race cannot be printed because potentially white
> criminals would not be identified as such while all others would be.  
> And the source of this story is a Journalism School - the Poynter
> Journalism School in Florida.  Sorry but their logic truly escapes me
> totally.
>
>
>
> [ Attached Message ]From:"Disqus" <notifications-Q4OSSD9...@disqus.net>To:rhomp2...@earthlink.netDate:Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:17:20 -0000Local:Thurs, Aug 4 2011 5:17 pmSubject:[poynter] Re: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 'Police Beat' column identifies suspects by race
>
> Rod Paul wrote, in response to rhomp2002:
>
> Because, as in your own examples, the racial description all too often is used only when the alleged criminal is not White.
>
> Link to comment:http://disq.us/2w4o5f
>
> rhomp2002 wrote:
>
> I fail to see why this would be controversial at all.  If you have a rapist out there and he is Chinese or Hispanic or African American, then say so.  Otherwise all the women would be scared to talk to anyone at all.  It just seems stupid to say that a man around 6 feet tall and weighing 180 lb raped 5 women in a neighborhood and then not say that he was African American could not be more stupid IMNSHO.  You need to give people the information they need to deal with what is out there on the street.
>
> -----
> Options:  Respond in the body to post a reply comment.
>
> To turn off notifications, go to:http://disqus.com/account/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: [Fwd: News Alert: Bloomberg Investing $30 Million of His Money in Program to Aid Minority Youth]

sounds like Coach can't stand to hear the truth about American jews

maybe you'll find the religious state of Israel a better place to live

On Aug 5, 6:22 am, Coach <coachl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sounds like plainolamerican lives in a compound with his Aryan
> brothers, Sink Heil bro.
>
> On Aug 4, 11:36 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > just another jew promoting minorities
>
> > they know where their political power comes from
>
> > On Aug 3, 8:19 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > Now watch him run for mayor again.
>
> > > [ Attached Message ]From:NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdir...@nytimes.com>To:rhomp2...@earthlink.netDate:Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:15:09 -0400Local:Wed, Aug 3 2011 8:15 pmSubject:News Alert: Bloomberg Investing $30 Million of His Money in Program to Aid Minority YouthBreaking News Alert
> > > The New York Times
> > > Wednesday, August 3, 2011 -- 9:03 PM EDT
> > > -----
>
> > > Bloomberg Investing $30 Million of His Money in Program to Aid Minority Youth
>
> > > The administration of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, in a blunt acknowledgment that thousands of young black and Latino men are cut off from New York's civic, educational and economic life, plans to spend nearly $130 million on far-reaching measures to improve their circumstances.
>
> > > The program, the most ambitious policy push of Mr. Bloomberg's third term, would overhaul how the government interacts with a population of about 315,000 New Yorkers who are disproportionately undereducated, incarcerated and unemployed.
>
> > > To pay for the endeavor in a time of fiscal austerity, the city is relying on an unusual source: Mr. Bloomberg himself, who intends to use his personal fortune to finance about a quarter of the cost, city officials said.
>
> > > Read More:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/04/nyregion/new-york-plan-will-aim-to-...
>
> > > About This E-Mail
> > > You received this message because you are signed up to receive breaking news
> > > alerts from NYTimes.com.
>
> > > To unsubscribe, change your e-mail address or to sign up for daily headlines
> > > or other newsletters, go to:http://www.nytimes.com/email
>
> > > NYTimes.com
> > > 620 Eighth Ave.
> > > New York, NY 10018
>
> > > Copyright 2011 The New York Times Company- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Why Is America Committing Suicide?

Why Is America Committing Suicide?
The US of A on the road to ruin
by Justin Raimondo, August 05, 2011

America is committing suicide. That's the only explanation I have for the course followed by US policymakers in the past decade, a period in which the US budget deficit has skyrocketed beyond all reason. While we have run up deficits before, some of them considerable by the standards of the day, in 2001 – the year we launched our endless " war on terrorism" – the deficit began to enter new territory. Whereas before it had fluctuated, going up, down, and effectively maintaining a steady state of neutral, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks this country went into debt bigtime, with the deficit climbing steadily, doubling in 2007, and nearly doubling again the next fiscal year.

In the name of fiscal "austerity," Congress recently authorized yet another raising of the debt ceiling, and everyone sits around waiting for the "draconian" cuts to fall – a "cut," that is, in the rate at which government spending is projected to grow. Only in Washington, D.C., is a "cut" actually an increase – just not as much of an increase as was anticipated. As Ron Paul pointed out, if Congress had simply frozen spending at 2004 levels, we'd have more of a "cut" than we do now.

No one is surprised by this Washington doubletalk: that's the language they speak in the Imperial City, where murdering civilians is " collateral damage" and taxation is " revenue enhancement" instead of good old-fashioned theft. It's silly season on Capitol Hill: so what else is new? Yet I sense a more sinister pattern in this Kabuki theater known as the debt ceiling drama, the implications of which are darker than I care to contemplate ­ but then again, that's my job …

While governments can only finance their completely non-productive (in reality: counter -productive) activities by incurring debt, it's rare in human history to find profligacy comparable to our own. One has to go all the way back to ancient Rome, under the heel of its more depraved emperors, to find a precedent. The numbers are not merely astonishing: they are inconceivable. The figure ­ $14.3 trillion – must forever remain in the world of abstractions, because any attempt by the human brain to concretize it fails. How do our lawmakers imagine we can continue to spend at these levels, living light years beyond our means?

Their recklessness is epitomized by how the military budget came out in all the deficit dickering. As it stands, real defense cuts only kick in if the "super-Congress" fails to come to an agreement on what cuts to make. Then and only then will the misnamed "defense" department come in for something approximating its fair share of cuts. Put another way: only in the most extreme and politically next-to-impossible case will Congress even consider cutting back on its overseas empire. They'll yank your grandmother off her dialysis machine before they'll contemplate getting rid of "foreign aid." 

We ordinary folk live in a completely different world than the movers and shakers of the Imperial City: no one outside the Beltway bubble can really understand the mental processes that allow for such a massive evasion of reality, a kind of collective madness that infects the ruling elite in this country, regardless of party. They talk down to the hoi polloi, and use a different language when they converse among themselves, but occasionally the truth comes out. In 2004, Ron Suskind wrote a piece for the New York Times Magazine which included this quote from an unnamed top White House aide:

"The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' … 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality­judiciously, as you will­we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'"

While the context was a discussion of the Iraq war, this mindset – which is dominant in the Washington of Barack Obama just as it was during the Bush era – pervades our ruling elite in all matters. Why shouldn't they run up a $14.3 trillion debt  ­ after all, don't they create their own reality? Armed  with such supernatural powers, we aren't going to let a little thing like impending bankruptcy stand in our way – not when we can wish it out of existence.

Except we can't. World markets trembled this week, and all indications are that the Big One is just now visible over the horizon. Americans are waking from their decade-long dream – or is that nightmare? – to discover that the world as they used to know it is falling apart, and a new world – a poorer, more restrictive, grayer world ­ is dawning. Yet our "leaders" in Washington are oblivious to the crisis, as much as they posture and pose: they are, personally, practically invulnerable to the effects of the economic collapse – at least, so far – and so don't take it seriously. Encased in their self-created bubble, and imbued with the radical subjectivism that has taken hold everywhere but in the sorely beleaguered reality-based community, our rulers pursue policies that are suicidal in their effect, if not their intent.  And I am beginning to wonder if that isn't their intent, at least on some level….

I put this out there as a proposition, a speculation, based solely on evidence of the circumstantial sort. When someone habitually engages in suicidal behavior, repeating the same pattern in spite of recognizing, on some level, that their actions are self-destructive, one has to wonder if they harbor a death wish. Which raises the question: So why is the American ruling class intent on committing suicide?

There is a theory of history, which I don't agree with, that treats civilizations as organic entities which go through a process of maturation, progressing from youth to senility in stages roughly comparable to the life process of a human being. Could the Spenglerians be right? Is American civilization entering a new phase ­ one of terminal decadence? This isn't the first time I've thought of these lines from Robinson Jeffers' poem, " Shine, Perishing Republic":

"While this America settles in the mould of its vulgarity, heavily thickening
          to empire

And protest, only a bubble in the molten mass, pops and sighs out, and the
          mass hardens,

I sadly smiling remember that the flower fades to make fruit, the fruit rots
          to make earth.

Out of the mother; and through the spring exultances, ripeness and decadence;
          and home to the mother.

You making haste haste on decay: not blameworthy; life is good, be it stubbornly
          long or suddenly

A mortal splendor: meteors are not needed less than mountains:
          shine, perishing republic."

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/08/04/why-is-america-committing-suicide/