Friday, March 25, 2011

**JP** Bhong Mosque Sadiqabad.

Designed/Patron by: Sardar Rais Ghazi Muhammad Khan (Late)
Status: Completed
Construction Date: 1932
Completion Date: 1982
Client: Sardar Rais Ghazi Muhammad Khan (Late)
Contractors: N/A
Building Style: Vernacular Architecture
Building Type: Religous
Building Usage: Masjid + Madrassah/Tourist Spot
Height: N/A
Location: Bhong Sharif, Sadiqabad, Rahim Yar Khan

Description:

THE AGHA KHAN 1986 AWARDFor Architecture

Bhong Mosque Sadiqabad.

Master Craftsmen: Haji Rahim Bukhsh, Mistri Faiz Muhammad, Allah Diwaya, Nabi Bukhsh, Hafiz Anwar, Faiz Bukhsh, Wahid Bukhsh, Rahim Bukhsh, Syed Shah Ghulam Mahmood, Abdul Ghani, Allah Bukhsh, Ahmed Bukhsh.

Completion of the large mosque in 1982 in this town of 5000 in the south eastern Punjab concluded the complex which was begun in 1932. Rais Ghazi Muhammad, client, designer, patron and landlord, conceived, directed and funded the entire building program. Over the 50 years of its evolution, the complex has generated job and trained up to 1000 workers and craftsmen in indigenous crafts. Its development included the growth of infrastructures including a market, roads, installation of electricity and running water, irrigation and bus and railroad lines. Until the development of secular education in the early 1960s, the mosque was the principal regional centre for education.

Bhong Mosque

The large mosque and a smaller one, containing a women's prayer hall and library, sit on a 3 m high platform which contains storage space and worker's quarters. An ablution pool, the school and guest accommodations are found at an intermediate level. The madressa and student rooms are located still lower. The mosque garden surrounds the north and part of the east side of the complex. A private gate marks the entrance to the garden, along with a water channel which defines the main axis leading to the mosque.

Formally, the mosque reflects the traditional regional style, with its three ribbed domes and eight minarets accenting the corners and entrance. In addition, Rais Ghazi borrowed stylistic elements from monuments in Lahore, Iran, Spain and Turkey. He mixed these with the western colonial elements of the 1740s, which appear in the guest houses and market. Decorative elements and techniques used are also eclectic, though the extensive ornamentation is standard. The structural system combines brick masonry and cement mortar with brick and stone arches and reinforced concrete. Brick domes are set as independents units on top of reinforced concrete roofs.

Materials and crafts range from the traditional teak, ivory, marble, colored glass, onxy, glazed tile work, fresco, mirror work, gilded tracery, ceramics, calligraphy work and inlay to the modern and synthetic marbleized industrial tile, artificial stone facing, terrazzo, colored cement tile and wrought iron. Rais Ghazi used modern materials freely in the ancillary buildings, such as, the gates, the small mosque and the porch of the large mosque. He applied only traditional materials to the mosque interiors. His intention was to represent as many forms of vernacular craft and Islamic religious architectural features as possible, using a combination of modern and traditional materials.

Citation

The award is made in recognition of a significant attempt by a single individual to create a local center of learning and building crafts, by establishing it in the village of Bhong, in the district of Rahimyar Khan. It is a complex of buildings, consisting at first of a small mosque, later converted as a prayer hall and library for women, a madressa and residential dormitories for students and visitors. The entire infrastructure required to serve the complex, such as roads and irrigation channels were also built by him for the use of the people. After some years, the grand mosque was constructed.

The complex as it stands today, is fully utilized by the local population and its acceptability with the people has been well established. The madressa is still functioning, although with less importance than in the past. At its peak, students came from Iran, Afghanistan and Turkey.

Bhong Mosque

This tremendous effort of Rais Ghazi Muhammad extended over a period of nearly 50 years from 1930 to 1980, during which time he engaged specialized craftsmen in various trades from all over Pakistan and master masons for the lavish ornamentation and decoration of the buildings of the complex. He patronized and encouraged these craftsmen and set up a workshop for their training and a large number of the craftsmen have been subsequently employed in the restoration of the monuments by the government. Thus he made a monumental effort in the revival of traditional crafts.

The achievements of the master craftsmen over two generations deserve to be recognized. It is sometimes thought that the quality of the architecture produced lacks authenticity in a country with a long historical and cultural architectural tradition.

The buildings are of particular interest because of the skill with which the craftsmen have chosen and brought together vastly different materials and techniques. They have evolved a new kind of craftsmanship by choosing existing manufactured elements and recombining them in original and judicious ways, and producing a new kind of creativity using mass produced elements to generate surprising meanings from new contexts and juxtapositions.

In giving the award to this building complex, the jury wished to make an acknowledgement to the diversity that enriches society. "Popular" buildings might be a little different from the buildings derived from indigenous craftsmanship. The population might love them, and therefore, they have an immense significance for the ordinary people, in spite of the fact that the architects might hate them.

Bhong represents a monumental achievement in these terms. It enshrines and epitomizes the "popular" taste in Pakistan with all its vigor, pride, tension and sentiment. Its use and misuse of signs and symbols express appropriate growing pains in transition and yet may prove significant for the future.

Specialists were gathered from all over Pakistan and India: master masons and craftsmen from Rajasthan; from Multan for glazed tile work, mosaic, woodwork and painting and from Karachi for painting and calligraphy. Craftsmen for the artificial stone work and most of the unskilled laborers were from Bhong. Workshops were set up to train craftsmen in skills that had hitherto been passed from father to son for generations. At the peak of construction, the project employed 1000 workers and trained up to 200 craftsmen. The workshop helped to revive and reserve these indigenous crafts and have contributed to the government's conservation efforts.






Regards.,

WAQAR SHAFI
 
I. T. PROFESSIONAL
KARACHI-PAKISTAN.
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Pics and toons 3/24/11 (3)




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Pics and toons 3/24/11 (2)

 



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Pics and toons 3/24/11 (1)




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Why the Libyan War Is Unconstitutional


Why the Libyan War Is Unconstitutional
by John Samples
This article appeared on The Daily Caller on March 22, 2011.

War is commonly defined as "a state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations." By that definition, the United States and its allies have been at war with Libya since late last week. "At my direction," President Obama told Congress, "U.S. military forces commenced operations" in Libya.

Article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution states that "Congress shall have the power ... to declare war..." Since Congress has not declared war on Libya, is American involvement in the Libyan war unconstitutional?

Some members of Congress think so. Rep. Scott Ringell, a freshman from Virginia, said that the Libya hostilities "should trigger a debate within Congress and [among] the American people about proper interpretation and application of [the] Constitution. I'm surprised more conservatives aren't speaking out about this issue." Some Democrats have spoken out questioning the validity of the action. In the past, Senators Obama and Biden both said the president lacks the authority to do what President Obama has done.

The question of the constitutionality of the Libyan effort depends on the original public meaning of Article I, section 8 of the Constitution. Vice President (then Senator) Joseph Biden recalled that meaning in a speech on the Senate floor on July 30, 1998. He noted that the original draft of the Constitution would have empowered Congress to "make war." James Madison and Elbridge Gerry moved that the language be changed to "declare war" so that the president would have the power "to repel sudden attacks." Biden pointed out that only one framer, Pierce Butler of South Carolina, thought the president should have the power to initiate war.

Biden concluded that under the Constitution, the president could not use force without prior authorization unless it was necessary to "repel a sudden attack." Presidential candidate Barack Obama agreed in 2007: "the President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

Senator Biden also expounded on the framers' reasons for limiting presidential discretion:
The rationale for vesting the power to launch war in Congress was simple. The Framers' views were dominated by their experience with the British King, who had unfettered power to start wars. Such powers the Framers were determined to deny the President.

Of course, in 1998 and today, some claim the president has broad powers to initiate and carry on war under the "executive power" and the commander-in-chief clauses of Article II. But the framers rejected this "monarchist view" of the presidency.

The framers of the Constitution knew that the English king possessed certain prerogatives or discretionary powers to act for the public interest. Among these prerogatives was the power to declare war. He could also carry on undeclared wars. Yet the framers explicitly gave Congress the power to declare war. Apart from repelling sudden attacks, the Constitution is silent on the president's power to conduct undeclared wars. Read against the English background, the text of the Constitution creates a constrained executive for the new nation.

What does this history imply for the present? President Obama told Congress that the use of force in Libya was intended "to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and address the threat posed to international peace and security by the crisis in Libya." But the framers did not empower the president to initiate war to prevent humanitarian catastrophes, deal with threats to international peace and security, or protect the lives of foreign nationals. The framers stated that the Constitution was instituted to provide for the common defense of We, the People, not the defense of people everywhere.

They did recognize a limited power to repel sudden attacks. The Libyan regime did not suddenly attack the United States or its citizens. There is nothing to repel. America's war in Libya thus cannot be constitutional.

What now? The Supreme Court is unlikely to invalidate presidential actions in Libya. The task of vindicating the Constitution falls to Congress. It needs to hear from its conservatives, those who believe in the original meaning of the Constitution. Congress also needs to hear from its liberals, those who believe what Senators Biden and Obama once said about presidential power. Together members of Congress could finally live up to their constitutional obligations and impose restraints on a president who has become too much of a king.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=12905