Re: Urgent Message to New York State Voters: Don't Let Obstructionist Republicans Win Back The State Senate

False twisted pretzel logic. No dice, no points to Dick.

On 11/1/10, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
> And the support of the people of NY state is what? Do you have numbers
> as to what support this has?
>
> Also remember that members of legislative bodies represent their
> constituents. Suppose the constituents supported civil unions but not
> marriage, something which is common across the country. If the civil
> union gave you the benefits of marriage, why would you give a damn. And
> if the constituents supported civil unions but not marriage, then that
> is what their senators should vote. Did you ask why the 8 Dems voted
> against? If they had not voted against it would have passed 32-30.
> Blame them!
>
> On 11/01/2010 02:01 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>> On December 2nd, 2009, by a vote of 38
>> Nays to 24 Yeas, The New York State Senate Voted Against Marriage
>> Equality.
>> Every single Republican and eight Democrats voted for discrimination.
>>
>>
>> On 11/1/10, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> What stand-alone bill did the Republicans vote for discrimination. If
>>> you are still harping on DADT, they should have noted against that
>>> debacle. The garbage that was tacked onto that bill made it imperative
>>> to see it did not get passed.
>>>
>>> If you want repeal of DADT passed, then put up a bill that repeals
>>> DADT. Also make sure that you also change the UCMJ as well. As it
>>> stands now if all you do is let the judge say DADT is bad, then it
>>> defaults to the older legislation in UCMJ which actually does not even
>>> include DADT but only dismissal. Stop playing stupid games with the
>>> crap. Pitiful! Also remember who first passed and signed DADT. And
>>> no, it was not the Republicans. Thank your hero, Bubba, and his crew
>>> that were in charge.
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2010 01:21 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>>> Every single Republican voted for discrimination.
>>>> Every single one. No exceptions.
>>>>
>>>> Do NOT vote for a Republican obstructionist under ANY circumstances.
>>>>
>>>> A Republican Mammoth:
>>>>
>>>> https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNhVxhrwnnsNAk0dYuT8PvXUIV9y9tWhKf2_uKzKfQ_0KcsIjKkbhYhvdcAIE04c5AKTqYjLLuy27i1NoX737NSx04zgkVJK3kVk68RR3WGAuKqlzZHkDGbhMmIKv3nzOdp6PS9Fe6DSnd/s400/GOP+mammoth+large.jpg
>>>>
>>>> On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa<keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.