Monday, January 24, 2011

Fwd: News Alert: Appeals Court Throws Emanuel Off Chicago Mayoral Ballot

    Fun and games in Chicago -  Now what is he going to do.  Betcha Zero is on the phone to the State Supremes on this one or else telling Rahm, "Come home, all is forgiven."

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: News Alert: Appeals Court Throws Emanuel Off Chicago Mayoral Ballot
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:24:46 -0500
From: NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdirect@nytimes.com>
Reply-To: nytdirect@nytimes.com
To: rhomp2002@EARTHLINK.NET


Breaking News Alert The New York Times Mon, January 24, 2011 -- 1:23 PM ET -----  Appeals Court in Illinois Throws Rahm Emanuel Off Chicago Mayoral Ballot  The Illinois Appellate Court ruled on Monday that Rahm Emanuel, the former congressman and White House chief of staff, did not meet the residency requirements to run for mayor of Chicago, and threw him off the ballot. The ruling overturned a decision in his favor by the Chicago Board of Elections. The decision is expected to be appealed to the state Supreme Court.  Read More: http://www.nytimes.com?emc=na   About This E-Mail You received this message because you are signed up to receive breaking news alerts from NYTimes.com.  To unsubscribe, change your e-mail address or to sign up for daily headlines or other newsletters, go to: http://www.nytimes.com/email  NYTimes.com 620 Eighth Ave. New York, NY 10018  Copyright 2011 The New York Times Company    

**JP** Falah Path, Must read this book...

 

Second Amendment Remedies

Second Amendment Remedies
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1300

"
American freedom dictates that we will never have a risk-free society. But taking away our 2nd Amendment freedoms could certainly put us all at more risk."
--
"An armed society is a polite society."
- Robert Heinlein

When dealing with legal issues, far too many people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Learn how to control judges and lawyers from a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits!

Re: Wyoming Legislation Targets Islamic, International Law

Seems either unnecessary, a waste of time, or both.

I'm going with the latter.

On Jan 24, 12:36 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> *Wyoming Legislation Targets Islamic, International Lawhttp://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/article_ab...
> --
> We're in a fight for freedom, folks. Our freedom is at stake.
>
> *
> *When dealing with legal issues, far too many people rely on stupid
> ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars!
> Learn how to control judges and lawyers
> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> from a lawyer with a
> quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits!*

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Google Seeks to Weaken Search Engine Ranking of "Content Farming" Websites

Google Seeks to Weaken Search Engine Ranking of "Content Farming" Websites
http://blacklistednews.com/Google-Seeks-to-Weaken-Search-Engine-Ranking-of-%22Content-Farming%22-Websites/12402/0/7/7/Y/M.html

Is this shift intended to punish sites such as The Drudge Report[1], The Blaze[2] and Freedoms Phoenix[3]?

[1] http://www.drudgereport.com/
[2] http://www.theblaze.com/
[3] http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Front-Page.htm
--
"We used to be able to rely on the mainstream media to keep governments in check... but these days they're just petty hacks and cheerleaders."

When dealing with legal issues, far too many people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Learn how to control judges and lawyers from a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits!

Wyoming Legislation Targets Islamic, International Law

Wyoming Legislation Targets Islamic, International Law
http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/article_abc1a5ff-96dc-5b2e-ab34-f46d4b68f0ec.html
--
We're in a fight for freedom, folks. Our freedom is at stake.

When dealing with legal issues, far too many people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Learn how to control judges and lawyers from a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits!

Fwd: REMEMBER: CELL PHONE NUMBERS GO PUBLIC THIS MONTH



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: REMEMBER: CELL PHONE NUMBERS GO PUBLIC THIS MONTH
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:46:39 -0500
From: Kerwin, Michael <Michael.Kerwin@ssa.gov>
To: 'jkerwin2@verizon.net' <jkerwin2@verizon.net>, 'dick thompson' <rhomp2002@earthlink.net>, 'Big2Wheelr@aol.com' <Big2Wheelr@aol.com>, 'The Carleo's' <carleo@comcast.net>, 'cordovado@verizon.net' <cordovado@verizon.net>


 >   > REMEMBER:  Cell Phone Numbers Go Public this  month.   > REMINDER.....  all cell phone numbers are being released  to telemarketing  > companies and you will st art  to receive sales calls. >  > .... YOU WILL BE  CHARGED FOR THESE CALLS >  > To prevent  this, call the following number from your cell  phone:     > 888-382-1222. > It  is the National DO NOT CALL li st It will only  take a minute of your  > time.. It blocks your  number for five (5) years. You mu st call from  the  > cell phone number you want to have blocked.  You  cannot call from a different  > phone  number. >  > HELP OTHERS BY PASSING THIS ON ..  It takes about 20 seconds.    > _https://www.donotcall.gov/default.aspx_  > (https://www.donotcall.gov/default.aspx)    >  >  >   >   >  

Re: Who knew and why was this info hidden for so long - did previous congress hope it would go away?

somewhat related

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON—The government says it will sell 465.1 million warrants it
holds from Citigroup Inc. in an auction on Tuesday. It is the latest
effort to recoup costs from the $700 billion financial bailout.
Sale of the warrants gives the holder the right to buy Citigroup
common stock at a fixed price.
The warrant sales will add to the $12 billion profit that Treasury
says the government has realized from its $45 billion bailout of
Citigroup. Treasury released that estimate in December when it
completed the remaining sales of Citigroup common stock that the
government held.

On Jan 24, 10:38 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_17178165?source=email&nclick_c...

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Who knew and why was this info hidden for so long - did previous congress hope it would go away?

http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_17178165?source=email&nclick_check=1

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Another little girl shot and killed in the name of "patriotic" conservative nut jobs

25 Americans are killed everyday by illegal alien/criminals

oh, the outrage!!!

On Jan 22, 11:44 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> January 21, 2011 03:00 PM
> The Shawna Forde trial: Will the mainstream media bother to notice?
> By David Neiwert
>
> The little girl's name was Brisenia Flores.
> She lived near the border with her parents and sister outside the town
> of Arivaca, Arizona.
> On May 30 of 2009, a woman named Shawna Forde, who led an offshoot
> unit of Minutemen who ran armed border patrols for patriotic "fun".
> Forde's gang had decided to go "operational," which meant they
> concocted a scheme to raid drug smugglers and take their money and
> drugs and use it to finance a border race war and "start a revolution
> against the government". They targeted the Flores home, which had
> neither money nor drugs, based on dubious information.
> They convinced Flores to let them in by claiming to be law-enforcement
> officers seeking fugitives, then shot him point-blank in the head when
> he questioned them and wounded his wife, Gina Gonzalez.
> And then, while she pleaded for her life, they shot Brisenia in cold
> blood in the head.
> (Her sister, fortunately, was sleeping over at a friend's.)
>
> http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/shawna-forde-trial-will-mains...
>
> ---
> PS. I know the conservative nut jobs are offended by what I think
> about this.
> But I don't really give a rats ass.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

pure fun

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=OQnU1t7UzgM

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

RE: **JP** Har Gahar Mein Mander Ki Ghantti

Its very good effort to awake the Muslim Nation. Keep going................
 
Muhammad Imran 


From: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com [mailto:joinpakistan@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Muhammed Shafiq
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 2:14 PM
To: ahmed bhai; PakistaniCommunityinGulf@yahoogroups.com; Pakistani-Girls@googlegroups.com; PakistaniWriters@yahoogroups.com; pakistan-media@yahoogroups.com; joinpakistan@googlegroups.com; kutefun@yahoogroups.com; kute_group@yahoogroups.com; Kat's Eye Group
Subject: **JP** Har Gahar Mein Mander Ki Ghantti

Thanks for the sharing greats sentences for the our Muslim Community .
 

01a101cb6787$dee24dd0$6602a8c0@mehboob


-- 



 





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** ICC Cricket World Cup 2011

Dear cricket lovers,

Check out the amazing excel work. Complete ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 fixture with point table. Update it as the World Cup proceeds and get to know who is on the top, who has qualified, what are the run rates etc.

 



--
"Dream is not that what you see in your sleep..Dream is the thing which do not allow you to sleep"


Regards,

Talha Ahmed Ali

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Another Fail by Zero and the State Department

   
The State Dept and the WH are supposed to vet the program at State Dinners.  Guess they either missed this or it was once again Amateur Night in DC:


http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/01/chinese-pianist-plays-propaganda-tune.html
Modify       message

Re: **JP** DAILY QURAN AND HADITH

SubhanAllah n JazakAllah

On 1/23/11, Imran Ilyas <imran.ilyass@gmail.com> wrote:
> *IN THE NAME OF "ALLAH"
> **Assalamu'alaikum Wa Rahmatullah e Wa Barakatuhu,*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Thanks & Best regards,
>
> Imran Ilyas
> Dubai
> Cell: 00971509483403
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
> You all are invited to come and share your information with other group
> members.
> To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
> You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
> on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Keith Olbermann New Show


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Military Spending: The New Third Rail

On Jan 23, 10:15 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> "A careful look at the budget-cutting proposal offered by the GOP reveals several points. One, even if it were adopted in its entirety, it would cut spending by only $250 billion a year, just a quarter of what is needed to close the deficit. Two, the bill plays into the hands of the Democrats who largely placed the Republic at such financial risk over the past two years and then left the mess created to be cleaned up somehow by the Republicans.

First I don't think military spending is a 3rd rail at all.
Second the only reason Dems approved Republican military spending was
out of fear of being labeled unpatriotic and unAmerican by Republicans
repeatedly demanding the money multiple times in the first place.

I believe many Tea Partiers will endorse military spending cuts
despite Republican disapproval, and that is a good thing.
But that said, the military spending ball is in the Dem court now and
they should take the lead in the issue instead of waiting to be led.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Truth:

On Jan 23, 4:44 pm, Wes <wesleykell...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't say Jesus was a Socialist and he did use force that one
> time in the temple (maybe that was a mistake)

Force against a table?
He knocked over tables, he didn't knock over people.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Another little girl shot and killed in the name of "patriotic" conservative nut jobs

On Jan 23, 4:35 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Where was your outrage, when Arizona rancher Rob Krentz was brutally
> murdered?

Ok, so I'm outraged at that also...
but I would just wonder where his conservative gun was and why it
didn't protect him?

The little girl didn't have a gun, nor did her parents, and their
house was broken into by "patriots" people with legal guns, who then
proceeded to murder them.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Truth:

"...who gives away free Health Care."

No, he wants to give away very expensive health care, paid for by hard
working American taxpayers. If it were free I don't think anyone would
have an issue with it.


On Jan 23, 11:55 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Truth:
> President Obama is *not* a brown skinned anti war socialist who gives
> away free Health Care.
>
> You are thinking of Jesus Christ.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:14:59 +0000
From: Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir <gabeposey@gmail.com>
To: rhomp2002@earthlink.net


Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir

Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir



01/23/2011

Posted: 22 Jan 2011 07:06 PM PST

Reality:DaybyDayCartoon

Reality Shows.

Military Spending: The New Third Rail

"A careful look at the budget-cutting proposal offered by the GOP reveals several points. One, even if it were adopted in its entirety, it would cut spending by only $250 billion a year, just a quarter of what is needed to close the deficit. Two, the bill plays into the hands of the Democrats who largely placed the Republic at such financial risk over the past two years and then left the mess created to be cleaned up somehow by the Republicans. Failure by the Republicans to do precisely that will inure to the benefit of the Democrats in the upcoming elections in 2012 and 2014. Third, the bill limits the debate within certain parameters, with defense spending off-limits, as noted. Finally, unless defense spending is slashed, along with the rest of Leviathan, then deficit spending will continue until default." 

Military Spending: The New Third Rail
Written by Bob Adelmann   
Friday, 21 January 2011 16:17

When the Spending Reduction Act of 2011 was unveiled yesterday by House Republicans Scott Garrett (R-N.J.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), and Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), U.S. News and World Report called it "eye-popping," referring to the bill's attempt to rein in government spending by $2.5 trillion over the next 10 years. Rep. Jordan, who is the Chairman of the Republican Study Committee (RSC ), explained the need for such sharp cuts:

This mountain of debt, nearly the size of our entire economy, threatens to create a whole new financial crisis. Every day we refuse to change course and instill some fiscal responsibility, the problem grows ever larger.

Rep. Garrett commented, "This bill represents the first step in the process, not the last." Sen. DeMint concurred:

The Spending Reduction Act begins the difficult task of shrinking the Federal bureaucracy that threatens our future prosperity. Congress must take the steps now to balance the budget, pay off our debt, and preserve freedom for future generations.

More than 100 cuts are recommended, including:
  • reducing the federal workforce by 15 percent
  • eliminating all remaining "stimulus" spending
  • privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
  • prohibiting any funding of the implementation ­ or legal defense ­ of ObamaCare
  • eliminating Amtrak subsidies

 Of note was eliminating subsidies for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB) which was suggested on this website earlier this week, with the author concluding that "the permanent solution for freedom is to pull it [CPB] out by the roots: abolishing the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, and thus eliminating its funding altogether."

Careful observers of the announcement by Garrett, Jordan and DeMint, however, noted that the proposed cuts "would reduce current spending for non-defense, non-homeland security and non-veterans programs to 2008 levels." [Emphasis added.] This reflects the socially-conservative bent of the RSC, which "has always pushed for significant cuts in non-defense spending," supporting instead cuts in "pork" spending in order to balance the budget. 

But the day is long past when such cuts, even if enacted, would have any appreciable effect on the annual anticipated "trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see."  To limit the conversation to non-defense spending falls into the playbook of the military-industrial ­ and the military-surveillance ­ complexes. As Rep, Ron Paul (R-Texas) points out, "The total expenditures to maintain our world empire are approximately $1 trillion annually, which is roughly what the entire federal budget was in 1990!"

We spend more on defense than the rest of the world combined, and far more than we spent during the Cold War. These expenditures in many cases foment resentment that does not make us safer, but instead makes us a target.

We referee and arm conflicts the world over, and have troops in some 140 countries with over 700 military bases…[this spending has] nothing to do with the security of the United States….

Eric Margolis outlined the enormous sums involved in "defense" spending: "Pentagon spending [is] $880 billion. Add secret 'black programs' (about $70 billion), military aid to foreign nations like Egypt, Israel and Pakistan (including bribes), 225,000 military "contractors" (mercenaries and workers), and veterans' costs. Add $75 billion for 16 poorly functioning intelligence agencies with 200,000 employees who keep tripping over one another."

So far, for the RSC at least, considering military spending cuts is off-limits. For them, it is the current "third rail" (touch it and you die) of politics. But that is about to change. As noted by Anthony Wile of The Daily Bell, "If the Republicans do not seize on the issue, it will be thrust upon them." Even some military hawks are having second thoughts about the massive and ever-escalating military spending. Consider comments from Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) on the House floor:

It is time…to speak out publicly, Mr. Speaker. We need to become more engaged in the issue [of wars and their costs] and make our feelings known.

[Regarding Afghanistan my military advisor, a retired general] asks, "What is the end state we are looking to achieve, measures of effectiveness? What is our exit strategy?" [He asks,] "What do we say to the mother and father, to the wife of the last soldier or Marine killed to support a corrupt government and corrupt leader in a war that cannot be won?'" It is time that Congress and the American people really look at what is going on and what war really means.

Ron Paul couldn't agree more: "There is nothing conservative about spending money we don't have simply because that spending is for defense." He continues:

No enemy can harm us in the way we are harming ourselves, namely bankrupting the nation and destroying our own currency. The former Soviet Union did not implode because it was attacked: it imploded because it was broke.

We cannot improve our economy if we refuse to examine all major outlays, including so-called defense spending.

A careful look at the budget-cutting proposal offered by the GOP reveals several points. One, even if it were adopted in its entirety, it would cut spending by only $250 billion a year, just a quarter of what is needed to close the deficit. Two, the bill plays into the hands of the Democrats who largely placed the Republic at such financial risk over the past two years and then left the mess created to be cleaned up somehow by the Republicans. Failure by the Republicans to do precisely that will inure to the benefit of the Democrats in the upcoming elections in 2012 and 2014. Third, the bill limits the debate within certain parameters, with defense spending off-limits, as noted. Finally, unless defense spending is slashed, along with the rest of Leviathan, then deficit spending will continue until default. 

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/5991-military-spending-the-new-third-rail

A Government Work Simulator


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Countdown with Keith Olbermann: The Basement Edition





WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Tucson Shooter Jared Loughner was inspired by right-wing conspiracy theory, in Zeitgeist

Tommy obviously has no clue what " zeitgeist " means !

****************************************************************************************************

On Jan 23, 11:12 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know who reminded me of this,  it was probably you Bruce, but Rosie
> O'Donnell,  Charlie Sheen,  Cynthia "Queen Moonbat McKinney,  Ed Asner,
> Jesse "The Body" (And former voice of the Tampa Bay  Buccaneers)  Ventura,
> Whoopie Goldberg, and a host of other Moonbats are also
> conspiratorialists.....Far from anything remotely considered, "Right
> Wing".   Once again,  Lil' Tommie continues to spread hate, lies and smear,
> from the likes of a Moonbat like Michele Goldberg,  (I'm sure, a good Irish
> American gal)
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > I believe I met Michelle in DC.
>
> > Typical middle brow whoreflak.
>
> > What makes 9/11 conspiracy theorists "right wing"?
>
> > John Stroebel, your fellow Obama supporting yahoogroup spammer, is one, and
> > he was a socialist for years, though lately he has been pretending to like
> > Ron Paul (while continuing to smear anyone who criticizes Odumbie).
>
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> The Cult Web Film that Inspired Loughner
>
> >> by Michelle Goldberg
>
> >> We now know a little bit more about the matrix of ideas that helped
> >> inspire Jared Loughner's murderous rampage on Saturday. According to a
> >> friend of his interviewed on Good Morning America on Wednesday, the
> >> conspiracy documentary Zeitgeist "poured gasoline on his fire" and had
> >> "a profound impact on Jared Loughner's mindset and how he views the
> >> world that he lives in." He was also, according to his friend's
> >> father, influenced by the documentary Loose Change, a classic of the
> >> 9/11 Truth movement. This does not mean that either of these movies is
> >> responsible for making Loughner do what he did, but it does show how
> >> his madness was shaped by a broader climate of paranoia, and offers a
> >> clue as to why he targeted Gabrielle Giffords.
>
> >> According to his friend, Zach Osler, Loughner "didn't listen to
> >> political radio, he didn't take sides, he wasn't on the left, he
> >> wasn't on the right." Naturally, conservatives have seized upon this
> >> to exonerate themselves of charges of incitement. But it's not that
> >> simple. It's hard to place Zeitgeist and Loose Change on the
> >> conventional partisan spectrum—both come from a shadowy conspiracy-mad
> >> subculture where the far right and the far left meet. Yet it's the
> >> contemporary right, the right of Glenn Beck and the Tea Party, that
> >> has mainstreamed ideas from this demimonde in an unprecedented way.
>
> >> To understand how, it helps to look at the career of Alex Jones, an
> >> Austin radio host and the country's most prominent conspiracy
> >> theorist. Jones was the executive producer of Loose Change, and chunks
> >> of Zeitgeist are taken from his documentary Terrorstorm. Jones
> >> disagrees with elements of Zeitgeist—he's a Christian, while Zeitgeist
> >> attacks religion—but he's said he supports 90 percent of what's in the
> >> movie, and he promotes it on his show. "A lot of people find my work
> >> because of Zeitgeist," he said during an interview with the
> >> documentary's director, Peter Joseph.
>
> >> The point, again, is not that Alex Jones, Zeitgeist, or The Tea Party
> >> are responsible for Loughner's crimes. The point is that he targeted
> >> Giffords for a reason, one rooted in his unhinged interpretation of
> >> recognizable conspiracy theories.
>
> >> Both Zeitgeist and Alex Jones promote the idea that world events are
> >> controlled by a secretive banking cabal that is using debt to enslave
> >> us all. Zeitgeist echoes Alex Jones in warning that the United States
> >> is about to be merged with Canada and Mexico into a "North American
> >> Union" that will use a new currency, the "Amero." "When the time is
> >> right," Zeitgeist informs us, "the North American Union, The European
> >> Union, the African Union, and the Asian Union will be merged together,
> >> forming the final stages of the plan these men have been working on
> >> for over 60 years: a one-world government." This government will
> >> implant microchips in all of our arms. "In the end, everybody will be
> >> locked into a monitored control grid, where every single action you
> >> perform is documented," it says.
>
> >> Zeitgeist, which came out in 2007 and has since spawned two sequels,
> >> is an Internet phenomenon. The two-hour documentary is available for
> >> free online, and according to its creators, it has been viewed tens of
> >> millions of times. Its claims are heatedly debated on Ron Paul forums
> >> and anarchist websites; excerpts appear on numerous Tea Party pages.
> >> It has a global following: When it played in a South African theater,
> >> the Cape Times described it as a "disturbing reminder" of "the subtle
> >> move towards a micro-chipped society, with the world's population
> >> potentially destined to be logged onto a monitored grid, leading up to
> >> a centralized one world economy."
>
> >> The idea of control and manipulation is the movie's real theme,
> >> knitting together its disparate parts. Zeitgeist's second-third
> >> rehashes classic 9/11 Truth theories that purport to show that the
> >> attacks were actually an inside job. This was done, the final section
> >> argues, at the behest of a banking cabal that has repeatedly goaded
> >> the United States into war in order to solidify its wealth and power.
> >> Chip Berlet, a senior analyst at the think tank Political Research
> >> Associates and one of the country's foremost experts on right-wing
> >> movements, points out that Zeitgeist borrows liberally from the G.
> >> Edward Griffin's The Creature from Jekyll Island, an "expose" of the
> >> Federal Reserve System popular with the John Birch Society, Alex
> >> Jones, and some Tea Party groups. It also draws on ideas from the
> >> Protocols of the Elders of Zion, though it never mentions Jews.
>
> >> Right-wing conspiratorial beliefs have long festered on the fringes,
> >> but in the Obama era, they've been injected into the center of our
> >> politics like never before. The distance between figures like Alex
> >> Jones and the contemporary conservative movement has shrunk
> >> alarmingly.
>
> >> Steeped in the rhetoric of the militia movement, Jones has promoted
> >> just about every conspiracy theory out there: He even accused the
> >> Illuminati of putting its symbols in the Starbucks logo as a taunting
> >> show of strength. Though rooted in the right, he also occasionally has
> >> guests from the far left—he's hosted Democratic Congressman Dennis
> >> Kucinich [Kucinich is on the "far left"? -- WH] as well as Texas
> >> Republican Louie Gohmert. His political hero is Ron Paul—he runs
> >> RonPaulWarRoom.com, and Paul is a frequent guest on his radio show.
> >> But until recently, most conservatives disdained him. In 2007,
> >> Michelle Malkin argued that Paul's association with Jones was enough
> >> to disqualify the congressman from participating in GOP primary
> >> debates.
>
> >> Since then, though, Republican politics have become a lot more
> >> paranoid. Tea Party groups and Fox News started echoing Jones'
> >> warnings that the swine flu virus was really a pretext to establish
> >> martial law. Lou Dobbs went on Jones' show in 2008 to discuss the
> >> coming North American Union. In March 2009, Jones released The Obama
> >> Deception, which argued that Obama is the front man for a
> >> transnational oligarchy working to create a one-world totalitarian
> >> state. The day after it came out, the online Fox News show Freedom
> >> Watch did a joint broadcast with him. "I appreciate what you're
> >> exposing," Fox host Andrew Napolitano told Jones. "I must tell you
> >> that there was a time when the types of things that you are warning
> >> against was not discussed openly and publicly." Glenn Beck
> >> fictionalized Jones-style conspiracy theories in his 9/11 truth-themed
> >> novel, The Overton Window.
>
> >> People who study the right have worried for months about the
> >> consequences of paranoid beliefs about treasonous government plots. In
> >> 2009, Berlet authored a report titled, "Toxic to Democracy: Conspiracy
> >> Theories, Demonization and Scapegoating." It traced the history and
> >> dissemination of the kind of conspiracy theories floating around the
> >> right, and said, "People who believe conspiracist allegations
> >> sometimes act on those irrational beliefs, and this has concrete
> >> consequences in the real world."
>
> >> Loughner was caught up in the sort of conspiratorial fantasy Berlet
> >> was describing. His YouTube videos are often unintelligible, but in
> >> their moments of lucidity, they rail against manipulation of the
> >> currency system and the illegitimate power of the federal government,
> >> obsessions of the right-wing populist milieu. In this milieu,
> >> politicians like Gabrielle Giffords weren't simply wrong, they were
> >> agents of an intolerable tyranny manipulating the economy and turning
> >> Americans into slaves. Hence the vitriol and intimations of violence
> >> that scared Giffords and her staff well before Saturday's shooting.
>
> >> The point, again, is not that Alex Jones, Zeitgeist, or The Tea Party
> >> are responsible for Loughner's crimes. The point is that he targeted
> >> Giffords for a reason, one rooted in his unhinged interpretation of
> >> recognizable conspiracy theories. Right-wing activists and politicians
> >> have traded on such theories, giving them far more mainstream exposure
> >> and credibility than they ever had before. Experts on political
> >> violence have been arguing for months that this is extremely
> >> dangerous. People like Loughner are the reason why.
>
> >> To read it all:
>
> >>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-01-13/zeitgeist-t...
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help see
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Tucson Shooter Jared Loughner was inspired by right-wing conspiracy theory, in Zeitgeist


(N)ational (P)ropaganda for (R)ockefeller 'Analyses' of the Tucson Shooter
Posted by David Kramer on January 23, 2011 03:46 PM

Notice in this NPR interview done two weeks after the Tucson shooting that of the five people interviewed, the sound bite from the only interviewee who isn't pro-government/left-wing is very short and nebulous. Nothing from him even about the fact that some of the shooter's reading materials were Communist/left-wing in nature (e.g., The Communist Manifesto). In other words,
two weeks after this shooting when more information has come out about the shooter having basically no political leanings one way or the other, NPR is still trying to convince its predominantly left-wing sheeple listeners that the shooter was a right-wing, anti-government, anti-fiat currency (i.e., anti-Rockefeller) conspiracy nut.

http://www.npr.org/2011/01/23/133156205/A-Look-Inside-Loughners-Mind-Reveals-Our-Own

Re: The Truth:

I wouldn't say Jesus was a Socialist and he did use force that one
time in the temple (maybe that was a mistake)

in righteousness he doth judge and make war

11And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat
upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth
judge and make war.

12His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns;
and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.

13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is
called The Word of God.

14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses,
clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should
smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he
treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+19&version=KJV

On Jan 23, 10:55 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Truth:
> President Obama is *not* a brown skinned anti war socialist who gives
> away free Health Care.
>
> You are thinking of Jesus Christ.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Tucson Shooter Jared Loughner was inspired by right-wing conspiracy theory, in Zeitgeist

If you pay any attention to Michelle Goldberg then you are an idiot.
She should be working with Katherine Vanden Heuvel at The Nation
magazine, that communist publication (don't believe me, check the
history of it).

On 01/23/2011 10:11 AM, Tommy News wrote:
> The Cult Web Film that Inspired Loughner
>
> by Michelle Goldberg
>
> We now know a little bit more about the matrix of ideas that helped
> inspire Jared Loughner's murderous rampage on Saturday. According to a
> friend of his interviewed on Good Morning America on Wednesday, the
> conspiracy documentary Zeitgeist "poured gasoline on his fire" and had
> "a profound impact on Jared Loughner's mindset and how he views the
> world that he lives in." He was also, according to his friend's
> father, influenced by the documentary Loose Change, a classic of the
> 9/11 Truth movement. This does not mean that either of these movies is
> responsible for making Loughner do what he did, but it does show how
> his madness was shaped by a broader climate of paranoia, and offers a
> clue as to why he targeted Gabrielle Giffords.
>
> According to his friend, Zach Osler, Loughner "didn't listen to
> political radio, he didn't take sides, he wasn't on the left, he
> wasn't on the right." Naturally, conservatives have seized upon this
> to exonerate themselves of charges of incitement. But it's not that
> simple. It's hard to place Zeitgeist and Loose Change on the
> conventional partisan spectrum—both come from a shadowy conspiracy-mad
> subculture where the far right and the far left meet. Yet it's the
> contemporary right, the right of Glenn Beck and the Tea Party, that
> has mainstreamed ideas from this demimonde in an unprecedented way.
>
> To understand how, it helps to look at the career of Alex Jones, an
> Austin radio host and the country's most prominent conspiracy
> theorist. Jones was the executive producer of Loose Change, and chunks
> of Zeitgeist are taken from his documentary Terrorstorm. Jones
> disagrees with elements of Zeitgeist—he's a Christian, while Zeitgeist
> attacks religion—but he's said he supports 90 percent of what's in the
> movie, and he promotes it on his show. "A lot of people find my work
> because of Zeitgeist," he said during an interview with the
> documentary's director, Peter Joseph.
>
> The point, again, is not that Alex Jones, Zeitgeist, or The Tea Party
> are responsible for Loughner's crimes. The point is that he targeted
> Giffords for a reason, one rooted in his unhinged interpretation of
> recognizable conspiracy theories.
>
> Both Zeitgeist and Alex Jones promote the idea that world events are
> controlled by a secretive banking cabal that is using debt to enslave
> us all. Zeitgeist echoes Alex Jones in warning that the United States
> is about to be merged with Canada and Mexico into a "North American
> Union" that will use a new currency, the "Amero." "When the time is
> right," Zeitgeist informs us, "the North American Union, The European
> Union, the African Union, and the Asian Union will be merged together,
> forming the final stages of the plan these men have been working on
> for over 60 years: a one-world government." This government will
> implant microchips in all of our arms. "In the end, everybody will be
> locked into a monitored control grid, where every single action you
> perform is documented," it says.
>
> Zeitgeist, which came out in 2007 and has since spawned two sequels,
> is an Internet phenomenon. The two-hour documentary is available for
> free online, and according to its creators, it has been viewed tens of
> millions of times. Its claims are heatedly debated on Ron Paul forums
> and anarchist websites; excerpts appear on numerous Tea Party pages.
> It has a global following: When it played in a South African theater,
> the Cape Times described it as a "disturbing reminder" of "the subtle
> move towards a micro-chipped society, with the world's population
> potentially destined to be logged onto a monitored grid, leading up to
> a centralized one world economy."
>
> The idea of control and manipulation is the movie's real theme,
> knitting together its disparate parts. Zeitgeist's second-third
> rehashes classic 9/11 Truth theories that purport to show that the
> attacks were actually an inside job. This was done, the final section
> argues, at the behest of a banking cabal that has repeatedly goaded
> the United States into war in order to solidify its wealth and power.
> Chip Berlet, a senior analyst at the think tank Political Research
> Associates and one of the country's foremost experts on right-wing
> movements, points out that Zeitgeist borrows liberally from the G.
> Edward Griffin's The Creature from Jekyll Island, an "expose" of the
> Federal Reserve System popular with the John Birch Society, Alex
> Jones, and some Tea Party groups. It also draws on ideas from the
> Protocols of the Elders of Zion, though it never mentions Jews.
>
> Right-wing conspiratorial beliefs have long festered on the fringes,
> but in the Obama era, they've been injected into the center of our
> politics like never before. The distance between figures like Alex
> Jones and the contemporary conservative movement has shrunk
> alarmingly.
>
> Steeped in the rhetoric of the militia movement, Jones has promoted
> just about every conspiracy theory out there: He even accused the
> Illuminati of putting its symbols in the Starbucks logo as a taunting
> show of strength. Though rooted in the right, he also occasionally has
> guests from the far left—he's hosted Democratic Congressman Dennis
> Kucinich [Kucinich is on the "far left"? -- WH] as well as Texas
> Republican Louie Gohmert. His political hero is Ron Paul—he runs
> RonPaulWarRoom.com, and Paul is a frequent guest on his radio show.
> But until recently, most conservatives disdained him. In 2007,
> Michelle Malkin argued that Paul's association with Jones was enough
> to disqualify the congressman from participating in GOP primary
> debates.
>
> Since then, though, Republican politics have become a lot more
> paranoid. Tea Party groups and Fox News started echoing Jones'
> warnings that the swine flu virus was really a pretext to establish
> martial law. Lou Dobbs went on Jones' show in 2008 to discuss the
> coming North American Union. In March 2009, Jones released The Obama
> Deception, which argued that Obama is the front man for a
> transnational oligarchy working to create a one-world totalitarian
> state. The day after it came out, the online Fox News show Freedom
> Watch did a joint broadcast with him. "I appreciate what you're
> exposing," Fox host Andrew Napolitano told Jones. "I must tell you
> that there was a time when the types of things that you are warning
> against was not discussed openly and publicly." Glenn Beck
> fictionalized Jones-style conspiracy theories in his 9/11 truth-themed
> novel, The Overton Window.
>
> People who study the right have worried for months about the
> consequences of paranoid beliefs about treasonous government plots. In
> 2009, Berlet authored a report titled, "Toxic to Democracy: Conspiracy
> Theories, Demonization and Scapegoating." It traced the history and
> dissemination of the kind of conspiracy theories floating around the
> right, and said, "People who believe conspiracist allegations
> sometimes act on those irrational beliefs, and this has concrete
> consequences in the real world."
>
> Loughner was caught up in the sort of conspiratorial fantasy Berlet
> was describing. His YouTube videos are often unintelligible, but in
> their moments of lucidity, they rail against manipulation of the
> currency system and the illegitimate power of the federal government,
> obsessions of the right-wing populist milieu. In this milieu,
> politicians like Gabrielle Giffords weren't simply wrong, they were
> agents of an intolerable tyranny manipulating the economy and turning
> Americans into slaves. Hence the vitriol and intimations of violence
> that scared Giffords and her staff well before Saturday's shooting.
>
> The point, again, is not that Alex Jones, Zeitgeist, or The Tea Party
> are responsible for Loughner's crimes. The point is that he targeted
> Giffords for a reason, one rooted in his unhinged interpretation of
> recognizable conspiracy theories. Right-wing activists and politicians
> have traded on such theories, giving them far more mainstream exposure
> and credibility than they ever had before. Experts on political
> violence have been arguing for months that this is extremely
> dangerous. People like Loughner are the reason why.
>
> To read it all:
> http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-01-13/zeitgeist-the-documentary-that-may-have-shaped-jared-loughners-worldview/
>
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

What You Need To Know About Your Rights At The Airport

What You Need To Know About Your Rights At The Airport
http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/11/23/what-you-need-to-know-about-your-rights-at-the-airport/

   1. TSA "screeners" are not law enforcement officers. Despite wearing police-type uniforms and calling themselves "officers", they have no police powers and no immunity from any state or local laws. At some airports, notably San Francisco (SFO) and Kansas City (MCI), they aren’t government employees at all, but rent-a-cops employed by a private contractor. They cannot legally arrest or detain you (except as a citizen’s arrest, the same way you can arrest them if they commit assault or battery). All they can do is call the local police.

   2. You have the right to remain silent, including when questioned by TSA "Behavior Detection Officers." Anything you say may be used against you.

   3. You have the 1st Amendment right to film, photograph, and record what happens in public areas of airports, including your interactions with TSA and screeners.  Photography and recording in airports and at TSA checkpoints violates no Federal law or TSA regulation. Any state or local laws that purport to prohibit this are likely to be unconstitutional. You have the right, for your own protection, to document what happens to you and what is done to you.

   4. You have the right not to be assaulted or battered (sexually or otherwise), falsely arrested, unlawfully detained, or kidnapped. You should consult the applicable laws, including local laws, and/or an attorney if you plan to do any of these things, but you have the right to make a criminal complaint and/or a citizen’s arrest of someone who assaults you, and/or to sue them for damages.

   5. Under most airlines’ conditions of carriage, you have the right to a full and unconditional refund if the airline refuses to transport you because you won’t show ID or won’t "consent" to whatever they want to do to you in the name of "screening." Read this first: Here’s what to do to protect your right to a refund [1]. If the airline refuses to give you a full refund, you can sue them for damages and request that the US Department of Transportation investigate and fine them.

   6. If an airline cancels your reservation or refuses to transport you[2], you may be entitled to collect damages, and you can request that the US Department of Transportation (and, if you were denied passage to the USA from another country, that country’s authorities) investigate and fine or impose other sanctions on the airline.

   7. You have the right to freedom of movement, guaranteed by the First Amendment ("the right of the people… peaceably to assemble") and Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)[3], a human rights treaty to which the US is a party: "Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence. Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.... No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country." Federal law (49 USC § 40101, part of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978)[4] requires the TSA to consider "the public right of freedom of transit" by air when it issues regulations.

[1] http://papersplease.org/wp/2010/11/23/airlines-threaten-illegal-actions-against-travelers-who-opt-out-of-groping/
[2] http://papersplease.org/wp/2010/10/18/airlines-to-cancel-reservations-and-deny-passage-to-travelers-who-wont-provide-secure-flight-info/
[3] http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm#art12

[4] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/49/usc_sec_49_00040101----000-.html
--
"We don't have to experience the world in the way we have been told to."

When dealing with legal issues, far too many people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Learn how to control judges and lawyers from a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits!

Re: Keith Olbermann Leaves ‘Countdown’, But His Legacy Remains on MSNBC

On Jan 23, 10:05 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:

That explains it all! Tommie thinks Olbermann is both " funny, smart
AND entertaining "!

***********************************************************************************************
>
> Keith Olberman will find another network. He is very entertaining,
> smart and funny.
>

>
>
>
> > Like on most issues, you are obviously missing the big picture here Lil'
> > Tommie;
>
> > "Olbermann 'was'  the highest rated host on MSNBC";  is just like saying,
> > "Olbermann was listened to by only a very small fringe element",  and
> > whatever NBC's thoughts were,  whether NBC gambled and thought that they
> > could attract a large audience of Moonbats; or whether the folks (who are on
> > their way out) at NBC let their personal opinions get in the way, and they
> > believed the kind of crap that MSNBC was broadcasting,  matters none
> > anymore.  It was a dismal failure,  never profitable,  very
> > un-American,  and it ruined a once fine news network/broadcasting
> > company.  NBC News became a laughing stock.  NBC News was no longer credible
> > as a news agency.  Tom Brokaw and others cringed at the likes of Chris
> > Matthews, Olbermann, Maddow, and others.   NBC attempted to put these
> > indivudals up on their networks as legitimate news reporters, and they were
> > not.  They were biased, partisan hacks, who espoused a point of view that
> > was very much believed in, and catered to, by a very smalll minority of
> > people in this Nation, the individuals like you who are misguided, and who
> > have Marxist and communist tendencies.
>
> > No matter,  it's done now, and hopefully NBC can rebuild its reputation as a
> > legitimate news agency,  like FOX News, which is the LEADER in the news
> > gathering business today!  The opinion shows on FOX News that you reference,
> > (Not news shows Lil' Tommie) that you so hate and despise, are popular
> > beyond belief!   Whether you like it, or don't like it,  get used to
> > it!  FOX News is now the leader in news gathering, and their opinion
> > shows ain't going no-where!!!
>
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Not annoyed, amused. Say Goodnight Faux Noise, Glenn Beck, Gretchen
> >> Van Snide of Mouth, Ann Coulter, Pitbull Palin, and The Rest Of The
> >> Crazy Wing Nut Unfair and Unbalanced Pundits
>
> >>  On 1/22/11, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >             As an old radio talk show host Jerry Williams often would
> >> > ask ! " What's the matter Tommy ? You sound ANNOYED " !
>
> >> ***************************************************************************­************************************************************
>
> >> > On Jan 22, 11:56 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Say Goodnight Faux Noise, Glenn Beck, Gretchen Van Snide of Mouth and
> >> >> The Rest Of The Crazy Wing Nut Unfair and Unbalanced Pundits
>
> >> >> On 1/22/11, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >  Once Comcast completes the buy-out from G.E.,  rest assured that
> >> >> > NBC,
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > MSNBC will return to profitability, and hopefully, a sense of
> >> >> > rationality.
> >> >> > I tend to believe this is the reason that Moonbat extradordiniare
> >> >> > Olbermann
> >> >> > flew the coop now, versus being termianted.  The writing was on the
> >> >> > wall.
> >> >> > Say G'Night Maddow, Schultz, and the rest of the crazy
> >> >> > Anti-American's.....Your fifteen minutes of fame are over!
>
> >> >> >> Olbermann Leaves 'Countdown' on MSNBC
> >> >> >> By BILL CARTER
>
> >> >> >> Virginia Sherwood/MSNBC
>
> >> >> >> Keith Olbermann in November.
> >> >> >> 12:05 a.m. | Updated Keith Olbermann, the highest-rated host on
> >> MSNBC,
> >> >> >> announced abruptly on the air Friday night that he was leaving his
> >> >> >> show, "Countdown," immediately.
>
> >> >> >> The host, who has had a stormy relationship with the management of
> >> the
> >> >> >> network for some time, especially since he was suspended for two
> >> >> >> days
> >> >> >> last November, came to an agreement with NBC's corporate management
> >> >> >> late this week to settle his contract and step down.
>
> >> >> >> In a closing statement on his show, Mr. Olbermann said simply that
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> would be the last edition of the program. He offered no explanation
> >> >> >> other than on occasion "all that surrounded the show – but never the
> >> >> >> show itself – was just too much for me."
>
> >> >> >> Mr. Olbermann thanked his viewers for their enthusiastic support of
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> show that had "gradually established its position as
> >> >> >> antiestablishment."
>
> >> >> >> In a statement, MSNBC said: "MSNBC and Keith Olbermann have ended
> >> >> >> their contract. The last broadcast of 'Countdown with Keith
> >> Olbermann'
> >> >> >> will be this evening. MSNBC thanks Keith for his integral role in
> >> >> >> MSNBC's success and we wish him well in his future endeavors."
>
> >> >> >> NBC executives said the move had nothing to do with the impending
> >> >> >> takeover of NBC Universal by Comcast. With viewers and fans of Mr.
> >> >> >> Olbermann suggesting that Comcast was responsible for forcing Mr.
> >> >> >> Olbermann out, Comcast also released an official statement late
> >> Friday
> >> >> >> night:
>
> >> >> >> "Comcast has not closed the transaction for NBC Universal and has no
> >> >> >> operational control at any of its properties including MSNBC. We
> >> >> >> pledged from the day the deal was announced that we would not
> >> >> >> interfere with NBC Universal's news operations. We have not and we
> >> >> >> will not."
>
> >> >> >> MSNBC announced that "The Last Word" with Lawrence O'Donnell would
> >> >> >> replace "Countdown" at 8 p.m., with "The Ed Show" with Ed Schultz
> >> >> >> taking Mr. O'Donnell's slot at 10 p.m. Mr. Olbermann did not discuss
> >> >> >> any future plans, but NBC executives said one term of his settlement
> >> >> >> would keep him from moving to another network for an extended period
> >> >> >> of time.
>
> >> >> >> Mr. Olbermann signed a four-year contract extension in 2008 for an
> >> >> >> estimated $30 million. He had hosted "Countdown" at 8 p.m. since
> >> >> >> 2003
> >> >> >> and it became the foundation of the channel's surge to its status as
> >> >> >> the second-ranked news channel on cable television, after Fox News,
> >> >> >> surpassing the one-time leader CNN.
>
> >> >> >> Mr. Olbermann's outspoken, and sometimes controversial, support of
> >> >> >> liberal positions and Democratic candidates redefined MSNBC from a
> >> >> >> neutral news channel to one that openly offered a voice to viewers
> >> >> >> on
> >> >> >> the left, much as Fox News has done for conservatives.
>
> >> >> >> Mr. Olbermann challenged Fox News publicly on numerous occasions,
> >> >> >> especially the top-rated cable host Bill O'Reilly.
>
> >> >> >> Ratings for Mr. Olbermann's show grew, though he never approached
> >> >> >> Mr.
> >> >> >> O'Reilly's level of popularity. But he helped expand the MSNBC brand
> >> >> >> by his frequent invitations to Rachel Maddow, who was eventually
> >> >> >> offered her own show on MSNBC.
>
> >> >> >> Ms. Maddow became the 9 p.m. host following Mr. Olbermann and has
> >> >> >> built such a successful show that some NBC executives felt less
> >> >> >> concerned about losing Mr. Olbermann as the signature star of the
> >> >> >> network.
>
> >> >> >> According to several senior network executives, NBC's management had
> >> >> >> been close to firing Mr. Olbermann on previous occasions, most
> >> >> >> recently in November after he revealed that he had made donations to
> >> >> >> several Democratic candidates in 2010 — one of them, coincidentally,
> >> >> >> was Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who has been the subject of
> >> >> >> many of his recent shows after being shot in an assassination
> >> attempt.
>
> >> >> >> The top MSNBC executive, Phil Griffin, said the donations had
> >> violated
> >> >> >> NBC News standards and ordered Mr. Olbermann suspended. His fans
> >> >> >> responded with a petition to reinstate him that attracted over
> >> 250,000
> >> >> >> signatures. Mr. Olbermann returned two days later. In his response
> >> >> >> he
> >> >> >> said the rules on donations had been "inconsistently applied."
>
> >> >> >> More:
>
> >>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/olbermann-hosts-last...
>
> >> >> >> Keith Olbermann out at MSNBC
> >> >> >> By Greg Sargent
> >> >> >> So Keith Olbermann is out. As best as I can tell, none of the news
> >> >> >> accounts about his departure have gotten to the bottom of what
> >> >> >> happened here. But Olbermann himself offered enough clues in his
> >> final
> >> >> >> broadcast for us to reasonably speculate that he abruptly got the
> >> >> >> ax,
> >> >> >> perhaps even as late as last night.
>
> >> >> >> A "knowledgeable official" at MSNBC told Howard Kurtz that the
> >> >> >> separation was "mutual." But it's hard to see how that squares with
> >> >> >> this, from Olbermann's last words on Countdown last night:
>
> >> >> >> "I think the same fantasy has popped into the head of everybody in
> >> >> >> my
> >> >> >> business who has ever been told what I have been told, that this is
> >> >> >> going to be the last edition of your show. You go directly to the
> >> >> >> scene from the movie 'Network,' complete with the pajamas, and the
> >> >> >> raincoat, and you go off on an existential, otherworldly journey of
> >> >> >> profundity and vision...
>
> >> >> >> "When I resigned from ESPN 13 and a half years ago, I was literally
> >> >> >> given 30 seconds to say goodbye at the very end of my last edition
> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> "Sports Center." As God is my witness, in the commercial break just
> >> >> >> before the emotional moment, the producer got into my earpiece and
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.