Jan 16, 2012 || World News

Monday, January 16, 2012

Re: Attempt to Change a Light Bulb

Every once in a while, a blind squirrel can find an acorn. Same here for Crazy Uncle Ron's Ghost writer....Rockwell is correct here.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/shannon-m1.1.1.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Hillary Clinton Ok’s Introduction Of Sharia Law In U.S.

I was unaware of this UN Resolution, and I appreciate you sharing this with the group Travis!

Keith

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

New post on actjonesboroar

Hillary Clinton Ok's Introduction Of Sharia Law In U.S.
by burkasrugly

Fellow infidels,

In this installment, Fishin' Guy brings attention to a very scary United Nations Resolution, Resolution 16/18 that essentially opens the door to implementation of Sharia in the United States. But you can do something about this. ACT! for America is gauging how much support there is in each state for American Laws for American Courts legislation. Please go to the ACT! for America website and sign the petition here. You will need to scroll down a bit to the form. AND you can call your senator or representative...the phone number to the Capitol switchboard is at the end of this article. Please call your representatives!!!! - Burkasrugly

Last month, a meeting was quietly conducted in Washington, D.C. that may signal the beginning of a slow dismantling of the First Amendment. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hosted the meeting for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The purpose of this gathering was basically to discuss how the United States can implement the OIC agenda to criminalize criticism of Islam.

The end result was that a freedom-limiting resolution, United Nations Resolution 16/18, was adopted by the U.S. government.

After seeing that support for the UN Blasphemy Resolution was dwindling, the OIC sought a meeting with Clinton to do an end-run around the Constitution. Since 2005, this group has been trying to implement a ten-year program that would have the UN adopt an international resolution to counter "Islamaphobia" and call upon States to counter it, including "deterrent punishments." (Jail time for criticizing radical Islam).

The meeting was described as a working session to discuss legal mechanisms to combat religious discrimination. However, the only religion that the UN Human Rights Council ever mentioned in any previous resolution was Islam. The Human Rights Council includes several "outstanding" protectors of human rights such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, Cuba, and Libya. In Pakistan women get the death penalty for being raped – Islamic law says they have committed adultery by being raped - and blasphemy against Islam is punishable by death.

Why aren't liberals howling about this? If Resolution 16/18 is fully implemented, their rights to dunk a cross in urine and display it as "art" may be over. Probably not, though, since this sham meeting was only about imposing Sharia law and Islamic supremacy upon unsuspecting Americans.

The First Amendment is our only protection against this resolution. Europe doesn't have a First Amendment, and as a result several notable cases of "incitement to hatred of religion" have been moving through the courts there. Criticizing radical Islam can get people into legal trouble in several European countries.

Clinton's eagerness to appease countries that are human rights violators is despicable. Please be aware that this woman has put your freedom of speech in jeopardy.

Adoption of this resolution is unacceptable. Americans are not made to be ruled by Islamic supremacists....much less the United Nations. Let your Congressman hear about this. The phone number to the Capitol switchboard is 202-224-3121. Just ask for your representative or senator for your state. Please be polite but firm that you will not stand for this.

Until next time,

Burkasrugly

burkasrugly | January 16, 2012 at 2:25 am | Tags: Organization of Islamic Conference, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, United Nations Resolution 16/18 | Categories: Radical Islam, Sharia Law | URL: http://wp.me/p1t1Gt-vS

Comment See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actjonesboroar.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/hillary-clinton-oks-introduction-of-sharia-law-in-u-s/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

JP Who are Men of Cave اصحاب کہف کون ہیں اور کہاں دفن ہیں

Thanks & Best regards,

Imran Ilyas
Cell: 00971509483403

****People oppose things because they are ignorant of them****

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

112th Congress the Most Futile Since 1947…Only Passed 80 Bills…Harry Reid Senate Was Even Worse

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

112th Congress the Most Futile Since 1947…Only Passed 80 Bills…Harry Reid Senate Was Even Worse

by Scotty Starnes

This pretty much flies in the face of those "obstructionist" charges the President and his Democrat cohorts have been screaming over the past year. What they would like people to forget is the fact that Democrats control the Senate. All bills originate in the House and are sent to the Senate for a vote. It is the Senate that was the most futile last year and only passed 80 bills.

Harry Reid is the obstructionist.

Washington Times reports:

It's official: Congress ended its least-productive year in modern history after passing 80 bills — fewer than during any other session since year-end records began being kept in 1947.

Furthermore, an analysis by The Washington Times of the scope of such activities as time spent in debate, number of conference reports produced and votes taken on the House andSenate floors found that Congress set a record for legislative futility by accomplishing less in 2011 than any other year in history.

The Senate's record was weakest by a huge margin, according to the futility index, and the House had its 10th-worst session on record.

Of the bills the 112th Congress did pass, the majority were housekeeping measures, such as naming post office buildings or extending existing laws. Sometimes, it was too difficult for the two chambers to hammer out agreements. More often, the Senate failed to reach agreement within the chamber.

That left much of the machinery of the federal government on autopilot, with the exception of spending, where monumental clashes dominated the legislative session.

"Absent unified party control with a bolstered Senate majority, I think it's just very hard to get things done, particularly in a period when revenues aren't growing and the decisions are how to cut, and how to cut in the long term," said Sarah Binder, who studies Congress as a Brookings Institution scholar and professor at George Washington University. "Congress just isn't very good at solving long-term problems."

The futility record could be short-lived. The full House returns from a monthlong Christmas break on Tuesday to begin the second session, but all sides expect election-year paralysis, meaning some of the usually routine bills may run into trouble.

Scotty Starnes | January 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM | Tags: 112th Congress, futile, futility, Harry Reid, House, obstructionist, Senate | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-6nf

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/112th-congress-the-most-futile-since-1947-only-passed-80-bills-harry-reid-senate-was-even-worse/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com

Hostess Files for Bankruptcy — Here Are 10 Hostess Snacks You May Have Forgotten [IMAGES, VIDEOS]

http://thefw.com/forgotten-hostess-snacks/

Hillary Clinton Ok’s Introduction Of Sharia Law In U.S.

New post on actjonesboroar

Hillary Clinton Ok's Introduction Of Sharia Law In U.S.

by burkasrugly

Fellow infidels,

In this installment, Fishin' Guy brings attention to a very scary United Nations Resolution, Resolution 16/18 that essentially opens the door to implementation of Sharia in the United States. But you can do something about this. ACT! for America is gauging how much support there is in each state for American Laws for American Courts legislation. Please go to the ACT! for America website and sign the petition here. You will need to scroll down a bit to the form. AND you can call your senator or representative...the phone number to the Capitol switchboard is at the end of this article. Please call your representatives!!!! - Burkasrugly

Last month, a meeting was quietly conducted in Washington, D.C. that may signal the beginning of a slow dismantling of the First Amendment. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hosted the meeting for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The purpose of this gathering was basically to discuss how the United States can implement the OIC agenda to criminalize criticism of Islam.

The end result was that a freedom-limiting resolution, United Nations Resolution 16/18, was adopted by the U.S. government.

After seeing that support for the UN Blasphemy Resolution was dwindling, the OIC sought a meeting with Clinton to do an end-run around the Constitution. Since 2005, this group has been trying to implement a ten-year program that would have the UN adopt an international resolution to counter "Islamaphobia" and call upon States to counter it, including "deterrent punishments." (Jail time for criticizing radical Islam).

The meeting was described as a working session to discuss legal mechanisms to combat religious discrimination. However, the only religion that the UN Human Rights Council ever mentioned in any previous resolution was Islam. The Human Rights Council includes several "outstanding" protectors of human rights such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, Cuba, and Libya. In Pakistan women get the death penalty for being raped – Islamic law says they have committed adultery by being raped - and blasphemy against Islam is punishable by death.

Why aren't liberals howling about this? If Resolution 16/18 is fully implemented, their rights to dunk a cross in urine and display it as "art" may be over. Probably not, though, since this sham meeting was only about imposing Sharia law and Islamic supremacy upon unsuspecting Americans.

The First Amendment is our only protection against this resolution. Europe doesn't have a First Amendment, and as a result several notable cases of "incitement to hatred of religion" have been moving through the courts there. Criticizing radical Islam can get people into legal trouble in several European countries.

Clinton's eagerness to appease countries that are human rights violators is despicable. Please be aware that this woman has put your freedom of speech in jeopardy.

Adoption of this resolution is unacceptable. Americans are not made to be ruled by Islamic supremacists....much less the United Nations. Let your Congressman hear about this. The phone number to the Capitol switchboard is 202-224-3121. Just ask for your representative or senator for your state. Please be polite but firm that you will not stand for this.

Until next time,

Burkasrugly

burkasrugly | January 16, 2012 at 2:25 am | Tags: Organization of Islamic Conference, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, United Nations Resolution 16/18 | Categories: Radical Islam, Sharia Law | URL: http://wp.me/p1t1Gt-vS

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actjonesboroar.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/hillary-clinton-oks-introduction-of-sharia-law-in-u-s/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com

Worlds' Greatest Signal Light

Just think of the possibilities of having huge searchlight-like beacons with a pig signal. Better than the Bat Signal. Shine on mosques at night. Light up muzzie oparades and prayer times in the streets. Advertise places where muzzies gather. Maybe even scare muzzies off in war zones. Keep our troops safe. The possibilities are endless.

Attempt to Change a Light Bulb

http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/shannon-m1.1.1.html

Re: So Misunderstood.....Ron Paul Continues Assault On The Media

When was the last time that the government of Russia or China condoned the storming of our embassy and the taking of hostages from our embassy?

When was the last time that Russia or China engaged in open hostilities (like the taking of a drone, the funding of weapons and the placement of weapons that killed American servicemen) like Iran has?

There is plenty of reason for concern PlainOl, but go ahead and continue to stick your head in the sand.

Just as important, despite Crazy Uncle Ron's allegations, I don't hear anyone clamoring for war with Iran. We collectively have a bad taste in our mouths after Afghanistan and Iraq. There is no need to be ignorant and ignore potential threats.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:16 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:

Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
debates.

---
Iran's nukes are not America's business and no more of a threat than
Israel, Russia or China nukes.
Don't be so afraid.

On Jan 16, 8:32 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than Crazy Uncle Ron's recent claims, (because Crazy Uncle Ron at
> first beleived that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, but didn't seem
> alarmed about it, and when this was pointed out to PlainOl, who also didn't
> care, he said, "Cite examples" which I did. Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
> Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
> debates.
>
> Where are you getting that there is no evidence that Iran is not attempting
> to make a nuclear weapon? From Panetta's recent statement?
>

> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/damning-report-on-iran-shin...
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8866022/Ira...

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is not a single credible report that says that they are. All the
> > reports that are referred to claim a certainty that Iran is in the business
> > of processing radioactive material solely for use in their Nuclear reactors
> > and medical uses. There is no proof (not a shred) that there is anything
> > else going on. Paul is on THAT committee. As opposed to all others he is
> > the only candidate that would have access to all the evidence.
>
> > Iran has a whole lot of oil... they have no refineries... They export
> > crude and import gas, oil, and other oil products... that is why Paul says
> > they don't even have enough gas for their cars...They don't.
>
> > The USA has even more oil than Iran.... why in the hell are they using and
> > refining the nuclear process??
>
> > Do I want someone that looks at and assesses all the facts before
> > screaming for war on unfounded bases. Why, yes, I do; if speaking of Paul.
>
> > If the question is about Monkey man from Iran... then, No, I do not;
> > fortunately there is not a shred of credible evidence that this will or can
> > take place.
>

> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> >> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other
> >> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking
> >> nuclear power?
>
> >> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon?
>

> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com

> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> Please read the word COULD>>>>>>>
>
> >>> Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
> >>> preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
> >>> security."
> >>> "If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
> >>> is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
> >>> a nuclear weapon.
> >>> A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
> >>> over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
> >>> And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
> >>> a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
>
> >>> There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
> >>> positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
> >>> it.
>
> >>> On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> >>> > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> >>> > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> >>> > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a
> >>> fair,
> >>> > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul
> >>> > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> >>> > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which
> >>> turns
> >>> > out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> >>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <
> >>> keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and
> >>> re-read
> >>> > > it.
>
> >>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> >>> > >> misinformed
> >>> > >> ---
> >>> > >> again, what I've written are facts:
> >>> > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an
> >>> 'important'
> >>> > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> >>> > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> >>> > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> >>> > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash
> >>> allegedly
> >>> > >> showed
> >>> > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to
> >>> Jeremy
> >>> > >> > Bash?
>
> >>> > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to
> >>> stay
> >>> > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> >>> > >> nevertheless
> >>> > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating
> >>> their
> >>> > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> >>> > >> misinformation
> >>> > >> > as the truth.
>
> >>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> >>> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> >>> > >> > > ---
> >>> > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP.
> >>> > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron
> >>> Paul
> >>> > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt
> >>> whomever
> >>> > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed
> >>> bias
> >>> > >> > > against Paul.
>
> >>> > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her
> >>> husband
> >>> > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the
> >>> Secretary
> >>> > >> > > of Defense.
>
> >>> > >> > > some don't forget
>
> >>> > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> >>> > >> > > > **
> >>> > >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> >>> > >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> >>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-...
>
> >>> > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire
> >>> primary, Ron
> >>> > >> Paul
> >>> > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> >>> > >> presidential
> >>> > >> > > > campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in
> >>> second
> >>> > >> place,
> >>> > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> >>> > >> supporters at a
> >>> > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last
> >>> night
> >>> > >> was a
> >>> > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the
> >>> real
> >>> > >> > > > conversation."
>
> >>> > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> >>> > >> 76-year-old
> >>> > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul
> >>> said
> >>> > >> after
> >>> > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted
> >>> to
> >>> > >> thank
> >>> > >> > > the
> >>> > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> >>> > >> > > > He continued:
>
> >>> > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> >>> > >> what--what is
> >>> > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be
> >>> > >> ignoring
> >>> > >> > > so
> >>> > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> >>> > >> fascinating
> >>> > >> > > when
> >>> > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it
> >>> could be
> >>> > >> in the
> >>> > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of
> >>> have to
> >>> > >> chuckle
> >>> > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one
> >>> > >> thing they
> >>> > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status
> >>> quo
> >>> > >> of this
> >>> > >> > > > country.
>
> >>> > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul
> >>> was
> >>> > >> forced
> >>> > >> > > to cut
> >>> > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob
> >>> of more
> >>> > >> than
> >>> > >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day
> >>> and a
> >>> > >> half,
> >>> > >> > > to
> >>> > >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters,
> >>> who are
> >>> > >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible
> >>> > >> > > atmosphere,"
> >>> > >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement.
>
> >>> > >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting
> >>> out
> >>> > >> early
> >>> > >> > > from
> >>> > >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off,
> >>> cutting
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're
> >>> > >> stopping."
>
> >>> > >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg
> >>> > >> > > > 36KViewDownload
>
> >>> > >> > > --
> >>> > >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> > >> > > For options & help seehttp://
> >>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> > >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> > >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> > >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>> > >> --
> >>> > >> Thanks for
>

> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Al 'Shifty' Sharpton has no problem with Muslims hijacking Martin Luther King Day for a Muslim Day against 'Islamophobia'.

silencing abrahamic myth believers is the most important thing
Americans can do

On Jan 15, 9:13 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.endtimestoday.com/category/cair-nazis/****
>
> ** **
> Al 'Shifty' Sharpton has no problem with Muslims hijacking Martin Luther
> King Day for a Muslim Day against
> 'Islamophobia'…<http://www.endtimestoday.com/2012/01/13/al-shifty-sharpton-has-no-pro...>
> ****
>
> *Posted:* January 13, 2012 | *Author:*
> barenakedislam<http://www.endtimestoday.com/author/admin/>
> | *Filed under:* CAIR Nazis<http://www.endtimestoday.com/category/cair-nazis/>
> | *32* Comments
> »<http://www.endtimestoday.com/2012/01/13/al-shifty-sharpton-has-no-pro...>
> ****
> [image: Description:http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/images9.jpeg]<http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/images9.jpeg>But
> he thinks its "racially insensitive" to have a televised Republican debate
> on MLK Day.****
>
> The Blaze<http://www.theblaze.com/stories/al-sharpton-guest-its-racially-insens...>
> *And what about all the other activities scheduled for the same day?* "For
> instance, there are 35 basketball games scheduled for this Monday: 11 NBA
> games <http://www.nba.com/gameline/20120116/> — Kevin Durant will lead the
> Oklahoma City Thunder against the Boston Celtics at the same time that
> Republicans begin to debate
> <http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-debate-schedule/2011...>in
> Myrtle Beach — and fully 24 NCAA basketball
> games<http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/schedule?date=20120116>."
> ****
>
> Or how about the Council on American-Islamic Relations' decision to
> schedule "Washington State Muslims
> Day<http://www.theblaze.com/stories/stories/cair-will-hold-washington-sta...>"
> on MLK Day? If the MSNBC panel indignantly condemns the GOP's decision to
> hold a debate MLK Day, when do they plan on doing a segment accusing CAIR
> of similar "racial insensitivity"? Yet Sharpton has yet to share his
> indignation in this instance.****
>
> *An initiative aimed at stopping discrimination and educating lawmakers
> about Islamophobia or an attempt to get politicians to "pander to
> Islamists?"* You decide.****
>
> The Blaze<http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cair-will-hold-washington-state-musli...>
> *An upcoming event that is said to be honoring the life of Dr. Martin
> Luther King, Jr., is set to unfold this upcoming Monday. It is on this day
> that more than 400 Muslims are scheduled to meet with elected
> representatives as part of the Council on American-Islamic Relations'
> "Washington State Muslims Day."*****
>
> [image: Description:http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Muslim-Day-At...]<http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Muslim-Day-At...>
> ****
>
> While CAIR leaders dub the annual event a day of honor for King, others
> find it offensive and see it as a co-opting of the holiday that celebrates
> the life of the civil rights leader. The fifth annual event will take place
> at the Washington state capitol in just one week. There will be a march,
> legislative appointments and other related activities.****
>
> According to organizers, "Muslims Day" event is aimed at educating
> lawmakers<http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/05/4165269/cair-400-wash-state-muslims-...>about
> Islamophobia as well as anti-Muslim incidents.
> *The end goal is to encourage these state lawmakers to speak out against
> hate crimes and anti-Muslim commentary.* Additionally, the meetings that
> are to be held with politicians will purportedly focus upon the state's
> budget and the need for public programs.****
>
> [image: Description:http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Muslims+Hold+...]<http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Muslims+Hold+...>
> ****
>
> Muslim Asslifters foul Capitol Hill in Washington every year****
>
> Arsalan Bukhari, the executive director of CAIR's Washington affiliate,
> says, "Muslim constituents will work to make lawmakers aware of the growing
> problem of Islamophobia and of the veiled and camouflaged manner in which
> it is being promoted." ****
> The CAIR video about this event has been removed, but here's one of the
> Muslim invasion of Capitol Hill on Aug. 30, 2011.****
>
> [image: Description:http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/beware-of-cai...]<http://www.endtimestoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/beware-of-cai...>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> image002.jpg
> 46KViewDownload
>
> image001.jpg
> 13KViewDownload
>
> image003.jpg
> 93KViewDownload
>
> image004.jpg
> 40KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: So Misunderstood.....Ron Paul Continues Assault On The Media

Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
debates.
---
Iran's nukes are not America's business and no more of a threat than
Israel, Russia or China nukes.
Don't be so afraid.

On Jan 16, 8:32 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than Crazy Uncle Ron's recent claims, (because Crazy Uncle Ron at
> first beleived that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, but didn't seem
> alarmed about it, and when this was pointed out to PlainOl, who also didn't
> care, he said, "Cite examples" which I did. Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
> Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
> debates.
>
> Where are you getting that there is no evidence that Iran is not attempting
> to make a nuclear weapon? From Panetta's recent statement?
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/damning-report-on-iran-shin...
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8866022/Ira...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is not a single credible report that says that they are. All the
> > reports that are referred to claim a certainty that Iran is in the business
> > of processing radioactive material solely for use in their Nuclear reactors
> > and medical uses. There is no proof (not a shred) that there is anything
> > else going on. Paul is on THAT committee. As opposed to all others he is
> > the only candidate that would have access to all the evidence.
>
> > Iran has a whole lot of oil... they have no refineries... They export
> > crude and import gas, oil, and other oil products... that is why Paul says
> > they don't even have enough gas for their cars...They don't.
>
> > The USA has even more oil than Iran.... why in the hell are they using and
> > refining the nuclear process??
>
> > Do I want someone that looks at and assesses all the facts before
> > screaming for war on unfounded bases. Why, yes, I do; if speaking of Paul.
>
> > If the question is about Monkey man from Iran... then, No, I do not;
> > fortunately there is not a shred of credible evidence that this will or can
> > take place.
>
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other
> >> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking
> >> nuclear power?
>
> >> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon?
>
> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> Please read the word COULD>>>>>>>
>
> >>> Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
> >>> preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
> >>> security."
> >>> "If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
> >>> is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
> >>> a nuclear weapon.
> >>> A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
> >>> over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
> >>> And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
> >>> a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
>
> >>> There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
> >>> positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
> >>> it.
>
> >>> On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> >>> > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> >>> > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> >>> > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a
> >>> fair,
> >>> > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul
> >>> > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> >>> > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which
> >>> turns
> >>> > out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> >>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <
> >>> keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and
> >>> re-read
> >>> > > it.
>
> >>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> >>> > >> misinformed
> >>> > >> ---
> >>> > >> again, what I've written are facts:
> >>> > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an
> >>> 'important'
> >>> > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> >>> > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> >>> > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> >>> > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash
> >>> allegedly
> >>> > >> showed
> >>> > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to
> >>> Jeremy
> >>> > >> > Bash?
>
> >>> > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to
> >>> stay
> >>> > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> >>> > >> nevertheless
> >>> > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating
> >>> their
> >>> > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> >>> > >> misinformation
> >>> > >> > as the truth.
>
> >>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> >>> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> >>> > >> > > ---
> >>> > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP.
> >>> > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron
> >>> Paul
> >>> > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt
> >>> whomever
> >>> > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed
> >>> bias
> >>> > >> > > against Paul.
>
> >>> > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her
> >>> husband
> >>> > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the
> >>> Secretary
> >>> > >> > > of Defense.
>
> >>> > >> > > some don't forget
>
> >>> > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> >>> > >> > > > **
> >>> > >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> >>> > >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> >>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-...
>
> >>> > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire
> >>> primary, Ron
> >>> > >> Paul
> >>> > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> >>> > >> presidential
> >>> > >> > > > campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in
> >>> second
> >>> > >> place,
> >>> > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> >>> > >> supporters at a
> >>> > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last
> >>> night
> >>> > >> was a
> >>> > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the
> >>> real
> >>> > >> > > > conversation."
>
> >>> > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> >>> > >> 76-year-old
> >>> > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul
> >>> said
> >>> > >> after
> >>> > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted
> >>> to
> >>> > >> thank
> >>> > >> > > the
> >>> > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> >>> > >> > > > He continued:
>
> >>> > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> >>> > >> what--what is
> >>> > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be
> >>> > >> ignoring
> >>> > >> > > so
> >>> > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> >>> > >> fascinating
> >>> > >> > > when
> >>> > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it
> >>> could be
> >>> > >> in the
> >>> > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of
> >>> have to
> >>> > >> chuckle
> >>> > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one
> >>> > >> thing they
> >>> > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status
> >>> quo
> >>> > >> of this
> >>> > >> > > > country.
>
> >>> > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul
> >>> was
> >>> > >> forced
> >>> > >> > > to cut
> >>> > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob
> >>> of more
> >>> > >> than
> >>> > >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day
> >>> and a
> >>> > >> half,
> >>> > >> > > to
> >>> > >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters,
> >>> who are
> >>> > >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible
> >>> > >> > > atmosphere,"
> >>> > >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement.
>
> >>> > >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting
> >>> out
> >>> > >> early
> >>> > >> > > from
> >>> > >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off,
> >>> cutting
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're
> >>> > >> stopping."
>
> >>> > >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg
> >>> > >> > > > 36KViewDownload
>
> >>> > >> > > --
> >>> > >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> > >> > > For options & help seehttp://
> >>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> > >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> > >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> > >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>> > >> --
> >>> > >> Thanks for
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: So Misunderstood.....Ron Paul Continues Assault On The Media

Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology?
---
because their neighbors have nukes and the technology can be used for
Iranians

but go ahead, play favorites again

On Jan 13, 1:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other
> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking
> nuclear power?
>
> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon?
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Please read the word COULD>>>>>>>
>
> > Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
> > preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
> > security."
> > "If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
> > is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
> > a nuclear weapon.
> > A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
> > over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
> > And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
> > a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
>
> > There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
> > positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
> > it.
>
> > On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> > > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> > > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> > > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a fair,
> > > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul
> > > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> > > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which turns
> > > out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and
> > re-read
> > > > it.
>
> > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> > > > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> > > >> misinformed
> > > >> ---
> > > >> again, what I've written are facts:
> > > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an 'important'
> > > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> > > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> > > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> > > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash allegedly
> > > >> showed
> > > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to
> > Jeremy
> > > >> > Bash?
>
> > > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> > > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> > > >> nevertheless
> > > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating
> > their
> > > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> > > >> misinformation
> > > >> > as the truth.
>
> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> > > >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> > candidacy,
> > > >> > > called
> > > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> > > >> > > ---
> > > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP.
> > > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron
> > Paul
> > > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt
> > whomever
> > > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed
> > bias
> > > >> > > against Paul.
>
> > > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her
> > husband
> > > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the
> > Secretary
> > > >> > > of Defense.
>
> > > >> > > some don't forget
>
> > > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> > > >> > > > **
> > > >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> > > >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> > > >>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-.
> > ..
>
> > > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire primary,
> > Ron
> > > >> Paul
> > > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> > > >> presidential
> > > >> > > > campaign.
>
> > > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in second
> > > >> place,
> > > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> > > >> supporters at a
> > > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last
> > night
> > > >> was a
> > > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the
> > real
> > > >> > > > conversation."
>
> > > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> > > >> 76-year-old
> > > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> > > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul said
> > > >> after
> > > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted to
> > > >> thank
> > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> > > >> > > > He continued:
>
> > > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> > > >> what--what is
> > > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be
> > > >> ignoring
> > > >> > > so
> > > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> > > >> fascinating
> > > >> > > when
> > > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it could
> > be
> > > >> in the
> > > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of have
> > to
> > > >> chuckle
> > > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one
> > > >> thing they
> > > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status
> > quo
> > > >> of this
> > > >> > > > country.
>
> > > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul was
> > > >> forced
> > > >> > > to cut
> > > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob of
> > more
> > > >> than
> > > >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop.
>
> > > >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day and
> > a
> > > >> half,
> > > >> > > to
> > > >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters, who
> > are
> > > >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible
> > > >> > > atmosphere,"
> > > >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement.
>
> > > >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting out
> > > >> early
> > > >> > > from
> > > >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off,
> > cutting
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're
> > > >> stopping."
>
> > > >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> > candidacy,
> > > >> > > called
> > > >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
>
> > > >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg
> > > >> > > > 36KViewDownload
>
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > >> > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
> ahmadenijadchavez.jpg
> 90KViewDownload
>
> Ahmadinejad_alleged.jpg
> 42KViewDownload
>
> images.jpg
> 11KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.