Sunday, November 21, 2010

Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame

Good Afternoon Nom,

I am on the board this early afternoon, only because my beloved Buc's are on at 4:00 P.M.;

What is the point? What is it that you wish to accomplish here, and why?

There is no argument, there is no discussion, as I stated to you the other day, "It Is, What It Is".

Mark didn't do anything that was out of line or as you put it, "Cosmo-Like, Magrest-Like, or Nazi-Like". Merc has done this to herself, and it was not just one event or transgression. Merc is known throughout all of the political boards in Google, Yahoo, ABC, CBS, and throughout the world wide web as a trouble maker, and unstable.

As I told you, Merc can come back, if she wishes to participate, act like a lady, and Merc agrees to remain moderated while on this board.

Again, what is it that you wish to accomplish here?

KeithInTampa

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, nominal9 <nominal9@yahoo.com> wrote:

Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing
Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself
seem to condemn....

"Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
someones
elses kid were also ill is wrong."
Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop
grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ...
The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming
near....
Nominal9

PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half-
Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit,
the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto Magcrest, and their
Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia.

Hypocrites.... one and all....

On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have decided and it is rather simple:
>
> Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that someones
> elses kid were also ill is wrong.
>
> KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry.
>
>
>
>
>

> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > bring
> > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > will
> > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
> > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the victim,
> > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very ignorant
> > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed the
> > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it, Merc
> > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
> > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge or
> > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > others here abouts....
> > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is living
> > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among "half-
> > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
> > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the crap
> > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the crap
> > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > "banning".....
> > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Nominal9,
>
> > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To bring
> > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I will
> > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa...
> > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the low, in
> > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass stupid, as
> > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of answer....
> > > > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > > > brains... for eternity....
> > > > nominal9
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e.
> > ..
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237.
> > ..
> > > > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the Pusillanimous
> > > > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along with the
> > > > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > > > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at least
> > > > two
> > > > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > > > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still .....whatever
> > > > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > > > comparison
> > > > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and of the
> > > > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that les and
> > > > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > > > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to run
> > > > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say... censorship
> > > > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > > > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous Pellet, more than ample
> > > > warning of his impending dishonor , shame and eternal damnation of
> > > > being relegated to my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame....Consigned
> > > > to an eternity of literal punishment to correspond to the
> > > > metaphorical condition in which he lives his life as the censor and
> > > > sysop of 72... which is to say, Damnerd to an Eternity in Hell with
> > > > his Head Stuck Up His Ass and with Shit for Brains. But Rabbit, the
> > > > Pusilllanomous Pellet, seems to scoff at this most foul and dire
> > > > opprobrium... seemingly glad to join the ranks of his fellow Head Up
> > > > The Ass and Shit For Brains sysops and Censors in their eternal
> > > > misery...
>
> > > > So be it....Abandon All Hope...forever...
>
> > > > nominal9
>
> > > > Rogue View profile
> > > > More options Aug 27, 12:46 pm
>
> > > > From: Rogue <rogueplan...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:29 -0400
> > > > Local: Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:46 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > Rabbit? Ban posters?
>
> > > > Say it ain't so! / rogue
>
> > > > - Hide quoted text -
> > > > -Reporting spam
> > > > Message reported
> > > > Rate this post:
>
> > > > nominal9 View profile
> > > > More options Aug 30, 2:33 pm
>
> > > > From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > > > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > Local: Mon, Aug 30 2010 2:33 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove |
> > > > Report
> > > > this message | Find messages by this author
>
> > > >http://www.bio.miami.edu/hare/poop.html
>
> > > > Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet... with the shit-eating grin..... /
> > > > n9
>
> > > > Then I tried to add another post in reply to a snide aside by Rabbit
> > > > under his pseudonym...RighteousObserver...
> > > > here's Rabbit's "concealed" whiny-ass post
>
> > > > From: RighteousObserver <tinywhiterab...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > Local: Tues, Aug 31 2010 7:24 am
> > > > Subject: I Sucked The Fun Out Of 71 And Now I'm Here For You On 72!
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > I *am* RighteousOberserver.
>
> > > > Sworn Defender of Board Justice and um..er..other stoopid shit like
> > > > that.
>
> > > > <doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin' the crab><doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin'
> > > > the crab> / rabbit
>
> > > > To which I replied with my own counter that flashed on the board for
> > > > a
> > > > minute or so... before rabbit proceeded to remove it from 72...
> > > > as I recall it....
>
> > > > "The cecotrophic Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet with the shit-
> > > > eating grin... turns two big floppy deaf ears...."
>
> > > > That was it.... looks like I'm "Banned" from 72... too.....another
> > > > badge of honor.....
> > > > Always good to be Banned by the Damned ... see?... Rabbit does
> > > > deserve
> > > > to be in Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame...
>
> > > > n9- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/

> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Mark M. Kahle H.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame

Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing
Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself
seem to condemn....
"Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
someones
elses kid were also ill is wrong."
Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop
grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ...
The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming
near....
Nominal9

PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half-
Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit,
the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto Magcrest, and their
Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia.

Hypocrites.... one and all....

On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have decided and it is rather simple:
>
> Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that someones
> elses kid were also ill is wrong.
>
> KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > bring
> > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > will
> > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
> > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the victim,
> > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very ignorant
> > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed the
> > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it, Merc
> > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
> > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge or
> > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > others here abouts....
> > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is living
> > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among "half-
> > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
> > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the crap
> > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the crap
> > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > "banning".....
> > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Nominal9,
>
> > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To bring
> > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I will
> > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa...
> > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the low, in
> > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass stupid, as
> > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of answer....
> > > > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > > > brains... for eternity....
> > > > nominal9
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e.
> > ..
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237.
> > ..
> > > > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the Pusillanimous
> > > > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along with the
> > > > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > > > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at least
> > > > two
> > > > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > > > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still .....whatever
> > > > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > > > comparison
> > > > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and of the
> > > > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that les and
> > > > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > > > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to run
> > > > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say... censorship
> > > > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > > > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous Pellet, more than ample
> > > > warning of his impending dishonor , shame and eternal damnation of
> > > > being relegated to my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame....Consigned
> > > > to an eternity of literal punishment to correspond to the
> > > > metaphorical condition in which he lives his life as the censor and
> > > > sysop of 72... which is to say, Damnerd to an Eternity in Hell with
> > > > his Head Stuck Up His Ass and with Shit for Brains. But Rabbit, the
> > > > Pusilllanomous Pellet, seems to scoff at this most foul and dire
> > > > opprobrium... seemingly glad to join the ranks of his fellow Head Up
> > > > The Ass and Shit For Brains sysops and Censors in their eternal
> > > > misery...
>
> > > > So be it....Abandon All Hope...forever...
>
> > > > nominal9
>
> > > > Rogue View profile
> > > > More options Aug 27, 12:46 pm
>
> > > > From: Rogue <rogueplan...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:29 -0400
> > > > Local: Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:46 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > Rabbit? Ban posters?
>
> > > > Say it ain't so! / rogue
>
> > > > - Hide quoted text -
> > > > -Reporting spam
> > > > Message reported
> > > > Rate this post:
>
> > > > nominal9 View profile
> > > > More options Aug 30, 2:33 pm
>
> > > > From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > > > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > Local: Mon, Aug 30 2010 2:33 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove |
> > > > Report
> > > > this message | Find messages by this author
>
> > > >http://www.bio.miami.edu/hare/poop.html
>
> > > > Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet... with the shit-eating grin..... /
> > > > n9
>
> > > > Then I tried to add another post in reply to a snide aside by Rabbit
> > > > under his pseudonym...RighteousObserver...
> > > > here's Rabbit's "concealed" whiny-ass post
>
> > > > From: RighteousObserver <tinywhiterab...@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > Local: Tues, Aug 31 2010 7:24 am
> > > > Subject: I Sucked The Fun Out Of 71 And Now I'm Here For You On 72!
> > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > I *am* RighteousOberserver.
>
> > > > Sworn Defender of Board Justice and um..er..other stoopid shit like
> > > > that.
>
> > > > <doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin' the crab><doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin'
> > > > the crab> / rabbit
>
> > > > To which I replied with my own counter that flashed on the board for
> > > > a
> > > > minute or so... before rabbit proceeded to remove it from 72...
> > > > as I recall it....
>
> > > > "The cecotrophic Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet with the shit-
> > > > eating grin... turns two big floppy deaf ears...."
>
> > > > That was it.... looks like I'm "Banned" from 72... too.....another
> > > > badge of honor.....
> > > > Always good to be Banned by the Damned ... see?... Rabbit does
> > > > deserve
> > > > to be in Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame...
>
> > > > n9- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Mark M. Kahle H.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

this should be posted in every school

Only 31 words --- Think about it

Isn't life strange?

I never met one Veteran who enlisted to
fight for Socialism

86% will send this on.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,

OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT

STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD,

INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND

JUSTICE FOR ALL!

If Muslims can pray on Madison Avenue, why are
Christians banned from praying in public and erecting religious displays on their holy days?
What happened to our National Day of Prayer? Obama says we can't have that, yet Muslims are allowed to block off Madison Ave. in N. Y. and pray in the middle of the street! And, it's a monthly ritual!

Tell me again, whose country is this? Ours or the Muslims?

I was asked to send this on if I agree, or delete if I don't. It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God.

Therefore I have a very hard time understanding why
there is such a problem in having 'In God! We Trust' on our money and having 'God' in the Pledge of Allegiance.

I believe it's time we stand up for what we believe!

If you agree, pass this on, if not, delete

Pot growers portrayed as terror threat

Pot growers portrayed as terror threat

By Jeff Stein

What were they smoking?

Federal, state and local officials carrying out a counter-terrorism drill in Northern California Wednesday played out a scenario in which local marijuana growers set off bombs and took over the Shasta Dam, the nation's second largest, to free an imprisoned comrade.

According to an account in the Redding (Calif.) Record Searchlight, the 12-hour drill was part of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Critical Infrastructure Crisis Response Exercise Program, begun in 2003.

"More than 250 people from more than 20 agencies took part," said Sheri Harral, a spokeswoman for the Bureau of Reclamation, according to the paper.

Harral said the drill took 18 months to plan and cost the bureau alone $500,000. The other agencies covered their own costs.

The paper made only passing reference to the scenario's designation of pot growers as terrorist villians.

In the otherwise realistic mock-terror scenario, the marijuana growers' "red cell" set off bus and car bombs as distractions, took over the dam with three hostages, and then "threatened to flood the Sacramento River by rolling open the drum gates atop the dam," according to the paper.

No matter how worthwhile a drill, said marijuana legalization advocates, envisioning pot growers as a terrorist threat in laid-back Northern California was ridiculous.

"That was so stupid," said Dale Gieringer, head of the California chapter of NORML, the decades-old National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

"I don't know what inspired it," Gieringer told the Drug War Chronicle. "I can see the need to do better pat downs for air travelers to make sure they're not holding joints in their underpants, but this? It sounds like something some yahoo redneck county sheriff would dream up."

Harral did not return the Chronicle's call for comment and could not be immediately reached by SpyTalk.

In a confidential catalogue of terrorist threats, uncovered by Congressional Quarterly in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security did not include the region's marijuana growers.

In August, however, the Big Valley News in Madera, Calif reported that the federal High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program "has been studying the escalating violence associated with the growing of cannabis throughout California."

It said, "The increasing involvement of highly organized drug trafficking organizations protecting their investment or competing for territory and market share has elevated the dangers surrounding cannabis growing from 'pot users merely growing their stash' to...a 'marijuana war.'"

2010

By Jeff Stein | November 18, 2010; 7:20 PM ET

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/11/pot_growers_portrayed_as_terro.html

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Contact the group owner or moderators at this address if there are any problems ::
House_of_Dawg-owner@yahoogroups.com

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/House_of_Dawg/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UncensoredPolitics/
http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/Halomaniacs/

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___

JP Corruption in Hajj????????

Re: They Walk Among Us

Good Analogy.

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Cold Water <coldwater000@gmail.com> wrote:

The Constitution? Anyone, they say, who believes that document should reign supreme is an "extremist."

They Walk among Us

By Robert T. McLean

A dedicated cadre of counterrevolutionaries struggle to subvert the legacy of our Revolution and return us to our former status as subjects of a foreign political philosophy controlled by alien (European) elites.

In 1988, wrestler Rowdy Roddy Piper starred in the film They Live. He finds a pair of special sunglasses that reveals subliminal messages beneath billboard ads, magazines, and books of every sort. The messages are simple. OBEY, SUBMIT, NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT. The glasses also reveal the existence of alien beings that have disguised themselves as humans and dwell among us. He soon learns that the aliens are as numerous as they are influential, many possessing powerful positions in business, politics, and the media.

In the end, Piper's character manages to destroy a satellite uplink the aliens use to maintain the illusion. Suddenly, around the world, humans see the aliens without their cover. Humanity wakes up en masse, and the plot to subjugate the human race fails. In one horrifying moment, the deluded and deceived see the aliens as they truly are.

Unfortunately, the aliens have not been vanquished in real life as they were in the movie. They continue to live among us. They control most of the media, Hollywood, virtually all universities, and the bureaucracy. They control the agenda of one major political party, but they have their useful idiots in place in the opposing party, also. Although subtle, their message to the herd (us) is the same. Obey, submit, and no independent thought.

These aliens do not come from another planet or dimension, however. They are as human as the rest of us, but they are in thrall to an alien philosophy that is distinctly European, not American. Their secular political philosophy arises from their view of humanity. We evolved, and there is no Creator -- ergo, unalienable rights do not exist. To the adherents of this worldview, we're little more than resources to be used as the King/Party/Dictator sees fit. Our only right is the privilege of working to sustain the Machine in whatever form.

The aliens despise anything that could thwart their goals. If people look to God or the Church first, the aliens do all in their power to destroy people's faith. Failing that, the aliens turn to destroying people of faith. The Constitution? Anyone, they say, who believes that document should reign supreme is an "extremist."

After the English defeated the Jacobites in 1746, the Royal House of Hanover ordered the Highlands of Scotland cleared. The Clearances decimated the population, using murder, enslavement, and the destruction of crops and livestock to starve the survivors. Today, we call such action genocide. Thirty years later, wealthy landowners in the American colonies understood the price of failure. Nonetheless, these men pledged their wealth and sacred honor in their efforts to gain independence from the same House of Hanover. Against all odds, the American Revolution succeeded in defeating the world's only superpower.

Yet today, revanchist counterrevolutionaries seek to return us to the status quo ante. There can be no compromise between lives flourishing in freedom and lives enduring in slavery. We are either free men or we are slaves. The aliens wish to do to us what they've done to countless peoples across the globe. The aliens want to rule the entire earth, but the unique people of the United States stands athwart their goals, and therefore, we must be destroyed.

How does a dedicated cadre of counterrevolutionaries go about bringing down the greatest nation ever to inhabit the planet? Militarily? No. John Quincy Adams once remarked, "Our Constitution is written for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."

The keystone of American supremacy has always been a moral and religious populace. The Constitution constrains the federal government. Moral and religious belief restrains the population. Therefore, the only way to destroy the United States is to change Americans into a different kind of people. Destroy religious adherence, make belief in God a subject of ridicule, and advocate behavior to shock the bourgeoisie until that which was unacceptable becomes not only normal, but required and subsidized.

Of course, the aliens know such a course of destruction can only occur gradually, over many decades. Their useful idiots come and go, but the goal never changes. If they fail to subvert this generation, they go to work on the next, and the next, and the next. Each generation must fight the same battle anew.

They may have brainwashed half the population in the propaganda mills we once called schools. But we Americans are nothing if not innovative. If we don't approve of the curricula, we pull our kids out and send them elsewhere, or we teach them at home. The aliens get livid, but even now they dare not use force to make Americans obey, submit, and eschew independent thought.

The aliens reigned supreme in January 2009, but they moved too far and too fast. They inadvertently removed their masks to reveal their true selves -- leading to a backlash, as we saw earlier this month. We are not Venezuela. We are not Cuba. We are the United States of America, and the alien leadership in Washington cannot trust the military to vote. How could they possibly believe the military would acquiesce to orders to occupy this country and subdue the American people?

Yet short of that, we Americans will never be cowed, no matter how many of our neighbors have succumbed to the alien philosophy. More Americans are waking every day. The slumbering giant stretched and yawned on November 2. By 2012, the giant will be standing and girded for battle.

On the first Tuesday of this month, I saw a whole army of my countrymen gather in defiance of tyranny. The question is this: shall we continue to fight for our freedom or give in to our would-be slave masters? Our forefathers risked everything to give us what we have. How can we do less to ensure that our children's children enjoy the same blessings of liberty that we do?

The aliens will not go quietly. They will attack us personally and mock us to derision. But they know they cannot compete with our arguments. They have no choice but to call us names. Let their calumny roll off our shoulders, and then stick it to them. Make them defend this alien philosophy or call them on it when they dissemble. We can lose to these sad sacks only by surrendering the field. We've ceded far too much ground already.

Robert McClain is a writer living near Baton Rouge, LA.

November 21, 2010 - 04:55:52 AM CST

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/they_walk_among_us.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: TSA "My Ding-a-Ling" Sing-Along (Video)

Tommy will you be applying for a job at TSA?

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

TSA "My Ding-a-Ling" Sing-Along (Video)

Scotty Starnes | November 21, 2010 at 9:00 AM | Tags: airport security, enhanced patdowns, T.S.A., Transportation Security Administration | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-3z5

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

TSA pat-down leaves traveler covered in urine

Harold | November 21, 2010 at 8:08 am | Categories: Corruption, Criminal Activity, Executive, Government, Health, Police State, Privacy Rights, Progressives, U.S. Constitution | URL: http://wp.me/pmtmV-4Yx

Harriet Baskas 11/20/2010 'I was absolutely humiliated,' said bladder cancer survivor A retired special education teacher on his way to a wedding in Orlando, Fla., said he was left humiliated, crying and covered with his own urine after an enhanced pat-down by TSA officers recently at Detroit Metropolitan Airport. "I was absolutely humiliated, I couldn't [...]

TSA "My Ding-a-Ling" Sing-Along (Video)

Scotty Starnes | November 21, 2010 at 9:00 AM | Tags: airport security, enhanced patdowns, T.S.A., Transportation Security Administration | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-3z5

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

Re: Baby hummingbird rescued.

HUMMINGBIRDS are HIGHLY inquistive!!!ROFL Get near their territory

and WATCH OUT!!!!

From: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com>
To: individual-sovereignty <Individual-Sovereignty@yahoogroups.com>; politicalforum <PoliticalForum@googlegroups.com>; Politics_CurrentEvents_Group@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Lets_Discuss_Anything@yahoogroups.com; whateverreturns <whateverreturns@yahoogroups.com>; ronpaul-30@meetup.com
Sent: Sun, November 21, 2010 5:14:56 AM
Subject: Baby hummingbird rescued.

http://www.wimp.com/babyhummingbird/

Fwd: About your "Boycott TSA" petition signature

Dear Bruce Majors,

Thank you for signing the "Boycott TSA" petition at iPetitions.com.
Your signature is valuable and makes a real difference. Please encourage others to sign the petition as well. Forward the text below to everyone who might be interested:

------- FORWARD THIS TO YOUR FRIENDS -------
Hi,

I wanted to draw your attention to this important petition that I recently signed:

"Boycott TSA"
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/boycotttsa/

I really think this is an important cause, and I'd like to encourage you to add your signature, too. It's free and takes just a few seconds of your time.

Thanks!
------------------------------

p.s. If you would like to start your own free petition, you can do so at
http://www.ipetitions.com/start-petition

---
UNSUBSCRIBE: This email is a one-time correspondence from iPetitions to confirm your petition signature and you will not be contacted again regarding this matter. You are not part of any iPetitions mailing list and there is nothing to "unsubscribe" from.

Did you receive this email in error? Sometimes people enter wrong email addresses when they sign a petition. If you think this has happened, please send us an email at support@ipetitions.com and explain the problem. Thank you!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Bang!

Have we found the universe that existed before the Big Bang?

The current cosmological consensus is that the universe began 13.7 billion years ago with the Big Bang. But a legendary physicist says he's found the first evidence of an eternal, cyclic cosmos.

The Big Bang model holds that everything that now comprises the universe was once concentrated in a single point of near-infinite density. Before this singularity exploded and the universe began, there was absolutely nothing - indeed, it's not clear whether one can even use the term "before" in reference to a pre-Big-Bang cosmos, as time itself may not have existed yet. In the current model, the universe began with the Big Bang, underwent cosmic inflation for a fraction of a second, then settled into the much more gradual expansion that is still going on, and likely will end with the universe as an infinitely expanded, featureless cosmos.

Sir Roger Penrose, one of the most renowned physicists of the last fifty years, takes issue with this view. He points out that the universe was apparently born in a very low state of entropy, meaning a very high degree of order initially existed, and this is what made the complex matter we see all around us (and are composed of) possible in the first place. His objection is that the Big Bang model can't explain why such a low entropy state existed, and he believes he has a solution - that the universe is just one of many in a cyclical chain, with each Big Bang starting up a new universe in place of the one before.

How does this help? Well, Penrose posits the end of each universe will involve a return to low entropy. This is because black holes suck in all the matter, energy, and information they encounter, which works to remove entropy from our universe. (Where that entropy might go is another question entirely.) The universe's continued expansion into eventual nothingness causes the black holes themselves to evaporate, which ultimately leaves the universe in a highly ordered state once again, ready to contract into another singularity and set off the next Big Bang.

As alternative theories go, it's not without its merits, but there's no evidence to support it...until now. He says he's found evidence for his ideas in the cosmic microwave background, the microwave radiation that permeates the universe and was thought to have formed 300,000 years after the Big Bang, providing a record of the universe at that far distant time. Penrose and his colleague Vahe Gurzadyan have discovered clear concentric circles within the data, which suggests regions of the radiation have much smaller temperature ranges than elsewhere.

So what does that mean? Penrose believes these circles are windows into the previous universe, spherical ripples left behind by the gravitational effects of colliding black holes in the previous universe. He also says these circles don't work well at all in the current inflationary model, which holds all temperature variations in the CMB should be truly random.

Here's where the fun begins. If the circles are really there and are really doing what Penrose says they're doing, then he's managed to overthrow the standard inflationary model. But there's a long way to go between where we are now and that point, assuming it ever happens.

The inflationary model has become the consensus for a good reason - it's the best explanation we've got for the universe we have now - and so cosmologists will examine any results that appear to disprove it very critically. There are also a couple key assumptions in Penrose's theory, particularly that all particles will lose their mass towards the end of the universe. Right now, we don't know whether that will actually happen - in particular, there's no proof that electrons ever decay.

[via arXiv]

Shutterstock image by Kim D. French