Saturday, March 12, 2011
"Mission No. 77": U.S.- Funded False Flag Terrorism in Egypt?
http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2011/03/mission-no-77-us-funded-false-flag.html
"The most significant find, however, was a group of eight documents discussing attacks on Christian churches. Nestled in that batch was a December 2, 2010 memo to the Egyptian Interior Minister outlining 'Mission No. 77,' an operation in which a jailed Islamist would organize the plot to bomb the Saints Coptic Church in Alexandria during New Year's Eve mass."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Liberty Dollar Trial News
http://www.liberty4free.com/Liberty%20Dollar%20Trial.htm
Heather Lewis has started a website devoted to reporting on the Liberty Dollar Trial (United States v. Bernard von NotHaus).
"I consider myself to be a friend of Bernard von NotHaus and I also am a Liberty Dollar Associate, so I am by no means a partial reporter in this case. In my opinion, Liberty Dollar is one of the doors to changing our broken financial system. Liberty Dollar became a threat to the Federal Reserve by competing with them, and the Fed had them taken out of business. That is my opinion. However, I have made every effort to report accurately the proceedings that are going on in the Federal District Court here in Statesville, North Carolina."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
GOP Expects Dems to Back Bill Killing ‘Backdoor Cap and Trade’
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/backdoor_cap_and_trade_261.html
"REPUBLICANS EXPECT conservative Democrats to back legislation introduced into the House and the Senate that will permanently bar the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating so-called greenhouse gases. It's part of a plan to prevent the White House from bypassing Congress in order to impose costly reforms on U.S. corporations that some contend will drive even more factories from U.S. shores in search of lesser-developed nations that care nothing about pollution."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Libertarian conventions today in New Jersey and Maryland
We are extremely pleased to announce the details for this year's
Convention. We are holding the Convention at Brookdale Community
College in Lincroft, NJ.
The Convention will be held on March 12th from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The
Party's Business Meeting will be held on morning of March 12th and
will be open to all. Registration will be required for the afternoon
events, which include a luncheon and speakers. Our full convention
package includes lunch on Saturday and afternoon speakers with coffee
and refreshments available all day.
Note that the business meeting on Saturday morning is free. You do not
need to register for the business meeting.
Speakers Include:
Brian Aitken
On August 27, 2010 Brian was sentenced to seven years in prison after
being wrongfully convicted of illegal possession of handguns while
traveling between residences in New Jersey. Judicial and prosecutorial
corruption in Brians case drew international media attention and
within two months the 'Free Brian Aitken' facebook page had gained
over 15,000 fans with millions of page views.
Governor Chris Christie issued an Executive Order to grant Brian
clemency on December 20, 2010.
Brian consults with companies to help them develop digital media & new
business strategies and serves as Executive Creative Director of
Alister & Paine Magazine.
John Papola
John Papola is the Creative Director for EconStories.org. EconStories
is well known for the viral sensation "Fear the Boom and Bust", a rap
battle between John Maynard Keynes and F.A. Hayek which John
co-created with creative economist partner Russ Roberts. John is an
award winning producer/director in broadcast entertainment and
marketing. He is currently a creative executive at Spike TV in their
industry-leading brand group. He previously worked for MTV Animation
series development and Nickelodeon's on-air creative group.
Frank Fiamingo
Frank Fiamingo is the founder and first President of the New Jersey
Second Amendment Society (NJ2AS). He is also a frequent contributor to
ConservativeNewJersey.com, one of the leading Conservative NJ Blog
Sites. Frank is also the owner of Professional Computer Services. He
recently retired after 30 plus years of running the computer
consulting end of the business, but still presides over the Medical
Billing Service Division.
Frank did not grow up around guns. In fact he never shot a handgun
until just this past year. He quickly discovered that owning and
possessing a handgun immediately put one in the position of being
guilty until proven innocent. Frank decided he wanted to do something
to change the climate for NJ gun owners and started the NJ2AS.
The New Jersey Second Amendment Society has monthly meetings with
featured speakers on a variety of related topics. They have an active
legislative affairs committee that meets regularly with
representatives throughout new Jersey. They are actively working with
NJ Legislators to create legislation that would de-criminalize simple
possession for law-abiding individuals, and to promote a bill that
would effectively make NJ a "shall issue" state.
F. Paul Wilson
F. Paul Wilson was born and raised in New Jersey where he misspent his
youth playing with matches, poring over Uncle Scrooge and E.C. comics,
reading Lovecraft, Matheson, Bradbury, and Heinlein, listening to
Chuck Berry and Alan Freed on the radio, and watching Soupy Sales and
Shock Theatre with Zacherley.
Paul is listed as a libertarian celebrity by The Advocates for Self
Government. He was the first winner of the Prometheus Award of the
Libertarian Futurist Society for his novel Wheels Within Wheels in
1979. Sims won again in 2004.
He is the author of more than forty books: science fiction (Healer,
Wheels Within Wheels, An Enemy of the State, Dydeetown World, The
Tery, Sims), horror thrillers (The Keep, The Tomb, The Touch, Reborn,
Reprisal, Nightworld, Black Wind, Sibs, Midnight Mass), contemporary
thrillers (The Select, Implant, Deep As the Marrow), novels that defy
categorization (The Fifth Harmonic, Virgin) and a number of
collaborations. In 1998 he resurrected his popular antihero, Repairman
Jack, and has chronicled his adventures in Legacies, Conspiracies, All
The Rage, Hosts, The Haunted Air, Gateways, Crisscross, Infernal,
Harbingers, Bloodline, By The Sword, Ground Zero, and Fatal Error.
He has peeked into Jack's teenage life in the young adult novels,
Jack: Secret Histories and Jack: Secret Circles.
Most of his short stories are collected in Soft & Others (1989), The
Barrens & Others (1998), and Aftershock & Others. He has edited two
anthologies: Freak Show (1992) and Diagnosis: Terminal (1996). He has
written for stage, screen, and interactive media as well.
The Keep, The Tomb, Harbingers, and By The Sword all appeared on the
New York Times Bestsellers List. The Tomb received the 1984 Porgie
Award from The West Coast Review of Books. His novelette "Aftershock"
won the 1999 Bram Stoker Award for short fiction. Dydeetown World was
on the young adult recommended reading lists of the American Library
Association and the New York Public Library, among others. He was
awarded the prestigious Inkpot Award from the San Diego ComiCon and
the Pioneer Award from the RT Booklovers Convention. He is listed in
the 50th anniversary edition of Who's Who in America.
His novel The Keep was made into a visually striking but otherwise
incomprehensible movie (screenplay and direction by Michael Mann) by
Paramount in 1983. The Tomb is in development as "Repairman Jack" by
Beacon Films and hopefully will not suffer a similar fate. His
original teleplay "Glim-Glim" aired on Monsters in 1989. An adaptation
of his short story "Menage a Trois" was part of the pilot for The
Hunger series that debuted on Showtime in July 1997. "Pelts" was
adapted by Dario Argento for Masters of Horror.
Chris Goldstein
Chris Goldstein is a marijuana reform advocate, public radio
broadcaster and writer. He hosts Active Voice Radio, a weekly social
justice interview program. In the last 10 years Chris has interviewed
hundreds of guests on topics related to marijuana including national
politicians like Congressmen Barney Frank and Ron Paul and
entertainment celebrities like Tommy Chong and Willie Nelson. Chris
worked for national NORML as their podcast and online media producer
from 2005-2008, founding NORML's Daily Audio Stash. Also active in New
Jersey, he worked with the Coalition for Medical Marijuana - New
Jersey (CMM-NJ) to help pass the new medical marijuana law in the
Garden State. Chris is often an expert guest for marijuana topics on
radio and television. Goldstein serves as Communications Director for
PhillyNORML and is very active on medical marijuana reform in
Pennsylvania.
Campus Location and Map
Brookdale Community College is located at 765 Newman Springs Road in
Lincroft, NJ. The convention is to be held in the Warner Student Life
Center in the Navesink Room.
When
March 12th, 2011 8:00 AM through 5:00 PM
Location
765 Newman Springs Road
Warner Student Life Center
Lincroft, NJ 07738
United States
Contact
Email: convention@njlp.org
Conference Fee
Convention Registration
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
DHS: We Have the Authority to Routinely Strip-Search Air Travelers
DHS: We Have the Authority to Routinely Strip-Search Air Travelers
Electronic Privacy Information Center
The Department of Homeland Security told a federal court that the agency believes it has the legal authority to strip-search every air traveler. The agency made the claim at oral argument in EPIC's lawsuit to suspend the airport body scanner program. The agency also stated that it believed a mandatory strip-search rule could be instituted without any public comment or rulemaking. EPIC President Marc Rotenberg urged the Washington, DC appeals court to suspend the body scanner program, noting that the devices are "uniquely intrusive" and ineffective. EPIC's opening brief in the case states that the Department of Homeland Security "has initiated the most sweeping, the most invasive, and the most unaccountable suspicionless search of American travelers in history," and that such a change in policy demands that the TSA conduct a notice-and-comment rule making process. The case is EPIC v. DHS, No. 10-1157. For more information, see EPIC: EPIC v. DHS and EPIC: Whole Body Imaging Technology.
Reprinted from the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Re: Will Congress Lay the Groundwork for Gun Confiscation?
wrote:
> I would rather be paranoid when it comes to government,...
No, paranoia is not something you can control and that's why they make
meds for it.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Is Your Favorite Charity Infiltrated?
http://morphcity.com/home/93-is-your-favorite-charity-infiltrated
"Before you write a check, sign a petition or declare your unwavering support for foundations or "nonprofit" organizations (NPOs), you may wish to investigate their agendas by using this step-by-step guide. Many large foundations and nonprofit organizations have destructive agendas in opposition to public interest or they receive funding from dubious sources and may be unduly influenced."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
NYT on Wisconsin Republicans - sure doesn't match up with the rest of the story
It’s Not Over in Wisconsin
Published: March 10, 2011
Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin have reversed half-a-century’s middle-class progress in the state by erasing collective-bargaining rights for public employees. Union members, caught off guard and infuriated by the Senate vote on Wednesday and the Assembly vote on Thursday, immediately talked of legal challenges and general strikes, but the outcome was probably inevitable given the Republican success in the 2010 elections. Now union members have to make sure they do not stay away from the polls again when their rights are at stake.
The vote, pushed by Gov. Scott Walker, would have happened weeks ago if Democratic state senators had not fled to Illinois to deprive the Senate of the supermajority it needs to pass bills that are considered fiscal matters. Republicans then moved the bargaining rights from a larger budget bill to a separate bill that they could pass by proclaiming that the rights were not a fiscal issue.
And, in doing so, they reluctantly exposed the real truth behind the maneuver: stripping the unions of their rights was never about the budget, especially once the unions had agreed to significant concessions on pensions and health care. It was always about politics. Governor Walker had hoped to hide behind a cooked-up budget crisis, but the fleeing Democrats at least succeeded in pulling away that facade.
Undermining public unions — and the support they give to Democrats — has been a long-sought goal of the Republican Party and many of its corporate backers. Koch Industries, one of the party’s biggest supporters, spent $1.2 million last year to help elect Mr. Walker and other Republican governors who want to eliminate or reduce bargaining rights. On Wednesday, the State Senate’s Republican leader, Scott Fitzgerald, told Fox News that if unions lose the battle for their rights, they would have less money to help President Obama win re-election.
Some union benefits are exorbitant, but no politician was forced to hand them out. Lawmakers are free to end this practice and should, but ending the basic rights of unions is a very different matter. It could have serious consequences for the Wisconsin Republicans who voted to do so. Recall efforts against Mr. Walker and several Republican senators are already under way. Polls in The Times and The Wall Street Journal have consistently shown large national majorities against these kinds of union-busting moves.
More broadly, the overreach by Mr. Walker and Republicans elsewhere has finally revealed their true agenda to blue-collar voters who either voted for them last year or who stayed home. These voters are not going to benefit from a crippled union movement; they live next door to the teachers and nurses and D.M.V. clerks who are about to lose what little clout they had in the state capital. Many have suffered during the recession and have watched in pain as private-sector unions have been battered to the point of ineffectiveness.
They understand the power play that took place this week. The place to exercise some power of their own is at the voting booth.
A version of this editorial appeared in print on March 11, 2011, on page A26 of the New York edition.
Soldiers and their ballots - DOJ doesn't care
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
WSJ writeup on Wisconsin
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Interesting comparison of how the AP is reporting the Wisconsin law and the governor and how his info is reported online
AP is not.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_17591067?source=email&nclick_check=1
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Rhetoric
John,
Perhaps a definition of liberty is needed for your perusal. From Webster's 1828 dictionary:
LIB''ERTY, n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.]
1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the body, or to the will or mind. The body is at liberty, when not confined; the will or mind is at liberty, when not checked or controlled. A man enjoys liberty, when no physical force operates to restrain his actions or volitions.
How does one gain liberty from YOUR New Constitution? From what little you have provided, for every problem YOUR New Constitution claims to solve, YOUR New Constitution creates ten new problems.
On 03/11/2011 12:46 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Mark: Your pet one-page constitution was unknown to me when I wrote my New Constitution—which is based on and expanded from, the original. So, don't fault me for not following your lead. At no time is the input of any outsider, like you, being sought to... "evaluate" what I have done. Most of the content was for solving very specific governmental problems highlighted in the news. Unless one understands the hundreds of problems solved, most don't have the smarts to realize how much more personal liberty and how much less government control there will be that would otherwise have affected most Americans. Even YOU will be a beneficiary! — J. A. Armistead —On Mar 11, 9:34 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:> Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the states having laws governing such.THERE GOES MY STATES RIGHT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IN PRISON FOR REPEAT OFFENDER PEDOPHILES... English, that is grammaticallywritten and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws, documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average people,JUST WHAT IS "AVERAGE"... DEFINE "LEGALESE".... DOES THAT MEAN (IT CERTAINLY IMPLIES) THAT ANY "OFFICIAL" LANGUAGE MUST BE IN A FORM THAT WOULD ALLOW IDIOTS AND DROPOUTS TO UNDERSTAND..(EBONICS).. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT ANYONE WITH AN EDUCATION COULD NOT UNDERSTAND IT. or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages in civil court.EXPLAIN WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT A THOUSAND YEAR OLD LANGUAGE?? No person shall be punished for violations of lawsthat: aren�t common knowledge;SO IF I CLAIM THAT I DID NOT KNOW THAT KILLING UNCLE JOE WAS "ILLEGAL" I CAN'T BE PROSECUTED. disagree with the macro moral consensusof the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first year and passed by less than 60% of the House.On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is undeserving of being replied to. — J. A. A. —On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist hodge-podge.On 03/10/2011 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote:Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to straightening- out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is..." Article IV:Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts, records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws, documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed. Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moralconsensusof the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first year and passed by less than 60% of the House. Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged with treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, shall, on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary servitude� except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place subject to its jurisdiction. The House may create new states if such aren�t within the jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House can make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of the United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of the USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature or the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened), the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence." � John A. Armistead � PatriotOn Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... *** Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended!I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others. Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System:"Article III:Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President, or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect, high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments, yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution�never on their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren�t royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: �The justice system is on trial.� All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall not�on their own�reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall bedevoid ofgavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.Section 2& 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or corruption within any arm of government�including the entire judicial system� judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during sentencing, favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of law enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges, justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for wrongful acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails to respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice may be guilty of a felony. The determination of the.. read more »
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft
Don't the actions of the DOJ give you a warm and fuzzy feeling?
/ sarc
This whole mess in Alaska smells to high heaven, including and
particularly the Ted Stevens issue. Too bad Ted is dead now. From what
I have read the material that was withheld by the prosecutors would have
proved Ted was innocent but now that he is dead from an airplane crash
it is just too late to render him justice. Meanwhile the guy they were
going to use in court against Stevens ends up as a vicious pedophile and
now they are dropping charges against him. Holder should be fired!!
http://www.adn.com/2011/03/10/1747968/dropping-of-allen-sex-investigation.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Never thought to see a story like this one about increasing property taxes
what the state law permits to add funding to schools. This would throw
out the whole funding structure for the school systems for the whole
state. Wonder what the non-parents think of this. If the parents are
so het up on more bucks for the schools, write a check.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/11/2110334/judge-rules-against-kan-parents.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Rhetoric
wrote my New Constitution—which is based on and expanded from, the
original. So, don't fault me for not following your lead. At no time
is the input of any outsider, like you, being sought to... "evaluate"
what I have done. Most of the content was for solving very specific
governmental problems highlighted in the news. Unless one understands
the hundreds of problems solved, most don't have the smarts to realize
how much more personal liberty and how much less government control
there will be that would otherwise have affected most Americans. Even
YOU will be a beneficiary! — J. A. Armistead —
>
On Mar 11, 9:34 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,
>
> > > records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more
> > > strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the
> > > states having laws governing such.
>
> THERE GOES MY STATES RIGHT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IN PRISON FOR
> REPEAT OFFENDER PEDOPHILES...
>
> English, that is grammatically
>
> > > written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and
> > > shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws,
> > > documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written
> > > concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average
> > > people,
>
> JUST WHAT IS "AVERAGE"... DEFINE "LEGALESE".... DOES THAT MEAN (IT CERTAINLY
> IMPLIES) THAT ANY "OFFICIAL" LANGUAGE MUST BE IN A FORM THAT WOULD ALLOW
> IDIOTS AND DROPOUTS TO UNDERSTAND..(EBONICS).. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT ANYONE
> WITH AN EDUCATION COULD NOT UNDERSTAND IT.
>
> or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.
>
> > > Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages
> > > in civil court.
>
> EXPLAIN WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT A THOUSAND YEAR OLD LANGUAGE??
>
> No person shall be punished for violations of laws
>
> > > that: aren�t common knowledge;
>
> SO IF I CLAIM THAT I DID NOT KNOW THAT KILLING UNCLE JOE WAS "ILLEGAL" I
> CAN'T BE PROSECUTED.
>
> disagree with the macro moral consensus
>
> > > of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first
> > > year and passed by less than 60% of the House.
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is
> > undeserving of being replied to. — J. A. A. —
>
> > On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> > > It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist
> > > hodge-podge.
>
> > > On 03/10/2011 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to straightening-
> > > > out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is...
>
> > > > " Article IV:
>
> > > > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,
> > > > records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more
> > > > strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the
> > > > states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically
> > > > written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and
> > > > shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws,
> > > > documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written
> > > > concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average
> > > > people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.
> > > > Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages
> > > > in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws
> > > > that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral
> > consensus
> > > > of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first
> > > > year and passed by less than 60% of the House.
> > > > Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and
> > > > immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged with
> > > > treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, shall,
> > > > on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled,
> > > > be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in
> > > > such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary servitude�
> > > > except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been
> > > > duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place
> > > > subject to its jurisdiction.
> > > > The House may create new states if such aren�t within the
> > > > jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by
> > > > joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House can
> > > > make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of the
> > > > United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of the
> > > > USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the
> > > > union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall
> > > > protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature or
> > > > the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened),
> > > > the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence."
> > > > � John A. Armistead � Patriot
>
> > > > On Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > >> Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My
> > > >> father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most
> > > >> frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The
> > > >> "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct
> > > >> the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to
> > > >> experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the
> > > >> police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or
> > > >> not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony
> > > >> for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is
> > > >> latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the
> > > >> presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury
> > > >> has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be
> > > >> the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... ***
> > > >> Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not
> > > >> guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended!
>
> > > >> I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said
> > > >> anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others.
> > > >> Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System:
>
> > > >> "Article III:
>
> > > >> Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
> > > >> such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
> > > >> interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
> > > >> rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
> > > >> laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
> > > >> Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
> > > >> as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
> > > >> from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
> > > >> such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
> > > >> executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
> > > >> justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
> > > >> good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
> > > >> or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
> > > >> nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
> > > >> high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
> > > >> nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
> > > >> shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
> > > >> yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
> > > >> make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution�never on
> > > >> their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel
> > > >> shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of
> > > >> seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters
> > > >> nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren�t
> > > >> royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
> > > >> superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
> > > >> lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
> > > >> in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
> > > >> socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
> > > >> Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend
> > > >> State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not
> > > >> stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be
> > > >> addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not
> > > >> respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
> > > >> pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
> > > >> begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: �The justice system is
> > > >> on trial.� All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for
> > > >> one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall
> > > >> not�on their own�reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be
> > devoid of
> > > >> gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
> > > >> process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
> > > >> respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
> > > >> to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.
>
> > > >> Section 2& 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the
> > > >> People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or corruption
> > > >> within any arm of government�including the entire judicial system�
> > > >> judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during sentencing,
> > > >> favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of law
> > > >> enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges,
> > > >> justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for wrongful
> > > >> acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails to
> > > >> respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government
> > > >> official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice may be
> > > >> guilty of a felony. The determination of the
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
New York Man Faces Five Years In Jail For 'Linking' To Online Videos
New York Man Faces Five Years In Jail For 'Linking' To Online Videos
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/03/10/new-york-man-faces-five-years-in-jail-for-linking-to-online-videos/
"In a case against a New York website owner, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is claiming that merely linking to copyrighted material is a crime."
"'Based on my participation in the investigation leading to the February 2011 Seizure, I know that Channelsurfing.net was a "linking" website,' special agent Daniel Brazier wrote in the complaint."
"The new growth industry in the US is criminalizing, harassing, robbing and imprisoning American citizens."
- Author Unknown
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Federal Gun Raid Leaves Border Town Without Mayor, Police Chief
http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/03/10/new.mexico.columbus.raid/index.html?hpt=T2
"The mayor, police chief and a village trustee in the New Mexico border town of Columbus have been charged along with eight other defendants with buying firearms for illegal export to Mexico, federal authorities said Thursday."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Alleged California 'Dirty DUI' Arrests Detailed
http://www.officer.com/web/online/Internal-Affairs-News/Alleged-California-Dirty-DUI-Arrests-Detailed/5$57210
"Deputy Stephen Tanabe, 47, told a reserve sheriff's deputy on patrol with him the night of Jan. 14 that a drunken-driving arrest the two were making outside a Danville bar was a 'setup' and that the target needed to be 'dirtied' for a future court date, a sheriff's investigator wrote in a search warrant affidavit."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Liberty Dollar Trial Begins
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/085423-2011-03-10-united-states-v-bernard-von-nothaus-bvnh-case-5-09.htm?From=News
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Utah Governor Signs Law Restricting Access To Public Records
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/03/09/protesters-flood-utah-statehouse-as-governor-signs-law-restricting-access-to-public-records/
"The Utah statehouse was teeming with protesters last night, even as the governor put his signature on a new "transparency" law that would severely restrict public access to government records."
"Why is it so hard to understand that the reason the first ten Amendments — commonly known as the Bill of Rights — are trampled underfoot by politicos and bureaucrats is that the Founding Fathers neglected to provide a suitably harsh penalty for it?" — L. Neil Smith
Good for Governor Walker of Wisconsin - he handled this mess pretty well and didn't blink.
MADISON, Wis (Reuters) – Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker signed into law
on Friday sweeping new limits on collective bargaining for public sector
workers that have sparked a national debate over labor relations.
In a major setback for organized labor, the state Assembly on Thursday
voted 53-42 to approve the controversial bill, which has triggered the
biggest demonstrations in the Wisconsin capital since the Vietnam War.
The state Senate had earlier approved the measure despite a boycott of
Democratic senators.
"This morning Governor Walker fulfilled his promise to sign the budget
repair bill as soon as legally possible," Walker's office said in a
statement. A signing ceremony was scheduled for later on Friday.
Walker has said the bill, which sharply limits the union rights of
public workers and requires them to pay more of their health insurance
and pension costs, was needed to help the state close a $3.6 billion
budget deficit over two years.
The governor said on Friday that he was canceling the layoff warning
notices he sent late last week to public sector unions after lawmakers
approved the proposal to restrict union power.
Walker said the new powers for state and local government in the bill,
which he is expected to sign into law as early as Friday, would save $30
million in the current budget year, which ends June 30.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110311/us_nm/us_wisconsin_18
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Funny - openness for thee but not for me - gotta love the journalists - what a crew
access to the full story but only what they choose to tell us I can't
see that their words mean a whole lot.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.