Re: Urgent Message to New York State Voters: Don't Let Obstructionist Republicans Win Back The State Senate

What is false about it. 38 - 8 = 30 and 24 + 8 = 32. Bill would pass
32 - 30. Blame your Dems who voted against it. That was the
difference. Guess in addition to failing logic you also failed math.

On 11/01/2010 02:15 PM, Tommy News wrote:
> False twisted pretzel logic. No dice, no points to Dick.
>
>
>
> On 11/1/10, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> And the support of the people of NY state is what? Do you have numbers
>> as to what support this has?
>>
>> Also remember that members of legislative bodies represent their
>> constituents. Suppose the constituents supported civil unions but not
>> marriage, something which is common across the country. If the civil
>> union gave you the benefits of marriage, why would you give a damn. And
>> if the constituents supported civil unions but not marriage, then that
>> is what their senators should vote. Did you ask why the 8 Dems voted
>> against? If they had not voted against it would have passed 32-30.
>> Blame them!
>>
>> On 11/01/2010 02:01 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>> On December 2nd, 2009, by a vote of 38
>>> Nays to 24 Yeas, The New York State Senate Voted Against Marriage
>>> Equality.
>>> Every single Republican and eight Democrats voted for discrimination.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/1/10, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> What stand-alone bill did the Republicans vote for discrimination. If
>>>> you are still harping on DADT, they should have noted against that
>>>> debacle. The garbage that was tacked onto that bill made it imperative
>>>> to see it did not get passed.
>>>>
>>>> If you want repeal of DADT passed, then put up a bill that repeals
>>>> DADT. Also make sure that you also change the UCMJ as well. As it
>>>> stands now if all you do is let the judge say DADT is bad, then it
>>>> defaults to the older legislation in UCMJ which actually does not even
>>>> include DADT but only dismissal. Stop playing stupid games with the
>>>> crap. Pitiful! Also remember who first passed and signed DADT. And
>>>> no, it was not the Republicans. Thank your hero, Bubba, and his crew
>>>> that were in charge.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/01/2010 01:21 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>>>> Every single Republican voted for discrimination.
>>>>> Every single one. No exceptions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do NOT vote for a Republican obstructionist under ANY circumstances.
>>>>>
>>>>> A Republican Mammoth:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNhVxhrwnnsNAk0dYuT8PvXUIV9y9tWhKf2_uKzKfQ_0KcsIjKkbhYhvdcAIE04c5AKTqYjLLuy27i1NoX737NSx04zgkVJK3kVk68RR3WGAuKqlzZHkDGbhMmIKv3nzOdp6PS9Fe6DSnd/s400/GOP+mammoth+large.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa<keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.