Monday, July 26, 2010

JP E-Consultant Pakistan Jobs In Pakistan

V Can Do It Pakistan <hrd.vcanduit.org@gmail.com>

Hi,

Jobs of the week, Kindly fined the attached job list. These jobs are available in multiple cities of Pakistan Kindly forward these jobs to those people who are needy for job and help them to finding right job.

Thanks.

--
Hello,
Due to the jobless scenario in Pakistan we decided to volunteer our group for job postings.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "E-Consultant Pakistan" (www.econsultant.pk) group.

To post to this group, send email to e-consultant@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
e-consultant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/e-consultant?hl=en
or on Facebook at:
www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=133233547582
or on Linkedin at:
www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2262144&trk=myg_ugrp_ovr

Regards

"E-Consultant Pakistan"
www.econsultant.pk

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com

JP Jobs In Pakistan

JP Sankore Masjid (Timbuktu)

Sankore Masjid (Timbuktu)

Please wait images are loading.....

One of the historic mosques of Timbuktu, the Sankore mosque was built during the declining years of the Empire of Mali, in the early 15th century A.D. Architecturally, it is remarkable for its large pyramidal mihrab.

JP Shab-e-Bar'at

JP FW: Potential gold mines found in Kerala !!!

Re: There are only 6 active members in this forum

I come to forums to get YOUR opinion. NOT the opinion of some guy who
wrote an article for the WSJ or the NYTimes. If you have an opinion
based on some article you read, write it. It isn't that hard.

And like I said, I don't mind the occasional article being linked to,
but dozens and dozens makes it difficult to follow a discussion thread
by burying it under pages of treads with no response. The result of
this is obvious.

On Jul 26, 10:07 am, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's get this straight - you don't want to follow links and you don't want
> to read? It begs the question - WTF are you doing on the INTERNET? Looking
> at the pictures? Oh dear... those kind of pics Zeb???
>
> The "discourse" as you call it in this forum is garden variety with the
> occasional stroke of brilliance. The articles posted are sometimes
> brilliant and often amusing.
>
> The only thing wrong with this forum is your whining about the forum. You
> are not alone though Zeb. Studio and Louie (euwe) also whine about the
> forum. Great company you keep there Zebby.
>
> If you don't like Political Forum...
>
> Regards,
> CW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zebnick" <zebn...@gmail.com>
> To: "PoliticalForum" <politicalforum@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 09:29
> Subject: Re: There are only 6 active members in this forum
>
> I don't think you get it. Shot gun posting of numerous articles you
> find on the internet kills discourse. It doesn't encourage it. Just
> witness the LACK of discourse on this forum. 80-90% of the posts
> aren't responded to. Dozens and dozens of posts with just a link to an
> article or a link with a terse comment about it. Then we have to go to
> the article, read it, figure out what the OP is trying to comment on
> and reply? No fun. No thanks. I wouldn't mind it once in a while, but
> thats almost all there is here. And THATS why there are so few active
> posters. All of the "discourse" is buried under article postings.
>
> This is constructive criticism. Take it or leave it.
>
> On Jul 24, 7:52 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Actually if I killed that which was common in the past and takes place
> > on some of the other "Forums" it is a proud moment. We allow ANY
> > civilized discourse here or any "news/article" posters as well. It is
> > now up to the individual to comment or not without being too harassed.
> > If the one requirement we have.... civility.... is not your cup of tea
> > please feel free to stay or go as YOU please, just do it civilly.
>
> > Its' a good thing.
>
> > On Jul 24, 12:08 pm, Zebnick <zebn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > This board is used a bulletin board for people posting articles that
> > > no one reads or responds to. It has been killed as a discussion forum.
> > > Those doing it know who they are and don't care.
>
> > > On Jul 23, 12:20 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > 3810.... ha!
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: There are only 6 active members in this forum

Let's get this straight - you don't want to follow links and you don't want
to read? It begs the question - WTF are you doing on the INTERNET? Looking
at the pictures? Oh dear... those kind of pics Zeb???

The "discourse" as you call it in this forum is garden variety with the
occasional stroke of brilliance. The articles posted are sometimes
brilliant and often amusing.

The only thing wrong with this forum is your whining about the forum. You
are not alone though Zeb. Studio and Louie (euwe) also whine about the
forum. Great company you keep there Zebby.

If you don't like Political Forum...

Regards,
CW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zebnick" <zebnick@gmail.com>
To: "PoliticalForum" <politicalforum@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 09:29
Subject: Re: There are only 6 active members in this forum

I don't think you get it. Shot gun posting of numerous articles you
find on the internet kills discourse. It doesn't encourage it. Just
witness the LACK of discourse on this forum. 80-90% of the posts
aren't responded to. Dozens and dozens of posts with just a link to an
article or a link with a terse comment about it. Then we have to go to
the article, read it, figure out what the OP is trying to comment on
and reply? No fun. No thanks. I wouldn't mind it once in a while, but
thats almost all there is here. And THATS why there are so few active
posters. All of the "discourse" is buried under article postings.

This is constructive criticism. Take it or leave it.

On Jul 24, 7:52 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually if I killed that which was common in the past and takes place
> on some of the other "Forums" it is a proud moment. We allow ANY
> civilized discourse here or any "news/article" posters as well. It is
> now up to the individual to comment or not without being too harassed.
> If the one requirement we have.... civility.... is not your cup of tea
> please feel free to stay or go as YOU please, just do it civilly.
>
> Its' a good thing.
>
> On Jul 24, 12:08 pm, Zebnick <zebn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This board is used a bulletin board for people posting articles that
> > no one reads or responds to. It has been killed as a discussion forum.
> > Those doing it know who they are and don't care.
>
> > On Jul 23, 12:20 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 3810.... ha!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: There are only 6 active members in this forum

Good for you. I'm glad you have a source of articles you like. This,
however, is supposed to be a discussion forum. I come here seldom
because it isn't.

And while you may not like the hyper-emotional lunacy spewed by
lefties who visit here, it is instructive in understanding the kind of
people who have blind allegiance to such as Obama and his destructive
agenda. Merely ignoring or shutting out opinion that does not comport
with your own is the province of liberals and you should eschew it.

On Jul 26, 9:36 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think you get it
>
> I find the things Dick and Travis post interesting and I save them
>
> I think the regurgitated msnbc flatulence stupio, sheep pattie and others
> post is not worthy of response
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Zebnick <zebn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think you get it. Shot gun posting of numerous articles you
> > find on the internet kills discourse. It doesn't encourage it. Just
> > witness the LACK of discourse on this forum. 80-90% of the posts
> > aren't responded to. Dozens and dozens of posts with just a link to an
> > article or a link with a terse comment about it. Then we have to go to
> > the article, read it, figure out what the OP is trying to comment on
> > and reply? No fun. No thanks. I wouldn't mind it once in a while, but
> > thats almost all there is here. And THATS why there are so few active
> > posters. All of the "discourse" is buried under article postings.
>
> > This is constructive criticism. Take it or leave it.
>
> > On Jul 24, 7:52 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Actually if I killed that which was common in the past and takes place
> > > on some of the other "Forums" it is a proud moment. We allow ANY
> > > civilized discourse here or any "news/article" posters as well. It is
> > > now up to the individual to comment or not without being too harassed.
> > > If the one requirement we have.... civility.... is not your cup of tea
> > > please feel free to stay or go as YOU please, just do it civilly.
>
> > > Its' a good thing.
>
> > > On Jul 24, 12:08 pm, Zebnick <zebn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > This board is used a bulletin board for people posting articles that
> > > > no one reads or responds to. It has been killed as a discussion forum.
> > > > Those doing it know who they are and don't care.
>
> > > > On Jul 23, 12:20 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > 3810.... ha!
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Gingrich

On Gingrich: A legacy of surrender

DIGG/BUZZ IT UP

POLITICO 44

The news that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich folded like a cheap suit in the wake of a brazen political attack on the tea party movement was sad. But not surprising.

As far back as his second term in Congress, in 1980, Gingrich sided with big labor interests until brought to his knees by a National Right to Work education campaign. Contrary to his image, Gingrich has demonstrated throughout his political career that he possesses no real ideological mooring.

Now, his legitimizing the NAACP's crass political attempt to play the race card reveals him to be nothing more than a rank political opportunist – a White House-aspiring demagogue who prefers looking good for the liberal legacy media to standing up for our rights as citizens and taxpayers.

Practically-speaking, Gingrich no more subscribes to the tea party ideals of limited government, individual liberty and personal responsibility than President Barack Obama. At least, that's what one could infer from his endorsement of liberal "stimulus"-supporter Dede Scozzafava in upstate New York last year.

In fact, Gingrich previously dismissed the tea party as nothing more than the "militant wing of the Republican Party" — a crude diminution of a diverse group of freedom-loving Americans.

That's why, when the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People decided to play the race card against the tea party earlier this month, it wasn't shocking to see Gingrich immediately raise the white flag and suggest that the Tea Party should give credence to this attack by co-hosting town hall meetings with the NAACP. Rather than rebuking this unfounded attack and exposing its political motivations, Gingrich chose to cave – again – in hopes of giving America a "teachable moment."

This policy of appeasement had disastrous results in past. In fact, it is responsible for the GOP's fateful retreat from its limited government roots after the "Republican Revolution" of 1994.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fox teams with Wahabbi's for 24-hr Arabic news channel

creeping | July 26, 2010 at 8:15 AM | Tags: Creeping Sharia, islam, Jihad, Life, Media, Muslim, News, Politics, Random, Religion, Sharia, travel | Categories: Creeping Sharia, Media, News, Politics, Stealth Jihad | URL: http://wp.me/pbU4v-6dF

via Diana West's The Death of the Grown-Up The Fox & Camel No, it's not a new pub serving non-alchololic beer, it's a new media venture between Rupert Murchoch and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, whose business relationship grows ever cosier (see here and here, for example, to catch up on the whole affair). From Canada's [...]