Dear J. Ashley: Your motivations "as the skeptic" sometimes serve a
useful purpose: Allowing me to explain the exacting rationale behind
specific portions of my New Constitution. *** The crux and most
important (though most disregarded) precept of the original
Constitution is this: Having our government be a Representative
Republic. That, as closely as possible, gives equal power to every
law-abiding citizen of voting age. A Representative Republic, being
the anti-thesis of socialism and communism has ALWAYS made the latter
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. When our brave men and women in the military put
their lives on the line to "preserve our freedoms", there is no
greater FREEDOM than allowing law-abiding citizens of voting age to
fairly determine the course of Government!
Somewhere along the way, the Will of the People wasn't good enough for
the good-for-nothing, leftist, progressive democrats. If they
couldn't turn this country into a socialist or communist nation via
congressional actions, they decided to use... the courts. Nowhere in
the Constitution does it say that justices to the Supreme Court can be
ideologically screened to agree with the views of the President who
nominated them, or with the ideology of the "particular" party that
happens to be in power. The "Justice is Blind" ideal for the courts
demands that there be NO built-in BIAS in the judges and justices!
And nowhere in the Constitution does it say that in the process of
determining (yes or no) whether anything has a Constitutional
"sticking point" that those nine justices, by their BIASED decision(s)
get to usurp the power of Congress and decide by themselves, not only
which side will win, but will also have that biased decision become
part of the history of (bad) decisions that future justices will look
for so hard in justifying their own high corruption!
In the case of Obama Care, all prudent observers know that States
Rights are by far more important than a general stipulation by the
founding fathers that the Fed. Government can regulate interstate
commerce. Hell, in those horse and buggy times, there was no such
thing as health insurance! And since the SPIRIT of the Constitution
OUTLAWS anything that's unfair and non democratic, then the concept of
government controlled social anything is blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
The only constitutional avenue of action when the Supreme Court finds
a sticking point, is to send the questioned "law" back to congress to
be re-written or abandoned. By their votes, justices aren't entitled
to decide constitutional issues, themselves! Neither are they
empowered, in deciding civil or criminal appeals, to use their biases
as a basis for punishing those who happen to disagree with them! ***
Easily, the majority of the decisions "handed down" (unconstitutional)
by the "high court" (unconstitutional) are unconstitutional! In a
Representative Republic, no oligarchy, such as the US Senate and the
God Damned US Supreme Court are empowered to have power greater than
one-person-one vote.! And that has NEVER been the vote of one of nine
justices!
I know a great deal about the corrupt CULTURE of our courts, because
that was my motivation for starting to write my New Constitution in
the first place. The entire Article III is copied, below.
"Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—never on
their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel
shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of
seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters
nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren't
royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend
State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not
stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be
addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not
respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: "The justice system is
on trial." All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for
one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall
not—on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.
Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the
People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or corruption
within any arm of government—including the entire judicial system—
judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during sentencing,
favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of law
enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges,
justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for wrongful
acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails to
respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government
official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice may be
guilty of a felony. The determination of the above status shall be
made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a yea vote of 1/3
of the House, a national public trial, televised from the House, shall
be held regarding all named parties—with judgment being determined via
referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered voters who vote determine
that there is guilt, the government officials, judges, justices and/or
members of law enforcement shall be removed from their former
positions and sentenced commensurate with their crimes, up to and
including the death penalty.
Judicial authority shall extend to all cases in law and equity
arising under this New Constitution, the laws of the United States,
treaties made or which shall be made under their authority, to all
cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, to
all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, to controversies in
which the United States is a party, to controversies between two or
more states, between a state and Citizens of another state, between
Citizens of different states, between Citizens of the same state
claiming lands under grants of different states or the Citizens
thereof, and foreign states, Citizens or subjects. The Supreme Court
shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors
and consuls, and those in which a state is a party. In all other
cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate juris-diction both as to
law and to fact—with such exceptions and under such regulations as the
House shall make. Except in cases of impeachment, the trial of all
crimes shall be by jury in the state where said crimes were allegedly
committed, or if otherwise, where the House directs. Misdemeanors and
crimes occurring conjunctively shall be tried with the more serious
crime, unless the disproving of the misdemeanor would excuse the
crime. If either occurred in multiple jurisdictions, the trial shall
be at a single common venue that is least compromising to the
defense. But capital murder cases may be tried consecutively.
Section 4: New trials shall be granted to anyone previously found
guilty if there is substantive new evidence for innocence, or if there
was an improper collection of, suppression of, or distortion of the
facts by law enforcement, the prosecution, or by the courts. The
resolution of such matters shall be the top priority of the courts.
If a person is tried in a civil court for substantially the same
offense that they previously or subsequently be acquitted of in a
criminal case, a unanimous verdict of nine jurors shall be required
for the civil judgment to stand. No civil agency nor governmental
body shall independently seek to punish any person acquitted, as by
denying to such person any fundamental rights or privileges. In civil
trials monetary awards determined by juries shall stand. Achieving
justice being the primary objective, such shall take precedence over
petty procedural or legal technicalities, except those restrictions
placed on government(s) or protecting the full civil rights of any
citizen shall never be waived.
Obtaining a lawyer in civil cases is as fundamental to justice as
obtaining a lawyer in criminal cases. No statute of limitation shall
apply to any case in which a plaintiff or defendant diligently seeks
but can't find a lawyer. Upon request to the court, an unbiased
lawyer shall be appointed. In federal cases licensed lawyers from any
state or territory may be used regardless of where the trial takes
place. The right of the People to obtain justice for any criminal or
civil injury is funda-mental. Justice departments, law enforcement
agencies, and/or the courts shall be the instruments of justice.
Should such in any way obstruct justice by improper procedure, bias,
or intentional neglect of duty, such persons shall be held as
criminally accountable as anyone else for obstruction of justice—a
felony. Undue delay by a defendant or their counsel in a civil case—
as a defensive tactic—is prohibited, and if present may be considered
as evidence supporting guilt. Causing undue delay of appeals,
similarly, is prohibited.
Section 5 & 6: It is treason to foster corruption in any arm of
government, to levy war against the USA, adhere to her enemies, or to
give them aid and comfort. The former must show abuse of power that
subverts the New Constitution, such as by enlisting subordinates into
unlawfulness that violates the civil rights of any Citizen or group.
No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two
witnesses to the same overt act, or by confession in court. The House
sets punishment for treason, if the civil rights of innocent relatives
aren't affected.
Witnesses in court shall be asked: "Do you promise that the
testimony you are about to give will be truthful to the best of your
knowledge?" No religious help or association shall be required during
the asking of such question. The truthfulness of a witness's
testimony can be limited by the manner, sequence, and extent of
questioning, so witnesses always have the right to volunteer apt,
truthful testimony without fear of sanction by the court. Perjury
shall be punished commensurate with the level of negative effects
resulting therefrom. Judges shall have discretionary sentencing power
below the maxi-mum, but felonies carry a min. 3-year sentence, or as
stated herein. The accrued negative effects of any criminal sentence
shall not exceed the accrued negative effects of the crime. Fines or
monetary judgments shall not be used to allay government costs. If
the public isn't injured, it's not a crime to flee or hide from
injustice, nor to aid another, therewith. Nor is it a crime, or proof
of a crime, for an innocent person to lie to protect their own
privacy, or the privacy of an inno-cent person. The House or states
shall pass no law nor approve any regulation requiring that a
convicted person admit to guilt in order to get a fair sentence or to
be considered for parole. During incarceration, if a jailed person's
behavior has been good, at the appointed time, parole shall be
granted. When a conviction is appealed, adjudication shall occur
within six months, without public pressure, bias, or a presumption of
the correctness of the conviction. A rightful decision in such shall
be based only on the facts in the case while respecting the continuing
constitutional rights of the one convicted. The appeal(s) of a
conviction shall never place the appealer in jeopardy of a worse
sentence. A reasonable daily frequency of unmonitored phone calls and
unopened mail (external sniffing and/or x-raying accepted) shall be
allowed for persons held against their will.
Section 7: Judges and justices shall not selectively interpret,
limit, or exclude existing laws so as to effectively make new laws.
No judge or justice shall be appointed based on their ideology, nor
shall ideology be considered in confirmation processes. As to the
nominating or appointing of judges or justices: No candidate for
public office, member of the Executive Branch nor the House, shall
state nor imply that a nominee will hold, or does hold, a particular
ideology, because by so stating or implying, such candidate shall be
disqualified, the apt one's governmental job shall be lost, and the
apt nominee disqualified. Criminal cases shall be processed as a
named, titleless person v. a named person(s). The defense can choose
to sit on either side of the court. Judges and justices shall not
anthropomorphize "the Court", nor seek out "historical" court
positions on which to base decisions; rather, decisions shall be
theirs alone.
Section 8: It's a felony for any person, organization, group, or
special interest—publicly or privately—to lobby judges or justices for
influencing their rulings; also, for any judge or justice to accept a
bribe in exchange for a judicial favor. It's a capital offense for
such to accept a bribe that directly results in a person's death.
It's a felony to extort an innocent defendant into pleading guilty by
threatening to try them for a greater crime; ipso facto, the greater
crime is excused. Law enforcement and the courts shall be responsive
rather than proactive, protective without being subjugative, and shall
enforce the New Constitution ahead of any other laws or employment
hierarchies. Racial or other statistical profiling, preemptive
arrests, detention or sentencing are illegal if a person's
constitutional rights are violated. But in an emergency, the President
—or when apt, a state governor(s)—may temporarily waive the latter.
It's a felony for an attorney to acquiesce to their client's ongoing
violations of this constitution, and/or their criminal conduct,
without censure; or for any reason to conspire to violate, or violate,
another person's civil rights; or to stonewall the easy resolution of
justified complaints by non action, legal shenanigans or personal
bias. Similarly, it's a civil offense for an individual, group or
business to require that a justified plaintiff have an attorney before
moving to make agreeable amends. States shall license no attorney on
the payroll or board of another type business, organization or non-
judicial governmental agency; nor one who violates this constitution;
nor one who because of personal bias, fails to competently defend the
civil rights of any Citizen. Incorporation doesn't protect those in
such from personal responsibility for maliciousness in: harming any
person; irremediably harming local or world environs; or endangering
the likely health and safety of local or world Citizens. A crime's
seriousness shall be consistent with the mores of the People and the
apt juries rather than with government. Judges & justices shall be
well mannered, forthright and succinct; courtrooms aren't their
property nor forums for venting their feelings. A Citizen can
sanction a judge or justice in court for deviating from this
constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by any law-abiding
Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so acting shall be
subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer to overly drawn-
out legal processes or pending rulings."
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Jun 4, 7:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> You have certainly lived up to your moniker this time.
>
> Article III, Section 1: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall
> be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the
> Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
>
> How can something specifically enumerated in the Constitution be
> unconstitutional?
>
> On 06/04/2011 03:37 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear plainol...: The Federal Government, especially the court system,
> > has been disregarding the Constitution for over a century. If there
> > is a disagreement, the only thing the Supreme Court is authorized to
> > do is to send things back to CONGRESS to be resolved. Nothing in the
> > Constitution grants one justice more total power than Congress!
> > Therefore the Supreme Court is Unconstitutional... by RITUAL. � J. A.
> > Armistead � Patriot
> > On Jun 3, 3:11 pm, plainolamerican<plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Does the federal government's
> >> authority to regulate interstate commerce rule, or does the powers
> >> granted to the states clause rule?
> >> ---
> >> what states rights?
> >> that was resolved in 1865 ... sorta
> >> it's time for another showdown since it's obvious that the feds pick
> >> and choose their responsibilities and powers
>
> >> On Jun 2, 3:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> >>> No, MJ! Every day, the US Supreme Court is finding interpretations
> >>> that will allow this, but not "that". Does the federal government's
> >>> authority to regulate interstate commerce rule, or does the powers
> >>> granted to the states clause rule? That, supposedly, will determine
> >>> the constitutionality of Obama Care. As I've explained: The Senate
> >>> was included ONLY because of the small states' extortion (blackmail).
> >>> A Representative Republic is PURE; an oligarchy, such as the US
> >>> Senate, is unfair, undemocratic and thus UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Like our
> >>> Manchurian Candidate... "President" (gag!), Obama�s being in the White
> >>> House makes him no less a TREASONOUS bastard! If you want 100 senile,
> >>> career politicians to run things, then why not propose a constitution
> >>> without a House of Representatives? For running a government, I'll
> >>> take the fair and democracy-like House, over our drag-on-government US
> >>> Senate every time! Harry Reid should be out of a job! � J. A.
> >>> Armistead � Patriot
> >>> On Jun 2, 9:25 am, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>> Perhaps we have highlighted (again) yet another of your difficulties. When you ignore common definitions of words, it is difficult to convey your message in any meaningful way.
> >>>> Constitutional, as noted previously is of or by the Constitution. The Senate is constitutional -- by definition.
> >>>> Regard$,
> >>>> --MJ
> >>>> "[Democracy] is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive" -- Westbrook Pegler, popular columnist of the 1930s and '40s.At 08:38 PM 5/26/2011, you wrote:MJ: What "definition" is that? That an anti-democracy and anti-
> >>>> Republic oligarchy has more power than the former two? The US senate
> >>>> is THE most corrupt band of career politicians on planet Earth! We
> >>>> could do better by just giving the vote to the first 100 people to
> >>>> cross Main Street! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>> On May 26, 1:32 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Again, Constitutional is of or by the Constitution.
> >>>>> The Senate is constitutional -- by definition.
> >>>>> Until the removal of the check with Amendment 17 (not properly ratified per Article V), the Senate was the 'representative' of the States -- those entities forming the United States (plural).
> >>>>> Contrary to your insistence, the Constitution does not create this idea of mob rule to which you are so enamored and believe will *magically* correct ills.
> >>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>> --MJ
> >>>>> Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic ... Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based on deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, or impulse, without restraint or regard to the consequences. Result is demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
> >>>>> -- U.S. Army training manual No. 2000-25 (1928-1932)Dear MJ: The Founding Fathers were BLACKMAILED into including a
> >>>>> senate, because small states feared being exploited by larger states.
> >>>>> The senate is an oligarchy that slaps-in-the-face our Representative
> >>>>> Republic. Since principles of FAIRNESS are so evident throughout the
> >>>>> main body of the Constitution, then, the VICTOR in disputes has to be
> >>>>> the side favoring fair play and democracy! The mere fact that the
> >>>>> senate was included in the Constitution doesn't make that
> >>>>> constitutional! Just because 'laws' are passed doesn't make those
> >>>>> constitutional, either. The US Senate has been a drag of fair play
> >>>>> and democracy from day one! For the record, the US Supreme Court,
> >>>>> wherein one justice has a power greater than Congress, or the People,
> >>>>> is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Learn, if you can, MJ. So far you seem
> >>>>> committed to a lifetime of taking-over your flunked courses in how to
> >>>>> think. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> On May 25, 9:43 am, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> The US Senate, which was originally selected by the legislatures of
> >>>>>> the several states, was an ill conceived OLIGARCHY. Since there has
> >>>>>> never been a parity of the population served by each senator, that
> >>>>>> means the USA has two conflicting political systems, and the oligarchy
> >>>>>> is the one which isn't FAIR. Giving undue power to smaller population
> >>>>>> states slaps REPUBLIC ideas in the face. So, the US Senate is and
> >>>>>> always has been, unconstitutional.The Senate -- by definition -- cannot be unconstitutional.
> >>>>>> What you (continue) fail to grasp is that the Constitution is/was an agreement between Sovereign States. The Senate is THEIR representative body. Amendment 17 curtailed yet another check on Federal power.
> >>>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>>> --MJ
> >>>>>> The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> >>>> --
> >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
>
> Freedom is always illegal!
>
> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> have any possibility of being free.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
![[]](http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/cimages/9712f553eeb54df4c700abc96d8f0cb4/RPsig.jpg){kind=small}
![[]](http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/cimages/9e1a03df3a024e863ece9f4018b8c898/revolutionromneycare_clickabke.jpg)