Saturday, September 4, 2010

**JP** Truth is coming out - shame that no one stands for our boys but the High Commissioner in UK

It is so shameful that our boys are being humiliated and punished (before any investigation, just on allegations, which seems absurd from the word go) and no one is standing for them...especially the PCB (the center of corruption, as it seems!). The truth is emerging, and I am sure that if "independent unbiased" trial is undertaken then it will reveal the whole game, but that independence is hard to find...when people are set to punish from the word go...since it is Pakistan on the receiving end!!!  I do admire the Pakistan foreign officer in UK, who has come out in the open and show the bungling of the ICC and that of an obvious set up...he has been up to the mark even before, and one of the very few people in this corrupt lot of politicians that can still talk of truth!!! It is one of the most disgraceful and unjust acts of the ICC for which they should be put on trial now!!!! 

Afridi apologizes following fixing allegations against Pakistan teammates

LONDON — The captain of Pakistan's limited overs teams has apologized to cricket fans for the controversy that erupted after three of his teammates were suspended on suspicion of fixing.

Shahid Afridi said Saturday that the players in the squad for the remaining two Twenty20 and five one-day matches against England were upset by the allegations, which the International Cricket Council has called the most serious to hit the sport for a decade.

"On behalf of these boys — I know they're not in this series — I want to say sorry to all cricket lovers and all cricketing nations," Afridi said.

Cricket's ruling body suspended Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir this week while it investigates them for various offences under the sport's anti-corruption code.

The ICC has not detailed the charges, which followed accusations by a British tabloid that a middleman accepted payment in exchange for deliberate no-balls against England last week.

"It's very bad news," Afridi said ahead of Sunday's first Twenty20 in Cardiff. "It's a big challenge for me as captain but we're all ready. The coach and I are not talking about the issue — we are here to play cricket."

The trio were released without criminal charge after being questioned by London police on Friday but could be banned from cricket for life if found guilty.

The Pakistan Cricket Board's legal adviser said Saturday that Butt, Amir and Asif have denied knowledge of any alleged wrongdoing by the middleman, agent Mazhar Majeed.

"The players have informed the police that the man was their agent, but they had no knowledge," about his alleged wrongdoing, Tafazzul Rizvi told private television channels in Pakistan.

British tabloid News of the World has accused Majeed of acting as a middleman, accepting money in exchange for getting Asif and Amir to bowl intentional no-balls.

Players and officials are waiting to see if the News of the World follows its initial report with further allegations when the Sunday paper is distributed late Saturday.

"I've told the boys, 'don't read the newspapers,'" Afridi said.

After winning the four-match Test series 3-1, England are also trying to focus on the matches ahead.

"It's going to be interesting to see what happens tonight," batsman Paul Collingwood said. "That's out of our hands as players. We've just got to mentally prepare ourselves to play tomorrow."

ICC chief executive Haroon Lorgat said Friday the allegations that Asif, Amir and Butt conspired with bookmakers was the most serious case of corruption since South Africa captain Hansie Cronje was banned for life 10 years ago.

Cronje admitted to forecasting results in exchange for money from a London bookmaker, prompting the ICC to create its Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU).

But the fallout from the case is spreading, with Pakistan's top diplomat in Britain accusing the ICC of bias and banning the players only to cover up shortcomings in its own procedures.

Pakistan High Commissioner Wajid Shamsul Hasan criticized the ICC again Friday for taking action before police had completed criminal investigations.

"After the shocking, arbitrary and high-handed suspension of the three Pakistani cricketers through the ICC's uncalled for action, nothing is coming to me as a surprise," Hasan said in a statement. "Rather, my apprehensions that there is a rat in the whole affair are being strengthened.

"It is emerging as a fishy situation where pieces have now started falling in place to convince me that there is more than meet the eyes."

With Pakistan banned from playing home internationals following last year's terrorist attack on the Sri Lanka squad, some Pakistani journalists have suggested there is a conspiracy against their country.

With illegal gambling often occurring in India, some have even suggested involvement by Pakistan's neighbour and territorial rival.

Lorgat denied that the charges were evidence of bias and said the ICC was committed to maintaining the country's status as a full member of the body.

There is no suggestion that the Pakistan players conspired to affect the result of the match at Lord's — which Pakistan lost by an innings and 225 runs for its worst ever test defeat.

The ICC could widen the investigation into the allegations against Asif, Amir and Butt — whom it suspended late Thursday — to cover January's contentious Test match against Australia in Sydney.

"We will go where the evidential trail takes us," ACSU chairman Ronnie Flanagan said.

The relevant article of the ICC's anti-corruption code includes:

— Fixing or contriving in any way or otherwise influencing improperly, or being a party to any effort to fix or contrive in any way or otherwise influence improperly, the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of any international match or ICC event.

— Seeking, accepting, offering or agreeing to accept any bribe or other reward to fix or to contrive in any way or otherwise to influence improperly the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of any international match or ICC event.



Re: A Couple of Thoughts On Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" Rally

Tommy is deeply sub-intellectual while sprinkled with that pretentious pixie dust that keeps hi smugly picked in his own ignorance.  So faggoty intellectually

The Cold, Crisp Taste of Koch

From Frank Rich's rehash of Jane Mayer's recent hit piece on the philanthropizin' oilmen Charles and David Koch:

When David Koch ran to the right of Reagan as vice president on the 1980 Libertarian ticket (it polled 1 percent), his campaign called for the abolition not just of Social Security, federal regulatory agencies and welfare but also of the F.B.I., the C.I.A., and public schools -- in other words, any government enterprise that would either inhibit his business profits or increase his taxes.

You might be wondering why the author thinks a campaign that wanted to abolish the FBI and CIA was "to the right of Reagan." It looks like Rich is just recycling Mayer's New Yorker story here: Mayer wrote that the Ed Clark/David Koch ticket "was running against Ronald Reagan from the right."

The man who beat Barry Commoner.In fact, Clark is pretty much the sole Libertarian presidential nominee to have consciously presented himself as running from the left. (The only other case that even arguably comes close is Michael Badnarik, the party's standard-bearer in 2004, who played up his antiwar stances and established a friendly relationship with Green nominee David Cobb.) Clark told reporters he was a "low-tax liberal" (which, whatever else you think about it, rolls more trippingly off the tongue than "liberaltarian"); he issued white papers that presented a liberal-friendly, gradualist approach to shrinking the state; he got Eugene McCarthy to appear in a campaign ad and to write the intro to Clark's campaign book. (And then McCarthy turned around and endorsed Reagan, wrecking his lefty street cred. So it goes.) Frank Rich's description of what the "campaign called for" is drawn from the radical platform adopted by delegates at the Libertarian convention, not from the Clark/Koch campaign's own statements. Look at those and you'll find calls to reduce government spending to Kennedy-era levels, a suggestion that welfare need not be cut until unemployment is eliminated, and an education plan centered around the idea of a tax credit for "voluntary educational alternatives."

That was the Kochs' center-left side. In the Carter years, much of the brothers' libertarian largess went to projects with a far more left-wing flavor. Radical intellectuals and investigative journalists contributed to the Cato Institute's Inquiry magazine; Students for a Libertarian Society devoted most of its energy to opposing conscription and nuclear power. In June 1979, such activities prompted National Review to run its own contribution to the Koch-conspiracy oeuvre, featuring the immortal cover line "Anarchists, backed by corporate big money, infiltrate the freedom movement." Before Mayer was tracing the money trail from the Koch brothers to global warming skeptics, NR's Lawrence Cott was warning conservatives that Koch funds were linked to the Campaign to Stop Government Spying, the leftist Institute for Policy Studies, and members of "theapparat that exposed the American agent who was murdered in Athens." To give you a sense of how excitable Cott could be, that scary-sounding line about the "apparat" was a reference to someInquiry contributors who had also written for the anti-CIA magazine CounterSpy.

If you combine the accurate elements of the Cott and Mayer articles, you'll have the rudiments of a much more interesting story, one that may begin with the brothers' Bircher background and end with the rise of the Tea Parties but will take some unexpected detours along the way. The new narrative wouldn't be so easy to fit into a simple left/right, Red/Blue framework, let alone the pinko conspiracies of Cott's imagination or the corpo-conservative cabals of Mayer's. But the tale just might tell you a few things about the vast world to be found outside the Crossfire format.


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:42 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
Tommy, Tommy, Tommy,

to say ".... to accuse all
of us who care about helping others..."

I believe in helping others, I have founded a school, built a non-
denominational church, fed hundreds and housed hundreds more.... all
of my own volition

To have the government do this is un-constitutional. No one has a
right to tell me which insurance policy to buy, or to buy one for
someone else. Health and or health insurance is not a "Right" nor is
it an entitlement. I did not approve of nor did anyone I know vote for
the bailout of the car companies... there is no basis for firing one
of their executives.

I do not agree that the US has any business building or rebuilding
Mosques OVERSEAS... (60,000,000 this year..so far)

There are many other things as well.

As to Beck and his rally.....There were several "Politicos" but could
you please point out that part of their speeches that was indeed
political or even mentioned the political system in more than abstract
terms.

I am eagerly awaiting any pointed response to my post.

On Sep 1, 3:24 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *You and I know that Beck has NO beliefs, religious, social, civil, or
> otherwise.  He is certainly no expert on ANY religion and he certainly has
> no grounds to judge what is in our President's heart. His "I have a scheme"
> rally was beyond bizarre.
>
> This whole rant is being brought to us by Karl Rove, Dick Armey, and the
> Koch Brothers to further divide this country.  Glenn Beck claims to be a
> Mormon, but he changes his demented tune every day.  He is getting daily
> help writing this drivel.  First, he used hatred of illegals, then Muslims,
> and he and Palin are working hard to divide this country...now about
> religion...who believes in what, when.
>
> He is totally using real compassionate love of neighbor ideals to accuse all
> of us who care about helping others...to turn us into some kind of enemy of
> "conservatives"....such a bucket of warm spit.  He is NO expert on
> anything...he was lucky to make it through high school.  Yes, he is
> definitely obsessed, but religion has nothing to do with theology, but
> rather his addiction to power and attention.
>
> Thanks for letting me explain what he is really up to...in case anyone out
> there is tempted to latch on to the ravings of a mad man.*
>
> On 8/31/10, Robert Morton <robertmorton...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > My problem with Beck is that his concepts are simplistic, indeed, including
> > the chalkboard lectures on this TV show. Also, mixing religion with politics
> > frightens me. If any European leader mentioned religion like our politicians
> > do constantly, they would not be reelected to office. I'm a firm believer
> > in  Global Warming from a purely scientific stance, and am very tired in the
> > "tree hugging" accusations from conservatives thapt a conspiracy exists to
> > create a global warming falsehood. Glen Beck attacks Global Warming
> > scientific community under the guise that he's saving his children and
> > grandchildren from a liberal global warming hysteria created to increase
> > government power and control. He's wrong and is actually endangering the
> > lives of the next generation. Visit my conservative DECLASSIFIED
> > SECRETS-2 site at  http://declassifiedsecrets2.blogspot.com/  and read
> > the article "*(A-T) **U.S. SPY SATELLITES NEEDED TO "SPY ON POLAR BEARS".
> > *The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Military Advisory Board (MAB- a Pentagon think
> > tank), and various other such groups believe not only does man's activities
> > exacerbate the normal global warming effect, but that man's activities and
> > global warming itself is a National Security Threat to America's safety.
> > If you read the MAB's incredibly detailed and scientifically perused report,
> > you'll question Glen Beck's assertions. Robert
>
> >  On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:06 PM, greg dog99 <gregdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> While I am not a huge Beck fan, I am reading his book 'Arguing with
> >> Idiots', and finding myself agreeing with much of what he has to say. Very
> >> much anarcho-libertarian sentiment. The fact the founding fathers thought of
> >> their work as divinely inspired seems to raise the hackles of many whom
> >> otherwise consider themselves Libertarians.
> >> Greg
>
> >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> Maybe not your cup of tea Robert, but there was no, "Religious
> >>> Overtones".....It was a religious rally, period!   That was the point of the
> >>> rally, to get closer to God.
>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Robert Morton <
> >>> robertmorton...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> I'm a Barry Goldwater, Ronal Reagon Republican and I hated Glenn Beck's
> >>>> rally, especially the religious overtones. Robert
>
> >>>>   On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Keith In Tampa <
> >>>> keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>   I have read a number of far left extremist blogs and news media
> >>>>> reports regarding Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally yesterday,  to
> >>>>> include the New York Times, the Daily Kos, TruthOut.org, and a couple that
> >>>>> Tommy Tom For News has thrown into the mix this morning.   The rally, which
> >>>>> was held at the Lincoln Memorial on the 47th anniversary of Dr. King's
> >>>>> speech was attended by no less than a half a million people, and most
> >>>>> estimates have the crowd at over one million.  There were no serious
> >>>>> conflicts; no major arrests, nothing cosequential at all about the event,
> >>>>> but to read the far left's account of what took place yesterday, you would
> >>>>> think it was a great big hate-fest.
>
> >>>>> Beck attempted to create a non-political rally, in that he asked that
> >>>>> no one bring protest signs, and for the most part, very few individuals
> >>>>> did.  The rally was to be a "Pro-American-Pro-Religious" event, and for this
> >>>>> reason, those on the left, especially the far left Anti-American movement in
> >>>>> this Nation, hated it, and have done everything that they can do, to
> >>>>> discredit the event.
>
> >>>>> The attempt by the Left to paint the event as racist and hateful
> >>>>> was seriously undermined by the appearance and speech by the niece of Martin
> >>>>> Luther King, Alveda King, a noted Black political activist. Then came the
> >>>>> claims that Beck's call for a religious renaissance in the United States was
> >>>>> somehow anti-Constitutional. The First Amendment, as you well know, does not
> >>>>> forbid the mention of God in American life -- even official American life.
> >>>>> In fact, it appears to say just the opposite: "*Congress shall make no
> >>>>> law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
> >>>>> exercise thereof*".  Geez, the Moonbats really hate that, if only they
> >>>>> could somehow do away with the Constitution!!
>
> >>>>>  Our Declaration of Independence ends with these words: "*And for the
> >>>>> support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of
> >>>>> Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes
> >>>>> and our sacred honor*." Renewing our 'reliance on the protection of
> >>>>> Divine Providence' doesn't seem like such a bad idea, even after 234 years,
> >>>>> and despite the hateful yells and derogatory remarks from the likes of Tom
> >>>>> For News, and host of other far left extremist socialist-elitist Moonbats.
> >>>>> It is in fact the far left, socialist-elitist extremist camp that is so
> >>>>> filled with hate and so Anti-American, that is so blinded by their hate.
>
> >>>>> --
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: A Couple of Thoughts On Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" Rally

Such an ignorant reply

I imagine Beck knows more about all of these topics than Tommy, or than the people he worships

I also suspect he has more genuine intellectual curiosity

But one of the things Beck is doing well, which actually is what burns Tommy and the the fuhrers he blows is that Beck has on and discusses authors whose books Tommy has never read and might not be able to: Amity Shlaes, Niall Ferguson, FA Hayek, Yaron Brook, Burton Fulsom, etc

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
You and I know that Beck has NO beliefs, religious, social, civil, or otherwise.  He is certainly no expert on ANY religion and he certainly has no grounds to judge what is in our President's heart. His "I have a scheme" rally was beyond bizarre.

This whole rant is being brought to us by Karl Rove, Dick Armey, and the Koch Brothers to further divide this country.  Glenn Beck claims to be a Mormon, but he changes his demented tune every day.  He is getting daily help writing this drivel.  First, he used hatred of illegals, then Muslims, and he and Palin are working hard to divide this country...now about religion...who believes in what, when. 

He is totally using real compassionate love of neighbor ideals to accuse all of us who care about helping others...to turn us into some kind of enemy of "conservatives"....such a bucket of warm spit.  He is NO expert on anything...he was lucky to make it through high school.  Yes, he is definitely obsessed, but religion has nothing to do with theology, but rather his addiction to power and attention.

Thanks for letting me explain what he is really up to...in case anyone out there is tempted to latch on to the ravings of a mad man.



On 8/31/10, Robert Morton <robertmorton359@gmail.com> wrote:
My problem with Beck is that his concepts are simplistic, indeed, including the chalkboard lectures on this TV show. Also, mixing religion with politics frightens me. If any European leader mentioned religion like our politicians do constantly, they would not be reelected to office. I'm a firm believer in  Global Warming from a purely scientific stance, and am very tired in the "tree hugging" accusations from conservatives thapt a conspiracy exists to create a global warming falsehood. Glen Beck attacks Global Warming scientific community under the guise that he's saving his children and grandchildren from a liberal global warming hysteria created to increase government power and control. He's wrong and is actually endangering the lives of the next generation. Visit my conservative DECLASSIFIED SECRETS-2 site at  http://declassifiedsecrets2.blogspot.com/   and read the article "(A-T) U.S. SPY SATELLITES NEEDED TO "SPY ON POLAR BEARS". The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Military Advisory Board (MAB- a Pentagon think tank), and various other such groups believe not only does man's activities exacerbate the normal global warming effect, but that man's activities and global warming itself is a National Security Threat to America's safety. If you read the MAB's incredibly detailed and scientifically perused report, you'll question Glen Beck's assertions. Robert

 
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:06 PM, greg dog99 <gregdog99@gmail.com> wrote:
While I am not a huge Beck fan, I am reading his book 'Arguing with Idiots', and finding myself agreeing with much of what he has to say. Very much anarcho-libertarian sentiment. The fact the founding fathers thought of their work as divinely inspired seems to raise the hackles of many whom otherwise consider themselves Libertarians.
Greg

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe not your cup of tea Robert, but there was no, "Religious Overtones".....It was a religious rally, period!   That was the point of the rally, to get closer to God. 
 


 
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Robert Morton <robertmorton359@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm a Barry Goldwater, Ronal Reagon Republican and I hated Glenn Beck's rally, especially the religious overtones. Robert

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
 
I have read a number of far left extremist blogs and news media reports regarding Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally yesterday,  to include the New York Times, the Daily Kos, TruthOut.org, and a couple that Tommy Tom For News has thrown into the mix this morning.   The rally, which was held at the Lincoln Memorial on the 47th anniversary of Dr. King's speech was attended by no less than a half a million people, and most estimates have the crowd at over one million.  There were no serious conflicts; no major arrests, nothing cosequential at all about the event, but to read the far left's account of what took place yesterday, you would think it was a great big hate-fest.   
 
Beck attempted to create a non-political rally, in that he asked that no one bring protest signs, and for the most part, very few individuals did.  The rally was to be a "Pro-American-Pro-Religious" event, and for this reason, those on the left, especially the far left Anti-American movement in this Nation, hated it, and have done everything that they can do, to discredit the event. 
 
The attempt by the Left to paint the event as racist and hateful was seriously undermined by the appearance and speech by the niece of Martin Luther King, Alveda King, a noted Black political activist. Then came the claims that Beck's call for a religious renaissance in the United States was somehow anti-Constitutional. The First Amendment, as you well know, does not forbid the mention of God in American life -- even official American life. In fact, it appears to say just the opposite: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof".  Geez, the Moonbats really hate that, if only they could somehow do away with the Constitution!! 
 
 Our Declaration of Independence ends with these words: "And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor." Renewing our 'reliance on the protection of Divine Providence' doesn't seem like such a bad idea, even after 234 years, and despite the hateful yells and derogatory remarks from the likes of Tom For News, and host of other far left extremist socialist-elitist Moonbats.  It is in fact the far left, socialist-elitist extremist camp that is so filled with hate and so Anti-American, that is so blinded by their hate.   
 

--
 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** Must read- The Sun will rise from the West.

                                                            

 

Re: **JP** Biased ICC forced PCB to suspend players - a joke on justice!!! a plot?

Don't waste your energies in trying tofend cheaters and those who sold national pride
for money. Salman Butt has a history of doing this dirty deals
Farooq

From: Saleh
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 9:28 PM
Subject: **JP** Biased ICC forced PCB to suspend players - a joke on justice!!! a plot?

Pakistan was forced by ICC to suspend players just on allegations, and here is the proof, their own words!! What a joke on justice! It clearly indicates that the whole ICC is biased against our players, and ofcourse, our Ijaz butt (following the role of Mr. Zardari crook) will abide and will only surprise them with his obedience to them....read it yourself!!

What did you try to impress upon the PCB? 
Earlier in the week, [we urged them] to do the right thing, which was to not select the players because there were just too many allegations, too much speculation and the public would not have confidence in the players. They [the players] needed the opportunity to clear themselves, so we were throughout the course of the week trying to impress upon them to do the right thing and not involve them in the remainder of the tour, for their own sake. And then on Wednesday night, Mr [Ijaz] Butt was quoted as saying that they were available to play. We realised that if that was indeed the case, we needed to move quicker. We worked quite hard to complete what we needed to do. We were surprised the next morning when they announced the non-selection, but by then we had progressed to a point completing our work.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** URDU COLUMNS 4.9.10

DO NOT LOOK WHO IS TALKING, LOOK WHAT HE IS TALKING. 
PLZ MUST READ......
Assalam -U- Alaikum warahmatullah,
Plz arrange to forward the Columns/press clippings to your friends and family members..... .
Best Wishes...
well-wisher
If any person is not interested to receive my mails plz ask me to discontinue

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** FW: How a football is made .......Adidas football factory !!

 

 

 

How a football is made .......Adidas football factory !!