|
Please reread DOMA. The wording is very carefully done so as to NOT step on the states toes in any way.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
- At 10:16 PM 1/8/2011, you wrote:
- If you read DOMA, that is EXACTLY what it says.... It leaves it to
- each and every state.
- Whatever DOMA says is irrelevant. The Constitution provides
- NO Power To Congress To make any such legislation. In fact,
- AIV, Section 1 is contrary.
- Let me READ it to you:
- Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the
- public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every
- other State. And the Congress may by general Laws
- prescribe the Manner in which such Acts,Records and
- Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
- As is plain to see, Congress may, for instance, make a law
- requiring pink paper be used for the documentation of the
- public act as it is 'transferred' ... but EVERY State MUST
- recognize the public acts (ie. marriage), Records and judicial
- proceedings of every other State.
- There is no Power/Authority or otherwise for the Congress to
- "except" some, a few or all.
- Congress 'defining' certain public acts is also contrary. It is
- up to each state to make that call ... and for all others to extend
- Full Faith and Credit for them.
- Them thar is the Constitution.
- Regard$,
- --MJ
- "[T]he ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it." -- Felix Frankfurter, Graves v. New York, 306 US 466 (1939)
- As to definition for Federal use ONLY it does define the terms (just
- use other words you idiot)
- "Marriage" and "Spouse".... the law is very exact and has no breathing room.
- Every court/jurisdiction/local/district/state/agency or branch has the
- right to "Define" terms and their applicability for use within their
- domain as long as it is non-conflicting.
- On 1/8/11, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
- >
- > STILL no Constitutional citation.
- >
- > Here is that document the House purportedly read the other day:
- > http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu. txt
- >
- > So WHERE is the Article, Section and Clause or Amendment
- > that provides Congress the Power To make such legislation?
- >
- > Article IV, Section 1 is contrary to your effort.
- >
- > This is clearly and plainly no concern nor business of the Feds.
- >
- > Regard$,
- > --MJ
- >
- > "[T]he ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself
- > and not what we have said about it." -- Felix Frankfurter, Graves v. New
- > York, 306 US 466 (1939)
- >
- >
- >
- > At 06:33 PM 1/8/2011, you wrote:
- >>
- >> ""No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian
- >> tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or
- >> judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe
- >> respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated
- >> as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession,
- >> or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
- >>
- >> This is no different than the law regarding Marriage that exists anyway.
- >> It allows each and every State to exercise the Rights they ALREADY have
- >> and exercise by treaty among the Several States.
- >>
- >> In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling,
- >> regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and
- >> agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal
- >> union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word
- >> 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a
- >> wife.
- >>
- >> This is simply upholding the States rights to issue permits and licenses
- >> as they see fit while reserving the legal "definition" of two words ...
- >> "marriage" and "spouse" on a Federal level. It does not preclude or
- >> disallow civil unions that are legally binding but do not include these
- >> terms.
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:13 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
- >>
- >> <sigh>
- >> So you CANNOT support the drivel you presented.
- >>
- >> There, of course, is no such thing as "Article III, Amendment I"
- >>
- >> Want to try again? Apparently not.
- >>
- >>
- >> Regard$,
- >> --MJ
- >>
- >> "[T]he ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is
- >> the Constitution itself and not what we have said
- >> about it."
- >> Felix Frankfurter, Graves v. New York, 306 US 466 (1939)
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >> At 05:07 PM 1/8/2011, you wrote:
- >>>
- >>> No, I need not identify anything. You are the one that chose to bring
- >>> the subject matter up, and I answered your question! It is, what it
- >>> is.
- >>>
- >>> Read, study, (away from and apart from the
- >>> "Militiamen/TaxProtest/Anti-Illuminati/AlexJones/PrisonPlanet/Conspiratorialist
- >>> web sites Michael!!
- >>>
- >>> <Grin>!!
- >>>
- >>>
- >>>
- >>> KeithInKöln
- >>>
- >>>
- >>>
- >>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:48 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
- >>> You will need to (better) identify some Article, Section and Clause or
- >>> Amendment of the US Constitution.
- >>> I provided a copy for simplicity:
- >>> http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu. txt
- >>>
- >>> Regard$,
- >>> --MJ
- >>> "[T]he ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is
- >>> the Constitution itself and not what we have said
- >>> about it."
- >>> Felix Frankfurter, Graves v. New York, 306 US 466 (1939)
- >>>
- >>>
- >>>
- >>>
- >>>
- >>> At 04:27 PM 1/8/2011, you wrote:
- >>>>
- >>>> For starters Michael, try "Article The Third, Amendment One"
- >>>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:34 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
- >>>> DOMA is very much Constitutional.
- >>>>
- >>>>
- >>>>
- >>>> Really? How about citing the article, section and clause or amendment
- >>>> you imagine it is based.
- >>>> Here is the Constitution:
- >>>> http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txt
- >>>> Regard$,
- >>>> --MJ
- >>>> "[Some people] have a depraved taste for equality, which impels the
- >>>> weak to lower the powerful to their own level, and reduces men to prefer
- >>>> equality in slavery to inequality with freedom" -- Alexis De
- >>>> Tocqueville.
- >>>>
- >>>> --
- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's
- >>>> active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest
- >>>> breaking news, and more.
- >>
- >>
- >> --
- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >>
- >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- >
- >
- > --
- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- >
- >
- > --
- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- >
- > --
- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- >
- >
- >
- >
- > --
- > Mark M. Kahle H.
- >
- > --
- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- >
- > --
- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- --
- Mark M. Kahle H.
- --
- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- --
- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
- * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On 01/10/2011 12:01 PM, J wrote:
> Yes. When I hunt, I look through the scope and see my prey at the
> intersection of cross hairs. I then shoot and kill. That's the imagery
> Palin intended. Remember the outcry after Palin placed this on her
> website, even from Congresswomen Gifford herself? Palin also said,
> "Don't retreat, reload!" After hurriedly taking down the map from
> their website, the Palin liars now say they meant the crosshairs on a
> surveyors instrument! How do you reload a surveyor's instrument?
>
> On the other hand, the map you reproduced has a target on it, which is
> what the makers of the map intended. Target the district for victory.
>
> The picture of Bush you posted offends me greatly. You should be
> ashamed for posting it.
>
> Palin doesn't belong on the national political scene. My independent
> friends now agree with me. Hopefully she'll disappear now.
>
> On Jan 10, 4:09 am, Keith In Köln<keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, I am at a loss as to how this is any more distinguishable, than what
>> the Democrats did in 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2010.
>>
>> Can you explain the difference to me?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:59 AM, studio<tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On the crosshairs targeting her district:
>>> "For example, we're on Sarah Palins targeted list, but the thing is
>>> the way she has it depicted is the crosshairs of a gun sight over our
>>> district. And when people do that, they got to realize there's
>>> consequences to that action".
>>> http://www.fark.com/cgi/vidplayer.pl?IDLink=5873831
>>> ---
>>> Let the consequences begin.
>>> Conservatives still at a loss to as to why them.
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>>
>> 1e471e42fadd4215b0fb3e29cc802103.jpg
>> 96KViewDownload
>>
>> Bush-Target.jpg
>> 99KViewDownload
>>
>> untitled.bmp
>> 199KViewDownload
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 Year old intern, may have saved Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid Daniel Hernandez had been U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' intern for five days when she was shot Saturday outside Tucson. The junior at the University of Arizona was helping check people in at the "Congress on Your Corner" event when he heard gunfire. He was about 30 feet from the congresswoman. When the shots began, he ran toward them. "I don't even know if the gunfire had stopped," he said Saturday night as he kept a vigil at the University Medical Center cafeteria, gathered near a TV watching tributes and getting updates. When the shots began that morning, he saw many people lying on the ground, including a young girl. Some were bleeding. Hernandez said he moved from person to person checking pulses. "First the neck, then the wrist," he said. One man was already dead. Then he saw Giffords. She had fallen and was lying contorted on the sidewalk. She was bleeding. Using his hand, Hernandez applied pressure to the entry wound on her forehead. He pulled her into his lap, holding her upright against him so she wouldn't choke on her own blood. Giffords was conscious, but quiet. Ron Barber, Giffords' district director, was next to her. Hernandez told a bystander how to apply pressure to one of Barber's wounds. Barber told Hernandez, "Make sure you stay with Gabby. Make sure you help Gabby." Hernandez used his hand to apply pressure until someone from inside Safeway brought him clean smocks from the meat department. He used them to apply pressure on the entrance wound, unaware there was an exit wound. He never let go of her. He stayed with Giffords until paramedics arrived. They strapped her to a board and loaded her into an ambulance. Hernandez climbed in with her. On the ride to the hospital, he held her hand. She squeezed his back. When they arrived at the hospital, Hernandez was soaked in blood. His family brought him clean clothes because the FBI took his for evidence. He waited at the hospital while she went into surgery. He needed to tell police what had happened. He overheard people walking by talking about how Giffords had died. He also heard this on NPR. Later, he learned she had lived. "I was ecstatic," he said. "She was one of the people I've looked up to. Knowing she was alive and still fighting was good news. She's definitely a fighter, whether for her own life, or standing up for people in southern Arizona." The fact that Hernandez was nearby and able to react quickly probably saved Giffords' life, said state Rep. Matt Heinz, D-Tucson, and a hospital physician. He talked to Hernandez at the hospital after the shooting. Eight hours after the shooting, Hernandez stood with Giffords' friends and staff and told them what had happened. The tall, strong 20-year-old said, "Of course you're afraid, you just kind of have to do what you can." They hugged and thanked him. Later, he sat with his mom and sisters and told them about his friends and the staffers who had died that day. "You just have to be calm and collected," he said. "You do no good to anyone if you have a breakdown. . . . It was probably not the best idea to run toward the gunshots, but people needed help." Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/09/20110109daniel-hernandez-gabrielle-giffords-arizona-shooting.html#ixzz1Ae2X7Eur
I will probably watch Baltimore get their butts handed to
them (I hope) today.
--------
Ooops!
Let 'em line up to lose to the Pats by 20 on Feb 6
On Jan 9, 5:55 am, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like a nice place Keith.
>
> CW
>
> From: politicalforum@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:politicalforum@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Keith In Köln
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 05:45
> To: politicalforum@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: NFL Playoff Schedule: Wild Card Week (Keith)
>
> Hey CW!
>
> I ventured into an American style sports bar last night here in Köln, to
> see if I could watch any of the games. To my surprise, there was a rather
> large turn-out! It seems that Köln has two "American Futbol" leagues, one
> that is junior for the kids, and one for the men. There were a lot of dads
> and sons at the bar to watch the Seahawks/Saint's game, and I did catch the
> first half of the game at the bar....(Thankfully, Co-Moderator "The
> Annointed One" was able to fill me in on the final score!).
>
> I will now be rooting for the dawgs, the Seahawks, being that they are some
> pitiful cut, and slapped the Ain'ts. I would also like to see the Pack
> whip Philly today, I hate everything about Philly, but that's another
> story.
>
> As a side note, if I were scouting for the Bucs (or the Brownies) I could
> have found a couple of guys (and gals) last night at the American sports
> bar, who could have easily been an improvement over the Bucs and Browns
> offensive and defensive lines CW!! There was one gal in particular, who
> looked as if she wanted to pick me up and toss me around a little...
>
> On the apartment hunting front: It's a pain in the ass, and I am beginning
> to feel panic set in. I like this place a lot:
>
> http://www.e-rent.de/SCRPone/GEFS1page.asp?angNR=18723
> <http://www.e-rent.de/SCRPone/GEFS1page.asp?angNR=18723&Language=En>
> &Language=En
>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Bears will be my team for this year's Super Bowl. The Bears don't play
> this weekend. I will probably watch Baltimore get their butts handed to
> them (I hope) today.
>
> CW
>
> NFL Playoff Schedule: Wild Card Week
>
> by Charlie Wilmoth <http://pittsburgh.sbnation.com/authors/charlie-wilmoth>
> • Jan 7, 2011 2:16 PM EST
>
> Here's the TV schedule for the first week of the NFL playoffs. The Steelers
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/pittsburgh-steelers> will be on the
> sidelines, but fans will be watching the AFC games closely to see who the
> Steelers' first opponent will be.
>
> Saturday: The New Orleans Saints
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-orleans-saints> play the Seattle
> Seahawks <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/seattle-seahawks> at 4:30
> (NBC). The New York Jets <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-york-jets>
> play the Indianapolis Colts
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/indianapolis-colts> at 8:00 (also on
> NBC). If the Jets advance, they cannot face the Steelers next week. If the
> Colts advance, they would automatically play the Steelers next week. The
> Kansas City Chiefs <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/kansas-city-chiefs>
> would be a better matchup for the Steelers, but the Colts aren't especially
> scary.
>
> On Sunday, the Baltimore Ravens
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/baltimore-ravens> take on the Chiefs at
> 1:00 (CBS). Of course Steelers fans have no love for the Ravens, but I would
> be interested in seeing Baltimore take a shot at knocking off the New
> England Patriots <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-england-patriots>
> next week; I'm not especially confident that the Chiefs could do it. The
> Jets were one of two teams (along with the Cleveland Browns
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/cleveland-browns> , weirdly enough) to
> beat the Patriots this year, but I wonder whether they would be able to do
> it twice.
>
> Also on Sunday, the Green Bay Packers
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/green-bay-packers> play the Philadelphia
> Eagles <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/philadelphia-eagles> at 4:30 PM
> (FOX).
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3367 - Release Date: 01/08/11
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Moonbat with additional bats in the belfry.
The evidence that assassin was on the left of the political spectrum continue to pile up. Friends, political ideology, religious beliefs, favorite books and activities already proved this lunatic was a progressive-liberal. Now comes word that Loughner was anti-Bush and a 9/11 Truther.
Hardly a Palin follower or Tea Party member, wouldn't ya say? It seems Loughner didn't like the way Congresswoman Gifford answered a question back in 2007...before anyone knew Palin and before the Tea Party was formed.
TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — At an event roughly three years ago, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords took a question from Jared Loughner, the man accused of trying to assassinate her and killing six other people. According to two of his high school friends the question was essentially this: "What is government if words have no meaning?"
Loughner was angry about her response — she read the question and didn't have much to say.
"He was like ... 'What do you think of these people who are working for the government and they can't describe what they do?'" one friend told The Associated Press on Sunday. "He did not like government officials, how they spoke. Like they were just trying to cover up some conspiracy."
Both friends spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they wanted to avoid the publicity surrounding the case. To them, the question was classic Jared: confrontational, nonsensical and obsessed with how words create reality.
The friends' comments paint a picture bolstered by other former classmates and Loughner's own Internet postings: that of a social outcast with nihilistic, almost indecipherable beliefs steeped in mistrust and paranoia.
[...]
Mistrust of government was Loughner's defining conviction, the friends said. He believed the U.S. government was behind 9/11, and worried that governments were maneuvering to create a unified monetary system ("a New World Order currency" one friend said) so that social elites and bureaucrats could control the rest of the world.
Sounds like a Van Jones disciple. Van Jones, President Obama and most of those on the left love to read Marxist/Communist material. Obama even said he sought out Marxist professors in college. Read his book, he said so himself.
On his YouTube page, he listed among his favorite books "Animal Farm" and "Brave New World" — two novels about how authorities control the masses. Other books in the wide-ranging list included "Mein Kampf," ''The Communist Manifesto," ''Peter Pan" and Aesop's Fables.
The Associated Press didn't want to use Adolf Hitler's or Karl Marx's name, since these are the heroes to those on the left who have a fondness for Socialism and Marxism.
Over time, Loughner became increasingly introspective — what one of the friends described as a "nihilistic rut."
An ardent atheist, he began to characterize people as sheep whose free will was being sapped by the government and the monotony of modern life.
"He didn't want people to wake up and do the same thing every day. He wanted more chaos, he wanted less regularity," one friend said.
Sounds like a lefty anarchist to me.
The friends said Loughner told anyone who would listen that the world we see does not exist, that words have no meaning — and that the only way to derive meaning was during sleep. Loughner began obsessing about a practice called lucid dreaming, in which people try to actively control their sleeping world.
H/T to HotAir
WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.Save up to 99% on HP Ink Cartridges while Supplies Last! Free S&H, 100%
Guaranteed.
http://click.lavabit.com/zszybjrhbh56rr95ygug3afg1f1ffcdnwnyw65f5yjs4xaa6j8py/
All I can say my friends, is that this EXTREMELY conservative
republican thinks that Bill Clinton's DOMA is both wrong and
unconstitutional - and 2 fed courts agree with me on the latter - and
that Captain Equal Rights President Obama is FIGHTING that in court.
DADT - Dems
DOMA - Dems
Barney Frank has REFUSED to co-sponsor a bill to repeal DOMA.
And dems think they are the champions of gay rights.
NO one has done more to dash them. NO one!
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Ooops!
Let 'em line up to lose to the Pats by 20 on Feb 6
On Jan 9, 5:55 am, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like a nice place Keith.
>
> CW
>
> From: politicalforum@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:politicalforum@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Keith In Köln
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 05:45
> To: politicalforum@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: NFL Playoff Schedule: Wild Card Week (Keith)
>
> Hey CW!
>
> I ventured into an American style sports bar last night here in Köln, to
> see if I could watch any of the games. To my surprise, there was a rather
> large turn-out! It seems that Köln has two "American Futbol" leagues, one
> that is junior for the kids, and one for the men. There were a lot of dads
> and sons at the bar to watch the Seahawks/Saint's game, and I did catch the
> first half of the game at the bar....(Thankfully, Co-Moderator "The
> Annointed One" was able to fill me in on the final score!).
>
> I will now be rooting for the dawgs, the Seahawks, being that they are some
> pitiful cut, and slapped the Ain'ts. I would also like to see the Pack
> whip Philly today, I hate everything about Philly, but that's another
> story.
>
> As a side note, if I were scouting for the Bucs (or the Brownies) I could
> have found a couple of guys (and gals) last night at the American sports
> bar, who could have easily been an improvement over the Bucs and Browns
> offensive and defensive lines CW!! There was one gal in particular, who
> looked as if she wanted to pick me up and toss me around a little...
>
> On the apartment hunting front: It's a pain in the ass, and I am beginning
> to feel panic set in. I like this place a lot:
>
> http://www.e-rent.de/SCRPone/GEFS1page.asp?angNR=18723
> <http://www.e-rent.de/SCRPone/GEFS1page.asp?angNR=18723&Language=En>
> &Language=En
>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Bears will be my team for this year's Super Bowl. The Bears don't play
> this weekend. I will probably watch Baltimore get their butts handed to
> them (I hope) today.
>
> CW
>
> NFL Playoff Schedule: Wild Card Week
>
> by Charlie Wilmoth <http://pittsburgh.sbnation.com/authors/charlie-wilmoth>
> • Jan 7, 2011 2:16 PM EST
>
> Here's the TV schedule for the first week of the NFL playoffs. The Steelers
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/pittsburgh-steelers> will be on the
> sidelines, but fans will be watching the AFC games closely to see who the
> Steelers' first opponent will be.
>
> Saturday: The New Orleans Saints
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-orleans-saints> play the Seattle
> Seahawks <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/seattle-seahawks> at 4:30
> (NBC). The New York Jets <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-york-jets>
> play the Indianapolis Colts
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/indianapolis-colts> at 8:00 (also on
> NBC). If the Jets advance, they cannot face the Steelers next week. If the
> Colts advance, they would automatically play the Steelers next week. The
> Kansas City Chiefs <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/kansas-city-chiefs>
> would be a better matchup for the Steelers, but the Colts aren't especially
> scary.
>
> On Sunday, the Baltimore Ravens
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/baltimore-ravens> take on the Chiefs at
> 1:00 (CBS). Of course Steelers fans have no love for the Ravens, but I would
> be interested in seeing Baltimore take a shot at knocking off the New
> England Patriots <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/new-england-patriots>
> next week; I'm not especially confident that the Chiefs could do it. The
> Jets were one of two teams (along with the Cleveland Browns
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/cleveland-browns> , weirdly enough) to
> beat the Patriots this year, but I wonder whether they would be able to do
> it twice.
>
> Also on Sunday, the Green Bay Packers
> <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/green-bay-packers> play the Philadelphia
> Eagles <http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/philadelphia-eagles> at 4:30 PM
> (FOX).
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3367 - Release Date: 01/08/11
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
