you
CAN'T do here. And that is a very short list with maligning (of ANY
nature)
kids topping the list followed by overt threats against anyone. Merc
did
BOTH. / Mark
I still say that you are being "egged on" and railroaded in your
opinions by others who are not necessarily "honest brokers", Mark. I
have done enough to at least raise the possibility that you acted
perhaps rashly and in error... I hope you take the cue....
nominal9
On Nov 21, 3:07 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ""I believe Merc explained that she mistook Cold Water to be another
> poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on
> the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of
> them....""
>
> And that is my or Cold Waters problem because ....??
>
> Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term
> "retard" to refer to some children....
>
> Some kids... doing away with Political Correctness and all the shit it
> entails... are Retarded Mentally (as are some adults). Is this not true ??
>
> .The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political
> Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with
> the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I
> don't get that insulted about the term "retard" if it is used in a
> non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case,
> even if it were....
>
> I am not responsible for what happens on other boards. I am not "censoring"
> Merc. I am simply not allowing her to verbally abuse children on THIS forum.
>
> But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying
> Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as
> a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to
> stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on
> by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who
> are the actual culprits....
>
> I do not read any non-Google forums.. The people on those other boards did
> not come on this Forum and Malign or threaten kids. The posts I pulled and
> the reason Merc was banned came after her "apology" and after an off-board
> warning was sent.
>
> Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't
> seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error....
>
> I made no "ERROR"... Kids are off-limits, Merc was informed of this and
> continued with a threat against another members child... There is NO EXCUSE
> for her behavior unless she would like to claim "Diminished Capacity". If
> she did that then any promise she may make to clean up her act in this
> regard would be tainted at best.
>
> and
> Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the
> moment.....
>
> I could care less, I have no right to tell you what to do, just what you
> CAN'T do here. And that is a very short list with maligning (of ANY nature)
> kids topping the list followed by overt threats against anyone. Merc did
> BOTH.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I believe Merc explained that she mistook Cold Water to be another
> > poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on
> > the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of
> > them.... Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term
> > "retard" to refer to some children.....I am telling you this as a
> > point of information....The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political
> > Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with
> > the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I
> > don't get that insulted about the term "retard" if it is used in a
> > non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case,
> > even if it were....
> > But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying
> > Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as
> > a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to
> > stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on
> > by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who
> > are the actual culprits....
> > Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't
> > seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error.... and
> > Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the
> > moment.....
>
> > On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Nominal9,
>
> > > The only person to bring Mercs kid into the conversation was Merc, the
> > only
> > > person to levy a threat against another persons child was Merc, the only
> > > person to victimize Merc was Merc herself.
>
> > > This is a political forum.... just what do you think her kids "condition"
> > > has to do with politics unless she had been using her experiences to talk
> > > about or relate personally under the health care laws which she did not
> > do.
>
> > > She was using that child as a crutch to garner some level of sympathy...
> > > (between shit and syphilis in dictionary).
>
> > > Again, I do not care who did it !!!!!! No one is "special". To bring any
> > > child into this forum in any negative light is ABSOLUTELY NOT GOING TO
> > > HAPPEN.
>
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing
> > > > Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself
> > > > seem to condemn....
> > > > "Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > > > someones
> > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong."
> > > > Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop
> > > > grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ...
> > > > The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming
> > > > near....
> > > > Nominal9
>
> > > > PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half-
> > > > Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit,
> > > > the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto Magcrest, and their
> > > > Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia.
>
> > > > Hypocrites.... one and all....
>
> > > > On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > We have decided and it is rather simple:
>
> > > > > Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > someones
> > > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong.
>
> > > > > KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > > > Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry.
>
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > > > > bring
> > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the
> > same
> > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my
> > country.
> > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > > > > > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > > > > > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > > > > > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
> > > > > > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > > > > > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > > > > > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > > > > > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > > > > > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the
> > victim,
> > > > > > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very
> > ignorant
> > > > > > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > > > > > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > > > > > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > > > > > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed
> > the
> > > > > > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it,
> > Merc
> > > > > > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is
> > a
> > > > > > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge
> > or
> > > > > > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > > > > > others here abouts....
> > > > > > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > > > > > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is
> > living
> > > > > > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > > > > > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among
> > "half-
> > > > > > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
> > > > > > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the
> > crap
> > > > > > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the
> > crap
> > > > > > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > > > > > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > > > > > "banning".....
> > > > > > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > > > > > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > Nominal9,
>
> > > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > > bring
> > > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the
> > same
> > > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > > will
> > > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my
> > country.
> > > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa...
> > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > > > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the
> > low,
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass
> > stupid,
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of
> > > > answer....
> > > > > > > > Always room in the Hell
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment