Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame

""I believe Merc explained  that she mistook Cold Water to be another
poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on
the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of
them....""

And that is my or Cold Waters problem because ....??

Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term
"retard" to refer to some children....

Some kids... doing away with Political Correctness and all the shit  it entails... are Retarded Mentally (as are some adults). Is this not true ??

.The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political
Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with
the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I
don't get that insulted about the term  "retard" if it is used in a
non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case,
even if it were....

I am not responsible for what happens on other boards. I am not "censoring" Merc. I am simply not allowing her to verbally abuse children on THIS forum.

But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying
Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as
a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to
stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on
by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who
are the actual culprits....

I do not read any non-Google forums.. The people on those other boards did not come on this Forum and Malign or threaten kids. The posts I pulled and the reason Merc was banned came after her "apology" and after an off-board warning was sent.

Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't
seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error.... 

I made no "ERROR"... Kids are off-limits, Merc was informed of this and continued with a threat against another members child... There is NO EXCUSE for her behavior unless she would like to claim "Diminished Capacity". If she did that then any promise she may make to clean up her act in this regard would be tainted at best. 

and
Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the
moment.....

I could care less, I have no right to tell you what to do, just what you CAN'T do here. And that is a very short list with maligning (of ANY nature) kids topping the list followed by overt threats against anyone. Merc did BOTH.

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM, nominal9 <nominal9@yahoo.com> wrote:

I believe Merc explained  that she mistook Cold Water to be another
poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on
the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of
them.... Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term
"retard" to refer to some children.....I am telling you this as a
point of information....The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political
Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with
the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I
don't get that insulted about the term  "retard" if it is used in a
non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case,
even if it were....
But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying
Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as
a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to
stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on
by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who
are the actual culprits....
Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't
seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error.... and
Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the
moment.....

On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nominal9,
>
> The only person to bring Mercs kid into the conversation was Merc, the only
> person to levy a threat against another persons child was Merc, the only
> person to victimize Merc was Merc herself.
>
> This is a political forum.... just what do you think her kids "condition"
> has to do with politics unless she had been using her experiences to talk
> about or relate personally under the health care laws which she did not do.
>
> She was using that child as a crutch to garner some level of sympathy...
> (between shit and syphilis in dictionary).
>
> Again, I do not care who did it !!!!!! No one is "special". To bring any
> child into this forum in any negative light is ABSOLUTELY NOT GOING TO
> HAPPEN.
>
>
>

> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing
> > Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself
> > seem to condemn....
> > "Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > someones
> > elses kid were also ill is wrong."
> >  Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop
> > grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ...
> > The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming
> > near....
> > Nominal9
>
> > PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half-
> > Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit,
> > the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto  Magcrest, and their
> > Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia.
>
> > Hypocrites.... one and all....
>
> > On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > We have decided and it is rather simple:
>
> > > Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that someones
> > > elses kid were also ill is wrong.
>
> > > KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry.
>
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > > bring
> > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > > will
> > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > > > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > > > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > > > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child.  I truly believe that
> > > > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > > > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > > > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > > > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > > > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the victim,
> > > > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very ignorant
> > > > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > > > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > > > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > > > "children'... If that is true,  I definitely think that you missed the
> > > > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it, Merc
> > > > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
> > > > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge or
> > > > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > > > others here abouts....
> > > > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > > > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is living
> > > > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > > > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among "half-
> > > > way serious folks" who try to deal in  mutually respectful
> > > > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the crap
> > > > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the crap
> > > > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > > > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > > > "banning".....
> > > > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > > > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Nominal9,
>
> > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > bring
> > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > will
> > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Annointed One,  Keith from Tampa...
> > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the low,
> > in
> > > > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass  stupid,
> > as
> > > > > > well.....  have to be, to think censorship is any sort of
> > answer....
> > > > > > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > > > > > brains... for eternity....
> > > > > > nominal9
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e.
> > > > ..
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237.
> > > > ..
> > > > > > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the Pusillanimous
> > > > > > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along with
> > the
> > > > > > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > > > > > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at least
> > > > > > two
> > > > > > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > > > > > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still .....whatever
> > > > > > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > > > > > comparison
> > > > > > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and of
> > the
> > > > > > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that les
> > and
> > > > > > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > > > > > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to run
> > > > > > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say... censorship
> > > > > > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > > > > > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous Pellet, more than ample
> > > > > > warning  of his impending dishonor , shame and eternal damnation of
> > > > > > being relegated to my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of
> > Shame....Consigned
> > > > > > to  an eternity of literal punishment to correspond to the
> > > > > > metaphorical condition in which he lives his life as the censor and
> > > > > > sysop of 72... which is to say, Damnerd to an Eternity in Hell with
> > > > > > his Head Stuck Up His Ass and with Shit for Brains. But Rabbit, the
> > > > > > Pusilllanomous Pellet, seems to scoff at this most foul and dire
> > > > > > opprobrium... seemingly glad to join the ranks of his fellow Head
> > Up
> > > > > > The Ass and Shit For Brains sysops and Censors in their eternal
> > > > > > misery...
>
> > > > > > So be it....Abandon All Hope...forever...
>
> > > > > > nominal9
>
> > > > > > Rogue    View profile
> > > > > >   More options Aug 27, 12:46 pm
>
> > > > > > From: Rogue <rogueplan...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:29 -0400
> > > > > > Local: Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:46 pm
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter...
> > Rabbit...
> > > > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > > > Rabbit?  Ban posters?
>
> > > > > > Say it ain't so! / rogue
>
> > > > > > - Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > -Reporting spam
> > > > > > Message reported
> > > > > >     Rate this post:
>
> > > > > > nominal9    View profile
> > > > > >   More options Aug 30, 2:33 pm
>
> > > > > > From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > > > Local: Mon, Aug 30 2010 2:33 pm
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter...
> > Rabbit...
> > > > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove |
> > > > > > Report
> > > > > > this message | Find messages by this author
>
> > > > > >http://www.bio.miami.edu/hare/poop.html
>
> > > > > > Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet... with the shit-eating grin.....
> > /
> > > > > > n9
>
> > > > > > Then I tried to add another post in reply to a snide aside by
> > Rabbit
> > > > > > under his pseudonym...RighteousObserver...
> > > > > > here's Rabbit's "concealed" whiny-ass post
>
> > > > > > From: RighteousObserver <tinywhiterab...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > > > Local: Tues, Aug 31 2010 7:24 am
> > > > > > Subject: I Sucked The Fun Out Of 71 And Now I'm Here For You On 72!
> > > > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > > > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > > > I *am* RighteousOberserver.
>
> > > > > > Sworn Defender of Board Justice and um..er..other stoopid shit like
> > > > > > that.
>
> > > > > > <doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin' the crab><doin' the
> > crab>grrrrr</doin'
> > > > > > the crab> / rabbit
>
> > > > > > To which I replied with my own counter that flashed on the board
> > for
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > minute or
>

> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Mark M. Kahle H.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.