December 29, 2011
I love Ron Paul. I liked him a lot during the last republican nomination and no one gave him a chance. If he wins the nomination for the Republican party in 2012 he's got my vote. Too bad he probably won't.
Kelly Clarkson: Popular Posts
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:00 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
he owes his supporters more than accepting "moral responsibility" for---
inadequately overseeing the newsletters to which he lent his name.
he already has ... on many occasions.
that Jacob Sullum, another jew, has spent his time to attack Paul is
no surprise. That the jews are concerned about RP becoming president
is also no surprise.
> At least he didn't like the Kirchick article.... Neither did I. --J.http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/pauls-apology
On Dec 29, 3:27 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> Individual-Sovereignty-ow...@yahoogroups.com>
> <Snip>
>
> Not everything you may have heard about the newsletters is true. Contrary
> to what James Kirchickclaims in The New Republic, the newsletters did not
> offer "kind words for the former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, David
> Duke." And although various media outlets have described parts of the
> newsletters as "anti-Semitic," there's little evidence to back up that
> description in the passages Kirchickcites.
>
> But the truth is bad enough. In addition to anti-gay comments that pine for
> the days of the closet, the newsletters include gratuitous swipes at Martin
> Luther King, discussions of crime that emphasize the perpetrators' skin
> color, and dark warnings of coming "race riots." None of it is explicitly
> racist, and some of it could be written off as deliberately provocative
> political commentary. Taken together, however, these passages clearly cater
> to the prejudices of angry white guys who hate gay people and fear blacks.
>
> When Paul's opponent in his 1996 congressional campaign pointed to some of
> this ugly stuff, Paul accused him of taking the quotes "out of context." It
> was not until a 2001 interview with the Texas Monthly that Paul said his
> campaign advisers had discouraged him from telling the complete,
> "confusing" truth about the newsletters: that the most outrageous material
> had been written by someone else.
>
> That is Paul's defense today, and I'm inclined to believe him. The
> race-baiting newsletter passages do not sound like anything else Paul has
> said or written in his public life. People who were familiar with the
> newsletters' production confirm that they were largely ghostwritten and
> that Paul often did not review them prior to publication.
>
> Yet the fact remains that Paul earned money and built his fund-raising list
> with newsletters that seemed to be aimed at bigots. Given his association
> with "paleolibertarians" such as Lew Rockwell whosought to construct an
> anti-statist coalition partly by appealing to racial resentments, he owes
> his supporters more than accepting "moral responsibility" for inadequately
> overseeing the newsletters to which he lent his name.
>
> In a CNN interview, Paul alternated between acknowledging the legitimacy of
> this issue and dismissing it as old news dredged up "for political
> reasons." I'm sure most of his supporters were not familiar with the
> content of his newsletters. I've been working at the country's leading
> libertarian magazine on and off since 1989, and it was news to me.
>
> If I thought Ron Paul might be president in 2009, I'd have to admit that
> his newsletter negligence raises questions about his judgment and about the
> people he'd choose to advise him. But since the value of the Paul campaign
> lies in promoting the libertarian ideals of limited government, individual
> freedom, and tolerance, the real problem is that the newsletters contradict
> this message.
>
> On CNN Paul emphasized that racist libertarian is an oxymoron, since
> libertarians judge people as individuals. He should follow through on that
> point by identifying the author(s) of the race-baiting material and
> repudiating not just the sentiments it represents but the poisonous,
> self-defeating strategy of building an anti-collectivist movement on group
> hatred.
>
> © Copyright 2008 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
>
> __._,_.___
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
> Messages in this topic (1)
> Recent Activity:
>
> Visit Your Group
> Report any problems, suggestions or abuse to
>
> MARKETPLACE
>
> Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get
> the Yahoo! Toolbar now.
>
> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
> .
> __,_._,___
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment