Re: Iowa Governor: Ignore Ron Paul Caucus Win

it's a fluke
---
the river of denial runs long and deep

he will sink soon after Iowa
---
I've lost count but I suspect that you'll succeed at being wrong again

run as a third party candidate, thereby allowing for the
socialists to control the White House for another four years
---
just as bad as having a zionist warmonger at the helm again

On Dec 20, 3:09 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Most everyone has already figured out that whatever Paul does in Iowa;
> it's a fluke.   I thought Paul could have won Iowa until he opened his
> flapper at the last debate.   No matter what Paul does,  he will sink soon
> after Iowa.  The question remains as to whether he gets the "Big Head"  and
> decides to run as a third party candidate, thereby allowing for the
> socialists to control the White House for another four years.   Pray to God
> that Paul does the right thing and drops out of the campaign by February or
> early March 2012 at the latest.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:24 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Terry Branstad should be ignored
>
> > On Dec 20, 12:53 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > December20thIowa Governor: Ignore Ron Paul Caucus WinTom Woods
> > > Andtheseare the people who want to "spread democracy" around the world.
> > > "People are going to look at who comes in second and who comes in
> > third," Governor Terry Branstad told Politico. "If [Mitt] Romney comes in a
> > strong second, it definitely helps him going into New Hampshire and the
> > other states."
> > > Has Ron Paul broken any rules? Has he cheated? No one even pretends he
> > has. Yet his victory, which the Establishment now seems to expect, is still
> > suspect.
> > > How dare he not want to stampede the country into another war promoted
> > by the same propagandists who gave us the Iraq fiasco!
> > > How dare he think prison rape might not be the most humane solution for
> > someone struggling with drugs! (And of course, if these people cared about
> > the Constitution as much as they pretend to, they would agree with Ron Paul
> > that drugs aren't a federal issue in the first place.)
> > > How dare he dissent from the (Republican and Democratic) Establishment,
> > which has wrecked the economy, saddled us with unpayable debt, and given us
> > a fiasco of a foreign policy that has made Americans more hated and
> > isolated than ever before!
> > > Note what they don't say. They don't say a Romney win would hurt the
> > caucuses, even though Romney said "my views are progressive" just five
> > years before running for president the first time. I won't bother listing
> > all of Romney's offenses.
> > > As for Ron Paul being to the "left" of Obama on foreign policy, this is
> > a total misconception. See the foreign-policy resources onthis page(below
> > the section on war powers) for an elaboration.
> > > So here's the message: the candidate the elites least want you to vote
> > for is Ron Paul. The newspapers, the cable news people, the politicos. They
> > are dying for you to support Romney, Gingrich, Perry, Bachmann anyone but
> > Paul. That is another great reason to support himhttp://
> >www.tomwoods.com/blog/iowa-governor-ignore-ron-paul-caucus-win/
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.