Re: when did google groups start rejecting posts based on content?

here is the objectionable content:
god - generic term for any of 2,500+ imaginary supernatural beings in
human
history. Note:the majority of voters in the United States believe in
imaginary supernatural beings and expect their elected leaders to do
the
same. No agnostics or atheists (god-free rationalists) need apply. Our
leaders should live in the world of reason where evidence is required
for
belief. In the world of faith, NO evidence is required for belief in
imaginary supernatural beings. Faith-based policies start with the
conclusions, then "fit the facts" around the apriori policies.

On Jan 20, 2:29 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I posted a TEST thread with just Test in the subject and body and it
> posted ok.
> Yet when I posted information about god believers the post was
> rejected.
>
> Any ideas?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.