On Jul 18, 12:29 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> You are the one with the word games. I asked a simple question.
> Define your terms. That is supposedly the first and most important of
> a discussion. You are doing everything you can to evade that by
> throwing up any and all other comments you can. What I might think of
> the guy in the article has nothing to do with this until you define
> what YOU mean by racism. Anything else is just dust to cover up.
>
> euwe wrote:
> > As I said, racists like to play word games like the guy in the article
> > - the neo nazi, a group that dick doesn't think has anything to do
> > with racism.
>
> > On Jul 17, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> I would join you if I knew what you consider racism. You apparently
> >> are not interested in telling us what you consider racism to be, so I
> >> cannot join you in having that story speak to me as it does to you.
> >> Sorry. Maybe if you define your terms I can join you in your seeing
> >> racism. Until then, nada. In the meantime, showing stories and
> >> calling them racism tells me nothing at all. Define your terms or
> >> forget about it.
>
> >> euwe wrote:
>
> >>> Look, you didn't see any racism in that story - that speaks loud
> >>> enough for me.
>
> >>> On Jul 17, 12:39 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> Stick to the subject. How do you define racism. Define it and I
> >>>> will tell you whether I support racism or not. All else is garbage.
>
> >>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>> And that means what with this discussion?
> >>>>> --------
> >>>>> was there anything in that article related to racism? Did you see
> >>>>> anything there to comment on, either positive or negative? Would you
> >>>>> think that was a Republican, or a liberal?
>
> >>>>> On Jul 17, 11:22 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> And that means what with this discussion? This discussion was to do
> >>>>>> with whether I condemned racism and my expectation of your defining what
> >>>>>> you consider racism so I could respond. You are doing everything you
> >>>>>> can to keep from defining racism so I will not respond to your
> >>>>>> question. Throwing up a bunch of other stories does not change the
> >>>>>> basic issue of your not defining what you want me to respond to. Do
> >>>>>> that and we have something to discuss. Until then, you are saying
> >>>>>> nothing that is of the slightest interest for me to respond to.
>
> >>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 17, 10:14 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> And you know this how. I think if they do so and you are friends, then
> >>>>>>>> that would reflect on you as well as on them. so I guess that would
> >>>>>>>> make you a racist by definition.
>
> >>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> but when they're alone with friends, they talk frankly about their
> >>>>>>>>> hate for minorities.
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 8:24 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> people who are racist play word games rather than admit their racism
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Anointed One,
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You are absolutely right. I know from prior dealings that euwe will
> >>>>>>>>>>> just pick and pick until he has some little point that he thinks he can
> >>>>>>>>>>> make a big deal out of and then will talk exclusively about that while
> >>>>>>>>>>> ignoring all the major points that you make. I am saying that if you
> >>>>>>>>>>> do not define what YOU mean by racism, then the possibilities of
> >>>>>>>>>>> complete misunderstanding and misquoting are legion and homey just got
> >>>>>>>>>>> tired of playing that game with euwe. It has been his MO and I think
> >>>>>>>>>>> it sucks major.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have
> >>>>>>>>>>>> no
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about."
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I find that just the opposite is true. When someone asks you to define
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the terms it is meant to clarify point by point to avoid being
> >>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstood. Just think what would happen to Washington if Congress
> >>>>>>>>>>>> had to "define their terms", No unread obamacare, no, "we'll find out
> >>>>>>>>>>>> if it happens again" wallstreet reform, Hell no Obama.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Weasels and liars don't like "define the terms"..... honest men love
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 4:10 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about. I think you know what I mean. Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> racism, defined in any way at all, bother you? Enough to do something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> about it?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 7:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Define racism. After all we have been told that speaking of black
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> holes in the sky is racist, black holes in an office is racist,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> niggardly is racist, etc. Define your terms.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does racism bother you?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:34 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are. Makes no difference to me. Seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a big point with the leftists though. They are the ones always
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a point about it. The rest of us have long ago agreed with MLK
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his rainbow ideal of life. I don't know what the leftists want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except to divide the nation up into little groups based on race, sex,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> color, age, national origin, etc and then try to make up special
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitlements for all of them so they can claim they care!! And then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the election forget all the above until the next election. At
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least that sure seems to be their MO. And then claim anyone who does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not support them is racist/sexist/ageist/whatever-ist. You are just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following your latest talking points from the 8:30 AM call.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you anti-racist, dick?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you could even write this garbage tells us just how racist
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are. You think that blaming the other guy as if he would do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what you would do in any circumstance is a good tactic. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is is a real cry for help from your guts to put you out of your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misery. Let's just hope that the public is smart enough to do just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this November.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarcastic American! wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, July 15, 2010
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How 2 b a racist without being one
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was more confused than a libertarian who didn t know the definition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Laissez Faire economics due to his Franco phobia.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all know racism is wrong. Even the Conservatives know this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So how do you get around this? Conservatives know that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International Jewish Bankers created all their problems. But hey! Say
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in public and you are then branded as an anti-Semitic monster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those damn skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis make you blush because they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> express what in is in the deepest recessions of your mind. Plus your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop lost his arm during WW2 fighting those Gerry s. You don t want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be associated with that crowd. So what s a true American to do? Easy!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be a passive/aggressive bigot and get away with it! Just fallow my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easy plan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being passive/aggressive is easy to do if you are an Anglo-Saxon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the many traits you have in your DNA is Sarcasm. Look how it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works for Glenn Beck! He gets paid the big bucks having a spasm of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mocking sarcasm. How about being stoic? You know: Clint Eastwood!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever see his early movies? Like all wasp, he internalizes his emotions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and represses it. That s a real man! Just think Dick Cheney? That man
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is dying of heart
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment